Brenda Ann wrote:

"Billy Burpelson" wrote in message
...

Many economists and media commentators have said that the 700 billion
dollar "bail-out" bill is socialist and George W. couldn't sign/approve
that bill fast enough. This would then indicate that -W- is a socialist.

So, you who loves Bush and hates socialists seem to have a conundrum on
your hands. The man you love just voted for the biggest socialist bill in
history.

You've wrapped the needle around the peg on the Irony Meter yet again.
:-)

They are ignorant of the language, obviously...

This bailout is not socialism. Government and big business being so
intimately in bed with each other is the very dictionary definition of
fascism.

Too many folks think that fascism means the same as dictatorship, because
that's the form it took in Italy and Germany during WWII. This is no more
the case than that communism (or socialism) necessarily takes the form of a
dictatorship. The two forms of government are diametrically opposed, but can
still take the same form when one person or group of persons works their way
into a position to cease power not normally granted them.

That's 'seize' :-) And don't let Obama do it.

NoBama!

I am dxAce and I approve this message.

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

That's 'seize' :-)

Thanks for the correction, Steve.