Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 13th 08, 11:27 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
RHF RHF is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,652
Default On-the-Radio : The Picken's Plan - How We Can Reduce OurDependence on Foreign Oil ?

On Jul 13, 6:59*am, Bob wrote:
On Jul 13, 12:44*am, D Peter Maus wrote:





Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote:
RHF wrote:
On Jul 12, 10:14 am, Dave wrote:
- - RHF wrote:
- -
- - RHF Replies : Dave - No !
- - More Drilling in the USofA ia Helping Every Day and
- - in US States like North Dakota : New Oil Wells are
- - Creating New Millionaires right here in the US
- - versus- Enriching the Saudis and Funding Al Qaeda
- - and the Islam-O-Fascist Terrorists.


- WTF is an "Islam-O-Fascist"?


-wrt- Islamofascism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamofascism


- Conservation is the only way to quickly reduce prices.
- Period.


Dave - 'Increased Supply' and 'Reduced Demand'
is the only way to permanently Reduce Prices [.]


The one thing that personal 'conservation' does is to
Reduce your overall Personal {out-fo-pocket} Cost to
You in the Short Term.


OLD - You Driving 600 Miles @ 20MPG and using 30 Gallons
of Gas a Week @ $4.00 per Gallon with a Total Weekly Cost
of $120 for Gas.


NEW - You Driving 450 Miles @ 20MPG and using 22.5 Gallons
of Gas a Week @ $4.00 per Gallon with a Total Weekly Cost
of $90 for Gas.


RESULT - Your personal Reduction of 150 Miles Driven
by 25% results in a Personal Cost Savings of 25% ~$30
per Week.


The ONLY WAY Conservation Works : Is When It Is Done
Equally By All : That Takes Some Form of Mandatory
Restrictions {Rationing} on Gas Use Age for All Drivers.


You are wrong. *Raising prices forces conservation just as well as
some stupid rule.


* Conservation does not result in independence.


There is not enough oil in the USA to make us "independent". *Let the
Chinese have the muck, we can go virtually all-electric (including cars)
within a decade. *Now would be a good time, as the economy's in the
****ter anyway.


* *There is more oil just off shore of the US than all of OPEC combined.
Off California it's being pushed through the silt on the ocean floor and
floating to the surface at Oily Point...named by the native Indians more
than 400 years ago.


* *There is so much very old petroleum under the Gulf it's pushing
through the silt and pooling on the Gulf floor.


* *Off Florida, there is more oil under the ocean floor that the Chinese
are setting up outside of our territorial waters to begin drilling in a
single deposit that our own facilities can access just a few miles offshore.


* *Yes, we have the oil.


* *As for electric cars...a great idea that's already seeing resistance
in several states. Wisconsin has banned them in 12 counties. With more
counties on the way. And several states are looking at placing enormous
restrictions on their us. California is one of them. Illinois is
another. Not just the NEV's that are starting to hit the market, but
electrics in general.


* *Why? To protect the tax stream. Wisconsin is the state that tells gas
station owners what they must charge for a gallon of gasoline, and
blocks discount promotions because the lower price reduces tax collection.


* *Conservation will not put a single gallon of gas on the market at a
lower price. Nor will it reduce demand, prices, or shortages.


* *Electric is definitely the way to go. I have no problem agreeing
there. Tesla has proven the technology exists to make a practical, if
expensive, electric car with good performance. But politics in these
matters are another matter.


* *As long as politicians have a say, electric cars are going to remain
the stuff of dreams. Get them out of the way, and a lot of things can
change.


The problem with electric cars is where the electricity comes from.
In hybrids, it comes from regen and that type of vehicle should have
been further tax "incentivised" and long term mandated by now.

If we all start plugging our cars into the grid, most of that
electricity comes from fossil fueled facilities, and under current
political climate any added generation would almost certainly be oil
or gas fired.


-*Nuclear is a dirty word, and so is any type of coal...
-
- Bob

Nuclear may be to Un-Safe to Use -but- It is Clean
-wrt- Air Polution.

Clean Coal when properly used is as Clean as Oil and Gas.

Co-Generation using Reclaimed Manufacturing Heat
can meet 15% of American's Electric Energy Needs.

Improved Hydro by Adding 100 Feet to most of the
Existing Dams in the USA could add to American's
Electric Energy Needs; plus better Flood Control;
and More Water for Agriculture and Humans.

~ RHF
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WGN Radio 720 kHz - Prospects And Problems For American Foreign Policy clifto Shortwave 0 January 6th 06 08:43 AM
Foreign Government Could End Up Controlling U.S.Radio Frequency [email protected] Shortwave 0 August 13th 05 11:20 PM
Russia could reduce Radio Liberty's correspondent network Burr Shortwave 0 August 6th 05 04:18 AM
Slovak Radio to end foreign language broadcasting on shortwave by the end of July Mike Terry Shortwave 0 July 13th 05 06:35 PM
foreign amateur radio policy William Policy 34 October 27th 04 10:23 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017