|
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote: MNMikeW wrote: "Dave" wrote in message ... D Peter Maus wrote: Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week? This is Daddy Warbucks? How about CBS editing out major McCain foreign policy gaffe a couple days ago? WTF is that about? How about the MSM editing out ALL of Obamas numerous gaffes? If they are doing that how do you know about them, whatever they are? And so there you do it, again...accepting without challenge the validity of sources on one side of an issue, while challenging the validity of the sources on the other side. It would seem the only difference between you and Limbaugh is that people listen to Rush. There are not 2 sides to a fact. |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
Dave wrote: D Peter Maus wrote: Dave wrote: D Peter Maus wrote: Dave wrote: D Peter Maus wrote: Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week? This is Daddy Warbucks? That is ratings-driven infotainment. People can't take their eyes off him. Let's face it, Mr. McCain doesn't really ooze charisma. The subject however is the lack of diverse opinions on the talk radio and the distorted impression of what is mainstream opinion that distortion creates. Ah. So, only talk radio need be balanced. Got it. It is a finite resource and part of the commons. It should not be used to the detriment of one part of the people while advancing the interests of a much smaller part of society. And who gets to determine that? You? If there were no lister interest, there would be no commercial support, so there would be no program. Suggesting that much smaller part of society....ain't so small. If you think that the Limbaugh/Hannity/Savage axis represents the mainstream you are wrong. Bush enjoys the support of maybe 1 out of 4 Americans. The war is opposed by 2 out of 3. We are the mainstream; the righties are the radicals. Gawd! I certainly hope that the mentally ill (such as yourself) are not the mainstream! |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote: Dave wrote: D Peter Maus wrote: Dave wrote: D Peter Maus wrote: Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week? This is Daddy Warbucks? That is ratings-driven infotainment. People can't take their eyes off him. Let's face it, Mr. McCain doesn't really ooze charisma. The subject however is the lack of diverse opinions on the talk radio and the distorted impression of what is mainstream opinion that distortion creates. Ah. So, only talk radio need be balanced. Got it. It is a finite resource and part of the commons. It should not be used to the detriment of one part of the people while advancing the interests of a much smaller part of society. And who gets to determine that? You? If there were no lister interest, there would be no commercial support, so there would be no program. Suggesting that much smaller part of society....ain't so small. If you think that the Limbaugh/Hannity/Savage axis represents the mainstream you are wrong. Bush enjoys the support of maybe 1 out of 4 Americans. The war is opposed by 2 out of 3. We are the mainstream; the righties are the radicals. And just who is 'we?' |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
On Jul 25, 5:34*am, Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote: * Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week? This is Daddy Warbucks? That is ratings-driven infotainment. *People can't take their eyes off him. *Let's face it, Mr. McCain doesn't really ooze charisma. - The subject however is the lack of diverse opinions on - the talk radio and the distorted impression of what is - mainstream opinion that distortion creates. -re-write- - The subject however is the lack of diverse opinions on - the talk radio and the distorted impression of what is - mainstream opinion that lack of diverse opinions creates. |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
On Jul 25, 5:39*am, Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote: * Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week? This is Daddy Warbucks? How about CBS editing out major McCain foreign policy gaffe a couple days ago? *WTF is that about? Dan Rather -aka- CBS -wrt- Clearly Bull **** enough said ~ RHF |
(OT) : The Fairness Doctrine is Forced Liberal Indoctrination
On Jul 25, 5:43*am, dxAce wrote:
Dave wrote: D Peter Maus wrote: * Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week? This is Daddy Warbucks? That is ratings-driven infotainment. *People can't take their eyes off him. *Let's face it, Mr. McCain doesn't really ooze charisma. The subject however is the lack of diverse opinions on the talk radio and the distorted impression of what is mainstream opinion that distortion creates. - The problem is, for whatever reason, *Liberal* talk radio - can't seem to find a loyal enough listener base that - would encourage advertisers, so therefore they either fail, - or on a limited number of outlets. - - It would seem to me that advertisers don't really care - what political persuasion buyers of their product(s) are - as long as their money is green. The Problem is *Liberal* Talk Radio already has 2800+ NPR {Public} FM Radio Stations that are preaching the Left-Wing {so called Educated & Enlightened} Political Line for Free without 'sponsers' so Commercial 'liberal' Talk Radio's potential Listeners are already being served. The NPR types are a loyal group of Radio Listeners who listen to NPR type Programs as a Fashion Statement of their Superior Education & Greater Enlightenment which they know the common people will never be able to obtain do to their simply being average people and not one of the gifted and chozen-ones. The Left-Wing and 'Liberals' want the Public Funding of the NPR Radio Stations -and- to Silence the AM Radio Stations that provide a Balance to the Liberal NPR Radio Stations so that Only the Liberal Voice Will Be Heard. the fairness doctrine is forced liberal indoctrination ~ RHF |
