Dave wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:45:52 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote:


No, actually, you were talking about nothing of the kind. You were on
your usual rant.

And that's all it is. A rant.

I notice you've not once commented on anything Randi Rhodes has said.
Never called Tom Daschle or Harry Reid a liar.

You just make the same lock step noise about corporate evil, right
wing fascism, and the end of the Republic.

To borrow a signature from a member of another newsgroup I frequent:

You are like an uninvited guest at a picnic, who insists the potato
salad may have gone bad.

You seem to hang with a lot of grouchy people.

Randi Rhodes isn't trying to destroy the middle class, so she doesn't
bother me so much. A corporation cannot be evil; that is a personal
attribute. Corporations do what politicians and courts allow them to
do. People elect politicians to represent their best interests. The
news media is supposed to also represent the people, and keep the
politicians under close scrutiny. This is a basic tenet of Jeffersonian
Democracy. As that function has broken down, the Republic is doomed.
The media are nothing but cheerleaders for Daddy Warbucks,


Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week?
This is Daddy Warbucks?

On Jul 24, 11:19*pm, D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:45:52 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote:

* *No, actually, you were talking about nothing of the kind. You were on
your usual rant.

* *And that's all it is. A rant.

* *I notice you've not once commented on anything Randi Rhodes has said.
Never called Tom Daschle or Harry Reid a liar.

* *You just make the same lock step noise about corporate evil, right
wing fascism, and the end of the Republic.

* *To borrow a signature from a member of another newsgroup I frequent:

* *You are like an uninvited guest at a picnic, who insists the potato
salad may have gone bad.

You seem to hang with a lot of grouchy people.

Randi Rhodes isn't trying to destroy the middle class, so she doesn't
bother me so much. *A corporation cannot be evil; *that is a personal
attribute. *Corporations do what politicians and courts allow them to
do. *People elect politicians to represent their best interests. *The
news media is supposed to also represent the people, *and keep the
politicians under close scrutiny. *This is a basic tenet of Jeffersonian
Democracy. *As that function has broken down, the Republic is doomed. *
The media are nothing but cheerleaders for Daddy Warbucks,

-*Have you been paying attention to the coverage
- of Obama this week?
- This is Daddy Warbucks?

Now that Obama Says It . . . It Must Be So !
[ The World According to Barack Hussein Obama II ]

The Faithful Follow the Great Citizen of the World ~ RHF

RHF wrote:

Now that Obama Says It . . . It Must Be So !
[ The World According to Barack Hussein Obama II ]

The Faithful Follow the Great Citizen of the World ~ RHF


I thought you wanted us to be #1 in something besides killing.

D Peter Maus wrote:

Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week?
This is Daddy Warbucks?


How about CBS editing out major McCain foreign policy gaffe a couple
days ago? WTF is that about?

Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:

Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week?
This is Daddy Warbucks?


How about CBS editing out major McCain foreign policy gaffe a couple
days ago? WTF is that about?


What are you complaining about...I thought the problem was only talk
radio.

Make up your mind, Buckwheat.

"Dave" wrote in message
...
D Peter Maus wrote:

Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week? This
is Daddy Warbucks?


How about CBS editing out major McCain foreign policy gaffe a couple days
ago? WTF is that about?

How about the MSM editing out ALL of Obamas numerous gaffes?

MNMikeW wrote:
"Dave" wrote in message
...
D Peter Maus wrote:
Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week? This
is Daddy Warbucks?

How about CBS editing out major McCain foreign policy gaffe a couple days
ago? WTF is that about?

How about the MSM editing out ALL of Obamas numerous gaffes?


If they are doing that how do you know about them, whatever they are?

Dave wrote:
MNMikeW wrote:
"Dave" wrote in message
...
D Peter Maus wrote:
Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week?
This is Daddy Warbucks?

How about CBS editing out major McCain foreign policy gaffe a couple
days ago? WTF is that about?

How about the MSM editing out ALL of Obamas numerous gaffes?

If they are doing that how do you know about them, whatever they are?



And so there you do it, again...accepting without challenge the
validity of sources on one side of an issue, while challenging the
validity of the sources on the other side.

It would seem the only difference between you and Limbaugh is that
people listen to Rush.

D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote:
MNMikeW wrote:
"Dave" wrote in message
...
D Peter Maus wrote:
Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this
week? This is Daddy Warbucks?

How about CBS editing out major McCain foreign policy gaffe a couple
days ago? WTF is that about?

How about the MSM editing out ALL of Obamas numerous gaffes?

If they are doing that how do you know about them, whatever they are?



And so there you do it, again...accepting without challenge the
validity of sources on one side of an issue, while challenging the
validity of the sources on the other side.

It would seem the only difference between you and Limbaugh is that
people listen to Rush.


There are not 2 sides to a fact.

On Jul 25, 7:47*am, Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote:
MNMikeW wrote:
"Dave" wrote in message
. com...
D Peter Maus wrote:
* Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this
week? This is Daddy Warbucks?

How about CBS editing out major McCain foreign policy gaffe a couple
days ago? *WTF is that about?

How about the MSM editing out ALL of Obamas numerous gaffes?

If they are doing that how do you know about them, whatever they are?

* And so there you do it, again...accepting without challenge the
validity of sources on one side of an issue, while challenging the
validity of the sources on the other side.

* It would seem the only difference between you and Limbaugh is that
people listen to Rush.

- There are not 2 sides to a fact.

According to DaviD - There Are Not 2 Sides To A Fact.

Actually Dave - Many Times There Are :

=Example= The Fact that 45% of Potential Voters
"Like" Barack Hussein Obama II :
* Side # 1 - 45% of Potential Voters "Like" Barack
Hussein Obama II {Good}
* Side # 2 - 55% of Potential Voters "Do Not Like" or
Could Care Less about Barack Hussein Obama II {Bad}

there are facts -and- there are facts ~ RHF