![]() |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
|
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
In article ,
Dave wrote: D Peter Maus wrote: m II wrote: D Peter Maus wrote: Subject: Wild Pigs Of course none of this movement to totalitarianism has happened in the last seven and a half years. The Patriot act is merely for your own good. mike You keep forgetting how many times Bill Clinton tried to pass the Patriot Act. And how many times the Republican Congress blocked him. Or that Projects Echelon and Carnivore were built during his administration. The (not even) Patriot Act is a hodge-podge of fascist dreams that has been kicking around for decades. Clinton is no benchmark of virtue; why do you worship him so? Looks like it's time for another bowl of stupid for you. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
In article ,
Dave wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , Dave wrote: On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:41:29 -0400, dxAce wrote: Interesting that no one's talking about that pile of Saddam's 'fictional' yellowcake that ended up in Canada. Yeah via D{e@o G@r(}a , that place that should not be mentioned. A pile of ore is not a weapon. It is not a gathering threat. http://www.dg.navy.mil/web/ http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...ego-garcia.htm Really? What about the illness it caused in Iraq? The illness caused when we left the stockpile unguarded and the locals dumped the powder out and reused the barrels for drinking water? Tragic. The first part is a hallucination. You got the second part right. That's an improvement for you being about 50% right instead of the usual 0%. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
(OT) : D'Oh ! The Global Warning Mantra - Say It Ten Times in a Row -and- You Are Full of Hot Air.
|
Dave -proclaims- There Is No Shortwage of Crude Oil
In article ,
Dave wrote: On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:47:07 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote: http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/01/2...-could-dry-up- nuclear- power-plants-in-southeast/ http://drought.unl.edu/dm/monitor.html You come help replace the burned out sump pump in my basement, and I'll listen to your noise about drought. Your basement is not the rest of the USA, nor the world. Neither is the inside of your drug addled head. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Dave -proclaims- There Is No Shortwage of Crude Oil
In article ,
Dave wrote: D Peter Maus wrote: "Nuclear" has been a dirty word since the movie 'The China Syndrome,' a film often pointed to as a reference in debates where nuclear plants were to be constructed. As a population, most of what is 'understood' about nuclear energy production comes from that film. Three Mile Island was the horror it was BECAUSE of the The China Syndrome, when in fact, though a meltdown had occurred--some 8 feet of reactor core was lost--the systems did precisely what they were supposed to do, and shut the reactor down. Odd, no one ever talks about THAT. The problem is not the ignorant 'drill happy' folks. The problem is the ignorant uneducated folks attempting to create a panic based on short sight, and snapshot focus on a very narrow picture of global events. And an overall suppression of understanding of energy production by so-called professionals in education. Nuclear plants need lots of water. Many installed nukes are running on low power now due to water shortage. Wrong. We need to consume less and not allow the rest of the world to become the oinkers that we already are. A few years of economic depression will do wonders for speeding that along. You are a sick puppy. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
(OT) : Islam-O-Facist "Dirty Bomb" Terrorist Projects Continue . . .
