![]() |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
On Jul 21, 11:46*am, D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote: On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:41:29 -0400, dxAce wrote: * Interesting that no one's talking about that pile of Saddam's 'fictional' yellowcake that ended up in Canada. Yeah via D{e@o G@r(}a , that place that should not be mentioned. A pile of ore is not a weapon. *It is not a gathering threat. http://www.dg.navy.mil/web/ http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...ego-garcia.htm * *Denial is a marvelous thing. Like your ridiculous claims on global warming science, which are entirely false? |
(OT) : D'Oh ! The Global Warning Mantra - Say It Ten Times in aRow -and- You Are Full of Hot Air.
On Jul 21, 7:55*am, RHF wrote:
On Jul 20, 11:18*pm, wrote: On Jun 18, 3:15*pm, RHF wrote: On Jun 18, 2:42*pm, Dave wrote: On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:05:33 -0700, wasatch wrote: Mr. Bush is about to propose offshore oil drilling even though there is plenty... U.S. imports 70% that we use. - - How to Find Gold : Dig For It! - - - - More Oil : Drill For It! - There is no shortage of crude oil. Dave that is Factually True -but- That Vast Supply of Oil is still in the Ground. -specifically- In the USA for the USA. -ps- Plus a Whole Lot More Coal Too. First - There is a Shortage of Getting the Oil out of the Ground to meet the Demand. -specifically- In the USA for the USA. -solution- Drill for more Oil in the USA. Second - There is a Shortage of Oil Refining Capablility to meet the Demand. -specifically- In the USA for the USA. -solution- Build more Oil Refineries in the USA. ALTERNATIVE : WALK ! -or- Go Nowhere. facts are facts ~ RHF *. - No, the fact is you don't care about the future. I 'care' about the "Future" Every Day ~ RHF - Carbon based fuel is NOT an option for long term energy use. * I Am Carbon Based - What Are You "Silly-Com" ? {Silly Communist} - Perhaps you haven't heard about global warming? D'Oh ! The Global Warning Mantra : Say It Ten Times in a Row -and- You Are Full of Hot Air. -*You should be informed. D'Oh ! . . . and you are ? - Not ! ~ RHF *. You're spouting nonsense. You have no idea what scientists say. You're getting your "science" from nutcase political hotair types. |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
|
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
|
(OT) : D'Oh ! The Global Warning Mantra - Say It Ten Times in aRow -and- You Are Full of Hot Air.
On Jul 21, 10:45*pm, wrote:
On Jul 21, 7:55*am, RHF wrote: On Jul 20, 11:18*pm, wrote: On Jun 18, 3:15*pm, RHF wrote: On Jun 18, 2:42*pm, Dave wrote: On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:05:33 -0700, wasatch wrote: Mr. Bush is about to propose offshore oil drilling even though there is plenty... U.S. imports 70% that we use. - - How to Find Gold : Dig For It! - - - - More Oil : Drill For It! - There is no shortage of crude oil. Dave that is Factually True -but- That Vast Supply of Oil is still in the Ground. -specifically- In the USA for the USA. -ps- Plus a Whole Lot More Coal Too. First - There is a Shortage of Getting the Oil out of the Ground to meet the Demand. -specifically- In the USA for the USA. -solution- Drill for more Oil in the USA. Second - There is a Shortage of Oil Refining Capablility to meet the Demand. -specifically- In the USA for the USA. -solution- Build more Oil Refineries in the USA. ALTERNATIVE : WALK ! -or- Go Nowhere. facts are facts ~ RHF *. - No, the fact is you don't care about the future. I 'care' about the "Future" Every Day ~ RHF - Carbon based fuel is NOT an option for long term energy use. * I Am Carbon Based - What Are You "Silly-Com" ? {Silly Communist} - Perhaps you haven't heard about global warming? - - D'Oh ! The Global Warning Mantra : - - Say It Ten Times in a Row - - -and- You Are Full of Hot Air. - You're spouting nonsense. - - You have no idea what scientists say. -*You're getting your "science" from - nutcase political hotair types. DG McD - Keep Repeating Your Global Warning Mantra : Say It Ten Times Over and Over in a Row -and- You Are Still Full of Hot Air. ~ RHF |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
Telamon wrote:
In article , Dave wrote: On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:41:29 -0400, dxAce wrote: Interesting that no one's talking about that pile of Saddam's 'fictional' yellowcake that ended up in Canada. Yeah via D{e@o G@r(}a , that place that should not be mentioned. A pile of ore is not a weapon. It is not a gathering threat. http://www.dg.navy.mil/web/ http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...ego-garcia.htm Really? What about the illness it caused in Iraq? The illness caused when we left the stockpile unguarded and the locals dumped the powder out and reused the barrels for drinking water? Tragic. |
(OT) : Islam-O-Facist "Dirty Bomb" Terrorist Projects Continue. . .
