Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 4, 4:22*am, dxAce wrote:
BCBlazysusan wrote: HeySteve/RHF/Telamon- thanks for the responses. I'll try an clear up what I said earlier. I just refered to a Radio Shack antenna selection/installation and projects book. I couldn't find an actual pic of it- they have folded dipole/yagi/stacked arrays/ multi elements/log periodic/conical arrays etc. It is not a satellite dish. It is a parabolic circular shape antenna. There is no meshing or anything like that but it does resemble one (dish) just for the fact that it is in the shape of a big perfect circle. I messed up earlier and left something out of the specs. It has 24 elements with 4" spacing between each one. If the antenna was up in the air those elements are all horizontal with the longest element being the one in the middle and it's 7 1/2 ft. in length. The other elements get gradually smaller as you are going either up or down. From the bottom of the circle to the top is exactly 7 ft. in height. Coming directly from the middle of the circle straight forward are 8 smaller elements plus a little bow tie looking UHF {?} antenna. Can you picture thisSteve- RHF-Telamon? After reading up on different antennas the closest description that seems to make sense is a fringe area antenna. With this antenna being highly directional for TV- I mainly want to use it for shortwave........would I still need a rotor? I know I'd need one for TV- but it wouldn't matter for shortwave- would it? TIA for the responses- it's an awfully nice and imposing antenna not to be used. ;-) As I may have said before I used to see a lot of those, seemed to me down in Indiana. As I remember they were most likely as you said for fringe area reception. I don't really recall seeing any up here in Michigan, but they sure seemed popular down in Indiana.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Thanks Steve for your help, I'll inspect it closer to see if I can actually see a name or an old tag on it somewhere. But that ChannelMaster at least 'looks' spot-on. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|