A Brave New America
 

David Hartung wrote:


The simple fact is that Bush has been at least as good as both of his
immediate predecessors.


"...as good as..." ???

Goodness has nothing to do with it.

He has done way more harm to the Constitution and has completely
destroyed any international goodwill, save for a few despotic regimes
scattered around the planet, we may have once enjoyed.

Then there's the whole deal with the economy in the ditch...

A Brave New America
 

Dave wrote:
David Hartung wrote:


The simple fact is that Bush has been at least as good as both of his
immediate predecessors.


"...as good as..." ???

Goodness has nothing to do with it.

He has done way more harm to the Constitution and has completely
destroyed any international goodwill, save for a few despotic regimes
scattered around the planet, we may have once enjoyed.

Then there's the whole deal with the economy in the ditch...

George W Bush has done no more damage to our Constitution than did his
Dad, or Bill Clinton.

As to "international goodwill" Any "goodwill" Bush has cost us, has been
lost because Bush has had the backbone to put our national interests
ahead of the interests of others. Since this is part of what he is
supposed to do as our president, I see no reason why I should worry
about any "goodwill" that has been lost.

A Brave New America
 

David Hartung wrote:
Dave wrote:
David Hartung wrote:


The simple fact is that Bush has been at least as good as both of his
immediate predecessors.


"...as good as..." ???

Goodness has nothing to do with it.

He has done way more harm to the Constitution and has completely
destroyed any international goodwill, save for a few despotic regimes
scattered around the planet, we may have once enjoyed.

Then there's the whole deal with the economy in the ditch...

George W Bush has done no more damage to our Constitution than did his
Dad, or Bill Clinton.

As to "international goodwill" Any "goodwill" Bush has cost us, has been
lost because Bush has had the backbone to put our national interests
ahead of the interests of others. Since this is part of what he is
supposed to do as our president, I see no reason why I should worry
about any "goodwill" that has been lost.


"...backbone..."??? WTF?

It takes no courage to kill by remote control and to send other peoples'
kids to die for the Empire. A courageous president would tell his
people that the USA must learn to live within its means and that the
country must not oppress people around the world because we need their
resources for our machines.

A Brave New America
 

Dave wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
Dave wrote:
David Hartung wrote:


The simple fact is that Bush has been at least as good as both of
his immediate predecessors.


"...as good as..." ???

Goodness has nothing to do with it.

He has done way more harm to the Constitution and has completely
destroyed any international goodwill, save for a few despotic regimes
scattered around the planet, we may have once enjoyed.

Then there's the whole deal with the economy in the ditch...

George W Bush has done no more damage to our Constitution than did his
Dad, or Bill Clinton.

As to "international goodwill" Any "goodwill" Bush has cost us, has
been lost because Bush has had the backbone to put our national
interests ahead of the interests of others. Since this is part of what
he is supposed to do as our president, I see no reason why I should
worry about any "goodwill" that has been lost.


"...backbone..."??? WTF?

It takes no courage to kill by remote control and to send other peoples'
kids to die for the Empire. A courageous president would tell his
people that the USA must learn to live within its means and that the
country must not oppress people around the world because we need their
resources for our machines.

Oppress?

You really need to learn what words mean.

A Brave New America
 

In 1989 I bought my big old 1978 Dodge van from a guy by the last name
of Hartung.
cuhulin

Try Something Better : Simply Post An ON-TOPIC Shortwave RadioRelated Item Yourself
 

On Nov 21, 10:40*pm, "Hall Monitor" wrote:

- It's all Tela-turds fault.....

Hall Monitor,

D'Oh! - If You Post To It : It's Your Fault Too !

Good : Read Telamon -or- Ignore Telamon

Try Something Better : Simply Post An ON-TOPIC
Shortwave Radio Related Item Yourself.

un-moderately yours ~ RHF

A Brave New America
 

§tarkiller© writes:

§tarkiller© On 21 Nov 2008 17:51:06 -0500, wrote:
David Hartung writes:

David SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim wrote:
now this is funny, bush has completely destroyed the constitution,
greed is rampant, bush singlehandedly destroyed the u.s. economy,
and you're scared of the demcorats?
you should be scared of the dumbass nazi neocon republican scum
save america, kill a neocon today

David If you will look around you, you will realize that your claim is
David completely without merit.

David Bush has destroyed nothing.

He has come very close to destroying Iraq.
By complete incompetence.

§tarkiller© Yeah yeah sure sure, guess that's why so many less people are dying in
§tarkiller© Iraq today than did under your hero Saddam yes?

Far more people die today than under Saddam. What could have
possibly made you think otherwise?

Iraq is in the control of political parties created in Iran, and
allied with Iran.

Recently we made allies with unreformed Baathists in the Sunni areas,
and have armed them. Now there are three Iraqi armies in Iraq --- the
Peshmurga (Kurds), the offical Iraqi Army (Shiite and allied with Iran),
and the new Sunni awakening army.

When we leave, these three armies will have a full scale war.

§tarkiller© Guess that's also why the Iraq oil business is booming raking in
§tarkiller© billions to Iraq.

Billions to the pro-Iranian Shiite parties.

§tarkiller© Guess that's also why we see so few reports of fighting and deaths
§tarkiller© these days compares to just a couple of years ago as well yes?

There is a short term reduction in violence, and the Baathists have pretty
much expelled al Queda. But the nation is ruined.

He has destroyed our prestige in the world.

§tarkiller© No, people like Soros, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton and few choice
§tarkiller© others traveling all over the world badmouthing the US to foreign
§tarkiller© nations did a lot of that, along with liberals like yoursel that

No, it was Bush arrogance and incompetence that did it.

Very sad.

§tarkiller© started screaming how horrible the US was even before Bush took office

He is really one of the worst presidents of
all time.

§tarkiller© Another youngster not old enough to have experienced the Carter
§tarkiller© administration no doubt.

You are not a good mind reader. Carter's ineptness pales next to Bush's.

§tarkiller© Not to worry though. It is likely you may see another Carteresque
§tarkiller© presidency shortly.

Perhaps, but it is hard to imagine it could be worse that Bush.

Read some history. I can give you a good reading list to see the truth
about the criminal incompetence of Bush.








§tarkiller© Regards


§tarkiller© §tarkiller©








§tarkiller© 'A government big enough to give you everything you want, is
§tarkiller© big enough to take away everything you have.'

§tarkiller© "You cannot enrich the poor by impoverishing the rich."


--
Andrew Hall
(Now reading Usenet in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh...)

A Brave New America
 

wrote in message
...
Read some history. I can give you a good reading list to see the truth
about the criminal incompetence of Bush.

Being incompetent is not a crime. If it was, then 75% of politicians,
school teachers and telephone "product support" people would be in jail.

A Brave New America
 

A Brave New America
 

Once in a very, very, very blue Moon I am on topic.
www.wireservices.com

The radio and antenna stuff.
cuhulin