Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 18, 1:01*pm, "Bob Campbell" wrote:
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" wrote in message m... now this is funny, bush has completely destroyed the constitution, greed is rampant, bush singlehandedly destroyed the u.s. economy, and you're scared of the demcorats? - - you should be scared of the dumbass nazi - Thread over. * Godwin's law invoked. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwins_Law NAZI = "The-N-Word" of any Political Discussion. NAZI = SOCIALIST = MARXIST = COMMUNIST = BAD PEOPLE NAZI = FASCIST = SKINHEAD = NEOCON = BAD PEOPLE Looks like "Neocon" has become the new name calling word for 'nazi' in the 21st Century. Plus calling some one a "Neocon" has those subtle Anti-Jewish undertones -and- "Neocon" has a decided Anti-Israel-Zionist Overtone. just say no to 'nazi' type name calling ~ RHF |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 18, 5:31�pm, RHF wrote:
NAZI = "The-N-Word" of any Political Discussion. NAZI = SOCIALIST = MARXIST = COMMUNIST = BAD PEOPLE NAZI = FASCIST = SKINHEAD = NEOCON = BAD PEOPLE Looks like "Neocon" has become the new name calling word for 'nazi' in the 21st Century. Plus calling some one a "Neocon" has those subtle Anti-Jewish undertones -and- "Neocon" has a decided Anti-Israel-Zionist Overtone. just say no to 'nazi' type name calling ~ RHF �. Roy, Real Nazis represent one of the most evil forces in history. You are right that anyone that anyone that suggests that a Neocon is the same as a Nazi is clearly exaggerating. Here's the way it really is: Neocons embrace conservatism. Nazis also embraced conservatism, but in a very extreme form of statist nationalism. Think neocon on steroids. While most neocons are not racists, many of their positions on national patriotism, national security, and the importance of security over individual freedoms, are definitely pointed in the same fascist direction that the Nazis started with. Liberals are not the same as Marxists or Socialists. But, just as the neocons are moving in the same direction as Nazis, the liberals are more like Marxist or Commies than Nazis. A Marxist is like a liberal on nasty steroids. Nazis are the opposite of Marxists or Socialists. One of Hitler's first steps toward World War was to burn down the Reichstag and blame it on the Commies and Socialists. The Nazi Fascists fought against the Soviet Marxists in WW2. It is estimated that 25 million Marxists died fighting the invading Fascist Nazis. Anyone that calls a Commie Marxist a Nazi or a Fascist is attempting to re-write history. So, neocons are not fascists and liberal are not Marxists. Both extremes are undesirable. Unless real American stand up to these foolish exaggerations, the people that distort history for their own political ends will prevent the people of this nation from uniting and really dealing with our societal problems. Obama is not a Marxist and I don't think most neocons (with the possible exception of Dick "Shotgun" Cheney) are Nazis. Let's stop this foolishness and realize that such hyperbole is a clear indication of a crackpot. I'm willing to bet that I'm the only one in this thread that has actual college degrees in Government and Public Affairs. Mike |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 18, 9:13*pm, Mike wrote:
Real Nazis represent one of the most evil forces in history. You are right that anyone that anyone that suggests that a Neocon is the same as a Nazi is clearly exaggerating. Here's the way it really is: LMFAO!!!! - I STRONGLYsuggest you Liberal Facsists read "Your Own" history before you stick your foot in your mouth so far down it pops out of your fat ass: " Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning" http://www.amazon.com/Liberal-Fascis.../dp/0385511841 http://www.reason.com/blog/show/124122.html Heil Hitler (get used to it) |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 18, 10:47�pm, wrote:
On Nov 18, 9:13�pm, Mike wrote: Real Nazis represent one of the most evil forces in history. You are right that anyone that anyone that suggests that a Neocon is the same as a Nazi is clearly exaggerating. Here's the way it really is: LMFAO!!!! - I STRONGLYsuggest you Liberal Facsists read "Your Own" history before you stick your foot in your mouth so far down it pops out of your fat ass: " Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning" http://www.amazon.com/Liberal-Fascis...ow/124122.html Heil Hitler (get used to it) As I originally wrote: We must stand up against people (like you!) that re-write history for their own purposes. Mussolini was opposed by US liberals during the '30s, while he was supported by US conservatives. That's a historical fact that you can't escape, "donki dix"! |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Mike wrote: On Nov 18, 10:47�pm, wrote: On Nov 18, 9:13�pm, Mike wrote: Real Nazis represent one of the most evil forces in history. You are right that anyone that anyone that suggests that a Neocon is the same as a Nazi is clearly exaggerating. Here's the way it really is: LMFAO!!!! - I STRONGLYsuggest you Liberal Facsists read "Your Own" history before you stick your foot in your mouth so far down it pops out of your fat ass: " Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning" http://www.amazon.com/Liberal-Fascis...ow/124122.html Heil Hitler (get used to it) As I originally wrote: We must stand up against people (like you!) that re-write history for their own purposes. Didn't you try to re-write history for your own purposes by claiming that you had a PhD? Mussolini was opposed by US liberals during the '30s, while he was supported by US conservatives. That's a historical fact that you can't escape, "donki dix"! |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 19, 7:44*am, Mike wrote:
On Nov 18, 10:47 pm, wrote: On Nov 18, 9:13 pm, Mike wrote: Real Nazis represent one of the most evil forces in history. You are right that anyone that anyone that suggests that a Neocon is the same as a Nazi is clearly exaggerating. Here's the way it really is: LMFAO!!!! - I STRONGLYsuggest you Liberal Facsists read "Your Own" history before you stick your foot in your mouth so far down it pops out of your fat ass: " Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning" http://www.amazon.com/Liberal-Fascis...i-Politics/dp/... Heil Hitler (get used to it) As I originally wrote: We must stand up against people (like you!) that re-write history for their own purposes. Mussolini was opposed by US liberals during the '30s, while he was supported by US conservatives. That's a historical fact that you can't escape, *"donki dix"!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You obviously havn't read the heavilly researched and very factual book. "And so they will remain ignorant and a laughing stock." |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike wrote:
snip As I originally wrote: We must stand up against people (like you!) that re-write history for their own purposes. Mussolini was opposed by US liberals during the '30s, while he was supported by US conservatives. That's a historical fact that you can't escape, "donki dix"! Since you mention Mussolini, this is as good a place as any to mention my shock and bewilderment at the McCain campaign's use early in the general election period after the conventions, of a pose of the candidate, in television spots, that looked to me exactly like the famous photos of Il Duce. Didn't anyone in that campaign have a clue? BTW, why is this thread cost posted so promiscuously (reading it in R.R.S) Michael |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 18, 10:13*pm, Mike wrote:
On Nov 18, 5:31 pm, RHF wrote: NAZI = "The-N-Word" of any Political Discussion. NAZI = SOCIALIST = MARXIST = COMMUNIST = BAD PEOPLE NAZI = FASCIST = SKINHEAD = NEOCON = BAD PEOPLE Looks like "Neocon" has become the new name calling word for 'nazi' in the 21st Century. Plus calling some one a "Neocon" has those subtle Anti-Jewish undertones -and- "Neocon" has a decided Anti-Israel-Zionist Overtone. just say no to 'nazi' type name calling ~ RHF . Roy, Real Nazis represent one of the most evil forces in history. You are right that anyone that anyone that suggests that a Neocon is the same as a Nazi is clearly exaggerating. Here's the way it really is: Neocons embrace conservatism. Nazis also embraced conservatism, but in a very extreme form of statist nationalism. Think neocon on steroids. While most neocons are not racists, many of their positions on national patriotism, national security, and the importance of security over individual freedoms, are definitely pointed in the same fascist direction that the Nazis started with. Liberals are not the same as Marxists or Socialists. But, just as the neocons are moving in the same direction as Nazis, the liberals are more like Marxist or Commies than Nazis. A Marxist is like a liberal on nasty steroids. Nazis are the opposite of Marxists or Socialists. One of Hitler's first steps toward World War was to burn down the Reichstag and blame it on the Commies and Socialists. The Nazi Fascists fought against the Soviet Marxists in WW2. It is estimated that 25 million Marxists died fighting the invading Fascist Nazis. Anyone that calls a Commie Marxist a Nazi or a Fascist is attempting to re-write history. So, neocons are not fascists and liberal are not Marxists. Both extremes are undesirable. Unless real American stand up to these foolish exaggerations, the people that distort history for their own political ends will prevent the people of this nation from uniting and really dealing with our societal problems. Obama is not a Marxist and I don't think most neocons (with the possible exception of Dick "Shotgun" Cheney) are Nazis. Let's stop this foolishness and realize that such hyperbole is a clear indication of a crackpot. I'm willing to bet that I'm the only one in this thread that has actual college degrees in Government and Public Affairs. Mike- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well. the Nazis fighting the Communists isn't evidence of them being a great deal different. When Ribbentrop went to Moscow to deal with Molotov, and agree to both invade Poland with their forces and split it between them, he returned to Berlin and reported, "We can deal with these guys, they are just like us". They also aggreed to split up Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, and Romania into Nazi and Soviet spheres of influence for take over by the two dictatorships. The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact (also known as the Hitler - Stalin Pact and other titles) remained in effect until Nazi Germany invaded the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941 in Operation Barbarossa. The only thing stopping the Nazi Germany from working together with the Soviet Union in the end was Hitler's megalomania. Otherwise, WW II could have turned out very differently. Perhaps in a way none of us would like to imagine. Stalin was in a state of shock that Hitler broke their pact, and attacked. It took him some days to recover his composure and start to act. Even Communist countries can fight against each other. It's the "Party" of one country against the "Party" in the other,. To the little man in the street, one dictatorship is little different from the other. Naziism/Fascism vs. Communism. They are both "Total Government" .... Totalitarianism. Kissing cousins. Both of them step on the freedom of the citizens. Destructive of Liberty. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cato" wrote in message ... Naziism/Fascism vs. Communism. They are both "Total Government" .... Totalitarianism. Kissing cousins. Both of them step on the freedom of the citizens. Destructive of Liberty. Said it before, will say it again. Any, ANY form of government can be abused. Fascism may well appear to the man on the street to be no different from Communism, but they are politcally diametrically opposite. The end result to the citizen may be the same, but the players have different sets of 'morals'. Fascism is, in part, Capitalism taken to it's extreme. Our own Democratic Republic (USA, but isn't it funny how so many Communist countries use those words in their proper names?) can be abused to the point where it would, to practical intents and purposes, be no different than either a Communist or Fascist dictatorship. Already, corporations have far too much power and control over our government. I'm all for "Joe the Plumber" blue collar types being able to earn whatever living they choose to work for. I have a BIG problem with corporations taking advantage of the hard work of others to garner obscene profits (Exxon-Mobil, for one). |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 20, 2:28*am, "Brenda Ann" wrote:
"Cato" wrote in message ... * * Naziism/Fascism *vs. Communism. * * They are both "Total Government" .... *Totalitarianism. * Kissing cousins. *Both of them step on the freedom of the citizens. Destructive of Liberty. Said it before, will say it again. *Any, ANY form of government can be abused. Fascism may well appear to the man on the street to be no different from Communism, but they are politcally diametrically opposite. The end result to the citizen may be the same, but the players have different sets of 'morals'. *Fascism is, in part, Capitalism taken to it's extreme. *Our own Democratic Republic (USA, but isn't it funny how so many Communist countries use those words in their proper names?) can be abused to the point where it would, to practical intents and purposes, be no different than either a Communist or Fascist dictatorship. Already, corporations have far too much power and control over our government. *I'm all for "Joe the Plumber" blue collar types being able to earn whatever living they choose to work for. *I have a BIG problem with corporations taking advantage of the hard work of others to garner obscene profits (Exxon-Mobil, for one). You are correct on some accounts, but notice in Nazi Germany with the big industries, although the original owners where still owners on paper, and retained their titles, they now had to produce what they were told to produce, they were told how much to produce, how much they would get paid, and how much to pay the workers. You were expected to meet government imposed quotas, just as in Communist countries. In Nazi Germany, you owned your company on paper, but you and your company and your workers were totally controlled by the government. If instead, you have the companys controlling the government, as you say you are getting in the U.S., you have it turned around backwards. That was not the case in either Nazi Germany, or Communist Soviet Union. There, the Government, (The Party) headed up by their Great Leaders, had control. Not much different then how business was run in the Soviet Union. There, you had your factory committees and party comrades running the factory. Totally controlled by the government again. Again, totally controlled by the government. Everyone's lives under total regulation. To regular people, dictatorship is dictatorship. With their "Re- education" Camps and Gulags and Concentration Camps. What does it matter if it is black fascism, red communism, or green or purple "ism" ? ? No diff to me. All evil, and destructive to Liberty. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
SCOTLAND the BRAVE | Shortwave | |||
Big, brave mopathetic! | CB | |||
BRave New Waves on XPN | Broadcasting | |||
Canada - Brave new radio waves | Broadcasting | |||
Brave New Waves | Broadcasting |