David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


You are absolutely insane.

No, you are pathological, and now making excuses.

A two day difference in time 11 years ago has nothing to do with 70 years of
contribution to a community. Read the article, not just the date.

A two day difference in reading a fuzzy JPEG from
11 years ago has no significance to any argument. The issue here was to
show
you that my mother was not a "socialite" but a very involved and
dedicated
member of the community where she lived. A two day difference in a date
is
of zero meaning in this. Nice try at obfuscating, though.

You are the one who is obfuscating, 'Eduardo'.

How about looking elsewhere on the site, and you will find the most complete
collection of early Radex, Whites, Stevenson's and other radio logs,
available in complete form, from my collection.

So?

There are dozens more
Radexes I am scanning day by day, as well as White's from Radio TV
Experimenter from 1958 (when White died) till the end of the 60's ready to
scan.

So?

Not only do all these represent many hours of work to scan, they represent
making available to everyone a collection that cost thousands of dollars to
build and which I rendered valueless by cutting the spine for scanning.

So?

Soon
you will see and even more extensive collection of early Broadcasting
Yearbooks, some costing as much as $600 each, chopped and scanned so all can
access them... a sample 1972 book is already there for "practice" as I
figure out how to make the books easily accessible. Indexed PDFs will be
used on future items, too.

So?

What have you done except whine about a two day (alleged) difference in a
scanned date... it still looks like a 23 to me, anyway.

So? (yet again) What does the above have to do with the fact that YOU, are a
pathological liar and have been so for over 50 years?

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


You are absolutely insane.

No, you are pathological, and now making excuses.

A two day difference in time 11 years ago has nothing to do with 70 years
of
contribution to a community. Read the article, not just the date.

A two day difference in reading a fuzzy JPEG from
11 years ago has no significance to any argument. The issue here was
to
show
you that my mother was not a "socialite" but a very involved and
dedicated
member of the community where she lived. A two day difference in a
date
is
of zero meaning in this. Nice try at obfuscating, though.

You are the one who is obfuscating, 'Eduardo'.

How about looking elsewhere on the site, and you will find the most
complete
collection of early Radex, Whites, Stevenson's and other radio logs,
available in complete form, from my collection.

So?

There are dozens more
Radexes I am scanning day by day, as well as White's from Radio TV
Experimenter from 1958 (when White died) till the end of the 60's ready
to
scan.

So?

Not only do all these represent many hours of work to scan, they
represent
making available to everyone a collection that cost thousands of dollars
to
build and which I rendered valueless by cutting the spine for scanning.

So?

Soon
you will see and even more extensive collection of early Broadcasting
Yearbooks, some costing as much as $600 each, chopped and scanned so all
can
access them... a sample 1972 book is already there for "practice" as I
figure out how to make the books easily accessible. Indexed PDFs will be
used on future items, too.

So?

What have you done except whine about a two day (alleged) difference in a
scanned date... it still looks like a 23 to me, anyway.

So? (yet again) What does the above have to do with the fact that YOU, are
a
pathological liar and have been so for over 50 years?

This is over your concern about whether a scan of a 1997 newspaper says
April, 21 or April 23. Whichever the case, it has nothing to do with the
reason I referenced the scan which was to show that, far from being a
"socialite" my mother was very much ahead of her time in being a social
activist and the first woman on the board of a number of Cleveland
institutions, including the county hospital system.

By the way, I just posted the Winter 1949 Whites Log, which is the first to
have a full FM section by location and frequency. It's very interesting to
peruse.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


You are absolutely insane.

No, you are pathological, and now making excuses.

A two day difference in time 11 years ago has nothing to do with 70 years
of
contribution to a community. Read the article, not just the date.

A two day difference in reading a fuzzy JPEG from
11 years ago has no significance to any argument. The issue here was
to
show
you that my mother was not a "socialite" but a very involved and
dedicated
member of the community where she lived. A two day difference in a
date
is
of zero meaning in this. Nice try at obfuscating, though.

You are the one who is obfuscating, 'Eduardo'.

How about looking elsewhere on the site, and you will find the most
complete
collection of early Radex, Whites, Stevenson's and other radio logs,
available in complete form, from my collection.

So?

There are dozens more
Radexes I am scanning day by day, as well as White's from Radio TV
Experimenter from 1958 (when White died) till the end of the 60's ready
to
scan.

So?

Not only do all these represent many hours of work to scan, they
represent
making available to everyone a collection that cost thousands of dollars
to
build and which I rendered valueless by cutting the spine for scanning.

So?

