wrote:

On Nov 3, 9:40 am, RHF wrote:
On Nov 3, 3:55 am, Mike wrote:

-http://projects.washingtonpost.com/2008/pick-your-president/14680/
-
- For a McCain victory,
- it all comes down to him carrying both Ohio
- and Pennsylvania. If he does that, he wins.

MWB, {Put the "OT" in the Subject-Line for you.}

Not very likely - Maybe if he won both California
and New York... ROTFL - when hell freezes over ~ RHF

IMHO - Barack Hussein Obama looks to get around
333 Electoral College Votes and John "Smiley"
McCain getting the remaining.http://www.electoral-vote.com/
Therefore McCain has to Win-Back 63 or more Electoral
College Votes to Win; and being very honest that does
not appear to be "Do-Able" but . . .http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...ab28df32b2daa3

UNDECIDED VOTERS - Last Minute Reality-Check :
Undicided Voters there is still One Good Reason
to Vote FOR John "Smiley" McCain as a Counter
Balance to the One Party Control of the Entire
US Government by the Liberal Democrats :http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...1130b583ae7f4e
Just Say No to "The Triumvirate" of :
Barack Hussein Obama - Liberal Democrat US President
Nancy Pelosi - Liberal Democrat Speaker of the US House
Harry Reid - Liberal Democrat Majority Leader of the US Senate
.
Failing a Last Minute McCain Win then may
Barack Hussein Obama take his Oath-of-Office
and Serve All the American People with Honor
and Distinction; and may the USA Prosper under
his Leadership - Amen ~ RHF
.
Let us all Pray for the Safety and Wellbeing
of Barack Hussein Obama and his Family during
these last 3 Critical Days of our Presidential
Election on 4 Nov 2008 - Amen ~ RHFhttp://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/be5a86d0104d4894
.
A PRAYER FOR AMERICA AND OUR LEADERS - PTL & PBTA :
Let Us All Pray the Barack Hussein Obama Serves
All the American People well as the US President;
and Lives a Long Good Life after his Presidency.
and we all say : amen, Amen. and AMEN ! ~ RHFhttp://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/be5a86d0104d4894http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/056c94b192d7248e
.
The 'Evil' of Not Voting : Just Vote "FOR"
Barack Hussein Obama -or- John 'Smiley' McCain.
Make Your Vote a Positive Affirmation of Your
Political Consciousness : Vote "FOR" What You
Believe-In -and- Not Against 'the-other-guy'.
* Be-a-Good-Citizen : JUST VOTE !
* Exercise Your Right-to-Vote : JUST VOTE !
* Responsible Citizens Vote : JUST VOTE !
.

The best data out there says:
Obama: 347
McCain: 191

And make no mistake: the SPANKING will be because of the nations
disgust with the party of George W. Bush, more than any other factor.

What is really funny about this is the fact that folks were not voting FOR Obama as much as they were voting AGAINST Bush.

Sometime, perhaps as early as January, the people will wake up and realize that they voted for a Socialist/Marxist twit.

dxAce wrote:


What is really funny about this is the fact that folks were not voting FOR Obama as much as they were voting AGAINST Bush.

Sometime, perhaps as early as January, the people will wake up and realize that they voted for a Socialist/Marxist twit.

They were voting more against Reagan than against Bush. The verdict
came in on "Trickle Down" Voodoo economics. It sucks.

You too don't get it.

Dave wrote:

dxAce wrote:


What is really funny about this is the fact that folks were not voting FOR Obama as much as they were voting AGAINST Bush.

Sometime, perhaps as early as January, the people will wake up and realize that they voted for a Socialist/Marxist twit.

They were voting more against Reagan than against Bush. The verdict
came in on "Trickle Down" Voodoo economics. It sucks.

You too don't get it.

Keep fooling yourself.

dxAce wrote:

What is really funny about this is the fact that folks were not voting FOR Obama as much as they were voting AGAINST Bush.

True, but...

....what is really funny is a statement like that coming from a HUGE Bush
supporter/defender such as yourself. Maybe the American voters have a
message in that for you...and maybe W wasn't as quite as wonderful as
you would want us to believe.