In article ,
Dave wrote: SNIP Total bull****. Grow a pair. The first is what your brain is made of and the second is something you can't fathom. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
In article lHshk.88743$kx.1730@pd7urf3no, John Barnard
wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , Dave wrote: On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:41:29 -0400, dxAce wrote: Interesting that no one's talking about that pile of Saddam's 'fictional' yellowcake that ended up in Canada. Yeah via D{e@o G@r(}a , that place that should not be mentioned. A pile of ore is not a weapon. It is not a gathering threat. http://www.dg.navy.mil/web/ http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...ego-garcia.htm Really? What about the illness it caused in Iraq? No metal, Now, now, it is the DU weapons used by the US military in Iraq which caused the illnesses. Wrong. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
In article oKshk.23629$nD.2259@pd7urf1no, John Barnard
wrote: Telamon wrote: In article DObhk.877$nu6.761@edtnps83, m II wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , Dave wrote: On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:41:29 -0400, dxAce wrote: Interesting that no one's talking about that pile of Saddam's 'fictional' yellowcake that ended up in Canada. Yeah via D{e@o G@r(}a , that place that should not be mentioned. A pile of ore is not a weapon. It is not a gathering threat. http://www.dg.navy.mil/web/ http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...ego-garcia.htm Really? What about the illness it caused in Iraq? Ten thousand Gulf war vets dead. DU played a big role. SNIP The yellow cake is far worse so you had better get that HAZMAT suit on. Yawn. Aren't you tired of fear-mongering yet? Yellow cake may be worse but it is far more difficult to get let alone process. Go Team Fear! Thanks for making my point on what is more dangerous. It was easy to get. It was sitting in barrels or was dumped on the ground. Go team retard. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
In article FPshk.23634$nD.18998@pd7urf1no,
John Barnard wrote: m II wrote: Telamon wrote: Think of this at Dinner time, ok? SNIP I'm not going to look at it because coming from you I'm sure it's something disgusting. Yes it is. The US army did it. With your money. http://www.uruknet.info/uruknet-images/290706du2.jpg Don't you want to make sure you're getting your money's worth? It's too difficult to reason with these morons. After all, if they treat their own countrymen in so expendable a fashion they won't hesitate to treat anyone else in the same manner. Such is the way of those who are morally nihilistic... Oh yeah baby you be the voice of reason... NOT! What an idiot. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
Dave wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:48:45 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote: No search engine necessary. I've told you. But you have to actually have read it to understand. Go back and read what I wrote. It's there. You are a Pavlovian drone, thanks to your uncritical gluttony of junk media. You don't read so good, do you. |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote: On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:48:45 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote: No search engine necessary. I've told you. But you have to actually have read it to understand. Go back and read what I wrote. It's there. You are a Pavlovian drone, thanks to your uncritical gluttony of junk media. You don't read so good, do you. I read well, thanks. I tend not to believe anything that Citadel Broadcasting spews my way. Misters Hannity and Limbaugh do not serve the American middle class's best interests; they promote a fascist agenda and are a direct threat to the continuation of representative government. Their lies go unchallenged and this is why the Fairness Doctrine was a brilliant idea. |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote: Dave wrote: On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:48:45 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote: No search engine necessary. I've told you. But you have to actually have read it to understand. Go back and read what I wrote. It's there. You are a Pavlovian drone, thanks to your uncritical gluttony of junk media. You don't read so good, do you. I read well, thanks. I tend not to believe anything that Citadel Broadcasting spews my way. Misters Hannity and Limbaugh do not serve the American middle class's best interests; they promote a fascist agenda and are a direct threat to the continuation of representative government. Their lies go unchallenged and this is why the Fairness Doctrine was a brilliant idea. You apparently don't listen so good, either. |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
Dave wrote:
Misters Hannity and Limbaugh do not serve the American middle class's best interests; they promote a fascist agenda and are a direct threat to the continuation of representative government. Their lies go unchallenged and this is why the Fairness Doctrine was a brilliant idea. Because, as we all know, only Republicans lie. |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
D Peter Maus wrote:
Because, as we all know, only Republicans lie. I've known that for years. It's a rule of Grammar. Bush Lies, Clinton lays. or was it lie on the couch, lay the carpet down.... mike -- Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage, this filter blocks all postings with a Gmail, Google Mail, Google Groups or HOTMAIL address. It also filters everything from a .cn server. http://improve-usenet.org/ |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:24:11 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote: Misters Hannity and Limbaugh do not serve the American middle class's best interests; they promote a fascist agenda and are a direct threat to the continuation of representative government. Their lies go unchallenged and this is why the Fairness Doctrine was a brilliant idea. Because, as we all know, only Republicans lie. You said it, I didn't. I wasn't talking about political parties, I was talking about corporations using a public resource to promote a markedly antisocial agenda. |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
Dave wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:24:11 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote: Dave wrote: Misters Hannity and Limbaugh do not serve the American middle class's best interests; they promote a fascist agenda and are a direct threat to the continuation of representative government. Their lies go unchallenged and this is why the Fairness Doctrine was a brilliant idea. Because, as we all know, only Republicans lie. You said it, I didn't. I wasn't talking about political parties, I was talking about corporations using a public resource to promote a markedly antisocial agenda. No, actually, you were talking about nothing of the kind. You were on your usual rant. And that's all it is. A rant. I notice you've not once commented on anything Randi Rhodes has said. Never called Tom Daschle or Harry Reid a liar. You just make the same lock step noise about corporate evil, right wing fascism, and the end of the Republic. To borrow a signature from a member of another newsgroup I frequent: You are like an uninvited guest at a picnic, who insists the potato salad may have gone bad. |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:45:52 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote:
No, actually, you were talking about nothing of the kind. You were on your usual rant. And that's all it is. A rant. I notice you've not once commented on anything Randi Rhodes has said. Never called Tom Daschle or Harry Reid a liar. You just make the same lock step noise about corporate evil, right wing fascism, and the end of the Republic. To borrow a signature from a member of another newsgroup I frequent: You are like an uninvited guest at a picnic, who insists the potato salad may have gone bad. You seem to hang with a lot of grouchy people. Randi Rhodes isn't trying to destroy the middle class, so she doesn't bother me so much. A corporation cannot be evil; that is a personal attribute. Corporations do what politicians and courts allow them to do. People elect politicians to represent their best interests. The news media is supposed to also represent the people, and keep the politicians under close scrutiny. This is a basic tenet of Jeffersonian Democracy. As that function has broken down, the Republic is doomed. The media are nothing but cheerleaders for Daddy Warbucks, |
(OT) : Dave - Take a 'look' in a Mirror.
On Jul 23, 3:49*pm, Dave wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:45:52 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote: * *No, actually, you were talking about nothing of the kind. You were on your usual rant. * *And that's all it is. A rant. * *I notice you've not once commented on anything Randi Rhodes has said. Never called Tom Daschle or Harry Reid a liar. * *You just make the same lock step noise about corporate evil, right wing fascism, and the end of the Republic. * *To borrow a signature from a member of another newsgroup I frequent: * *You are like an uninvited guest at a picnic, who insists the potato salad may have gone bad. - You seem to hang with a lot of grouchy people. Dave - Take a 'look' in a Mirror. - Randi Rhodes isn't trying to destroy the middle class, - so she doesn't bother me so much. Dave - If this is a Fact Prove It - Oops You Can't . -cause- It's just your opinion. -*A corporation cannot be evil; that is a personal attribute. -*Corporations do what politicians and courts allow them - to do. *People elect politicians to represent their best - interests. Dave - If this is a Fact Prove It - Oops You Can't . -cause- It's just your opinion. -*The news media is supposed to also represent the - people, and keep the politicians under close scrutiny. Barack Hussein Obama II has the the Liberal TV Networks in his Pockets LF=ABC; RF=CBS; RR=NBC; LR=PBS The News is so politically distorted as to un-real. -*This is a basic tenet of Jeffersonian Democracy. Just One of Many Tenets of Jeffersonian Democracy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffersonian_Democracy - As that function has broken down, Yeah Something is sure broken. - the Republic is doomed. * To follow the National Socialist path of the Democrat Party of the USA. - The media are nothing but cheerleaders for Daddy Warbucks, Never heard Barack Hussein Obama II called Daddy Warbucks before. hey this is how i 'feel' and these are my opinions with no claim to being right or factual accuracy ~ RHF |
(OT) : Dave - Take a 'look' in a Mirror.