(OT) : First Lie - Left-Wing Radical {Liberal} Talk Radio is'Progressive'
On Jul 25, 7:02*am, Dave wrote:
dxAce wrote: Dave wrote: D Peter Maus wrote: * Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week? This is Daddy Warbucks? That is ratings-driven infotainment. *People can't take their eyes off him. *Let's face it, Mr. McCain doesn't really ooze charisma. The subject however is the lack of diverse opinions on the talk radio and the distorted impression of what is mainstream opinion that distortion creates. The problem is, for whatever reason, *Liberal* talk radio can't seem to find a loyal enough listener base that would encourage advertisers, so therefore they either fail, or on a limited number of outlets. It would seem to me that advertisers don't really care what political persuasion buyers of their product(s) are as long as their money is green. Perhaps that's because the format is often on weaker stations with ****ty signals, vs. the righties being on flamethrowers. -*The Progressive Talk format does better on key demos - in a few markets, and beats sports talk in quite a few more. First Lie - Left-Wing Radical {Liberal} Talk Radio is 'Progressive' =NO= It is Left-Wing Political Propaganda ! Your so-called 'key demos' are College Students who are "Parroting" their Left-Wing Radical {Liberal} Professors. ~ RHF |
(OT) : To Be Fair-and-Balance {Fairness Doctrine} the Number of NPRFM Radio Stations should by Law be Cut-in-Half.
On Jul 25, 7:04*am, Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote: Dave wrote: D Peter Maus wrote: * Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week? This is Daddy Warbucks? That is ratings-driven infotainment. *People can't take their eyes off him. *Let's face it, Mr. McCain doesn't really ooze charisma. The subject however is the lack of diverse opinions on the talk radio and the distorted impression of what is mainstream opinion that distortion creates. * Ah. So, only talk radio need be balanced. Got it. - It is a finite resource and part of the commons. * - It should not be used to the detriment of one part - of the people while advancing the interests of a - much smaller part of society. Balance the 2800+ Liberal NPR FM Radio Stations {that are Tax Supported} -versus- The roughly 1000+ Conservative Commercial AM Radio Stations that are Privately 'paid for' through Advertising. To Be Fair-and-Balance {Fairness Doctrine} the Number of NPR FM Radio Stations should by Law be Cut-in-Half. ~ RHF |
(OT) : DaviD -rants against- The Limbaugh/Hannity/Savage Axis of Evil!
On Jul 25, 7:46*am, Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote: Dave wrote: D Peter Maus wrote: Dave wrote: D Peter Maus wrote: * Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week? This is Daddy Warbucks? That is ratings-driven infotainment. *People can't take their eyes off him. *Let's face it, Mr. McCain doesn't really ooze charisma. The subject however is the lack of diverse opinions on the talk radio and the distorted impression of what is mainstream opinion that distortion creates. * Ah. So, only talk radio need be balanced. Got it. It is a finite resource and part of the commons. *It should not be used to the detriment of one part of the people while advancing the interests of a much smaller part of society. * And who gets to determine that? You? * If there were no lister interest, there would be no commercial support, so there would be no program. * Suggesting that much smaller part of society....ain't so small. - If you think that the Limbaugh/Hannity/Savage axis - represents the mainstream you are wrong. DaviD -rants against- The Limbaugh/Hannity/Savage Axis of Evil ! - -*Bush enjoys the support of maybe 1 out of 4 Americans. - -*The war is opposed by 2 out of 3. - - We are the mainstream; - the righties are the radicals. DaviD -proclaims- We Are The Mainstream ! Dave Dang Two in One Post : This is a Banner Day For You ~ RHF |
(OT) : DaviD -proclaims- We Are The Mainstream !
On Jul 25, 7:46*am, Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote: Dave wrote: D Peter Maus wrote: Dave wrote: D Peter Maus wrote: * Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week? This is Daddy Warbucks? That is ratings-driven infotainment. *People can't take their eyes off him. *Let's face it, Mr. McCain doesn't really ooze charisma. The subject however is the lack of diverse opinions on the talk radio and the distorted impression of what is mainstream opinion that distortion creates. * Ah. So, only talk radio need be balanced. Got it. It is a finite resource and part of the commons. *It should not be used to the detriment of one part of the people while advancing the interests of a much smaller part of society. * And who gets to determine that? You? * If there were no lister interest, there would be no commercial support, so there would be no program. * Suggesting that much smaller part of society....ain't so small. - If you think that the Limbaugh/Hannity/Savage axis - represents the mainstream you are wrong. DaviD -rants against- The Limbaugh/Hannity/Savage Axis of Evil ! - - Bush enjoys the support of maybe 1 out of 4 Americans. - - The war is opposed by 2 out of 3. - - We are the mainstream; - the righties are the radicals. DaviD -proclaims- We Are The Mainstream ! Dave Dang Two in One Post : This is a Banner Day For You ~ RHF |
(OT) : According to DaviD - There Are Not 2 Sides To A Fact.
