In article ,
dxAce wrote:

dxAce wrote:

dave wrote:

http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/83758/

"...too much Fox News may be bad news for conservatives. An April
2007 Pew Research Study survey found that viewers of the
conservative Fox News channel had the lowest knowledge of
national and international affairs."

Hey, dumbass, I don't watch the Fox News channel. So, you can shove
that dumbass idea right up your gaping Liberal ass!

In fact Rickets, you're just as stupid as those 5 idiots who have the
nerve to call themselves Supreme Court Justices and issued yesterday
what has to be the most idiotic ruling that this country has ever
seen.

Treasonous in my book.

Yeah, that was one whacked outcome. I haven't read the decision yet so I
don't what the reasoning is but it sure must be torturous reading.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon wrote:

Yeah, that was one whacked outcome. I haven't read the decision yet so I
don't what the reasoning is but it sure must be torturous reading.




Torturous? No. That's what they're trying to stop.


mike


--
Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage, this filter
blocks all postings from Gmail, Google Mail and Google Groups.

http://improve-usenet.org/

In article bDC4k.1296$L03.533@edtnps92, m II wrote:

Telamon wrote:

Yeah, that was one whacked outcome. I haven't read the decision yet so I
don't what the reasoning is but it sure must be torturous reading.




Torturous? No. That's what they're trying to stop.

Yes torturous, mental in exchange for the physical. The supreme court
has seen fit to torture us all in exchange for the lot that has befallen
jailed foreign terrorists who are not US citizens. Military combatants
who would kill you if they had the chance, would deny you your rights if
they had the chance, and have no standing in our courts should get the
rights we posses? I don't think so.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon wrote:

Yes torturous, mental in exchange for the physical. The supreme court
has seen fit to torture us all in exchange for the lot that has befallen
jailed foreign terrorists who are not US citizens. Military combatants
who would kill you if they had the chance, would deny you your rights if
they had the chance, and have no standing in our courts should get the
rights we posses? I don't think so.



Who is denying rights? It's already happened. Washington did it.
Whatever became of innocent until proven guilty? When did the US convert
to Napoleanic law?
Nowadays, the US assumes guilt and then denies the right of a trial.
That is hell. Wake up.

Look up Napoleanic Law. You might as well learn it, now that it's
replaced the Constitution.


mike


--
Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage, this filter
blocks all postings from Gmail, Google Mail and Google Groups.

http://improve-usenet.org/

In article 8yJ4k.1364$L03.1142@edtnps92, m II wrote:

Telamon wrote:

Yes torturous, mental in exchange for the physical. The supreme court
has seen fit to torture us all in exchange for the lot that has befallen
jailed foreign terrorists who are not US citizens. Military combatants
who would kill you if they had the chance, would deny you your rights if
they had the chance, and have no standing in our courts should get the
rights we posses? I don't think so.



Who is denying rights? It's already happened. Washington did it.
Whatever became of innocent until proven guilty? When did the US
convert to Napoleanic law? Nowadays, the US assumes guilt and then
denies the right of a trial. That is hell. Wake up.

Look up Napoleanic Law. You might as well learn it, now that it's
replaced the Constitution.

You don't seem to understand the Constitution applies to US citizens not
foreign military combatants.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon wrote:

Look up Napoleanic Law. You might as well learn it, now that it's
replaced the Constitution.

You don't seem to understand the Constitution applies to US citizens not
foreign military combatants.


Some human beings are more equal than others in the eyes of God?

mike

--
Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage, this filter
blocks all postings from Gmail, Google Mail and Google Groups.

http://improve-usenet.org/

On Jun 13, 11:44*pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article 8yJ4k.1364$L03.1142@edtnps92, m II wrote:
Telamon wrote:

Yes torturous, mental in exchange for the physical. The supreme court
has seen fit to torture us all in exchange for the lot that has befallen
jailed foreign terrorists who are not US citizens. Military combatants
who would kill you if they had the chance, would deny you your rights if
they had the chance, and have no standing in our courts should get the
rights we posses? I don't think so.

Who is denying rights? It's already happened. Washington did it.
Whatever became of innocent until proven guilty? When did the US
convert to Napoleanic law? Nowadays, the US assumes guilt and then
denies the right of a trial. That is hell. Wake up.

Look up Napoleanic Law. You might as well learn it, now that it's
replaced the Constitution.

- You don't seem to understand the Constitution applies
- to US citizens not foreign military combatants.
-
- --
- Telamon
- Ventura, California

Telamon - Ditto That !

Point-of-Fact - These 'people' down in Gitmo are
Un-Lawful Military Combatants* : Who are Clearly
Outside the Geneva Convention 1949.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unlawfu...tary_combatant
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geneva_Convention
* They are in-fact Islam-O-Facist Terrorists.

GITMO - Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantan...detention_camp

The Failure of the US Congress to Protect the USA and
US Citizens from Terrorist Attacks by Islam-O-Facists.

Don't Blame the US Military and the DOD.