Adibotic (or whatever they call it) oil? Some people say that oil is
created by Earth's Magma, something like that, and Earth will never run out of oil.I don't know.I say make oil out of all of the politicians and that will solve the energy problems. cuhulin |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
Telamon wrote:
In article oKshk.23629$nD.2259@pd7urf1no, John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article DObhk.877$nu6.761@edtnps83, m II wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , Dave wrote: On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:41:29 -0400, dxAce wrote: Interesting that no one's talking about that pile of Saddam's 'fictional' yellowcake that ended up in Canada. Yeah via D{e@o G@r(}a , that place that should not be mentioned. A pile of ore is not a weapon. It is not a gathering threat. http://www.dg.navy.mil/web/ http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...ego-garcia.htm Really? What about the illness it caused in Iraq? Ten thousand Gulf war vets dead. DU played a big role. SNIP The yellow cake is far worse so you had better get that HAZMAT suit on. Yawn. Aren't you tired of fear-mongering yet? Yellow cake may be worse but it is far more difficult to get let alone process. Go Team Fear! Thanks for making my point on what is more dangerous. It was easy to get. It was sitting in barrels or was dumped on the ground. Go team retard. I'm sure that team retard welcomes your membership! A few questions for you: How do you know it was easy to get? Were you there to watch the shipments come in? How much was there? Did it take days, weeks, months or years for it to come in? If you had 25 000 tons of yellowcake, you could isolate about 50 tons of uranium metal. Uranium metal is 99.3% U-238 and U-235. From 50 tons you could isolate 0.35 tons of U-235 (this equals 700 lbs). For a gun-type fission weapon ("Little Boy" was a gun-type weapon), you need 110 lbs of U-235. All of this assumes that you have 100% extraction efficiency. But wait! You need to have extremely sophisticated facilities to separate out U-235 from the other isotopes! So where were these facilities to isolate the U-235??? Lay off the assumptions - it'll make you less of an idiot! JB |
(OT) : The Baracking-Up of Iraq
RHF wrote:
On Jul 22, 3:05 pm, John Barnard wrote: RHF wrote: On Jul 22, 5:58 am, Dave wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , Dave wrote: On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:41:29 -0400, dxAce wrote: Interesting that no one's talking about that pile of Saddam's 'fictional' yellowcake that ended up in Canada. Yeah via D{e@o G@r(}a , that place that should not be mentioned. A pile of ore is not a weapon. It is not a gathering threat. http://www.dg.navy.mil/web/ http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...ego-garcia.htm Really? What about the illness it caused in Iraq? - The illness caused when we left the stockpile unguarded - and the locals dumped the powder out and reused the - barrels for drinking water? Tragic. Dave so we are responsible for the Problems cause by Saddam Hussein's Government ? tragically you are wrong on this one too ~ RHF . - Don't you often say that you "broke" Iraq and - now must fix it? You broke it, you buy it - including all the problems with it. - - JB JB - Saddam Hussein's Government's Mess is the 'responsibility' of the new Iraqi Government. We 'fixed' it allright by sending the Yellow Cake to Canada : Thus We Un-Broke-It ! I am sure that US President Barack Hussein Obama II will Barack-Us-Out of Iraq PDQ (OT) : The Baracking-Up of Iraq Michelle LVR Obama -says- Let Them Eat Yellow Cake ! . Are you sure that your name isn't McCain II? You seem to be mixing up many things! JB |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
Telamon wrote:
In article lHshk.88743$kx.1730@pd7urf3no, John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , Dave wrote: On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:41:29 -0400, dxAce wrote: Interesting that no one's talking about that pile of Saddam's 'fictional' yellowcake that ended up in Canada. Yeah via D{e@o G@r(}a , that place that should not be mentioned. A pile of ore is not a weapon. It is not a gathering threat. http://www.dg.navy.mil/web/ http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...ego-garcia.htm Really? What about the illness it caused in Iraq? No metal, Now, now, it is the DU weapons used by the US military in Iraq which caused the illnesses. Wrong. Yes, yes, we know you are wrong. But that is the first step to admitting that you have a big problem. JB |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
Dave wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:45:52 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote: No, actually, you were talking about nothing of the kind. You were on your usual rant. And that's all it is. A rant. I notice you've not once commented on anything Randi Rhodes has said. Never called Tom Daschle or Harry Reid a liar. You just make the same lock step noise about corporate evil, right wing fascism, and the end of the Republic. To borrow a signature from a member of another newsgroup I frequent: You are like an uninvited guest at a picnic, who insists the potato salad may have gone bad. You seem to hang with a lot of grouchy people. Randi Rhodes isn't trying to destroy the middle class, so she doesn't bother me so much. A corporation cannot be evil; that is a personal attribute. Corporations do what politicians and courts allow them to do. People elect politicians to represent their best interests. The news media is supposed to also represent the people, and keep the politicians under close scrutiny. This is a basic tenet of Jeffersonian Democracy. As that function has broken down, the Republic is doomed. The media are nothing but cheerleaders for Daddy Warbucks, Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week? This is Daddy Warbucks? |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
