Like I said a couple weeks ago...

"In part of what was termed Georgia’s “special relationship” with
Israel, UPI Editor at Large Arnaud de Borchgrave reported in a
commentary today that a secret agreement between Georgia and Israel had
earmarked two military airfields in the south of Georgia for use by
Israeli fighter-bombers in a potential pre-emptive strike against Iran."

-antiwar.com

"In part of what was termed Communist Russia’s “special relationship”
with
Fascist Iran, no one reported in any media today that a secret
agreement between Russia and Iran had sold and installed surface-to-
air-land & sea missles in Iran and Syria for use by Islam-0-Fascist
terrorists in a potential pre-emptive strike against Israel."

Get a job Dr.DaviD, PhD (Piled higher & Deeper). The tax payers are
getting increasingly impatient with your continued suckling on the
teets of ObaMao's breast. The more radical of the movement are oiling
their torches heading your way!

Who is antiwar.com's Neo-Fascist Dennis (AKA Justin) Raimondo?

Runs the website Antiwar.com

Presents the Ba'athist party-states in Iraq and Syria as victims of
the malicious West
States that September 11 was "an enormous defeat for the U.S.," and
thus the source of President Bush's alleged "fascism"
Believes that the Great Satan is America, and the Little Satan is
Israel
Author of The Terror Enigma, a pamphlet that insinuates, with no
serious evidence, that the Israeli government had prior knowledge of
9/11 but failed to warn U.S. authorities


Dennis "Justin" Raimondo is a minor celebrity in the U.S., thanks to a
10-year career as an amateur demagogue in the libertarian milieu of
the San Francisco Bay Area, a political environment where anything
goes and nothing matters. He has the familiar personality traits of
the type: "sentimental formlessness, absence of disciplined thought,
ignorance combined with gaudy erudition." He poses as a conservative
[a liar like Dr.DaviD, PhD & his plastic ObaMao bust ] but runs a
website, "Antiwar.com," that features anti-Americans like Noam Chomsky
[a Neo-Communist] and is hugely popular with the left - not
surprisingly since it views America as an incipient fascist state.

Raimondo is a confused and confusing person [Sound familiar, Dr.DaviD,
PhD]), who seeks to be the master of the confusion he creates. Born
plain Dennis, he renamed himself Justin, while attending the Cherry
Lawn School, a defunct prep school in Darien, Conn., which he
graduated in 1970.

Raimondo unquestionably encompasses many contradictions. Now past 50,
he features a photo of himself on his website with a cigarette
dangling from his mouth, in a fey (and failed) pose as an homme
fatale. He is flamboyantly gay [ Like Dr.DaviD, PhD ], but promotes
himself as a Buchananite conservative and was in fact Buchanan's San
Francisco campaign spokesman during the "culture war" that other gays
took personally, many elections ago. The entire package is deceitful,
and it is a CALCULATED deceit. [ ref: Mao Tse DUNG ]

The movement that Raimondo has cobbled out of opponents of the Iraq
war, who are drawn into his site, is unabashedly fascist. Justin
Raimondo personifies an American "red-brown" alliance, like the one
that surfaced briefly in the 1930s when Communists and Nazis combined
forces to bring down the Weimar Republic. This alliance was revived
after the fall of Russian Communism, when Stalinists and fascists
around the world united on an old platform - war against the Jews - of
which more will be said further on. [Read the book "Liberal Fascism".]

Raimondo's own understanding of fascism - a word he himself throws
carelessly around when defaming political enemies and disarming
potential critics -- is utterly superficial. In a preposterous column
titled "A Fascist America," (March 3, 2005), he defines fascism as
follows:

1) "The idealization of the State as the embodiment of an all-powerful
national will or spirit;

2) "The leader principle, which personifies the national will in the
holder of a political office (whether democratically elected or
otherwise is largely a matter of style);

3) "The doctrine of militarism, which bases an entire legal and
economic system on war and preparations for war."

Of course. applied to America this is absurd. Outside the neo-Nazi
fringe, no Americans, least of all Republicans, idealize the state.
The "leader principle" is not only not in evidence, it is almost
absent in a political season when the President has been attacked more
viciously than any chief executive in memory; and it is pretty
difficult to refer to American "militarism" when the country's
security rests on a military that is voluntary and under attack. In
the same column, while attempting to draw a parallel between opponents
of the anti-war crowd and fascists, Raimondo even lends credibility to
Hitler's fairy tale that the Nazi seizure of power was a response to
"the imminent danger of Communist revolution" - a particularly absurd
assertion since the Communists actively colluded with the Nazis in
their attacks on Weimar's democracy and passively supported Hitler's
accession to power.

