Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 6, 5:24*am, "Michael" wrote:
Havent seen conditions for MW this good in a long time. *WBT 1110 in Charlotte NC & WTAM in Cleveland are usually good here, but tonight they sound like locals. * 760 WJR in Detroit is amazingly clear and regular just so long as you use SSB. *For the first time, I'm hearing 870 WWL in New Orleans. *I can copy it with LSB only. Very sloppy but I got the station ID above the clutter. *That is a first for me. Michael North NJ R75 Inverted L Nice work Michael. MW DXing is great fun when conditions are running = goog luck! Conditions here at 0200z were poor and I could only get the usual France Info Nice on 1557 kHz and Saudi Arabia on 1521. The French Island of Mayotte was coming in nicely on 1458 and R Free Africa from Tanzania on 1377. All my MW DXing is done in ECSS/SSB mode, usually with a 3 kHz filter for best fidelity and recognition of ID's. John Plimmer, Montagu, Western Cape Province, South Africa South 33 d 47 m 32 s, East 20 d 07 m 32 s Icom IC-7700, Icom IC-756 PRO III with MW mods ERGO software Drake SW8. Sangean 803A Sony 7600D, GE SRIII, Redsun RP2100 Antenna's RF Systems DX 1 Pro Mk II, Datong AD-270 Kiwa MW Loop. http://www.dxing.info/about/dxers/plimmer.dx |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Sep 6, 5:24 am, "Michael" wrote: Havent seen conditions for MW this good in a long time. WBT 1110 in Charlotte NC & WTAM in Cleveland are usually good here, but tonight they sound like locals. 760 WJR in Detroit is amazingly clear and regular just so long as you use SSB. For the first time, I'm hearing 870 WWL in New Orleans. I can copy it with LSB only. Very sloppy but I got the station ID above the clutter. That is a first for me. Michael North NJ R75 Inverted L Nice work Michael. MW DXing is great fun when conditions are running = goog luck! Conditions here at 0200z were poor and I could only get the usual France Info Nice on 1557 kHz and Saudi Arabia on 1521. The French Island of Mayotte was coming in nicely on 1458 and R Free Africa from Tanzania on 1377. All my MW DXing is done in ECSS/SSB mode, usually with a 3 kHz filter for best fidelity and recognition of ID's. I always use ECSS to sift for any DX. I like my R75 for that very much, but, the R75 is not a good MW rig. I'd like to try a Drake R7 for that. Michael |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael wrote:
wrote in message ... On Sep 6, 5:24 am, "Michael" wrote: Havent seen conditions for MW this good in a long time. WBT 1110 in Charlotte NC & WTAM in Cleveland are usually good here, but tonight they sound like locals. 760 WJR in Detroit is amazingly clear and regular just so long as you use SSB. For the first time, I'm hearing 870 WWL in New Orleans. I can copy it with LSB only. Very sloppy but I got the station ID above the clutter. That is a first for me. Michael North NJ R75 Inverted L Nice work Michael. MW DXing is great fun when conditions are running = goog luck! Conditions here at 0200z were poor and I could only get the usual France Info Nice on 1557 kHz and Saudi Arabia on 1521. The French Island of Mayotte was coming in nicely on 1458 and R Free Africa from Tanzania on 1377. All my MW DXing is done in ECSS/SSB mode, usually with a 3 kHz filter for best fidelity and recognition of ID's. I always use ECSS to sift for any DX. I like my R75 for that very much, but, the R75 is not a good MW rig. I'd like to try a Drake R7 for that. Michael My totally unmodified R75 gets stations on every MW channel. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave" wrote in message ... Michael wrote: My totally unmodified R75 gets stations on every MW channel. Without the attenuation removed, it is a pretty dull performer on MW. I would imagine you have not been able to detect even the easy TPs with it. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Eduardo wrote:
"Dave" wrote in message ... Michael wrote: My totally unmodified R75 gets stations on every MW channel. Without the attenuation removed, it is a pretty dull performer on MW. I would imagine you have not been able to detect even the easy TPs with it. I can get the TIS stations at LAX and Barstow. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 6, 4:56*pm, "Michael" wrote:
I always use ECSS to sift for any DX. * I like my R75 for that very much, but, the R75 is not a good MW rig. *I'd like to try a Drake R7 for that.. Michael- Actually some of the world's top MW DXer's use R75's, but they have removed the factory attenuation on MW. Why don't you send your R75 to Craig at Kiwa to supe it up? JP |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Sep 6, 4:56 pm, "Michael" wrote: I always use ECSS to sift for any DX. I like my R75 for that very much, but, the R75 is not a good MW rig. I'd like to try a Drake R7 for that. Michael- Actually some of the world's top MW DXer's use R75's, but they have removed the factory attenuation on MW. Why don't you send your R75 to Craig at Kiwa to supe it up? JP Hiya... Kiwa already made quick work of my R75 five years ago. I have the synch mod and audio mod. I didn't want to do any of the filter swaps or the attenuation mod. I'm happy with it as is. I don't know why people would like the R75 for MW DX. I think it is great for sw DX'ing. I actually prefer it over the R8 series for that. I can also get it to sound as good as just about any other radio in AM mode to listen to broadcast. When I want quality audio I use a line in to my PC. I have a full software mixer/processor along with a premium sound card and speakers. Between the PC set up and features on the R75, I can make just about any signal sound great. Still.. I think the R75 is too noisy down low for MW. It helped a lot when I set up my new inverted L antenna with ideal grounding, but it is a comparatively noisy rig down low. A friend of mine that also enjoys the hobby has had a number of radios over the years, many of which I have tried. He has a Drake R7 and we both agree it is ideal for MW. Not related to this thread, but he also has a NRD-545. I'm glad he got one before I did. Three years ago I was considering a545 as an upgrade to my R75. He picked up a brand new NRD-545 while I was considering it too. I got to try it for a few days. I swapped him for my R75 as he never had one. I think the NRD-545 sounds like hell. Looks amazing, but it was so tinny and non robust, even software processing through my PC couldn't make it tolerable for me. He never sold the radio, but hardly ever turns it on. He says he has no reason to use any radio other then his R8b. He thinks my R75 was "a fun toy". One of those Drake guys :-) Michael |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6 Sep, 18:00, "Michael" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Sep 6, 4:56 pm, "Michael" wrote: I always use ECSS to sift for any DX. I like my R75 for that very much, but, the R75 is not a good MW rig. I'd like to try a Drake R7 for that. Michael- Actually some of the world's top MW DXer's use R75's, but they have removed the factory attenuation on MW. Why don't you send your R75 to Craig at Kiwa to supe it up? JP Hiya... Kiwa already made quick work of my R75 five years ago. *I have the synch mod and audio mod. I didn't want to do any of the filter swaps or the attenuation mod. *I'm happy with it as is. *I don't know why people would like the R75 for MW DX. *I think it is great for sw DX'ing. *I actually prefer it over the R8 series for that. I can also get it to sound as good as just about any other radio in AM mode to listen to broadcast. *When I want quality audio I use a line in to my PC. *I have a full software mixer/processor along with a premium sound card and speakers. Between the PC set up and features on the R75, *I can make just about any signal sound great. *Still.. I think the R75 is too noisy down low for MW. *It helped a lot when I set up my new inverted L antenna with ideal grounding, but it is a comparatively noisy rig down low. A friend of mine that also enjoys the hobby has had a number of radios over the years, many of which I have tried. He has a Drake R7 and we both agree it is ideal for MW. *Not related to this thread, but he also has a NRD-545. *I'm glad he got one before I did. *Three years ago I was considering a545 as an upgrade to my R75. *He picked up a brand new NRD-545 while I was considering it too. *I got to try it for a few days. *I swapped him for my R75 as he never had one. *I think the NRD-545 sounds like hell. *Looks amazing, but it was so tinny and non robust, even software processing through my PC couldn't make it tolerable for me. *He never sold the radio, but hardly ever turns it on. He says he has no reason to use any radio other then his R8b. *He thinks my R75 was "a fun toy". One of those Drake guys :-) Michael The R75 is a very capable MW receiver, and sensitive even without the attenuation pad removal (it only improves sensitivity with 3 dB anyway). I had one myself but decided to replace it with Icom transceivers (746Pro and 703, all modded). Size and price were/are two good points about the R75; audio quality could be better. But there is always personal taste which makes the final judgement. As for the NRD-545 I agree. I had one and while it might surely be an excellent UTE rig, you will not want to use the 545 for broadcast DX- ing and even less for casual broadcast listening. The AGC setting in AM mode was stuck on "Fast", producing listening fatigue within minutes. A pretty radio though. BM |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
MW DX'ing | Shortwave | |||
Back to BCB DX'ing | Shortwave | |||
More on Shortwave Receivers... DX'ing, etc. | Shortwave | |||
DX'ing with a Jwin JX -M14 | Shortwave | |||
DX'ing conditions bad all over ??? | Shortwave |