On Jul 24, 11:19*pm, D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote: On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:45:52 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote: * *No, actually, you were talking about nothing of the kind. You were on your usual rant. * *And that's all it is. A rant. * *I notice you've not once commented on anything Randi Rhodes has said. Never called Tom Daschle or Harry Reid a liar. * *You just make the same lock step noise about corporate evil, right wing fascism, and the end of the Republic. * *To borrow a signature from a member of another newsgroup I frequent: * *You are like an uninvited guest at a picnic, who insists the potato salad may have gone bad. You seem to hang with a lot of grouchy people. Randi Rhodes isn't trying to destroy the middle class, so she doesn't bother me so much. *A corporation cannot be evil; *that is a personal attribute. *Corporations do what politicians and courts allow them to do. *People elect politicians to represent their best interests. *The news media is supposed to also represent the people, *and keep the politicians under close scrutiny. *This is a basic tenet of Jeffersonian Democracy. *As that function has broken down, the Republic is doomed. * The media are nothing but cheerleaders for Daddy Warbucks, -*Have you been paying attention to the coverage - of Obama this week? - This is Daddy Warbucks? Now that Obama Says It . . . It Must Be So ! [ The World According to Barack Hussein Obama II ] The Faithful Follow the Great Citizen of the World ~ RHF |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
RHF wrote:
Now that Obama Says It . . . It Must Be So ! [ The World According to Barack Hussein Obama II ] The Faithful Follow the Great Citizen of the World ~ RHF I thought you wanted us to be #1 in something besides killing. |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
D Peter Maus wrote:
Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week? This is Daddy Warbucks? How about CBS editing out major McCain foreign policy gaffe a couple days ago? WTF is that about? |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
Dave wrote: D Peter Maus wrote: Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week? This is Daddy Warbucks? That is ratings-driven infotainment. People can't take their eyes off him. Let's face it, Mr. McCain doesn't really ooze charisma. The subject however is the lack of diverse opinions on the talk radio and the distorted impression of what is mainstream opinion that distortion creates. The problem is, for whatever reason, *Liberal* talk radio can't seem to find a loyal enough listener base that would encourage advertisers, so therefore they either fail, or on a limited number of outlets. It would seem to me that advertisers don't really care what political persuasion buyers of their product(s) are as long as their money is green. |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote: Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week? This is Daddy Warbucks? That is ratings-driven infotainment. People can't take their eyes off him. Let's face it, Mr. McCain doesn't really ooze charisma. The subject however is the lack of diverse opinions on the talk radio and the distorted impression of what is mainstream opinion that distortion creates. Ah. So, only talk radio need be balanced. Got it. |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote: Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week? This is Daddy Warbucks? How about CBS editing out major McCain foreign policy gaffe a couple days ago? WTF is that about? What are you complaining about...I thought the problem was only talk radio. Make up your mind, Buckwheat. |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... Dave wrote: D Peter Maus wrote: Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week? This is Daddy Warbucks? That is ratings-driven infotainment. People can't take their eyes off him. Let's face it, Mr. McCain doesn't really ooze charisma. The subject however is the lack of diverse opinions on the talk radio and the distorted impression of what is mainstream opinion that distortion creates. Ah. So, only talk radio need be balanced. Got it. Balance has nothing to do with it. Their goal is to stifle free speech. Conservative speech that is. They can't succeed in the open market so they need Congress to do it for them. |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
"Dave" wrote in message ... D Peter Maus wrote: Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week? This is Daddy Warbucks? How about CBS editing out major McCain foreign policy gaffe a couple days ago? WTF is that about? How about the MSM editing out ALL of Obamas numerous gaffes? |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
dxAce wrote:
Dave wrote: D Peter Maus wrote: Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week? This is Daddy Warbucks? That is ratings-driven infotainment. People can't take their eyes off him. Let's face it, Mr. McCain doesn't really ooze charisma. The subject however is the lack of diverse opinions on the talk radio and the distorted impression of what is mainstream opinion that distortion creates. The problem is, for whatever reason, *Liberal* talk radio can't seem to find a loyal enough listener base that would encourage advertisers, so therefore they either fail, or on a limited number of outlets. It would seem to me that advertisers don't really care what political persuasion buyers of their product(s) are as long as their money is green. Perhaps that's because the format is often on weaker stations with ****ty signals, vs. the righties being on flamethrowers. The Progressive Talk format does better on key demos in a few markets, and beats sports talk in quite a few more. |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
Dave wrote: dxAce wrote: Dave wrote: D Peter Maus wrote: Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week? This is Daddy Warbucks? That is ratings-driven infotainment. People can't take their eyes off him. Let's face it, Mr. McCain doesn't really ooze charisma. The subject however is the lack of diverse opinions on the talk radio and the distorted impression of what is mainstream opinion that distortion creates. The problem is, for whatever reason, *Liberal* talk radio can't seem to find a loyal enough listener base that would encourage advertisers, so therefore they either fail, or on a limited number of outlets. It would seem to me that advertisers don't really care what political persuasion buyers of their product(s) are as long as their money is green. Perhaps that's because the format is often on weaker stations with ****ty signals, vs. the righties being on flamethrowers. Read the above again, dumbass. |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote: D Peter Maus wrote: Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week? This is Daddy Warbucks? That is ratings-driven infotainment. People can't take their eyes off him. Let's face it, Mr. McCain doesn't really ooze charisma. The subject however is the lack of diverse opinions on the talk radio and the distorted impression of what is mainstream opinion that distortion creates. Ah. So, only talk radio need be balanced. Got it. It is a finite resource and part of the commons. It should not be used to the detriment of one part of the people while advancing the interests of a much smaller part of society. |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
MNMikeW wrote:
"Dave" wrote in message ... D Peter Maus wrote: Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week? This is Daddy Warbucks? How about CBS editing out major McCain foreign policy gaffe a couple days ago? WTF is that about? How about the MSM editing out ALL of Obamas numerous gaffes? If they are doing that how do you know about them, whatever they are? |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote: Dave wrote: D Peter Maus wrote: Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week? This is Daddy Warbucks? That is ratings-driven infotainment. People can't take their eyes off him. Let's face it, Mr. McCain doesn't really ooze charisma. The subject however is the lack of diverse opinions on the talk radio and the distorted impression of what is mainstream opinion that distortion creates. Ah. So, only talk radio need be balanced. Got it. It is a finite resource and part of the commons. It should not be used to the detriment of one part of the people while advancing the interests of a much smaller part of society. And who gets to determine that? You? If there were no lister interest, there would be no commercial support, so there would be no program. Suggesting that much smaller part of society....ain't so small. |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
Dave wrote:
MNMikeW wrote: "Dave" wrote in message ... D Peter Maus wrote: Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week? This is Daddy Warbucks? How about CBS editing out major McCain foreign policy gaffe a couple days ago? WTF is that about? How about the MSM editing out ALL of Obamas numerous gaffes? If they are doing that how do you know about them, whatever they are? And so there you do it, again...accepting without challenge the validity of sources on one side of an issue, while challenging the validity of the sources on the other side. It would seem the only difference between you and Limbaugh is that people listen to Rush. |
(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote: D Peter Maus wrote: Dave wrote: D Peter Maus wrote: Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week? This is Daddy Warbucks? That is ratings-driven infotainment. People can't take their eyes off him. Let's face it, Mr. McCain doesn't really ooze charisma. The subject however is the lack of diverse opinions on the talk radio and the distorted impression of what is mainstream opinion that distortion creates. Ah. So, only talk radio need be balanced. Got it. It is a finite resource and part of the commons. It should not be used to the detriment of one part of the people while advancing the interests of a much smaller part of society. And who gets to determine that? You? If there were no lister interest, there would be no commercial support, so there would be no program. Suggesting that much smaller part of society....ain't so small. If you think that the Limbaugh/Hannity/Savage axis represents the mainstream you are wrong. Bush enjoys the support of maybe 1 out of 4 Americans. The war is opposed by 2 out of 3. We are the mainstream; the righties are the radicals. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:57 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com