RHF wrote:
On Jul 21, 3:45 pm, Dave wrote: On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:45:47 -0700, RHF wrote: Dave Two Words : "Dirty Bomb" ~ RHF Al Qaeda pursued a "Dirty Bomb" - The subject was Iraq, not Al Qaeda. Simply Matching "The Source" -with- "The Doer" US Removes Uranium from Iraq -and- Sets Back the Islam-O-Facist "Dirty Bomb" Project http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...022144f484dbcf - A "dirty bomb" would contaminate a few acres, - at best (worst). Dave you are simply dismissing reality. A Dirty Bomb like most Bombs can be small enough to 'contaminate' an Office - the little terror -or- BIG enough to Cover a City's Down Town Area. Making that City's Down Town Area "Contaminate" and a No-Man's Land for Years or Decades. THE BIG TERROR ! A Small Plane {Crop-Duster} at 5K Feet with the right Chemical Dispersal Equipment could Spiral Out from City Hall and Around and Around Down Town Raining Hell from Above. SPREADING THE TERROR ! For that matter the same Small Plane could cruise along at 100 Feet over Bumper-to-Bumper Crowded Freeway at 5 PM on a Hot Summer Day and Rain Down Radioactive Contamination on both directions of Commuter Traffic for 5 Miles or more. TRANSMUTING THE TERROR ! from a single City's Down Town Areas to an Metro's Whole Population via Single-Point Urban & Suburban Migratory Dispersion. - You have thrown your country away because you - are afraid of a media created Boogeyman. Dave - You Are The Boogeyman of Disbelief Playing the Part of an Ostrich. The Terrorists Are Here . . . http://www.realanimalfacts.com/wp-co...trich_head.jpg (OT) : Islam-O-Facist "Dirty Bomb" Terrorist Projects Continue . . . . Total bull****. Grow a pair. |
Dave -proclaims- There Is No Shortwage of Crude Oil
Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote: "Nuclear" has been a dirty word since the movie 'The China Syndrome,' a film often pointed to as a reference in debates where nuclear plants were to be constructed. As a population, most of what is 'understood' about nuclear energy production comes from that film. Three Mile Island was the horror it was BECAUSE of the The China Syndrome, when in fact, though a meltdown had occurred--some 8 feet of reactor core was lost--the systems did precisely what they were supposed to do, and shut the reactor down. Odd, no one ever talks about THAT. The problem is not the ignorant 'drill happy' folks. The problem is the ignorant uneducated folks attempting to create a panic based on short sight, and snapshot focus on a very narrow picture of global events. And an overall suppression of understanding of energy production by so-called professionals in education. Nuclear plants need lots of water. Many installed nukes are running on low power now due to water shortage. There is no water shortage. Record snows last year, record rains this spring, and the wettest summer in 50 years have rivers overunning their banks. Lakes over their piers, and even tributaries with white water for the first time in a century. Nuclear plants are built on the shores of rivers, lakes and other bodies of water. They're not running at half power due to low water. The hard reality is that most of them have been shut down by the ignorant demands of an uninformed public. I'm about a 3 wood in any direction from a nuclear power plant. Three are shut down. One was built and certified, but never started. We need to consume less and not allow the rest of the world to become the oinkers that we already are. A few years of economic depression will do wonders for speeding that along. Well, aren't we the very soul of arrogance. You don't get to make that call. |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote: m II wrote: D Peter Maus wrote: Subject: Wild Pigs Of course none of this movement to totalitarianism has happened in the last seven and a half years. The Patriot act is merely for your own good. mike You keep forgetting how many times Bill Clinton tried to pass the Patriot Act. And how many times the Republican Congress blocked him. Or that Projects Echelon and Carnivore were built during his administration. The (not even) Patriot Act is a hodge-podge of fascist dreams that has been kicking around for decades. Clinton is no benchmark of virtue; why do you worship him so? LOL! You ARE on drugs. |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote: Dave wrote: On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:56:17 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote: Dave wrote: On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:46:51 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote: Denial is a marvelous thing. As is courage; as is skepticism in the face of mass hysteria; as is wisdom. So far, all I see from you is denial. A lot of what I see from you is baseless criticism and a complete unwillingness to back up anything you say with any kind of factual matter. The fact that I don't post links that you yourself could find using the same search engines as I is only an indication that I choose not to do your work for you. If you were interested in the whole truth, you'd look them up yourself. Just as I do. ??? If you'd actually have read the post instead of deleting it, you'd have your answer. |
Dave -proclaims- There Is No Shortwage of Crude Oil