On Jul 25, 7:47*am, Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote: Dave wrote: MNMikeW wrote: "Dave" wrote in message . com... D Peter Maus wrote: * Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week? This is Daddy Warbucks? How about CBS editing out major McCain foreign policy gaffe a couple days ago? *WTF is that about? How about the MSM editing out ALL of Obamas numerous gaffes? If they are doing that how do you know about them, whatever they are? * And so there you do it, again...accepting without challenge the validity of sources on one side of an issue, while challenging the validity of the sources on the other side. * It would seem the only difference between you and Limbaugh is that people listen to Rush. - There are not 2 sides to a fact. According to DaviD - There Are Not 2 Sides To A Fact. Actually Dave - Many Times There Are : =Example= The Fact that 45% of Potential Voters "Like" Barack Hussein Obama II : * Side # 1 - 45% of Potential Voters "Like" Barack Hussein Obama II {Good} * Side # 2 - 55% of Potential Voters "Do Not Like" or Could Care Less about Barack Hussein Obama II {Bad} there are facts -and- there are facts ~ RHF |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
Dave wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:07:36 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote: If you think that the Limbaugh/Hannity/Savage axis represents the mainstream you are wrong. Bush enjoys the support of maybe 1 out of 4 Americans. The war is opposed by 2 out of 3. We are the mainstream; the righties are the radicals. And just who is 'we?' The great unwashed. And they all agree with you? |
(OT) : First Lie - Left-Wing Radical {Liberal} Talk Radio is'Progressive'
On Jul 25, 11:32*am, Dave wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:07:33 -0700, RHF wrote: - - First Lie - Left-Wing Radical {Liberal} Talk Radio - - is 'Progressive' - - =NO= It is Left-Wing Political Propaganda ! - - - - Your so-called 'key demos' are College Students who - - are "Parroting" their Left-Wing Radical {Liberal} Professors. - - - - ~ RHF - **** you. -*Quit calling people you disagree with liars. -*"Progressive Talk" is the name of the genre. -*If you don't like it tell Clear Channel and Viacom. DaviD -spoken like- A True Left-Wing Political Propagandist So in "Dave's World" it is 'nicer' to Say : F*ck You then to call someone a Liar. Dave - Is truly a name -or- Missleading Brand ? -or- Phony Marketing Buzz Word ? -since- They know that the word "Liberal" does not Sell. more liberal thinking ~ RHF |
(OT) : Dave - Don't Know If You Bath and Have OB . . .
On Jul 25, 11:25*am, Dave wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:07:36 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote: If you think that the Limbaugh/Hannity/Savage axis represents the mainstream you are wrong. *Bush enjoys the support of maybe 1 out of 4 Americans. *The war is opposed by 2 out of 3. *We are the mainstream; the righties are the radicals. - - And just who is 'we?' - The great unwashed. Dave - Don't Know If You Bath and Have OB . . . but your ideas stink ~ RHF |
(OT) : DaviD -rants against- The Limbaugh/Hannity/Savage Axis ofEvil !
On Jul 25, 11:35*am, Dave wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:21:08 -0700, RHF wrote: - - DaviD -rants against- The Limbaugh/Hannity/Savage Axis of Evil ! - Axis of fearmongering... More Like Keep Freedom Alive ! A Positive Message for American Citizens -to- Believe-In - What They Believe In ! -and to- Stand-Up For What They Believe In ! A Positive Message for American Citizens -to- Love American and Have Faith-In America -and- Support America ! A Positive Message for American Citizens -to- Work Hard and Prosper as Americans in our Free Capitalistic System ! that's what i hear on the radio and you call it fearmongering . . . it boggles the mind ~ RHF |
(OT) : DaviD -rants against- The Limbaugh/Hannity/Savage Axisof Evil !
On Jul 25, 11:35 am, Dave wrote:
- Axis of fearmongering... Only if you fear another point of view. |
(OT) : DaviD -rants against- The Limbaugh/Hannity/Savage AxisofEvil !
