In article
,
wrote:

SNIP

The best data out there says:
Obama: 347
McCain: 191

And make no mistake: the SPANKING will be because of the nations
disgust with the party of George W. Bush, more than any other factor.

That's what you do best. You make mistakes continually.

What happened here is a bad economy together with the old liberal media
selling O-bla-ma to the sheep.

A year from now most O-bla-ma supporters will wish they could take their
vote back.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article
,
wrote:

SNIP

The best data out there says:
Obama: 347
McCain: 191

And make no mistake: the SPANKING will be because of the nations
disgust with the party of George W. Bush, more than any other factor.

That's what you do best. You make mistakes continually.

What happened here is a bad economy

That's all that matters. People ALWAYS vote based on their pocketbook.
It is ALWAYS the economy. If the economy was still going fine, McCain
would have won. Since the economy is in the tank, its time for a Change.
This is based on history, and is 100% accurate. In the last 30 years,
every time the presidency has changed parties, the economy has been in the
tank.

1980, Carter and 20% interest rates, 8% unemployment and 20% inflation.
Surprise, Reagan got elected!

1984, economy going strong. Surprise, Reagan re-elected!

1988, economy is still going strong. Surprise, Bush 1 got elected!

1992, recession and Bush reneged on his "no new taxes" pledge. Surprise,
Clinton is elected!

1996, economy going fine. Surprise, Clinton is re-elected!

2000, recession and "dot com bubble burst". Surprise, Bush 2 is elected!

2004, economy doing fine. Surprise, Bush is re-elected!

2008, economy in the tank, banks failing. Surprise, Obama is elected!

Learn from history, people. It is ALWAYS the economy. In 4 years if
things have not improved - Surprise, the Republican Candidate will be
elected! If the economy is humming along - Surprise, Obama is re-elected!

In article ,
"Bob Campbell" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article
,
wrote:

SNIP

The best data out there says: Obama: 347 McCain: 191

And make no mistake: the SPANKING will be because of the nations
disgust with the party of George W. Bush, more than any other
factor.

That's what you do best. You make mistakes continually.

What happened here is a bad economy

That's all that matters. People ALWAYS vote based on their
pocketbook. It is ALWAYS the economy. If the economy was still
going fine, McCain would have won. Since the economy is in the
tank, its time for a Change. This is based on history, and is 100%
accurate. In the last 30 years, every time the presidency has
changed parties, the economy has been in the tank.

1980, Carter and 20% interest rates, 8% unemployment and 20%
inflation. Surprise, Reagan got elected!

1984, economy going strong. Surprise, Reagan re-elected!

1988, economy is still going strong. Surprise, Bush 1 got elected!

1992, recession and Bush reneged on his "no new taxes" pledge.
Surprise, Clinton is elected!

1996, economy going fine. Surprise, Clinton is re-elected!

2000, recession and "dot com bubble burst". Surprise, Bush 2 is
elected!

2004, economy doing fine. Surprise, Bush is re-elected!

2008, economy in the tank, banks failing. Surprise, Obama is
elected!

Learn from history, people. It is ALWAYS the economy. In 4 years
if things have not improved - Surprise, the Republican Candidate will
be elected! If the economy is humming along - Surprise, Obama is
re-elected!

You understand because you have a clue but unfortunately many do not.

The economy is the number one reason but do not underestimate the power
of a campaign together with the old media to help make a candidate
palatable.

We are on the verge of electing a bent radical marxist who will not
release his birth certificate for scrutiny or his academic record so we
can see how brilliantly he has performed.

Mr. O-bla-ma how do you vote? Present.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon wrote:

A year from now most O-bla-ma supporters will wish they could take their
vote back.

Maybe...

....but in 2000, 31% of the people thought the country was on the wrong path.

In 2008, 79%(!) thought the country was on the wrong path.

It sounds like more than a few Bush supporters wish they could take
their vote back.

Waaaay heckuva job, Georgie!

In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote:

Telamon wrote:

A year from now most O-bla-ma supporters will wish they could take their
vote back.

Maybe...

No maybe about it.

...but in 2000, 31% of the people thought the country was on the wrong path.

In 2008, 79%(!) thought the country was on the wrong path.

It sounds like more than a few Bush supporters wish they could take
their vote back.

Waaaay heckuva job, Georgie!

Yeah, so based on your numbers about 99% will want their O-bla-ma vote
back.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California