In an attempt to smear America even further (as if that would be
possible) Raimondo throws in Augusto Pinochet, the left's favourite
example of an American puppet. But Pinochet never idealized the
Chilean state, or promoted a cult of himself as a leader, or prepared
for war or waged war against any foreign country, as required by
Raimondo's fascist model. Pinochet even organized a democratic
referendum that removed him from power. Indeed, Pinochet was no more
than a typical, short-term military dictator of a type seen all over
Latin America, bereft of charisma or serious ideology. His rise to
power was the consequence of historical accidents, not of ideology or
mass mobilization, and he left behind a thriving democracy.

Raimondo attempted to become a Republican leader in San Francisco but
was quickly dumped after boring the small party group in that city
with his pretensions and diatribes. He took over a new conservative
tabloid in San Francisco and soon put it out of business by turning
every front page into a showcase for headlines about himself. About
these ventures, Raimondo writes, "National Review was my bible as a
teenager, and I actively campaigned for Barry Goldwater for President
in 1964. From there I joined Young Americans for Freedom (YAF), and
then founded my own youth group, 'Young Radicals for Capitalism.' We
had a huge chapter at Wayne State University, and put out a single
issue of a magazine, The New Radical, that was filled with
denunciations of the New Left. From there I joined the Libertarian
Party during the presidential campaign of Roger MacBride (1976) and
subsequently ran for office (Congress, state legislature, etc.)
several times in California under the LP banner. I left the LP in
1983."

Raimondo has always wanted to be considered an author and journalist,
no less than a political figure. At about 13 or so, he seems to have
imagined himself as a science fictioneer. But he never had the
discipline or stamina to apply himself to any profession aside from
that of absurdist publicity hound. He has failed as a journalist and
political commentator, exactly as Hitler failed as a painter, as
Mussolini failed as a socialist leader, and as the most notorious
fascist of the left, Fidel Castro, failed as a lawyer.

Like his models, when Raimondo never engages intellectually with
opponents, but relies on invective, insults, and innuendo.
Notwithstanding his bizarre and vulnerable persona as a gay
Buchananite, he glories in violating the privacy of others. He is
obsessed with exposing neoconservatives as "Trotskyites," a largely
spurious claim, since the most famous example among the original
neoconservatives, Irving Kristol, was a Trotskyist for only a year,
nearly seventy years ago, and only a handful of recent ex-leftists -
almost entirely ex-Democrats - are leading neo-conservatives today.

The psychological term for Raimondo's posturing is "projection." He
is obsessed with rooting out alleged political, ideological, and even
religious chameleons, with the unconscious intent of advertising his
own political transvestism. This pattern is evident in all his
activities: he claims that America is becoming a dictatorship, the
better to justify his own ambitions for power. He defends the
establishment media against criticism by conservative weblog authors,
although without the rise of the "blogs" he would be nothing. Until
the launch of Buchanan's unreadable (and soon to be defunct) American
Conservative, his only place of publication was the paleo-conservative
Chronicles.

Posing as a war-hater, Raimondo defends murderous dictators like
Milosevic, who unleashed the only wars in Europe over the past half
century. He presents the Ba'athist party-states in Iraq and Syria as
victims of the malicious West and openly wished that Japan had won the
Second World War, while fiercely alleging his patriotic motivations.
When it comes to America's present wars, he revels in a repellent
defeatism. The heinous attacks on America on 9/11 become for him an
explanation of American "fascism."

Taking a leaf from his comic-book canon of political wisdom, Raimondo
describes fascism as a product of "the traumatic humbling of a power
once considered mighty." He cites Germany defeated in the First World
War, while ignoring that Italy, where fascism originated, was a victor
in that war, as was the third Axis power, Japan. Perhaps this omission
can be ascribed to the fact that Raimondo idolizes Japan, which was at
the height of its power when it attacked Pearl Harbor. As he wrote so
eloquently, in an article titled. "Hiroshima Mon Amour: Why Americans
Are Barbarians," posted to his site on August 8, 2001, "the idea that
America is, in any sense, a civilized country is easily dispelled."
By contrast, imperialist Japan, which slaughtered millions in East
Asia, is his idea of paradise. He believes "the wrong side won the
war in the Pacific." It is, by the way, extremely doubtful that
Raimondo has ever set foot on Japanese soil.