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:16:36 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote: D Peter Maus wrote: "Nuclear" has been a dirty word since the movie 'The China Syndrome,' a film often pointed to as a reference in debates where nuclear plants were to be constructed. As a population, most of what is 'understood' about nuclear energy production comes from that film. Three Mile Island was the horror it was BECAUSE of the The China Syndrome, when in fact, though a meltdown had occurred--some 8 feet of reactor core was lost--the systems did precisely what they were supposed to do, and shut the reactor down. Odd, no one ever talks about THAT. The problem is not the ignorant 'drill happy' folks. The problem is the ignorant uneducated folks attempting to create a panic based on short sight, and snapshot focus on a very narrow picture of global events. And an overall suppression of understanding of energy production by so-called professionals in education. Nuclear plants need lots of water. Many installed nukes are running on low power now due to water shortage. There is no water shortage. Record snows last year, record rains this spring, and the wettest summer in 50 years have rivers overunning their banks. Lakes over their piers, and even tributaries with white water for the first time in a century. Nuclear plants are built on the shores of rivers, lakes and other bodies of water. They're not running at half power due to low water. http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/01/2...ry-up-nuclear- power-plants-in-southeast/ http://drought.unl.edu/dm/monitor.html |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:17:12 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote:
The (not even) Patriot Act is a hodge-podge of fascist dreams that has been kicking around for decades. Clinton is no benchmark of virtue; why do you worship him so? LOL! You ARE on drugs. Quit changing the subject. Everyone is on drugs. |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:17:53 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote:
If you were interested in the whole truth, you'd look them up yourself. Just as I do. ??? If you'd actually have read the post instead of deleting it, you'd have your answer. Which search engine do you suggest I use to determine why you insult me? |
(OT) : DaviD -proclaims- A Few Years of Economic Depression Will DoWonders . . .
On Jul 22, 5:52*am, Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote: * "Nuclear" has been a dirty word since the movie 'The China Syndrome,' a film often pointed to as a reference in debates where nuclear plants were to be constructed. As a population, most of what is 'understood' about nuclear energy production comes from that film. * Three Mile Island was the horror it was BECAUSE of the The China Syndrome, when in fact, though a meltdown had occurred--some 8 feet of reactor core was lost--the systems did precisely what they were supposed to do, and shut the reactor down. * Odd, no one ever talks about THAT. * The problem is not the ignorant 'drill happy' folks. * The problem is the ignorant uneducated folks attempting to create a panic based on short sight, and snapshot focus on a very narrow picture of global events. And an overall suppression of understanding of energy production by so-called professionals in education. - Nuclear plants need lots of water. -*Many installed nukes are running on low power now - due to water shortage. Nuclear may be to Un-Safe to Use -but- It is Clean -wrt- Air Polution. + Plus Nuclear is American Energy for Americans. Improved Hydro by Adding 100 Feet to most of the Existing Dams in the USA could add to American's Electric Energy Needs; plus better Flood Control; and More Water for Agriculture and Humans. + Plus Hydro is American Energy for Americans. Co-Generation using Reclaimed Manufacturing Heat can meet 15% of American's Electric Energy Needs. + Plus Co-Generation is American Energy for Americans Clean Coal Technology when properly used is as Clean as Oil and Gas and keeps our Money in the USA . + Plus Clean Coal is American Energy for Americans - We need to consume less and not allow the rest of - the world to become the oinkers that we already are. Dave that is a real : I GOT MINE ATTITUDE ! - A few years of economic depression will do wonders - for speeding that along. DaviD -proclaims- A Few Years of Economic Depression Will Do Wonders . . . Dave spoken like a true ELITIST who wants to Control the World to Gain His Ends By Any Means... ~ RHF |
Dave -proclaims- There Is No Shortwage of Crude Oil
Dave wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:16:36 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote: Dave wrote: D Peter Maus wrote: "Nuclear" has been a dirty word since the movie 'The China Syndrome,' a film often pointed to as a reference in debates where nuclear plants were to be constructed. As a population, most of what is 'understood' about nuclear energy production comes from that film. Three Mile Island was the horror it was BECAUSE of the The China Syndrome, when in fact, though a meltdown had occurred--some 8 feet of reactor core was lost--the systems did precisely what they were supposed to do, and shut the reactor down. Odd, no one ever talks about THAT. The problem is not the ignorant 'drill happy' folks. The problem is the ignorant uneducated folks attempting to create a panic based on short sight, and snapshot focus on a very narrow picture of global events. And an overall suppression of understanding of energy