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:58:29 -0700, RHF wrote:
On Jul 25, 11:35Â*am, Dave wrote: On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:21:08 -0700, RHF wrote: - - DaviD -rants against- The Limbaugh/Hannity/Savage Axis of Evil ! - Axis of fearmongering... More Like Keep Freedom Alive ! A Positive Message for American Citizens -to- Believe-In - What They Believe In ! -and to- Stand-Up For What They Believe In ! A Positive Message for American Citizens -to- Love American and Have Faith-In America -and- Support America ! A Positive Message for American Citizens -to- Work Hard and Prosper as Americans in our Free Capitalistic System ! that's what i hear on the radio and you call it fearmongering . . . it boggles the mind ~ RHF . Define "freedom". |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
In article ,
Dave wrote: MNMikeW wrote: "Dave" wrote in message ... D Peter Maus wrote: Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week? This is Daddy Warbucks? How about CBS editing out major McCain foreign policy gaffe a couple days ago? WTF is that about? How about the MSM editing out ALL of Obamas numerous gaffes? If they are doing that how do you know about them, whatever they are? I can see you have been a busy boy posting your usual drug addled nut case rants. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
(OT) : DaviD -asks- Define "Freedom"
On Jul 25, 4:49*pm, Dave wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:58:29 -0700, RHF wrote: On Jul 25, 11:35*am, Dave wrote: On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:21:08 -0700, RHF wrote: - - DaviD -rants against- The Limbaugh/Hannity/Savage Axis of Evil ! - Axis of fearmongering... More Like Keep Freedom Alive ! A Positive Message for American Citizens -to- Believe-In - What They Believe In ! -and to- Stand-Up For What They Believe In ! A Positive Message for American Citizens -to- Love American and Have Faith-In America -and- Support America ! A Positive Message for American Citizens -to- Work Hard and Prosper as Americans in our Free Capitalistic System ! that's what i hear on the radio and you call it fearmongering . . . it boggles the mind ~ RHF *. - Define "freedom". Freedom the 'feeling' of Being Free {Free Being} living without artificial limits imposed by a society of other person(s) The Smell of Freedom In Every Breath You Take - - - The Freedom To Exhale ! The Taste of Freedom In Every Mouth of Water that you Drink - - - The Freedom to Replenish Your Self with something as simply as natural flowing water. The Freedom to Grow and Eat your own Food and provide for Your Self - - - The Freedom to Nourish Your Self with something as simply as wholesome food. The Freedom to Think for Your Self and Know Your Own Mind. The Power of Free Though and Action. - - - Defining Freedom For Your Self [.] freedom is a 'feeling' - you got it or you don't and to many/most 'feelings' are FACTs ~ RHF |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
dxAce wrote:
Gawd! I certainly hope that the mentally ill (such as yourself) are not the mainstream! Tell us more about your friend who was murdered in that three way homosexual love triangle. Were you cleared of all charges? How did the troops in your militia respond to the news of their Supreme Commander being associated with a homosexual murder? mike -- Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage, this filter blocks all postings with a Gmail, Google Mail, Google Groups or HOTMAIL address. It also filters everything from a .cn server. http://improve-usenet.org/ |
(OT) : Mike - What is this Fixation of Yours with HomosexualActivities ?
On Jul 26, 12:34*am, m II wrote:
dxAce wrote: Gawd! I certainly hope that the mentally ill (such as yourself) are not the mainstream! - Tell us more about your friend who was murdered - in that three way homosexual love triangle. - Were you cleared of all charges? - How did the troops in your militia respond to the news - of their Supreme Commander being associated with a - homosexual murder? - - mike Mike, What is this Fixation of Yours with Homosexual Activities ? * homosexual love triangle * homosexual murder mike - it sure does appear that you have a 'problem' as reflected by the content of many of your posts ~ RHF |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
"David Eduardo" wrote in message ... Progressive does well in one market, Portland, but still does not beat KEX even though it is on a better signal. How do you get a "better signal" than KEX? 50KW that can be heard over most of western Oregon and SW Washington all day long, and is still the best signal in the metro area at night.. and don't talk to me about contours, I've lived in Portland most of my life, and know very well which signals are best in which areas. (the old KISN 910 was easily the worst nighttime signal in the area, and didn't come close to covering it's market at night. Still, it was, for a very long time, in the top three stations in the market, even though there were problems on many radios with IF doubling causing interference to their signal...) |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
m II wrote: dxAce wrote: Gawd! I certainly hope that the mentally ill (such as yourself) are not the mainstream! Tell us more about your friend who was murdered in that three way homosexual love triangle. Friend? I never met the two folks who were murdered. Were you cleared of all charges? What charges, boy? How did the troops in your militia respond to the news of their Supreme Commander being associated with a homosexual murder? I was not associated in any way, therefore, being the good troops that they are, they had no comment! Now you go grab that shine box, you mentally ill little boy, and get busy. |
(OT) : DaviD -asks- Define "Freedom"
RHF wrote:
On Jul 25, 4:49 pm, Dave wrote: On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:58:29 -0700, RHF wrote: On Jul 25, 11:35 am, Dave wrote: On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:21:08 -0700, RHF wrote: - - DaviD -rants against- The Limbaugh/Hannity/Savage Axis of Evil ! - Axis of fearmongering... More Like Keep Freedom Alive ! A Positive Message for American Citizens -to- Believe-In - What They Believe In ! -and to- Stand-Up For What They Believe In ! A Positive Message for American Citizens -to- Love American and Have Faith-In America -and- Support America ! A Positive Message for American Citizens -to- Work Hard and Prosper as Americans in our Free Capitalistic System ! that's what i hear on the radio and you call it fearmongering . . . it boggles the mind ~ RHF . - Define "freedom". Freedom the 'feeling' of Being Free {Free Being} living without artificial limits imposed by a society of other person(s) The Smell of Freedom In Every Breath You Take - - - The Freedom To Exhale ! The Taste of Freedom In Every Mouth of Water that you Drink - - - The Freedom to Replenish Your Self with something as simply as natural flowing water. The Freedom to Grow and Eat your own Food and provide for Your Self - - - The Freedom to Nourish Your Self with something as simply as wholesome food. The Freedom to Think for Your Self and Know Your Own Mind. The Power of Free Though and Action. - - - Defining Freedom For Your Self [.] freedom is a 'feeling' - you got it or you don't and to many/most 'feelings' are FACTs ~ RHF . =PS= Freedom ~ Liberty http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberty . How about freedom from owing money to the Chinese? Not all that new-age twaddle you just spewed. Where's that list of liberal advocacy programs from NPR? |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
David Eduardo wrote:
"Dave" wrote in message ... dxAce wrote: It would seem to me that advertisers don't really care what political persuasion buyers of their product(s) are as long as their money is green. Perhaps that's because the format is often on weaker stations with ****ty signals, vs. the righties being on flamethrowers. Progressive talk or liberal talk or whatever name you give it has been on excellent signals in some markets, like 50 kw WINZ 940 in Miami and even 1150 in LA, a decent full market signal. It did not do at all well in any market even when the signal, as far as the rated market was concerned, was competitive. KTLK interrupts frequently with live sports and runs infomercials all weekend long. They have a ****ty signal at night. |
(OT) : Mike - What is this Fixation of Yours with HomosexualActivities ?
RHF wrote:
mike - it sure does appear that you have a 'problem' as reflected by the content of many of your posts ~ RHF You seem to think *I* have a problem when I quote other postings. Why don't you complain about the original messages? Do you think there's ANY possibility of the problem being with THOSE people? A few examples: dxAce's invitations for some 'Mutual Respect': ======================================= Jerking off not enough for you, boy? Do you spit or swallow? Very tasty! Actually, I know quite a few homosexuals. -- Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage, this filter blocks all postings with a Gmail, Google Mail, Google Groups or HOTMAIL address. It also filters everything from a .cn server. http://improve-usenet.org/ |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
"Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... "David Eduardo" wrote in message ... Progressive does well in one market, Portland, but still does not beat KEX even though it is on a better signal. How do you get a "better signal" than KEX? 50KW that can be heard over most of western Oregon and SW Washington all day long, and is still the best signal in the metro area at night.. and don't talk to me about contours, The "new" 620 signal, day and night, conforms much better to the MSA, which is what radio ratings, sales and survival are about. KEX, on a much higher frequecy, does similarly by day, but at night the protection requirements make it less viable in the metro than KPOJ on the supoerior 620 channel with a less severe pattern. I've lived in Portland most of my life, and know very well which signals are best in which areas. (the old KISN 910 was easily the worst nighttime signal in the area, and didn't come close to covering it's market at night. Still, it was, for a very long time, in the top three stations in the market, even though there were problems on many radios with IF doubling causing interference to their signal...) That was in the 60's (till Don Burden lost the license) when the metro area had a single county definition and the audience was measured by Pulse and Hooper, not Arbitron. Boy, you had to go back 5 decades to find irrelevant data on that one. |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
"David Eduardo" wrote in message ... "Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... "David Eduardo" wrote in message ... Progressive does well in one market, Portland, but still does not beat KEX even though it is on a better signal. How do you get a "better signal" than KEX? 50KW that can be heard over most of western Oregon and SW Washington all day long, and is still the best signal in the metro area at night.. and don't talk to me about contours, The "new" 620 signal, day and night, conforms much better to the MSA, which is what radio ratings, sales and survival are about. KEX, on a much higher frequecy, does similarly by day, but at night the protection requirements make it less viable in the metro than KPOJ on the supoerior 620 channel with a less severe pattern. I've lived in Portland most of my life, and know very well which signals are best in which areas. (the old KISN 910 was easily the worst nighttime signal in the area, and didn't come close to covering it's market at night. Still, it was, for a very long time, in the top three stations in the market, even though there were problems on many radios with IF doubling causing interference to their signal...) That was in the 60's (till Don Burden lost the license) when the metro area had a single county definition and the audience was measured by Pulse and Hooper, not Arbitron. Boy, you had to go back 5 decades to find irrelevant data on that one. First, your math sucks. Five decades ago, I was 3 years old, and could not have possibly cared less about radio. Next, KISN was #1-3 in the market during the early to mid 1970's, when Star Broadcasting held the license, before they started doing what Faux News, Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity do freely and openly nowadays, and lost ALL their licenses. |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
"Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... That was in the 60's (till Don Burden lost the license) when the metro area had a single county definition and the audience was measured by Pulse and Hooper, not Arbitron. Boy, you had to go back 5 decades to find irrelevant data on that one. First, your math sucks. Five decades ago, I was 3 years old, and could not have possibly cared less about radio. Next, KISN was #1-3 in the market during the early to mid 1970's, when Star Broadcasting held the license, before they started doing what Faux News, Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity do freely and openly nowadays, and lost ALL their licenses. KISN lost its license over bribing and ex parte contact with a Senator, along with Burden's Indianapolis and Omaha AMs along with two FMs. While the final decision was in 1975, the stations had all been on the decline since the proceedings began some five years earlier; the Indianapolis station had never received a full 3-year renewal since Burden bought it in 1963 due to other FCC transgressions. Oh, of course the famous "lack of candor" hastened the 5-station revocations. "Star" was Burden, 100%. He had no other shareholders. Like most stations, KISN was held by a corporation for liability purposes and in this case Burden was sole owner. In the "mid 70's" year of 1975, where I have full ratings, KISN was 9th for the full year average. It was certainly not #1 to #3 anywhere in "The mid 70's" as by 1977 more than half the shares were on FM, and in younger demos, nearly all the shares. In any case, Fox News and Limbaugh and Hannity have not even been accused of bribing and engaging in illegal ex parte discussions with congresspersons... the reason Burden lost his licenses. From every indication, he was a real piece of work and a testimony to why consolidation is good for radio. In any case, what killed the station more than anything else was the expansion of the metro to areas the signal did not cover. |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
"David Eduardo" wrote in message ... In any case, what killed the station more than anything else was the expansion of the metro to areas the signal did not cover. As I said previously, it didn't cover most of the metro from the get-go. It's nighttime pattern gave it a great signal right up along the Columbia, but by the time you were 30-40 blocks south of the river, the signal was poor, and, as I also stated earlier, there was a problem with IF doubling in a lot of radios that caused a heterodyne in their signal, mostly at night when it was poorer than daytime. One of the primary reasons for loss of license was violations (lots of them) of the Fairness Doctrine. They were in the tank for several politicians on various levels, and pushed those politicians' agendas on the air and behind closed doors. Kind of funny, that you would never hear about any of this on the radio or TV.. only in the newspapers. You would think that something like that would have been all over the competitions' news programs. KGW and KISN were in a toe-to-toe slugging match for a long while. KGW had their own signal problems... in some parts of their pattern, they had a nice hum in the carrier. The two stations sort of complimented each other. KISN had their beam to the west, KGW had theirs to the south. Ironically, I think the two plants share the original 910 antenna system now. KGW used to have theirs in a nice open rather swampy area, which definately helped their local coverage. KISN put in a good signal on the coast (Astoria, Seaside) due to their pattern. |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
"Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... "David Eduardo" wrote in message ... In any case, what killed the station more than anything else was the expansion of the metro to areas the signal did not cover. As I said previously, it didn't cover most of the metro from the get-go. It's nighttime pattern gave it a great signal right up along the Columbia, but by the time you were 30-40 blocks south of the river, the signal was poor, And the market was not even the whole county in Pulse or Hooper. One of the primary reasons for loss of license was violations (lots of them) of the Fairness Doctrine. They were in the tank for several politicians on various levels, and pushed those politicians' agendas on the air and behind closed doors. That's not true. The biggest infraction was bribing a congressman and ex parte dealing with several others. In addition, the news on the Burden stations was slanted to favor candidates and politicians who Burden favored via clever writing. This was not "Fairness" at all but slanting the news; Fairness requires equal time... slanting the news falsely was considered then a character qualification. Today, it's irrelevant. But the big issue was the bribing and ex parte stuff, the same things that did in Channel 7 in Miaami and one of the Orlando TV's at the same time. |
(OT) : Mike - What is this Fixation of Yours with HomosexualActivities ?