The upshot of Raimondo's mishmash is his charge that September 11 was
"an enormous defeat for the U.S.," and thus the source of Bush
fascism. Many fascist movements have been expansionist and
imperialist, but others were historically known for their promotion of
disaffection and demoralization, such as those in France and England
before the Second World War, and the isolationist legion in America at
the same time, which Raimondo seeks to revive. The Rosetta Stone of
his philosophy is Buchanan's idea of the betrayed "American republic"
- betrayed by democracy that is - an ahistorical trope which echoes
prior fascist movements.

Classic fascism has other characteristics that resonate in Raimondo's
agendas. He is a fanatical rumormonger, asserting that U.S. war plans
against Syria and Iran are nearly operational, while Bush
administration policies toward these states have been notably
circumspect. He was among the most active disseminators of the legend
that an innocuous document, titled "A Clean Break," having to do with
Israeli foreign policy, was actually a blueprint for the invasion of
Iraq.

If, as Mary McCarthy said, every word written by the Stalinist Lillian
Hellman was a lie, including "and" and "the," Raimondo is a
prevaricator down to the placement of commas, periods, and
semicolons. One of his favorite tricks is the mendacious use of
hyperlinks, giving the impression that his statements are backed by
other sources. These are usually his own articles, immodestly declared
by him to be "classics," which in fact have little or nothing to do
with his latest ravings, but lead to more lies through more links.
This, too, is not original with Raimondo; it is the Chomsky method of
meretricious citations.

Raimondo calls Abraham Lincoln "the closest to a dictator that any
American president has ever come." A couple of days later, forgetting
or ignoring that statement, he labels President Franklin Roosevelt the
"predecessor" of today's "fascism," and declares that Harry Truman and
Winston Churchill were also "fascist heroes." At the same time, he
tenaciously defends Milosevic - a dictator who freed no slaves - and,
equally insistently, denies the occurrence of the 1995 massacre of
Bosnian Muslims at Srebrenica. He also defames the Albanians, and
encourages others on his site to do the same, and then denies being an
apologist for Serbian war crimes. He has called the Kosovars "the
Shi'ites of Western Europe" - meaning, Muslim friends of America, who
deserve to be slaughtered. He fervently hopes for a new war between
Slavic Macedonians and Albanians, since nothing warms his heart so
much as the thought of dead Albanians except, perhaps, the dead
"Zionists" buried in the Twin Towers on 9/11.

Calumny is Raimondo's Socratic method. He refers to David Frum and
Richard Perle, two intellectuals who have no governmental authority
whatever, as "strutting martinets." When I myself attempted to clarify
the status of Islam in Uzbekistan, an American ally, while criticizing
obstacles to democracy there, he labeled me a defender of torture. He
accused me of "rationalizing the same sort of regime in the U.S." as
in Uzbekistan - based, according to him, on "torturing dissidents,
shutting out all political opposition, and arresting thousands on
account of their political and religious convictions."

In his latest ridiculous column, "The Specter of Fascism," dated March
9, the Raimondian style of revisionist history is in full display. In
a single paragraph, he refers to the leftist New York tabloid PM,
published in the late 1930s and 1940s, as "Communist Party-
controlled," which will certainly come as a surprise to Arnold
Beichman, a long-serving anti-Communist and former leading editor of
the paper. PM was famous as a battleground where Stalinists and anti-
Stalinists fought for influence, but was never under Communist
control. For one thing, unlike the real Communist press, such as the
Daily Worker, PM did not promote an "antiwar" alliance, during the
Stalin-Hitler pact, with the Nazis, of the kind Raimondo wishes to
revive today - which is why PM, a newspaper that went out of business
in 1948, still provokes Raimondista rage. Raimondo refers to PM's
identification of pre-1941 isolationists as a "fifth column," which
Dennis shrieks was "scurrilous and untrue." He's wrong. Calling the
pro-Axis rabble in America then a "fifth column" was accurate
reporting, just as it is accurate reporting to describe Dennis
Raimondo as a sympathizer of America's enemies now.

Sometimes Raimondo posts other leftwing fascists to do his slandering
for him. He has done this with Kevin Keating, infamous for hoisting a
banner during the anti-Iraq demonstrations in San Francisco that read:
"We Support Our Troops When They Shoot Their Officers." If a critic of
Saudi Arabia's support for Wahhabism enters his sights, he will accuse
them of fomenting war against the Kingdom. He has, in fact, insisted
that the neo-conservatives in the government are actually preparing
military action against the Saudis. Raimondo's protective attitudes
towards the Saudis derive perhaps from the fact he and the Saudi
princes share a commitment to the fable of "Zionist" involvement in
9/11.