production by so-called professionals in education. Nuclear plants need lots of water. Many installed nukes are running on low power now due to water shortage. There is no water shortage. Record snows last year, record rains this spring, and the wettest summer in 50 years have rivers overunning their banks. Lakes over their piers, and even tributaries with white water for the first time in a century. Nuclear plants are built on the shores of rivers, lakes and other bodies of water. They're not running at half power due to low water. http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/01/2...ry-up-nuclear- power-plants-in-southeast/ http://drought.unl.edu/dm/monitor.html You come help replace the burned out sump pump in my basement, and I'll listen to your noise about drought. |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
Dave wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:17:12 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote: The (not even) Patriot Act is a hodge-podge of fascist dreams that has been kicking around for decades. Clinton is no benchmark of virtue; why do you worship him so? LOL! You ARE on drugs. Quit changing the subject. Everyone is on drugs. LOL! |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
Dave wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:17:53 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote: If you were interested in the whole truth, you'd look them up yourself. Just as I do. ??? If you'd actually have read the post instead of deleting it, you'd have your answer. Which search engine do you suggest I use to determine why you insult me? No search engine necessary. I've told you. But you have to actually have read it to understand. Go back and read what I wrote. It's there. |
Dave -proclaims- There Is No Shortwage of Crude Oil
D Peter Maus wrote: Dave wrote: On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:16:36 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote: Dave wrote: D Peter Maus wrote: "Nuclear" has been a dirty word since the movie 'The China Syndrome,' a film often pointed to as a reference in debates where nuclear plants were to be constructed. As a population, most of what is 'understood' about nuclear energy production comes from that film. Three Mile Island was the horror it was BECAUSE of the The China Syndrome, when in fact, though a meltdown had occurred--some 8 feet of reactor core was lost--the systems did precisely what they were supposed to do, and shut the reactor down. Odd, no one ever talks about THAT. The problem is not the ignorant 'drill happy' folks. The problem is the ignorant uneducated folks attempting to create a panic based on short sight, and snapshot focus on a very narrow picture of global events. And an overall suppression of understanding of energy production by so-called professionals in education. Nuclear plants need lots of water. Many installed nukes are running on low power now due to water shortage. There is no water shortage. Record snows last year, record rains this spring, and the wettest summer in 50 years have rivers overunning their banks. Lakes over their piers, and even tributaries with white water for the first time in a century. Nuclear plants are built on the shores of rivers, lakes and other bodies of water. They're not running at half power due to low water. http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/01/2...ry-up-nuclear- power-plants-in-southeast/ http://drought.unl.edu/dm/monitor.html You come help replace the burned out sump pump in my basement, and I'll listen to your noise about drought. Mine was rusted out (been here a long time before I got here) and when I discovered that I replaced it that very day. My basement is dry, but it's just good insurance if a pipe were to burst or the water heater would fail. |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
On Jul 22, 11:30*am, Dave wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:17:53 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote: * If you were interested in the whole truth, you'd look them up yourself. Just as I do. ??? * *If you'd actually have read the post instead of deleting it, you'd have your answer. - Which search engine do you suggest I use - to determine why you insult me? Dave - Actually No Search Engine is Required : Just read your own Posts and Your Very Own Words : There In Lies The Insult To All [.] ~ RHF |
(OT) : Islam-O-Facist "Dirty Bomb" Terrorist Projects Continue .. .
On Jul 22, 5:59*am, Dave wrote:
RHF wrote: On Jul 21, 3:45 pm, Dave wrote: On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:45:47 -0700, RHF wrote: Dave Two Words : "Dirty Bomb" ~ RHF Al Qaeda pursued a "Dirty Bomb" - The subject was Iraq, not Al Qaeda. Simply Matching "The Source" -with- "The Doer" US Removes Uranium from Iraq -and- Sets Back the Islam-O-Facist "Dirty Bomb" Project http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...022144f484dbcf - A "dirty bomb" would contaminate a few acres, - at best (worst). Dave you are simply dismissing reality. A Dirty Bomb like most Bombs can be small enough to 'contaminate' an Office - the little terror -or- BIG enough to Cover a City's Down Town Area. Making that City's Down Town Area "Contaminate" and a No-Man's Land for Years or Decades. THE BIG TERROR ! A Small Plane {Crop-Duster} at 5K Feet with the right Chemical Dispersal Equipment could Spiral Out from City Hall and Around and