"Bob Dobbs" wrote in message
news:4872e39a.3210326@chupacabra...
Rfburns wrote:

There a millions of analog receivers that work perfectly and all but a
few deluded insiders, like yourself, are perfectly happy with the
performance of analog radio. There are hundreds of local AM stations
that serve their areas well and they are still in business and
hopefully will be for a long time.

But your type, which is controlled by greed and convinced of their
superiority, both technical and intellectual, would put them out of
business in a second if you could. You are pathetic.

He acts like a stereotypical jew
selfish inconsiderate egotistical


First, I am not Jewish, although I see nothing wrong with being a Jew.

Second, I am being realistic. There is no empirical evidence that any
significant listening to first or second adjacent AM channels inside the
contours of a local station. And AM listening is, and has been pre-HD,
declining fast. Markets like Houston have less than 10% AM listening, and
nearly all is over 55.

The fact is that there is nearly no listening to AM by people under 45,
because there are two generations of Americans who have never had a use for
AM. Same is true in many other nations of the world.

In any case, the analog AM broadcasts are not going away... HD is probably
too little and too late to save AM, but it does not really negatively affect
any real listening.

"Bart Bailey" wrote in message
...
In posted on Mon,
7 Jul 2008 23:40:43 -0400, A Brown wrote: Begin


There a millions of analog receivers that work perfectly and all but a
few deluded insiders, like yourself, are perfectly happy with the
performance of analog radio.

And they can continue to enjoy them in analog.

HD radio simply adds more functionality.

No one istaking away analog radio



Jamming other stations with fat sloppy digital sidebands
is indeed 'taking away' those other stations.

As I said, there is no empirical evidence that out of market stations were
or are being listened to in the first of second adjacent channels in the
shadow of a stronger local station.

"Dave" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:35:06 -0700, David Eduardo wrote:

All the CC stations in the LA market make lots of money. None of the CC
stations is run at a loss on purpose, although some of them lose money
due to sharper competitors or bad signals.
They ran Indie 103.1 at a loss until the FCC stopped them.

They did no such thing. Indie was run by Entravision with a JSA (joint
sales agreement) with Clear Channel so they would not have to have a
separate sales department for a station (actually, combo) that only
covers about 20% of the market.

20% if you count unoccupied dirt. Clear Channel ran it at a loss to chip
away at KROQ and to claim the widest playlists in America. JSA usually
means the bigger entity runs things.

I meant "20% of the population" which is the way people in radio think of
coverage. Cattle and rattlesnakes don't carry people meters.

David Eduardo wrote:

"Bob Dobbs" wrote in message
news:4872e39a.3210326@chupacabra...
Rfburns wrote:

There a millions of analog receivers that work perfectly and all but a
few deluded insiders, like yourself, are perfectly happy with the
performance of analog radio. There are hundreds of local AM stations
that serve their areas well and they are still in business and
hopefully will be for a long time.

But your type, which is controlled by greed and convinced of their
superiority, both technical and intellectual, would put them out of
business in a second if you could. You are pathetic.

He acts like a stereotypical jew
selfish inconsiderate egotistical


First, I am not Jewish, although I see nothing wrong with being a Jew.

You are not Hispanic either.


Second, I am being realistic.

'Eduardo', you pathetic little habitual liar. You haven't been 'realistic' since
you were about 12 years old.

David Eduardo wrote:
"Dave" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:35:06 -0700, David Eduardo wrote:

All the CC stations in the LA market make lots of money. None of the CC
stations is run at a loss on purpose, although some of them lose money
due to sharper competitors or bad signals.
They ran Indie 103.1 at a loss until the FCC stopped them.
They did no such thing. Indie was run by Entravision with a JSA (joint
sales agreement) with Clear Channel so they would not have to have a
separate sales department for a station (actually, combo) that only
covers about 20% of the market.

20% if you count unoccupied dirt. Clear Channel ran it at a loss to chip
away at KROQ and to claim the widest playlists in America. JSA usually
means the bigger entity runs things.

I meant "20% of the population" which is the way people in radio think of
coverage. Cattle and rattlesnakes don't carry people meters.




You may want to rethink the rattlesnakes.

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Don't forget that his mama kicked him out of Cleveland because he was an
embarrassment to her and her socialite pretensions.

Teens are not kicked out of anything but high school.

http://www.davidgleason.com/1946_Family.htm

A person who gets a front page obit in a top-15 circulation daily does not
have "pretentions" to anything... they are already recognized community
leaders, not "socialites."

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Don't forget that his mama kicked him out of Cleveland because he was an
embarrassment to her and her socialite pretensions.

Teens are not kicked out of anything but high school.

http://www.davidgleason.com/1946_Family.htm

A person who gets a front page obit in a top-15 circulation daily does not
have "pretentions" to anything... they are already recognized community
leaders, not "socialites."

So? She did get you to hit the road so as to not be an embarrassment, did she
not?

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Don't forget that his mama kicked him out of Cleveland because he was an
embarrassment to her and her socialite pretensions.

Teens are not kicked out of anything but high school.

http://www.davidgleason.com/1946_Family.htm

A person who gets a front page obit in a top-15 circulation daily does not
have "pretentions" to anything... they are already recognized community
leaders, not "socialites."

Are you really certain that the Plain Dealer put obits on the front page? I'll
have to check that out as well!

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Don't forget that his mama kicked him out of Cleveland because he was
an
embarrassment to her and her socialite pretensions.

Teens are not kicked out of anything but high school.

http://www.davidgleason.com/1946_Family.htm

A person who gets a front page obit in a top-15 circulation daily does
not
have "pretentions" to anything... they are already recognized community
leaders, not "socialites."

So? She did get you to hit the road so as to not be an embarrassment, did
she
not?

No, that was my decision and desire... I was bored and suffering in school
in the US, and wanted to do something different.

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Don't forget that his mama kicked him out of Cleveland because he was
an
embarrassment to her and her socialite pretensions.

Teens are not kicked out of anything but high school.

http://www.davidgleason.com/1946_Family.htm

A person who gets a front page obit in a top-15 circulation daily does
not
have "pretentions" to anything... they are already recognized community
leaders, not "socialites."

Are you really certain that the Plain Dealer put obits on the front page?
I'll
have to check that out as well!

It did in this case. My stepfather was the publisher of the Plain Dealer and
my stepbrother the editor.