On Jun 13, 11:46*pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article LBJ4k.1365$L03.275@edtnps92, m II wrote:
Telamon wrote:

See how that works Mikey?

I'm not sure. The changing of topic and overstuffed reply by RHF or the
timely 'snip'?

The example of abortion.

- "There is no need to demonize or eliminate them.
- The liberals Darwinistic tendencies will take care of that."
-
- --
- Telamon
- Ventura, California

The Children of Charles Darwin and his Wife Emma :
http://www.aboutdarwin.com/darwin/Children.html
They had Ten (10) Children : Seven (7) of which had No Children.

Brody wrote:

m II wrote:
Telamon wrote:


Yes torturous, mental in exchange for the physical. The supreme court
has seen fit to torture us all in exchange for the lot that has befallen
jailed foreign terrorists who are not US citizens. Military combatants
who would kill you if they had the chance, would deny you your rights if
they had the chance, and have no standing in our courts should get the
rights we posses? I don't think so.




Who is denying rights? It's already happened. Washington did it.
Whatever became of innocent until proven guilty?

beyond bizzare.. by this logic, every Jap and German POW should have had
a US lawyer and his day in a US court, and presumably release on bond
until his court date

Yep, most idiotic decision the Supreme's have ever made.



When did the US convert
to Napoleanic law?
Nowadays, the US assumes guilt and then denies the right of a trial.
That is hell. Wake up.

Look up Napoleanic Law. You might as well learn it, now that it's
replaced the Constitution.


mike

Telamon wrote:
In article 8yJ4k.1364$L03.1142@edtnps92, m II wrote:

Telamon wrote:

Yes torturous, mental in exchange for the physical. The supreme court
has seen fit to torture us all in exchange for the lot that has befallen
jailed foreign terrorists who are not US citizens. Military combatants
who would kill you if they had the chance, would deny you your rights if
they had the chance, and have no standing in our courts should get the
rights we posses? I don't think so.


Who is denying rights? It's already happened. Washington did it.
Whatever became of innocent until proven guilty? When did the US
convert to Napoleanic law? Nowadays, the US assumes guilt and then
denies the right of a trial. That is hell. Wake up.

Look up Napoleanic Law. You might as well learn it, now that it's
replaced the Constitution.

You don't seem to understand the Constitution applies to US citizens not
foreign military combatants.

Moron!

And what about those people who have been wrongfully imprisoned?

You deserve to live in a police state!

JB

RHF wrote:
On Jun 13, 11:44 pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article 8yJ4k.1364$L03.1142@edtnps92, m II wrote:
Telamon wrote:
Yes torturous, mental in exchange for the physical. The supreme court
has seen fit to torture us all in exchange for the lot that has befallen
jailed foreign terrorists who are not US citizens. Military combatants
who would kill you if they had the chance, would deny you your rights if
they had the chance, and have no standing in our courts should get the
rights we posses? I don't think so.
Who is denying rights? It's already happened. Washington did it.
Whatever became of innocent until proven guilty? When did the US
convert to Napoleanic law? Nowadays, the US assumes guilt and then
denies the right of a trial. That is hell. Wake up.
Look up Napoleanic Law. You might as well learn it, now that it's
replaced the Constitution.

- You don't seem to understand the Constitution applies
- to US citizens not foreign military combatants.
-
- --
- Telamon
- Ventura, California

Telamon - Ditto That !

Point-of-Fact - These 'people' down in Gitmo are
Un-Lawful Military Combatants* : Who are Clearly
Outside the Geneva Convention 1949.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unlawfu...tary_combatant
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geneva_Convention
* They are in-fact Islam-O-Facist Terrorists.


Does that include those who had been wrongfully imprisoned?

JB



GITMO - Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantan...detention_camp

The Failure of the US Congress to Protect the USA and
US Citizens from Terrorist Attacks by Islam-O-Facists.

Don't Blame the US Military and the DOD.

Don't Blame the US Justice Department

Don't Blame the US Supreme Court and the Courts

Don't Blame the US President and Administration

Clearly the Blame Belongs to the US Congress*
both Democrats and Republicans alike; and the
US House of representatives and the USSenate alike.
* The US Congress Makes the Laws
* The US Congress Failed to Make Good Laws to deal
effectively with these Un-Lawful Military Combatants
who are Islam-O-Facist Terrorists.
* The US Congress has Failing to Act : This Situation
is the Fault of the US Congress.

as an american citizen and a voter - yes i say that ~ RHF
.

wrote:
Where is FEMA? www.rense.com/general82/where.htm

You won't hear that on Faux news and those other jerk off 24/7
mainstream tv news shows.



Apparently you only believe conspiracy websites.

harvey wrote:
On Jun 13, 9:16 am, dave wrote:
http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/83758/

"...too much Fox News may be bad news for conservatives. An April 2007
Pew Research Study survey found that viewers of the conservative Fox
News channel had the lowest knowledge of national and international
affairs."

- yeah? - So what !


Fascist love them some stupid.

Brody wrote:

beyond bizzare.. by this logic, every Jap and German POW should have had
a US lawyer and his day in a US court, and presumably release on bond
until his court date


Most of the people at Guantanamo were turned-in for bounty or otherwise
the result of something other than capture on the battlefield. If they
are POWs, this ruling doesn't apply. They are to be held under the
Geneva Conventions, which do not allow torture.

There is no Declaration of War in effect right now, unlike the Japs and
the Gerrys.

Speak for yourself,,, I am not a pu..ie
cuhulin

dxAce wrote:

dave wrote:

harvey wrote:
On Jun 13, 9:16 am, dave wrote:
http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/83758/

"...too much Fox News may be bad news for conservatives. An April 2007
Pew Research Study survey found that viewers of the conservative Fox
News channel had the lowest knowledge of national and international
affairs."
Yep !

heard that Saddam Husseins got them WMD's

George Bush's Gonna Invade

Yessiree Bob . . .
We are a nation of pussies.

"We", boy?


Anybody who's afraid of "terrorists" to the point of throwing away their
Liberty is a coward and doesn't deserve to live in a Free Country.

Brody wrote:

Who is denying rights? It's already happened. Washington did it.
Whatever became of innocent until proven guilty?

beyond bizzare.. by this logic, every Jap and German POW should have had
a US lawyer and his day in a US court, and presumably release on bond
until his court date


Those people were not picked up on the street or dragged out of their
beds at three in morning or turned in to the occupiers as a means of
revenge or as a political move by the competition.


An example of how things have been twisted around:

After WWII, Japanese soldiers who had water boarded US prisoners were
branded as having committed war crimes. In Texas, 1983, a Sheriff and
three deputies got 10 years for torturing with the technique. Today,
there must be a kinder, gentler version of this torture, as it's
accepted US practice. Hell, they even changed the definition of
'torture' to cover their illegal as hell backsides.

Please, do some research. Find out what monsters have taken over your
country:

http://www.searchmash.com/search/jap...oarding+prison

mike


--
Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage, this filter
blocks all postings from Gmail, Google Mail and Google Groups.

http://improve-usenet.org/