Around Down Town Raining Hell from Above. SPREADING THE TERROR ! For that matter the same Small Plane could cruise along at 100 Feet over Bumper-to-Bumper Crowded Freeway at 5 PM on a Hot Summer Day and Rain Down Radioactive Contamination on both directions of Commuter Traffic for 5 Miles or more. TRANSMUTING THE TERROR ! from a single City's Down Town Areas to an Metro's Whole Population via Single-Point Urban & Suburban Migratory Dispersion. - You have thrown your country away because you - are afraid of a media created Boogeyman. Dave - You Are The Boogeyman of Disbelief Playing the Part of an Ostrich. *The Terrorists Are Here . . . http://www.realanimalfacts.com/wp-co...02/ostrich_hea... - - (OT) : Islam-O-Facist "Dirty Bomb" Terrorist Projects Continue . . . - Total bull****. *Grow a pair. Dave - Using Profanity is Not a Valid Argument and at best shows 'intellectual' dishonesty'. endowed by god with 'a pair' ~ RHF Point # 1 - I Win :o) US Removes Uranium from Iraq -and- Sets Back the Islam-O-Facist "Dirty Bomb" Project http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...022144f484dbcf Point # 2 - I Win :o) (OT) : Islam-O-Facist "Dirty Bomb" Terrorist Projects Continue . . . http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...449575192b708a Dave - Now There's A Winning Pair ;-) ~ RHF |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
On Jul 22, 5:54*am, Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote: m II wrote: D Peter Maus wrote: Subject: *Wild Pigs Of course none of this movement to totalitarianism has happened in the last seven and a half years. The Patriot act is merely for your own good. mike * You keep forgetting how many times Bill Clinton tried to pass the Patriot Act. And how many times the Republican Congress blocked him. * Or that Projects Echelon and Carnivore were built during his administration. - The (not even) Patriot Act is a hodge-podge of fascist - dreams that has been kicking around for decades. -*Clinton is no benchmark of virtue; why do you worship him so? DaviD - Clinton is no benchmark of virtue; why do you worship him so? |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
On Jul 22, 5:58*am, Dave wrote:
Telamon wrote: In article , *Dave wrote: On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:41:29 -0400, dxAce wrote: * Interesting that no one's talking about that pile of Saddam's 'fictional' yellowcake that ended up in Canada. Yeah via D{e@o G@r(}a , that place that should not be mentioned. A pile of ore is not a weapon. *It is not a gathering threat. http://www.dg.navy.mil/web/ http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...ego-garcia.htm Really? What about the illness it caused in Iraq? - The illness caused when we left the stockpile unguarded - and the locals dumped the powder out and reused the - barrels for drinking water? *Tragic. Dave so we are responsible for the Problems cause by Saddam Hussein's Government ? tragically you are wrong on this one too ~ RHF |
Dave -proclaims- There Is No Shortwage of Crude Oil
dxAce wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote: Dave wrote: On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:16:36 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote: Dave wrote: D Peter Maus wrote: "Nuclear" has been a dirty word since the movie 'The China Syndrome,' a film often pointed to as a reference in debates where nuclear plants were to be constructed. As a population, most of what is 'understood' about nuclear energy production comes from that film. Three Mile Island was the horror it was BECAUSE of the The China Syndrome, when in fact, though a meltdown had occurred--some 8 feet of reactor core was lost--the systems did precisely what they were supposed to do, and shut the reactor down. Odd, no one ever talks about THAT. The problem is not the ignorant 'drill happy' folks. The problem is the ignorant uneducated folks attempting to create a panic based on short sight, and snapshot focus on a very narrow picture of global events. And an overall suppression of understanding of energy production by so-called professionals in education. Nuclear plants need lots of water. Many installed nukes are running on low power now due to water shortage. There is no water shortage. Record snows last year, record rains this spring, and the wettest summer in 50 years have rivers overunning their banks. Lakes over their piers, and even tributaries with white water for the first time in a century. Nuclear plants are built on the shores of rivers, lakes and other bodies of water. They're not running at half power due to low water. http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/01/2...ry-up-nuclear- power-plants-in-southeast/ http://drought.unl.edu/dm/monitor.html You come help replace the burned out sump pump in my basement, and I'll listen to your noise about drought. Mine was rusted out (been here a long time before I got here) and when I discovered that I replaced it that very day. My basement is dry, but it's just good insurance if a pipe were to burst or the water heater would fail. There is so much water here, mine has been running non stop for three months. Drought my ass. |
Dave -proclaims- There Is No Shortwage of Crude Oil