Soon
you will see and even more extensive collection of early Broadcasting
Yearbooks, some costing as much as $600 each, chopped and scanned so all
can
access them... a sample 1972 book is already there for "practice" as I
figure out how to make the books easily accessible. Indexed PDFs will be
used on future items, too.

So?

What have you done except whine about a two day (alleged) difference in a
scanned date... it still looks like a 23 to me, anyway.

So? (yet again) What does the above have to do with the fact that YOU, are
a
pathological liar and have been so for over 50 years?

This is over your concern about whether a scan of a 1997 newspaper says
April, 21 or April 23. Whichever the case, it has nothing to do with the
reason I referenced the scan which was to show that, far from being a
"socialite" my mother was very much ahead of her time in being a social
activist and the first woman on the board of a number of Cleveland
institutions, including the county hospital system.

But, she still tossed your sorry ass, because, at least at that time you were
an embarrassment to you,

By the way, I just posted the Winter 1949 Whites Log, which is the first to
have a full FM section by location and frequency. It's very interesting to
peruse.

Great, but that has nothing to do with the fact that you were an embarrassment
to your mother!

Try and obfuscate some more, you little pervert!

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


This is over your concern about whether a scan of a 1997 newspaper says
April, 21 or April 23. Whichever the case, it has nothing to do with the
reason I referenced the scan which was to show that, far from being a
"socialite" my mother was very much ahead of her time in being a social
activist and the first woman on the board of a number of Cleveland
institutions, including the county hospital system.

But, she still tossed your sorry ass, because, at least at that time you
were
an embarrassment to you,

So you, smartly, backed off the obsession with a mere two days in a date 11
years ago... one that has no relevance to the subject, anyway.

The fact is that my mother was quite proud of me. She had gone to Europe at
about the same age I went to Mexico, to study painting, so she encouraged me
and was the person who found a way for me to go to Ecuador via Herbert
Evans, president of Nationwide Communications and a member of several
organizations she supported.

By the way, I just posted the Winter 1949 Whites Log, which is the first
to
have a full FM section by location and frequency. It's very interesting
to
peruse.

Great, but that has nothing to do with the fact that you were an
embarrassment
to your mother!

Not really.

On the other hand, while you were thinking uo catchy insults (your usual
anal references have tapered off... 'roids getting to you?) I put on a 1958
and 1968 Whites. The 1958 one is very significant as it is the first one
published by Radio TV Experimenter following the early 1957 death of Mr.
White, creating a laps of some 9 months in publication.

Try and obfuscate some more, you little pervert!

Generally, homophobes make lots of anal references and crack bad gay jokes.
Those that call others names like "pervert" and such tend to have a fear of
being revealed as one themselves. I don't answer to the name "pervert" in
any case, nor do I call persons I don't know by that name, either.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


This is over your concern about whether a scan of a 1997 newspaper says
April, 21 or April 23. Whichever the case, it has nothing to do with the
reason I referenced the scan which was to show that, far from being a
"socialite" my mother was very much ahead of her time in being a social
activist and the first woman on the board of a number of Cleveland
institutions, including the county hospital system.

But, she still tossed your sorry ass, because, at least at that time you
were
an embarrassment to you,

So you, smartly, backed off the obsession with a mere two days in a date 11
years ago... one that has no relevance to the subject, anyway.

Give it up, boy.

The fact is that my mother was quite proud of me. She had gone to Europe at
about the same age I went to Mexico, to study painting, so she encouraged me
and was the person who found a way for me to go to Ecuador via Herbert
Evans, president of Nationwide Communications and a member of several
organizations she supported.

BS.


By the way, I just posted the Winter 1949 Whites Log, which is the first
to
have a full FM section by location and frequency. It's very interesting
to
peruse.

More obfuscation.

Great, but that has nothing to do with the fact that you were an
embarrassment
to your mother!


On the other hand, while you were thinking uo catchy insults (your usual
anal references have tapered off... 'roids getting to you?) I put on a 1958
and 1968 Whites. The 1958 one is very significant as it is the first one
published by Radio TV Experimenter following the early 1957 death of Mr.
White, creating a laps of some 9 months in publication.

So, has nothing to do with your propensity to lie.

Try and obfuscate some more, you little pervert!

Generally, homophobes make lots of anal references and crack bad gay jokes.
Those that call others names like "pervert" and such tend to have a fear of
being revealed as one themselves. I don't answer to the name "pervert" in
any case, nor do I call persons I don't know by that name, either.

Perhaps it's because you are a prevert?

'Eddy', you are a frickin liar!