On Jul 26, 7:54*am, m II wrote:
- - RHF wrote: - - mike - *it sure does appear that you have a 'problem' - - as reflected by the content of many of your posts ~ RHF - You seem to think *I* have a problem when I quote - other postings. - Why don't you complain about the original messages? - Do you think there's ANY possibility of the problem being - with THOSE people? Mike - Fact did DX Ace write "homosexual love triangle" NO -but- now you are implying or claiming that he did. -translation- You Got A Problem. Mike - Fact did DX Ace write "homosexual murder" NO -but- now you are implying or claiming that he did. -translation- You Got A Problem. your words are your reality ~ RHF |
(OT) : Mike - What is this Fixation of Yours with HomosexualActivities ?
RHF wrote:
Mike - Fact did DX Ace write "homosexual love triangle" NO -but- now you are implying or claiming that he did. -translation- You Got A Problem. It would appear you have a reading comprehension problem. His exact words we =================================== Unfortunately, a good number of years ago, he and another of his cronies killed two individuals whom were apparently involved in some kind of 'love triangle'. =================================== Would you like to see his entire posting? mike -- Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage, this filter blocks all postings with a Gmail, Google Mail, Google Groups or HOTMAIL address. It also filters everything from a .cn server. http://improve-usenet.org/ |
(OT) : Mike - What is this Fixation of Yours with HomosexualActivities ?
On Jul 27, 10:31*pm, m II wrote:
RHF wrote: Mike - Fact did DX Ace write "homosexual love triangle" NO -but- now you are implying or claiming that he did. -translation- You Got A Problem. It would appear you have a reading comprehension problem. His exact words we =================================== Unfortunately, a good number of years ago, he and another of his cronies killed two individuals whom were apparently involved in some kind of 'love triangle'. =================================== Would you like to see his entire posting? mike What May have been written 'a good number of years ago' may be true or not . . . But Clearly Today -mike- You Got A Problem ! |
(OT) : Mike - What is this Fixation of Yours withHomosexualActivities ?
m II wrote: RHF wrote: Mike - Fact did DX Ace write "homosexual love triangle" NO -but- now you are implying or claiming that he did. -translation- You Got A Problem. It would appear you have a reading comprehension problem. His exact words we =================================== Unfortunately, a good number of years ago, he and another of his cronies killed two individuals whom were apparently involved in some kind of 'love triangle'. =================================== Best you grab that shine box, you mentally ill little boy, and get busy! |
(OT) : Mike - What is this Fixation of Yours with HomosexualActivities ?
RHF wrote:
On Jul 27, 10:31 pm, m II wrote: RHF wrote: Mike - Fact did DX Ace write "homosexual love triangle" NO -but- now you are implying or claiming that he did. -translation- You Got A Problem. It would appear you have a reading comprehension problem. His exact words we =================================== Unfortunately, a good number of years ago, he and another of his cronies killed two individuals whom were apparently involved in some kind of 'love triangle'. =================================== What May have been written 'a good number of years ago' may be true or not . . . But Clearly Today -mike- You Got A Problem ! Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:28:28 is NOT a good number of years ago. **-------- Original Message -------- From: - Mon Jul 21 20:47:42 2008 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:28:28 -0400 From: dxAce Organization: "The Listener At The Gates Of Dawn" X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.234.120.49 m II wrote: dxAce wrote: m II wrote: dxAcehole, America's Finest, wrote: RHF, I gotta laugh because my first reaction was the same as yours regarding the 'fecal matter'. It's MALE fecal matter. Aroused yet? No, but I'm certain that you are, dumbass! Speaking of your homosexual tendencies, may I present a blast from your sordid past? dxAce's invitations for some 'Mutual Respect': ======================================= Jerking off not enough for you, boy? Do you spit or swallow? Very tasty! Actually, I know quite a few homosexuals. Ya know, I knew one years ago, and at the time he was kinda suspect. Unfortunately, a good number of years ago, he and another of his cronies killed two individuals whom were apparently involved in some kind of 'love triangle'. The interesting thing is that one of the guys was a Canadian citizen (one who was killed) who volunteered during the Vietnam War as a medic with (I think) the US Army. Fortunately, he, and the other guy, were convicted in the past few weeks, after a 'cold case investigation' had been re-opened, and apparently sentenced to spend the rest of their lives in prison. ==================================== RHF, your reading comprehension and MEMORY are failing. The "Ace' posted this exactly ONE WEEK ago. You should remember, he was replying to YOU. mike -- Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage, this filter blocks all postings with a Gmail, Google Mail, Google Groups or HOTMAIL address. It also filters everything from a .cn server. http://improve-usenet.org/ |
(OT) : Mike - What is this Fixation of Yours withHomosexualActivities ?