Don't Blame the US Justice Department

Don't Blame the US Supreme Court and the Courts

Don't Blame the US President and Administration

Clearly the Blame Belongs to the US Congress*
both Democrats and Republicans alike; and the
US House of representatives and the USSenate alike.
* The US Congress Makes the Laws
* The US Congress Failed to Make Good Laws to deal
effectively with these Un-Lawful Military Combatants
who are Islam-O-Facist Terrorists.
* The US Congress has Failing to Act : This Situation
is the Fault of the US Congress.

as an american citizen and a voter - yes i say that ~ RHF

RHF wrote:
On Jun 13, 11:44 pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article 8yJ4k.1364$L03.1142@edtnps92, m II wrote:
Telamon wrote:
Yes torturous, mental in exchange for the physical. The supreme court
has seen fit to torture us all in exchange for the lot that has befallen
jailed foreign terrorists who are not US citizens. Military combatants
who would kill you if they had the chance, would deny you your rights if
they had the chance, and have no standing in our courts should get the
rights we posses? I don't think so.
Who is denying rights? It's already happened. Washington did it.
Whatever became of innocent until proven guilty? When did the US
convert to Napoleanic law? Nowadays, the US assumes guilt and then
denies the right of a trial. That is hell. Wake up.
Look up Napoleanic Law. You might as well learn it, now that it's
replaced the Constitution.

- You don't seem to understand the Constitution applies
- to US citizens not foreign military combatants.
-
- --
- Telamon
- Ventura, California

Telamon - Ditto That !

Point-of-Fact - These 'people' down in Gitmo are
Un-Lawful Military Combatants* : Who are Clearly
Outside the Geneva Convention 1949.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unlawfu...tary_combatant
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geneva_Convention
* They are in-fact Islam-O-Facist Terrorists.


Does that include those who had been wrongfully imprisoned?

JB



GITMO - Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantan...detention_camp

The Failure of the US Congress to Protect the USA and
US Citizens from Terrorist Attacks by Islam-O-Facists.

Don't Blame the US Military and the DOD.

Don't Blame the US Justice Department

Don't Blame the US Supreme Court and the Courts

Don't Blame the US President and Administration

Clearly the Blame Belongs to the US Congress*
both Democrats and Republicans alike; and the
US House of representatives and the USSenate alike.
* The US Congress Makes the Laws
* The US Congress Failed to Make Good Laws to deal
effectively with these Un-Lawful Military Combatants
who are Islam-O-Facist Terrorists.
* The US Congress has Failing to Act : This Situation
is the Fault of the US Congress.

as an american citizen and a voter - yes i say that ~ RHF
.

Telamon wrote:
In article 8yJ4k.1364$L03.1142@edtnps92, m II wrote:

Telamon wrote:

Yes torturous, mental in exchange for the physical. The supreme court
has seen fit to torture us all in exchange for the lot that has befallen
jailed foreign terrorists who are not US citizens. Military combatants
who would kill you if they had the chance, would deny you your rights if
they had the chance, and have no standing in our courts should get the
rights we posses? I don't think so.


Who is denying rights? It's already happened. Washington did it.
Whatever became of innocent until proven guilty? When did the US
convert to Napoleanic law? Nowadays, the US assumes guilt and then
denies the right of a trial. That is hell. Wake up.

Look up Napoleanic Law. You might as well learn it, now that it's
replaced the Constitution.

You don't seem to understand the Constitution applies to US citizens not
foreign military combatants.

Moron!

And what about those people who have been wrongfully imprisoned?

You deserve to live in a police state!

JB

On Jun 14, 5:12*am, John Barnard wrote:
Telamon wrote:
In article 8yJ4k.1364$L03.1142@edtnps92, m II wrote:

Telamon wrote:

Yes torturous, mental in exchange for the physical. The supreme court
has seen fit to torture us all in exchange for the lot that has befallen
jailed foreign terrorists who are not US citizens. Military combatants
who would kill you if they had the chance, would deny you your rights if
they had the chance, and have no standing in our courts should get the
rights we posses? I don't think so.

Who is denying rights? It's already happened. Washington did it.
Whatever became of innocent until proven guilty? When did the US
convert to Napoleanic law? Nowadays, the US assumes guilt and then
denies the right of a trial. That is hell. Wake up.

Look up Napoleanic Law. You might as well learn it, now that it's
replaced the Constitution.

- - You don't seem to understand the Constitution
- - applies to US citizens not foreign military combatants.

- Moron!
-
- And what about those people who have been wrongfully imprisoned?
-
- You deserve to live in a police state!
-
- JB

JB - You deserve to Live in a Canada Occupied by your
'wrongfully imprisoned' Islam-O-Facist friends. ~ RHF

JB - Give us your Name and Address : We will send all
the ones who 'claim' that they were 'wrongfully imprisoned"
over to stay with you so that you can help them to get
over their "wrongfully imprisonment".

GITMO - Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantan...detention_camp
Since the beginning of the current war in Afghanistan,
* 775 detainees have been brought to Guantanamo,
* Approximately 420 of which have been released without charge.
* As of May 2008, approximately 270 detainees remain.
* More than a Fifth (1/5) are Cleared for Release but may have
to wait Months or Years because U.S. Officials are finding it
increasingly difficult to persuade Countries to accept them,
* According to Officials and Defense Lawyers.
* Of the Roughly 355 still Incarcerated,
* U.S. Officials said they intend to eventually put 60 to 80 on trial
* and Free the Rest.

OH CANADA - OPEN UP YOUR DOORS TO SET THE
WRONGFULLY IMPRISONED FREE: GIVE THE GITMO
DETAINEES A HOME TO PLAN THEIR NEXT JIHAD .
[ Jihad -aka- Islam-O-Facist Act of Terrorism. ]

Note - The US Pentagon claimed that 36 former Guantanamo
Inmates were "Confirmed or Suspected of having returned to
Terrorism".

oh the silence - no name - no address - just so much
liberal rhetoric from canada~ RHF