Billy Burpelson wrote:

dxAce wrote:

What is really funny about this is the fact that folks were not voting FOR Obama as much as they were voting AGAINST Bush.

True, but...

...what is really funny is a statement like that coming from a HUGE Bush
supporter/defender such as yourself. Maybe the American voters have a
message in that for you...and maybe W wasn't as quite as wonderful as
you would want us to believe.

What's really funny is that Bush wasn't running.

dxAce wrote:

What is really funny about this is the fact that folks were not voting FOR Obama as much as they were voting AGAINST Bush.

Billy Burpelson wrote:

True, but...
...what is really funny is a statement like that coming from a HUGE Bush
supporter/defender such as yourself. Maybe the American voters have a
message in that for you...and maybe W wasn't as quite as wonderful as
you would want us to believe.

dxAce wrote:

What's really funny is that Bush wasn't running.

Again, you are absolutely correct. However, that just goes to show you
how *absolutely ****ed* the voters were with W (and IMHO) his gang of
thieves, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Perle, et al.

Heck of a job, Georgie!

dxAce wrote:

Dave wrote:

dxAce wrote:

What is really funny about this is the fact that folks were not voting FOR Obama as much as they were voting AGAINST Bush.

Sometime, perhaps as early as January, the people will wake up and realize that they voted for a Socialist/Marxist twit.

They were voting more against Reagan than against Bush. The verdict
came in on "Trickle Down" Voodoo economics. It sucks.

You too don't get it.

Keep fooling yourself.


OK. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

Billy Burpelson wrote:

dxAce wrote:

What is really funny about this is the fact that folks were not voting FOR Obama as much as they were voting AGAINST Bush.

Billy Burpelson wrote:

True, but...
...what is really funny is a statement like that coming from a HUGE Bush
supporter/defender such as yourself. Maybe the American voters have a
message in that for you...and maybe W wasn't as quite as wonderful as
you would want us to believe.

dxAce wrote:

What's really funny is that Bush wasn't running.

Again, you are absolutely correct. However, that just goes to show you
how *absolutely ****ed* the voters were with W (and IMHO) his gang of
thieves, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Perle, et al.

Uh, they weren't running either.

Guess I'm correct again. And guess what, Billy? You're stupid!

In article ,
dxAce wrote:

Billy Burpelson wrote:

dxAce wrote:

What is really funny about this is the fact that folks were not voting
FOR Obama as much as they were voting AGAINST Bush.

Billy Burpelson wrote:

True, but...
...what is really funny is a statement like that coming from a HUGE Bush
supporter/defender such as yourself. Maybe the American voters have a
message in that for you...and maybe W wasn't as quite as wonderful as
you would want us to believe.

dxAce wrote:

What's really funny is that Bush wasn't running.

Again, you are absolutely correct. However, that just goes to show you
how *absolutely ****ed* the voters were with W (and IMHO) his gang of
thieves, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Perle, et al.

Uh, they weren't running either.

Guess I'm correct again. And guess what, Billy? You're stupid!

And clueless!

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Billy Burpelson wrote:

dxAce wrote:

What is really funny about this is the fact that folks were not voting FOR Obama as much as they were voting AGAINST Bush.
Billy Burpelson wrote:

True, but...
...what is really funny is a statement like that coming from a HUGE Bush
supporter/defender such as yourself. Maybe the American voters have a
message in that for you...and maybe W wasn't as quite as wonderful as
you would want us to believe.
dxAce wrote:

What's really funny is that Bush wasn't running.
Again, you are absolutely correct. However, that just goes to show you
how *absolutely ****ed* the voters were with W (and IMHO) his gang of
thieves, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Perle, et al.

dxAce wrote:

Uh, they weren't running either.

Uh, didn't say they were. Please pay attention.

Guess I'm correct again. And guess what, Billy? You're stupid!

So what's your point? I agreed with -both- of *your* statements. I'm
stupid because I agreed with you?

Weak comeback, Steve. You're floundering.