For Raimondo, the Great Satan is America, and the Little Satan is
Israel. He has written a screed called The Terror Enigma, that is a
kind of Protocols of the Elders of Zion for the War on Terror.
Raimondo's tract - it's only a pamphlet issued by a vanity press -
insinuates, with no serious evidence, that the Israeli government had
prior knowledge of 9/11 but failed to warn our authorities; that
because an Israeli lived in the same neighborhood as a 9/11
conspirator they were naturally complicit; Israelis selling art on the
streets of the U.S. were actually big-time spies engaged in
undermining our government; that here, there, and everywhere, the
omnipotent Israelis control everything, so why not the attack on the
Twin Towers as well? The next step from this conspiracy logic is, of
course, the claim that Israel was in on 9/11 with the Bush
administration.

On October 29, 2004 Raimondo wrote a piece under the headline, "Bush
and Kerry put Israel first." It claimed that, "the Jewish state keeps
an entire people captive in the twin concentration camps of Gaza and
the West Bank;" and "the Israelis love to torture and berate [Yasir
Arafat] far too much to let him die a natural death." Referring to the
Protocols of the Elders of Zion, he wrote, "one needn't refer to
fiction when the relevant facts are so readily available." (In other
words, the Protocols may be fake, but they tell the truth.) According
to Raimondo, "Today, the word 'fascist' is the political equivalent of
the 'f'-word, rendered virtually meaningless on account of its
degeneration into pure epithet. Yet, Israel in its present trajectory
fits the classic definition of fascism." And: "Israel, far from
being our faithful ally, is potentially an enemy."

Almost as intense as his hatred for the Jewish state is Raimondo's
loathing of democracy. Some may have been taken aback by the volume of
his bile when he denounced the "orange revolution" in Ukraine as well
as the current democratizing efforts in Lebanon. But not those who
have followed Raimondo's prominent association with the Russian Jew-
baiting website, Pravda.ru, and its American contributor, the neo-Nazi
Bill White.

Bill White has followed the predictable career of neo-Nazi agitators.
He is a Jew-hater and a compulsive liar, frequently inventing "facts"
about those he targets. Posing as a "libertarian socialist" with a
site at www.overthrow.com, he recently distinguished himself by
hailing the murder of the family of the judge in Chicago who had the
temerity to order payment of a fine by a neo-Nazi leader. The Roanoke
Times reported on March 3, "As authorities investigate the killings of
a federal judge's family in Chicago, a Roanoke white supremacist on
Wednesday applauded the murders as justified violence against Jews and
the federal government. 'I don't feel bad that Judge [Joan Humphrey]
Lefkow's family was murdered,' William A. White, editor of The
Libertarian Socialist News, wrote in an essay Tuesday on his Web site,
Overthrow.com. 'In fact, when I heard the story I laughed. 'Good for
them!' was my first thought.'"

While sorting out the love affair between antiwar.com and
overthrow.com is akin to diving into a sewer, Dennis Raimondo and Bill
White were eager contributors to the Pravda.ru site until the
"patriotic" admirers of both bridled at their association with a
journalistic enterprise associated, in the mind of most Americans,
with old-fashioned Communist propaganda. Articles by both Raimondo and
White have been widely recirculated by the Saudi-funded Council on
American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). In the "red-brown" logic, Jew-
baiting works equally well for fascists, Communists, and Islamo-
fascists.

Raimondo's website consistently published propaganda generated by
Randall (Ismail) Royer, a former CAIR employee now doing a 20-year
federal sentence for terrorist activities. Recently, one of Royer's
associates, Ahmad Omar Abu Ali, was charged with plotting to
assassinate President Bush in collaboration with al-Qaida. Before his
arrest, Royer distinguished himself between with a campaign to harass
and intimidate critics of the jihadists - myself, and the Saudi
dissident Ali al-Ahmed among them - in the Washington region. Raimondo
gleefully recycled Royer's Jew-baiting rants on his website. CAIR,
which employed Royer, joined in the campaign by redistributing the
Raimondo screeds. CAIR - which pretends to be an anti-defamation
organization - also disseminates the neo-Nazi propaganda of Bill
White.