D Peter Maus wrote: dxAce wrote: D Peter Maus wrote: Dave wrote: On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:16:36 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote: Dave wrote: D Peter Maus wrote: "Nuclear" has been a dirty word since the movie 'The China Syndrome,' a film often pointed to as a reference in debates where nuclear plants were to be constructed. As a population, most of what is 'understood' about nuclear energy production comes from that film. Three Mile Island was the horror it was BECAUSE of the The China Syndrome, when in fact, though a meltdown had occurred--some 8 feet of reactor core was lost--the systems did precisely what they were supposed to do, and shut the reactor down. Odd, no one ever talks about THAT. The problem is not the ignorant 'drill happy' folks. The problem is the ignorant uneducated folks attempting to create a panic based on short sight, and snapshot focus on a very narrow picture of global events. And an overall suppression of understanding of energy production by so-called professionals in education. Nuclear plants need lots of water. Many installed nukes are running on low power now due to water shortage. There is no water shortage. Record snows last year, record rains this spring, and the wettest summer in 50 years have rivers overunning their banks. Lakes over their piers, and even tributaries with white water for the first time in a century. Nuclear plants are built on the shores of rivers, lakes and other bodies of water. They're not running at half power due to low water. http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/01/2...ry-up-nuclear- power-plants-in-southeast/ http://drought.unl.edu/dm/monitor.html You come help replace the burned out sump pump in my basement, and I'll listen to your noise about drought. Mine was rusted out (been here a long time before I got here) and when I discovered that I replaced it that very day. My basement is dry, but it's just good insurance if a pipe were to burst or the water heater would fail. There is so much water here, mine has been running non stop for three months. Drought my ass. Yeah, been a lot of rain here. None yet today, but storms just NE of me now. Some nice static. |
Warning: You are abiout to be hustled by your president
Canada's proven oil reserves were estimated at 179 billion barrels (28×109 m3) as of 2007, placing it second only to Saudi Arabia. U.S. invasion plans are on the table. For the U.S.,taking Canada would be "merely a matter of marching" - (Jefferson quote before the War of 1812). |
Dave -proclaims- There Is No Shortwage of Crude Oil
dxAce wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote: dxAce wrote: D Peter Maus wrote: Dave wrote: On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:16:36 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote: Dave wrote: D Peter Maus wrote: "Nuclear" has been a dirty word since the movie 'The China Syndrome,' a film often pointed to as a reference in debates where nuclear plants were to be constructed. As a population, most of what is 'understood' about nuclear energy production comes from that film. Three Mile Island was the horror it was BECAUSE of the The China Syndrome, when in fact, though a meltdown had occurred--some 8 feet of reactor core was lost--the systems did precisely what they were supposed to do, and shut the reactor down. Odd, no one ever talks about THAT. The problem is not the ignorant 'drill happy' folks. The problem is the ignorant uneducated folks attempting to create a panic based on short sight, and snapshot focus on a very narrow picture of global events. And an overall suppression of understanding of energy production by so-called professionals in education. Nuclear plants need lots of water. Many installed nukes are running on low power now due to water shortage. There is no water shortage. Record snows last year, record rains this spring, and the wettest summer in 50 years have rivers overunning their banks. Lakes over their piers, and even tributaries with white water for the first time in a century. Nuclear plants are built on the shores of rivers, lakes and other bodies of water. They're not running at half power due to low water. http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/01/2...ry-up-nuclear- power-plants-in-southeast/ http://drought.unl.edu/dm/monitor.html You come help replace the burned out sump pump in my basement, and I'll listen to your noise about drought. Mine was rusted out (been here a long time before I got here) and when I discovered that I replaced it that very day. My basement is dry, but it's just good insurance if a pipe were to burst or the water heater would fail. There is so much water here, mine has been running non stop for three months. Drought my ass. Yeah, been a lot of rain here. None yet today, but storms just NE of me now. Some nice static. None here..but then, that MTA is really effective at static avoidance. |
(OT) : Islam-O-Facist "Dirty Bomb" Terrorist Projects Continue. . .
RHF wrote:
On Jul 22, 5:59 am, Dave wrote: RHF wrote: On Jul 21, 3:45 pm, Dave wrote: On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:45:47 -0700, RHF wrote: Dave Two Words : "Dirty Bomb" ~ RHF Al Qaeda pursued a "Dirty Bomb" - The subject was Iraq, not Al Qaeda. Simply Matching "The Source" -with- "The Doer" US Removes Uranium from Iraq -and- Sets Back the Islam-O-Facist "Dirty Bomb" Project http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...022144f484dbcf - A "dirty bomb" would contaminate a few acres, - at best (worst). Dave you are simply dismissing reality. A Dirty Bomb like most Bombs can be small enough to 'contaminate' an Office - the little terror -or- BIG enough to Cover a City's Down Town Area. Making that City's Down Town Area "Contaminate" and a No-Man's Land for Years or Decades. THE BIG TERROR ! A Small Plane {Crop-Duster} at 5K Feet with the right Chemical Dispersal Equipment could Spiral Out from City Hall and Around and Around Down Town Raining Hell from Above. SPREADING THE TERROR ! For that matter the same Small Plane could cruise along at 100 Feet over Bumper-to-Bumper Crowded Freeway at 5 PM on a Hot Summer Day and Rain Down Radioactive Contamination on both directions of Commuter Traffic for 5 Miles or more. TRANSMUTING THE TERROR ! from a single City's Down Town Areas to an Metro's Whole Population via Single-Point Urban & Suburban Migratory Dispersion. - You have thrown your country away because you - are afraid of a media created Boogeyman. Dave - You Are The Boogeyman of Disbelief Playing the Part of an Ostrich. The Terrorists Are Here . . . http://www.realanimalfacts.com/wp-co...02/ostrich_hea... - - (OT) : Islam-O-Facist "Dirty Bomb" Terrorist Projects Continue . . . - Total bull****. Grow a pair. Dave - Using Profanity is Not a Valid Argument and at best shows 'intellectual' dishonesty'. endowed by god with 'a pair' ~ RHF Point # 1 - I Win :o) US Removes Uranium from Iraq -and- Sets Back the Islam-O-Facist "Dirty Bomb" Project http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...022144f484dbcf Point # 2 - I Win :o) (OT) : Islam-O-Facist "Dirty Bomb" Terrorist Projects Continue . . . http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...449575192b708a Dave - Now There's A Winning Pair ;-) ~ RHF . Dave is right - you need to grow a pair! Dirty bombs are not considered to be weapons of mass destruction - your own USED made that conclusion. To get that much material, let alone to to expose people to it for any length of time to do any real damage would be unrealistic. You want to get some serious casualties? Use a persistent nerve agent instead. They aren't that difficult to synthesize and at a LD of around a few milligrams they are very effective. JB |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
Telamon wrote:
In article , Dave wrote: On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:41:29 -0400, dxAce wrote: Interesting that no one's talking about that pile of Saddam's 'fictional' yellowcake that ended up in Canada. Yeah via D{e@o G@r(}a , that place that should not be mentioned. A pile of ore is not a weapon. It is not a gathering threat. http://www.dg.navy.mil/web/ http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...ego-garcia.htm Really? What about the illness it caused in Iraq? No metal, Now, now, it is the DU weapons used by the US military in Iraq which caused the illnesses. JB |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
Telamon wrote:
In article DObhk.877$nu6.761@edtnps83, m II wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , Dave wrote: On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:41:29 -0400, dxAce wrote: Interesting that no one's talking about that pile of Saddam's 'fictional' yellowcake that ended up in Canada. Yeah via D{e@o G@r(}a , that place that should not be mentioned. A pile of ore is not a weapon. It is not a gathering threat. http://www.dg.navy.mil/web/ http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...ego-garcia.htm Really? What about the illness it caused in Iraq? Ten thousand Gulf war vets dead. DU played a big role. SNIP The yellow cake is far worse so you had better get that HAZMAT suit on. Yawn. Aren't you tired of fear-mongering yet? Yellow cake may be worse but it is far more difficult to get let alone process. Go Team Fear! JB |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
m II wrote:
Telamon wrote: Think of this at Dinner time, ok? SNIP I'm not going to look at it because coming from you I'm sure it's something disgusting. Yes it is. The US army did it. With your money. http://www.uruknet.info/uruknet-images/290706du2.jpg Don't you want to make sure you're getting your money's worth? mike Mike! It's too difficult to reason with these morons. After all, if they treat their own countrymen in so expendable a fashion they won't hesitate to treat anyone else in the same manner. Such is the way of those who are morally nihilistic... JB |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
RHF wrote:
On Jul 22, 5:58 am, Dave wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , Dave wrote: On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:41:29 -0400, dxAce wrote: Interesting that no one's talking about that pile of Saddam's 'fictional' yellowcake that ended up in Canada. Yeah via D{e@o G@r(}a , that place that should not be mentioned. A pile of ore is not a weapon. It is not a gathering threat. http://www.dg.navy.mil/web/ http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...ego-garcia.htm Really? What about the illness it caused in Iraq? - The illness caused when we left the stockpile unguarded - and the locals dumped the powder out and reused the - barrels for drinking water? Tragic. Dave so we are responsible for the Problems cause by Saddam Hussein's Government ? tragically you are wrong on this one too ~ RHF . Don't you often say that you "broke" Iraq and now must fix it? You broke it, you buy it - including all the problems with it. JB |
(OT) : DaviD -proclaims- A Few Years of Economic Depression WillDo Wonders . . .
