Rrrado Rn wrote:
Making my point...You're taking the argument to absurdity and then
claiming no real value. No ****.

That's what happens when you take your argument to it's (il)logical
conclusion!



You have "Pancho Syndrome." You argue regardless of what's being said.

Again, if you take an argument to its absurdity, you're not
discussing what's actually on the table. By definition, you're arguing
non-Real issues.

Stay within the real. That's where the discussion is. Or not. Your
choice.