(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
 

On Jul 21, 11:01*am, Dave wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:41:29 -0400, dxAce wrote:

* Interesting that no one's talking about that pile of Saddam's
'fictional' yellowcake that ended up in Canada.

Yeah via D{e@o G@r(}a , that place that should not be mentioned.

- A pile of ore is not a weapon. *It is not a gathering threat.

Dave Two Words : "Dirty Bomb" ~ RHF

US Removes Uranium from Iraq -and-
Sets Back the Islam-O-Facist "Dirty Bomb" Project
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...022144f484dbcf

Secret U.S. Mission Hauls Uranium from Iraq
Last major Stockpile from Saddam's Nuclear Bomb
efforts arrives in Canada
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25546334/
Removal of 550 Metric Tons of "YellowCake" the
seed material for higher-grade nuclear enrichment
and a prime source for a Yellow Cake "Dirty" Bomb.

Note - A Metric Ton = 1,000 Kilograms ~ 2205 Pounds {USA}

Al-Qaeda 'was making' Dirty Bomb - BBC
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/2711645.stm

Al Qaeda pursued a "Dirty Bomb"
http://www.washtimes.com/news/2003/o...-110337-4698r/

Al Qaeda Looking To Explode Dirty Bomb
http://www.thepiratescove.us/2007/11...g-to-explode-d...

Guantanamo Inmate Charged with Al-Qaeda "Dirty Bomb" Plot
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...icas/article40...

Fact Sheet on Dirty Bombs - US NRC
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-co...ts/dirty-bombs...

"Dirty Bomb" ~ Radiological Dispersal Device (RDD)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirty_bomb

"The Dirty Bomb" -by NOVA [PBS]
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/dirtybomb/

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) About Dirty Bombs
-by- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
http://www.bt.cdc.gov/radiation/dirtybombs.asp
http://www.cfr.org/publication/9548/

How Dirty Bombs Work
http://science.howstuffworks.com/dirty-bomb.htm

The "Dirty Bomb" Scenario
http://www.time.com/time/nation/arti...182637,00.html

Dirty Bomb Technology -by- BBC
http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon...irtybomb.shtml

The FARC [Columbia] "Dirty Bomb" Plot -by- LA Times
http://articles.latimes.com/2008/mar...fg-dirtybomb28
No mention of the Hugo Chavez and FARC 'connection'.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugo_Ch%C3%A1vez
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008...mbia.venezuela

(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
 

D Peter Maus wrote:

Subject: Wild Pigs

Of course none of this movement to totalitarianism has happened in the
last seven and a half years. The Patriot act is merely for your own good.




mike


--
Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage,
this filter blocks all postings with a Gmail,
Google Mail, Google Groups or HOTMAIL address.
It also filters everything from a .cn server.

http://improve-usenet.org/

(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
 

m II wrote:

D Peter Maus wrote:

Subject: Wild Pigs

Of course none of this movement to totalitarianism has happened in the
last seven and a half years. The Patriot act is merely for your own good.

Meanwhile, CanaDuh must have enacted the Dumbass Act!

(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
 

D Peter Maus wrote:

Interesting that no one's talking about that pile of Saddam's
'fictional' yellowcake that ended up in Canada.

UN Investigators were well aware of it's presence.
The fictional part of that is completely due to State department
bungling. Check out the sequence of events.


http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/1115/p01s04-uspo.htm

mike




--
Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage,
this filter blocks all postings with a Gmail,
Google Mail, Google Groups or HOTMAIL address.
It also filters everything from a .cn server.

http://improve-usenet.org/

(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
 

On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:56:17 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote:

Dave wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:46:51 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote:


Denial is a marvelous thing.

As is courage; as is skepticism in the face of mass hysteria; as is
wisdom.



So far, all I see from you is denial.

A lot of what I see from you is baseless criticism and a complete
unwillingness to back up anything you say with any kind of factual matter.

(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
 

On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:45:47 -0700, RHF wrote:


Dave Two Words : "Dirty Bomb" ~ RHF



Al Qaeda pursued a "Dirty Bomb"

The subject was Iraq, not Al Qaeda. A "dirty bomb" would contaminate a
few acres, at best (worst). You have thrown your country away because
you are afraid of a media created Boogeyman.

(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
 

m II wrote:

dxAcehole, America's Finest, wrote:

Well, you're certainly CanaDuh's Finest Dumbass, boy!

(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
 

m II wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:

Subject: Wild Pigs

Of course none of this movement to totalitarianism has happened in the
last seven and a half years. The Patriot act is merely for your own good.




mike





You keep forgetting how many times Bill Clinton tried to pass the
Patriot Act. And how many times the Republican Congress blocked him.

Or that Projects Echelon and Carnivore were built during his
administration.

(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
 

D Peter Maus wrote:

You keep forgetting how many times Bill Clinton tried to pass the
Patriot Act. And how many times the Republican Congress blocked him.
Or that Projects Echelon and Carnivore were built during his
administration.


It would appear government in general is out of control.
They tend to forget THEY are the servants, not the people
who sent them there.


mike


--
Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage,
this filter blocks all postings with a Gmail,
Google Mail, Google Groups or HOTMAIL address.
It also filters everything from a .cn server.

http://improve-usenet.org/

(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
 

Dave wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:56:17 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote:

Dave wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:46:51 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote:


Denial is a marvelous thing.
As is courage; as is skepticism in the face of mass hysteria; as is
wisdom.


So far, all I see from you is denial.

A lot of what I see from you is baseless criticism and a complete
unwillingness to back up anything you say with any kind of factual matter.


The fact that I don't post links that you yourself could find using
the same search engines as I is only an indication that I choose not to
do your work for you.

If you were interested in the whole truth, you'd look them up
yourself. Just as I do.

Or to put that another way...in the words of a certain Internet founder:

"How do you say '**** You' on the internet?"

"Cite your source."

I read as much, if not more, than you do. From a variety of sources.
Left, as well as Right. And what I find most interesting, is that the
left demands citations, sources, and peer reviewed publications for
everything that the Right presents....and then proceeds to dismiss, not
the material, but the source, as uninformed, irrelevant, fascist,...pick
your adjective.

The Left, however, when presenting it's material cites few sources,
and then states that their own sources are unimpeachable, and that to
question them is to question the very existence of Truth itself.

As if the Left and only the Left has the exclusive privilege of
access to the Truth.

Global Warming is a hoax disputed by more peer reviewed scientists
every day.

"The Science is settled. The debate is over."

--Al Gore.

No less than Nancy Pelosi suggested a bill cutting off all funding
for scientists not signing on to the global warming agenda. That
educators not signing on to the global warming agenda have their tenure
revoked, and for lower level educators, their very certification to
teach revoked. Meteorologists not signing on to the global warming
agenda were to be removed from their positions, and/or removed from the
air at once.

This is not just a disagreement in philosophy, this is a United
States Congressperson specifically calling for the censoring of
opposition, by the Government.

Have you HEARD of the First Amendment?

"People can't just walk around saying what they want. There need to
be limits on Free Speech. And in an Al Gore presidency, there will be."

--Al Gore, in an interview filmed by Alexandra Pelosi
during the 2000 campaign.

Dan Rather, a well known Liberal Democrat, in a piece smearing G. W.
Bush for his service record--an issue which has been cleared up by Lt
Bush's commanding officer--asserted that his story was in fact accurate,
even though the documents presented were forgeries.

Only the sources on the Left may be considered valid. Even if proven
forgeries. All others may be dismissed with prejudice.

You know what they call that, don't you?

David?

You do know, don't you?