RHF wrote:
Improved Hydro by Adding 100 Feet to most of the Existing Dams in the USA could add to American's Electric Energy Needs I have a feeling that if there WERE the possibility of that extra 100 ft, it would have been done at the initial construction stage. I don't think they can add height to ANY installation. Even if the dam itself were suitable, the increased shoreline of the reservoir would probably prevent it. Adding MORE dams doesn't work either, as there has to be a minimum 'head' of water between reservoirs and it's pretty well all dammed up as it is. mike -- Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage, this filter blocks all postings with a Gmail, Google Mail, Google Groups or HOTMAIL address. It also filters everything from a .cn server. http://improve-usenet.org/ |
Dave -proclaims- There Is No Shortwage of Crude Oil
D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote: On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:16:36 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote: Dave wrote: D Peter Maus wrote: "Nuclear" has been a dirty word since the movie 'The China Syndrome,' a film often pointed to as a reference in debates where nuclear plants were to be constructed. As a population, most of what is 'understood' about nuclear energy production comes from that film. Three Mile Island was the horror it was BECAUSE of the The China Syndrome, when in fact, though a meltdown had occurred--some 8 feet of reactor core was lost--the systems did precisely what they were supposed to do, and shut the reactor down. Odd, no one ever talks about THAT. The problem is not the ignorant 'drill happy' folks. The problem is the ignorant uneducated folks attempting to create a panic based on short sight, and snapshot focus on a very narrow picture of global events. And an overall suppression of understanding of energy production by so-called professionals in education. Nuclear plants need lots of water. Many installed nukes are running on low power now due to water shortage. There is no water shortage. Record snows last year, record rains this spring, and the wettest summer in 50 years have rivers overunning their banks. Lakes over their piers, and even tributaries with white water for the first time in a century. Nuclear plants are built on the shores of rivers, lakes and other bodies of water. They're not running at half power due to low water. http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/01/2...ry-up-nuclear- power-plants-in-southeast/ http://drought.unl.edu/dm/monitor.html You come help replace the burned out sump pump in my basement, and I'll listen to your noise about drought. Consider yourself fortunate that you have an abundance of water. Many parts of the USA are in drought conditions. http://drought.unl.edu/dm/monitor.html JB |
Dave -proclaims- There Is No Shortwage of Crude Oil
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:47:07 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote:
http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/01/2...-could-dry-up- nuclear- power-plants-in-southeast/ http://drought.unl.edu/dm/monitor.html You come help replace the burned out sump pump in my basement, and I'll listen to your noise about drought. Your basement is not the rest of the USA, nor the world. |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:48:45 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote:
No search engine necessary. I've told you. But you have to actually have read it to understand. Go back and read what I wrote. It's there. You are a Pavlovian drone, thanks to your uncritical gluttony of junk media. |
Dave -proclaims- There Is No Shortwage of Crude Oil
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:13:23 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote:
Drought my ass. California is having a major drought. As is Georgia. And Texas. |
Dave -proclaims- There Is No Shortwage of Crude Oil
Dave wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:13:23 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote: Drought my ass. California is having a major drought. As is Georgia. And Texas. How can those people be SO misguided? http://www.drought.unl.edu/dm/monitor.html mike -- Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage, this filter blocks all postings with a Gmail, Google Mail, Google Groups or HOTMAIL address. It also filters everything from a .cn server. http://improve-usenet.org/ |
(OT) : DaviD -proclaims- A Few Years of Economic Depression WillDo Wonders . . .
RHF wrote:
On Jul 22, 3:06 pm, m II wrote: RHF wrote: Improved Hydro by Adding 100 Feet to most of the Existing Dams in the USA could add to American's Electric Energy Needs - I have a feeling that if there WERE the possibility of that extra 100 - ft, it would have been done at the initial construction stage. I don't - think they can add height to ANY installation. Mike - Abilities and Needs have Changed -and- You WOULD Be Dam Wrong. - Even if the dam itself were suitable, the increased shoreline - of the reservoir would probably prevent it. Mike - You are Sure Dam Wrong. - Adding MORE dams doesn't work either, as there has - to be a minimum 'head' of water between reservoirs and - it's pretty well all dammed up as it is. Mike - You might be Head Strong -but- Dam Wrong. I suggest you study the requirements of hydro electric power generation before spouting off. I find it disturbing that you haven't got the faintest idea of how water is used and stored. mike -- Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage, this filter blocks all postings with a Gmail, Google Mail, Google Groups or HOTMAIL address. It also filters everything from a .cn server. http://improve-usenet.org/ |
(OT) : DaviD -proclaims- A Few Years of Economic Depression Will Do Wonders . . .
"m II" wrote in message news:5Wvhk.1161$%b7.532@edtnps82... RHF wrote: On Jul 22, 3:06 pm, m II wrote: RHF wrote: Improved Hydro by Adding 100 Feet to most of the Existing Dams in the USA could add to American's Electric Energy Needs - I have a feeling that if there WERE the possibility of that extra 100 - ft, it would have been done at the initial construction stage. I don't - think they can add height to ANY installation. Mike - Abilities and Needs have Changed -and- You WOULD Be Dam Wrong. - Even if the dam itself were suitable, the increased shoreline - of the reservoir would probably prevent it. Mike - You are Sure Dam Wrong. - Adding MORE dams doesn't work either, as there has - to be a minimum 'head' of water between reservoirs and - it's pretty well all dammed up as it is. Mike - You might be Head Strong -but- Dam Wrong. I suggest you study the requirements of hydro electric power generation before spouting off. I find it disturbing that you haven't got the faintest idea of how water is used and stored. mike So true. I guess he doesn't realize that to raise the head of a dam, you have to take the same amount off of the surrounding topography. I know many damsites that it would literally be impossible to raise the head any significant amount because what USED to be a valley is already a deep reservoir with only a relatively few feet of land on either side. I know others that to raise the head 50' would take out several (more) surrounding towns and farmland. |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com