Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Been listening to a little AM Broadcast Band “HD” radio and still
trying to figure out how iBiquity can tout it as CD quality. Considering the fact that it takes about 40 kHz bandwidth to broadcast all kinds of strange digital noises, odd warbling audio, dropouts and interference issues, false “HD” detection and switching problems. No CD system that I’ve heard sounds like that - even real cheap $15 ones. I think that if manufacturers made better radios and broadcasters would widen their AM signals you could achieve better and more consistent quality with less bother. There’s just no reason to buy one if you ask me. What I find particularly amusing is stations transmitting infomercials in iBiquity “HD” quality. Now that’s a real swell use of spectrum. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rfburns wrote:
Been listening to a little AM Broadcast Band “HD” radio and still trying to figure out how iBiquity can tout it as CD quality. Considering the fact that it takes about 40 kHz bandwidth to broadcast all kinds of strange digital noises, odd warbling audio, dropouts and interference issues, false “HD” detection and switching problems. No CD system that I’ve heard sounds like that - even real cheap $15 ones. I think that if manufacturers made better radios and broadcasters would widen their AM signals you could achieve better and more consistent quality with less bother. There’s just no reason to buy one if you ask me. What I find particularly amusing is stations transmitting infomercials in iBiquity “HD” quality. Now that’s a real swell use of spectrum. The dubious claim is that HD makes FM sound like CD and AM sound like FM. They both sound like XM on a bad day. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Dave wrote: Rfburns wrote: Been listening to a little AM Broadcast Band ³HD² radio and still trying to figure out how iBiquity can tout it as CD quality. Considering the fact that it takes about 40 kHz bandwidth to broadcast all kinds of strange digital noises, odd warbling audio, dropouts and interference issues, false ³HD² detection and switching problems. No CD system that I¹ve heard sounds like that - even real cheap $15 ones. I think that if manufacturers made better radios and broadcasters would widen their AM signals you could achieve better and more consistent quality with less bother. There¹s just no reason to buy one if you ask me. What I find particularly amusing is stations transmitting infomercials in iBiquity ³HD² quality. Now that¹s a real swell use of spectrum. The dubious claim is that HD makes FM sound like CD and AM sound like FM. They both sound like XM on a bad day. Do you have any idea what you sound like? A whack job and that's on a good day. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Telamon wrote:
In article , Dave wrote: Rfburns wrote: Been listening to a little AM Broadcast Band ³HD² radio and still trying to figure out how iBiquity can tout it as CD quality. Considering the fact that it takes about 40 kHz bandwidth to broadcast all kinds of strange digital noises, odd warbling audio, dropouts and interference issues, false ³HD² detection and switching problems. No CD system that I¹ve heard sounds like that - even real cheap $15 ones. I think that if manufacturers made better radios and broadcasters would widen their AM signals you could achieve better and more consistent quality with less bother. There¹s just no reason to buy one if you ask me. What I find particularly amusing is stations transmitting infomercials in iBiquity ³HD² quality. Now that¹s a real swell use of spectrum. The dubious claim is that HD makes FM sound like CD and AM sound like FM. They both sound like XM on a bad day. Do you have any idea what you sound like? A whack job and that's on a good day. Whack job? Who talks like that. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Dave wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , Dave wrote: Rfburns wrote: Been listening to a little AM Broadcast Band ³HD² radio and still trying to figure out how iBiquity can tout it as CD quality. Considering the fact that it takes about 40 kHz bandwidth to broadcast all kinds of strange digital noises, odd warbling audio, dropouts and interference issues, false ³HD² detection and switching problems. No CD system that I¹ve heard sounds like that - even real cheap $15 ones. I think that if manufacturers made better radios and broadcasters would widen their AM signals you could achieve better and more consistent quality with less bother. There¹s just no reason to buy one if you ask me. What I find particularly amusing is stations transmitting infomercials in iBiquity ³HD² quality. Now that¹s a real swell use of spectrum. The dubious claim is that HD makes FM sound like CD and AM sound like FM. They both sound like XM on a bad day. Do you have any idea what you sound like? A whack job and that's on a good day. Whack job? Who talks like that. You. You whack job. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Telamon wrote:
In article , Dave wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , Dave wrote: Rfburns wrote: Been listening to a little AM Broadcast Band ³HD² radio and still trying to figure out how iBiquity can tout it as CD quality. Considering the fact that it takes about 40 kHz bandwidth to broadcast all kinds of strange digital noises, odd warbling audio, dropouts and interference issues, false ³HD² detection and switching problems. No CD system that I¹ve heard sounds like that - even real cheap $15 ones. I think that if manufacturers made better radios and broadcasters would widen their AM signals you could achieve better and more consistent quality with less bother. There¹s just no reason to buy one if you ask me. What I find particularly amusing is stations transmitting infomercials in iBiquity ³HD² quality. Now that¹s a real swell use of spectrum. The dubious claim is that HD makes FM sound like CD and AM sound like FM. They both sound like XM on a bad day. Do you have any idea what you sound like? A whack job and that's on a good day. Whack job? Who talks like that. You. You whack job. You have social issues. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 4, 11:23 pm, Rfburns wrote:
Been listening to a little AM Broadcast Band “HD” radio and still trying to figure out how iBiquity can tout it as CD quality. Considering the fact that it takes about 40 kHz bandwidth to broadcast all kinds of strange digital noises, odd warbling audio, dropouts and interference issues, false “HD” detection and switching problems. No CD system that I’ve heard sounds like that - even real cheap $15 ones. I think that if manufacturers made better radios and broadcasters would widen their AM signals you could achieve better and more consistent quality with less bother. There’s just no reason to buy one if you ask me. What I find particularly amusing is stations transmitting infomercials in iBiquity “HD” quality. Now that’s a real swell use of spectrum. But the part I love the most about "HD"radio is when your listening to a non-hd station the radio switches to "HD" mode and goes silent. Now that's a cool strategy. You gotta just love the silence. You ibiquity guys are so smart. I wonder if this is one of their software tools? |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Rfburns" wrote in message news:943a3dde-145d-4ff8-b5b7- But the part I love the most about "HD"radio is when your listening to a non-hd station the radio switches to "HD" mode and goes silent. Now that's a cool strategy. On at least a dozen different HD receivers, I have never had this happen. Nor, until now in your message, have I ever heard of it happening. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 6, 3:23 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Rfburns" wrote in message news:943a3dde-145d-4ff8-b5b7- But the part I love the most about "HD"radio is when your listening to a non-hd station the radio switches to "HD" mode and goes silent. Now that's a cool strategy. On at least a dozen different HD receivers, I have never had this happen. Nor, until now in your message, have I ever heard of it happening. Well, Eduardo it happens all the time on the Sony XDR-S3HD. Which is practically being given away now because nobody wants them and places like Best Buy, etc lost their ass on them. I can't imagine why any company would want to waste anymore developmental dollars on ibiquity "HD" technology again after seeing the dismal sales and performance it produces. The other thing I like about "HD" is when the analog and digital signals are out of sync by several seconds and the signal just isn't strong enough to get an "HD" lock. It goes back and forth replaying the delayed signal over and over while it constantly switches back and forth from analog to "HD" and back to analog and then back to "HD". Over and Over. Since I live more the 20 miles from the nearest "HD" station this is pretty much the norm. It's a real treat to hear how screwed up system is and how poorly implemented the digital component is. Another thing I love seeing is when an "HD" station advertises their website on the goofy little screen so you can use your Web radio to hear them rather than their terrestrial radio signal. That’s a nice touch. Looks to me like most stations know what a bust ibiquity "HD" is. Someday, when iBiquity "HD" is just a memory of another failed technology I'll recall with fond memories what a joke it was. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 6, 4:28 pm, Rfburns wrote:
On Jul 6, 3:23 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Rfburns" wrote in message news:943a3dde-145d-4ff8-b5b7- But the part I love the most about "HD"radio is when your listening to a non-hd station the radio switches to "HD" mode and goes silent. Now that's a cool strategy. On at least a dozen different HD receivers, I have never had this happen. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Screw HD Radio iBiquity Digital | Shortwave | |||
Listen up iBiquity. I know how to get HD Radio sales up. | Shortwave | |||
iBiquity HD Radio Status | Shortwave | |||
AM is dead thanks to iBiquity and the HD Radio Alliance! | Shortwave | |||
Ibiquity/HD Radio going down the toilet? | Shortwave |