CAIR poses as a civil liberties advocate, Raimondo poses as "antiwar,"
White poses as a "libertarian socialist," and their comrade-in-arms
Kevin Keating poses as a "revolutionary." The technique is familiar to
any history student: the Nazi party called itself the socialist party
of the German workers, while plotting to suppress the labor movement
and enslave wage-earners.

The law recognizes that some conspiracies are real: one such is the
common effort of Raimondo, CAIR, Royer, Abu Ali, White, Keating, and
others to silence the critics of Islamist extremism and intimidate the
supporters of America's leadership in the global war on terror. Of
that leadership, Raimondo has written, "Go F*ck Yourself, Mr.
President." (November 26, 2003).

Raimondo has taken on the role of a pre-1941 Axis agent in America,
lashing the Jews, giving comfort to the country's worst enemies,
defaming the president, and, in general, seeking to undermine faith in
democracy. He also craves martyrdom, and dreams that he will be
arrested and tried for sedition the way some of his heroes were. He
is so reckless in his provocations that he may some day get his wish.

On his Antiwar.com website, Raimondo wrote in August 2005: "The
invasion of Iraq was itself a great diversion, in that it had nothing
to do with the alleged attempt to crush al-Qaeda. Instead, it had
everything to do with the preconceived agenda leading neocons took
with them to Washington when they were brought in by the Bush
administration to run American foreign policy. They hijacked that
policy to engage in an ideology-driven adventure, one that - having
achieved, like so many government programs, the exact opposite of its
stated intention - is ending in bloodstained tragedy."

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i...asp?indid=1894

On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 08:12:04 -0700, saltyfishsauce wrote:

...insinuates, with no serious
evidence, that the Israeli government had prior knowledge of 9/11 but
failed to warn U.S. authorities


The Israelis DID warn President Bush. Bush did not act on the warnings
and allowed the attacks to take place so he would have his "Pearl
Harbor", necessary to impose his radical agenda on the American sheeple.

Dave wrote:

On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 08:12:04 -0700, saltyfishsauce wrote:

...insinuates, with no serious
evidence, that the Israeli government had prior knowledge of 9/11 but
failed to warn U.S. authorities


The Israelis DID warn President Bush. Bush did not act on the warnings
and allowed the attacks to take place so he would have his "Pearl
Harbor", necessary to impose his radical agenda on the American sheeple.

More k00k fodder from the King of K00Ks!

My God are you incredibly stupid!

Only a true Marxist would parrot this long debunked propaganda lie of
the Left.

Did ObaMao anoint you as a model imbicile?

On Sep 3, 6:38*pm, Dave wrote:
On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:38:36 -0700, RHF wrote:

http://www.newamericancentury.org/Re...asDefenses.pdf

(from your link)

"Further, the process of transformation,
even if it brings revolutionary change, is *
likely to be a long one, absent some * * * *
catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a *
new Pearl Harbor. Domestic politics and
industrial policy will shape the pace and
content of transformation as much as the
requirements of current missions."

Dr.DaviD, PhD (Piled higher & Deeper) proclaimed:

'The Israelis DID warn President Bush. Bush did not act on the
warnings
and allowed the attacks to take place so he would have his "Pearl
Harbor", necessary to impose his radical agenda on the American
sheeple. '

I Repeat - Are you an imbicile?

On Sep 3, 4:38*pm, Dave wrote:
On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:38:36 -0700, RHF wrote:

http://www.newamericancentury.org/Re...asDefenses.pdf

(from your link)

"Further, the process of transformation,
even if it brings revolutionary change, is *
likely to be a long one, absent some * * * *
catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a *
new Pearl Harbor. Domestic politics and
industrial policy will shape the pace and
content of transformation as much as the
requirements of current missions."

Dave - You are a 'congress' unto yourself. ~ RHF

wrote:
On Sep 3, 6:38 pm, Dave wrote:
On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:38:36 -0700, RHF wrote:

http://www.newamericancentury.org/Re...asDefenses.pdf
(from your link)

"Further, the process of transformation,
even if it brings revolutionary change, is
likely to be a long one, absent some
catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a
new Pearl Harbor. Domestic politics and
industrial policy will shape the pace and
content of transformation as much as the
requirements of current missions."

Dr.DaviD, PhD (Piled higher & Deeper) proclaimed:

'The Israelis DID warn President Bush. Bush did not act on the
warnings
and allowed the attacks to take place so he would have his "Pearl
Harbor", necessary to impose his radical agenda on the American
sheeple. '

I Repeat - Are you an imbicile?


I calls 'em as I sees 'em.