On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:56:17 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote:

Dave wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:46:51 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote:


Denial is a marvelous thing.

As is courage; as is skepticism in the face of mass hysteria; as is
wisdom.



So far, all I see from you is denial.

A lot of what I see from you is baseless criticism and a complete
unwillingness to back up anything you say with any kind of factual matter.

Dave wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:56:17 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote:

Dave wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:46:51 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote:


Denial is a marvelous thing.
As is courage; as is skepticism in the face of mass hysteria; as is
wisdom.


So far, all I see from you is denial.

A lot of what I see from you is baseless criticism and a complete
unwillingness to back up anything you say with any kind of factual matter.


The fact that I don't post links that you yourself could find using
the same search engines as I is only an indication that I choose not to
do your work for you.

If you were interested in the whole truth, you'd look them up
yourself. Just as I do.

Or to put that another way...in the words of a certain Internet founder:

"How do you say '**** You' on the internet?"

"Cite your source."

I read as much, if not more, than you do. From a variety of sources.
Left, as well as Right. And what I find most interesting, is that the
left demands citations, sources, and peer reviewed publications for
everything that the Right presents....and then proceeds to dismiss, not
the material, but the source, as uninformed, irrelevant, fascist,...pick
your adjective.

The Left, however, when presenting it's material cites few sources,
and then states that their own sources are unimpeachable, and that to
question them is to question the very existence of Truth itself.

As if the Left and only the Left has the exclusive privilege of
access to the Truth.

Global Warming is a hoax disputed by more peer reviewed scientists
every day.

"The Science is settled. The debate is over."

--Al Gore.

No less than Nancy Pelosi suggested a bill cutting off all funding
for scientists not signing on to the global warming agenda. That
educators not signing on to the global warming agenda have their tenure
revoked, and for lower level educators, their very certification to
teach revoked. Meteorologists not signing on to the global warming
agenda were to be removed from their positions, and/or removed from the
air at once.

This is not just a disagreement in philosophy, this is a United
States Congressperson specifically calling for the censoring of
opposition, by the Government.

Have you HEARD of the First Amendment?

"People can't just walk around saying what they want. There need to
be limits on Free Speech. And in an Al Gore presidency, there will be."

--Al Gore, in an interview filmed by Alexandra Pelosi
during the 2000 campaign.

Dan Rather, a well known Liberal Democrat, in a piece smearing G. W.
Bush for his service record--an issue which has been cleared up by Lt
Bush's commanding officer--asserted that his story was in fact accurate,
even though the documents presented were forgeries.

Only the sources on the Left may be considered valid. Even if proven
forgeries. All others may be dismissed with prejudice.

You know what they call that, don't you?

David?

You do know, don't you?

D Peter Maus wrote:

Dave wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:56:17 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote:

Dave wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:46:51 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote:


Denial is a marvelous thing.
As is courage; as is skepticism in the face of mass hysteria; as is
wisdom.


So far, all I see from you is denial.

A lot of what I see from you is baseless criticism and a complete
unwillingness to back up anything you say with any kind of factual matter.

The fact that I don't post links that you yourself could find using
the same search engines as I is only an indication that I choose not to
do your work for you.

If you were interested in the whole truth, you'd look them up
yourself. Just as I do.

Or to put that another way...in the words of a certain Internet founder:

"How do you say '**** You' on the internet?"

"Cite your source."

I read as much, if not more, than you do. From a variety of sources.
Left, as well as Right. And what I find most interesting, is that the
left demands citations, sources, and peer reviewed publications for
everything that the Right presents....and then proceeds to dismiss, not
the material, but the source, as uninformed, irrelevant, fascist,...pick
your adjective.

The Left, however, when presenting it's material cites few sources,
and then states that their own sources are unimpeachable, and that to
question them is to question the very existence of Truth itself.

As if the Left and only the Left has the exclusive privilege of
access to the Truth.

Global Warming is a hoax disputed by more peer reviewed scientists
every day.

"The Science is settled. The debate is over."

--Al Gore.

No less than Nancy Pelosi suggested a bill cutting off all funding
for scientists not signing on to the global warming agenda. That
educators not signing on to the global warming agenda have their tenure
revoked, and for lower level educators, their very certification to
teach revoked. Meteorologists not signing on to the global warming
agenda were to be removed from their positions, and/or removed from the
air at once.

This is not just a disagreement in philosophy, this is a United
States Congressperson specifically calling for the censoring of
opposition, by the Government.

Have you HEARD of the First Amendment?

"People can't just walk around saying what they want. There need to
be limits on Free Speech. And in an Al Gore presidency, there will be."