m II wrote: RHF wrote: On Jul 27, 10:31 pm, m II wrote: RHF wrote: Mike - Fact did DX Ace write "homosexual love triangle" NO -but- now you are implying or claiming that he did. -translation- You Got A Problem. It would appear you have a reading comprehension problem. His exact words we =================================== Unfortunately, a good number of years ago, he and another of his cronies killed two individuals whom were apparently involved in some kind of 'love triangle'. =================================== What May have been written 'a good number of years ago' may be true or not . . . But Clearly Today -mike- You Got A Problem ! Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:28:28 is NOT a good number of years ago. **-------- Original Message -------- From: - Mon Jul 21 20:47:42 2008 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:28:28 -0400 From: dxAce Organization: "The Listener At The Gates Of Dawn" X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.234.120.49 m II wrote: dxAce wrote: m II wrote: dxAcehole, America's Finest, wrote: RHF, I gotta laugh because my first reaction was the same as yours regarding the 'fecal matter'. It's MALE fecal matter. Aroused yet? No, but I'm certain that you are, dumbass! Speaking of your homosexual tendencies, may I present a blast from your sordid past? dxAce's invitations for some 'Mutual Respect': ======================================= Jerking off not enough for you, boy? Do you spit or swallow? Very tasty! Actually, I know quite a few homosexuals. Ya know, I knew one years ago, and at the time he was kinda suspect. Unfortunately, a good number of years ago, he and another of his cronies killed two individuals whom were apparently involved in some kind of 'love triangle'. The interesting thing is that one of the guys was a Canadian citizen (one who was killed) who volunteered during the Vietnam War as a medic with (I think) the US Army. Fortunately, he, and the other guy, were convicted in the past few weeks, after a 'cold case investigation' had been re-opened, and apparently sentenced to spend the rest of their lives in prison. ==================================== RHF, your reading comprehension and MEMORY are failing. The "Ace' posted this exactly ONE WEEK ago. You should remember, he was replying to YOU. Mike, best you grab that shine box, like the mentally ill little boy you are, and hit the street and make something of yourself! And by the way, it seems as though Health CanaDuh is shorting you on your meds. |
(OT) : Mike - What is this Fixation of Yours with HomosexualActivities ?
On Jul 28, 6:48*am, m II wrote:
RHF wrote: On Jul 27, 10:31 pm, m II wrote: RHF wrote: Mike - Fact did DX Ace write "homosexual love triangle" NO -but- now you are implying or claiming that he did. -translation- You Got A Problem. It would appear you have a reading comprehension problem. His exact words we Mike -wrote- - - - =================================== - - - Unfortunately, a good number of years ago, - - - he and another of his cronies - - - killed two individuals whom were apparently - - - involved in some kind of 'love triangle'. - - - =================================== RHF -wrote- {Quoting Mike} - - What May have been written 'a good number - - of years ago' may be true or not . . . - - - - But Clearly Today -mike- You Got A Problem ! Mike -then wrote- - Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:28:28 is NOT a good number of years ago. -note- Attempting to 'correct' RHF. MEANING THAT MIKE'S FIRST STATEMENT WAS A LIE [.] Once Again : Clearly Today -mike- You Got A Problem ! Mike - What is this Fixation of Yours with Homosexual Activities ? |
(OT) : Mike - What is this Fixation of Yours with HomosexualActivities ?
RHF wrote:
MEANING THAT MIKE'S FIRST STATEMENT WAS A LIE [.] You really should learn how to read. No amount of obfuscation on your part will change what's been written. Mike - What is this Fixation of Yours with Homosexual Activities ? I don't like perverts soliciting sex on this newsgroup. One of them even put his phone number here, probably in reference to his depraved lust for fellatio. Care to see his solicitations? mike -- Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage, this filter blocks all postings with a Gmail, Google Mail, Google Groups or HOTMAIL address. It also filters everything from a .cn server. http://improve-usenet.org/ |
(OT) : Mike - What is this Fixation of Yours with HomosexualActivities ?
On Jul 28, 8:16*am, m II wrote:
RHF wrote: MEANING THAT MIKE'S FIRST STATEMENT WAS A LIE [.] You really should learn how to read. No amount of obfuscation on your part will change what's been written. - - Mike - What is this Fixation of Yours with Homosexual Activities ? - I don't like perverts soliciting sex on this newsgroup. - One of them even put his phone number here, probably - in reference to his depraved lust for fellatio. - - Care to see his solicitations? - - mike Mike -no- That would make you a 'pimp'. ~ RHF |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:37 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com