--Al Gore, in an interview filmed by Alexandra Pelosi
during the 2000 campaign.

Dan Rather, a well known Liberal Democrat, in a piece smearing G. W.
Bush for his service record--an issue which has been cleared up by Lt
Bush's commanding officer--asserted that his story was in fact accurate,
even though the documents presented were forgeries.

Only the sources on the Left may be considered valid. Even if proven
forgeries. All others may be dismissed with prejudice.

You know what they call that, don't you?

David?

You do know, don't you?

Unfortunately, David don't know Jack!

On Jul 21, 3:39*pm, Dave wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:56:17 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:46:51 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote:

* *Denial is a marvelous thing.

As is courage; *as is skepticism in the face of mass hysteria; *as is
wisdom.

* * * * So far, all I see from you is denial.

- A lot of what I see from you is baseless criticism
- and a complete unwillingness to back up anything
- you say with any kind of factual matter.

Ok Ok let me read it again 'factual matter' now that
is clearer.

But Dang Dave for a moment I thought that you had
written 'fecal matter' - considering the source ~ RHF

RHF wrote:

On Jul 21, 3:39 pm, Dave wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:56:17 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:46:51 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote:

Denial is a marvelous thing.

As is courage; as is skepticism in the face of mass hysteria; as is
wisdom.

So far, all I see from you is denial.

- A lot of what I see from you is baseless criticism
- and a complete unwillingness to back up anything
- you say with any kind of factual matter.

Ok Ok let me read it again 'factual matter' now that
is clearer.

But Dang Dave for a moment I thought that you had
written 'fecal matter' - considering the source ~ RHF

RHF, I gotta laugh because my first reaction was the same as yours regarding the
'fecal matter'.


.

dxAcehole, America's Finest, wrote:

RHF, I gotta laugh because my first reaction was the same as yours regarding the
'fecal matter'.

It's MALE fecal matter. Aroused yet?



mike

--
Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage,
this filter blocks all postings with a Gmail,
Google Mail, Google Groups or HOTMAIL address.
It also filters everything from a .cn server.

http://improve-usenet.org/

m II wrote:

dxAcehole, America's Finest, wrote:

RHF, I gotta laugh because my first reaction was the same as yours regarding the
'fecal matter'.

It's MALE fecal matter. Aroused yet?

No, but I'm certain that you are, dumbass!

dxAce wrote:

m II wrote:

dxAcehole, America's Finest, wrote:

RHF, I gotta laugh because my first reaction was the same as yours regarding the
'fecal matter'.
It's MALE fecal matter. Aroused yet?

No, but I'm certain that you are, dumbass!


Speaking of your homosexual tendencies, may I present a blast from your
sordid past?

dxAce's invitations for some 'Mutual Respect':
=======================================
Jerking off not enough for you, boy?

Do you spit or swallow?

Very tasty!

Actually, I know quite a few homosexuals.

I interact on at least a weekly basis with them, and surprisingly
enough, they themselves utter the words 'damn faggots' with those who
tend to step out of line.

Is that the gay place to be?

Were you the blower or the blowee?

Believe it, it's like a dream to be with you again...

If you'd like to call me, I'm here to help you until 0330 GMT at:
616 335-9762
dxAce
Michigan
USA

Ya right, suck my dick...

I know it may be hard, but as you withdraw, it will shrink away..
===============================





--
Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage,
this filter blocks all postings with a Gmail,
Google Mail, Google Groups or HOTMAIL address.
It also filters everything from a .cn server.

http://improve-usenet.org/

m II wrote:

dxAce wrote:

m II wrote:

dxAcehole, America's Finest, wrote:

RHF, I gotta laugh because my first reaction was the same as yours regarding the
'fecal matter'.
It's MALE fecal matter. Aroused yet?

No, but I'm certain that you are, dumbass!

Speaking of your homosexual tendencies, may I present a blast from your
sordid past?

dxAce's invitations for some 'Mutual Respect':
=======================================
Jerking off not enough for you, boy?

Do you spit or swallow?

Very tasty!

Actually, I know quite a few homosexuals.

Ya know, I knew one years ago, and at the time he was kinda suspect.

Unfortunately, a good number of years ago, he and another of his cronies killed two
individuals whom were apparently involved in some kind of 'love triangle'.

The interesting thing is that one of the guys was a Canadian citizen (one who was
killed) who volunteered during the Vietnam War as a medic with (I think) the US Army.

Fortunately, he, and the other guy, were convicted in the past few weeks, after a 'cold
case investigation' had been re-opened, and apparently sentenced to spend the rest of
their lives in prison.