Telamon wrote:

In article
,
traveler wrote:

On Feb 8, 3:42*pm, wrote:
Democratic plans to revive government censorship of the radio and TV
airways will strike hardest at religious broadcasters who stand in the
way of a liberal social revolution.


Such nonsense! I live in an area where we get nothing BUT rightwing
talk radio every day, ALL DAY LONG. I've complained to the single
talk radio station's owner several times and he always hands me a load
of bull about how these shows are the only ones he can get. We hear
G. Gordon Liddy, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, and Lars Larson. Each
of these guys are always on about the slightest progressive notion
being tantamount to high treason. As a result, the people in my area
are almost exclusively highschool educated retired machinists and ex-
military without a clue. They think it's perfectly alright to poison
the hell out of their homes and yards because they don't understand
the slightest thing about the environment and don't want to know.
They think only stupid people go to college or would want to go to
college. This is what these morons have done to this country,
propagandizing an already mentally challenged populace into believing
that being dumb and ignorant is a quality rather than a major drawback
to proper citizenship. And you actually think making a first attempt
at correcting this appalling situation is a problem? Nobody cares
about the religious stations. What we care about is social and
political discussion where only the far rightwing perspective is
presented as absolute truth. Enough! These stations are supposed to
be run in the public interest, not in the Republican interest. They
must obtain licenses to broadcast. It is NOT strictly free enterprise
at stake here but the public's right to know what is going on in the
world both inside and outside the local community.

Excellent propaganda. I think there is a future position on the FCC
commission for you.

Commissions on the Obama administration are so old school. He is more
likely have a Ministry of Newspeak.

Berkeley Bolshevik wrote:


Commissions on the Obama administration are so old school. He is more
likely have a Ministry of Newspeak.

You are inadvertently shooting yourself in the foot.

On Feb 9, 3:51*pm, dave wrote:
Berkeley Bolshevik wrote:

Commissions on the Obama administration are so old school. He is more
likely have a Ministry of Newspeak.

- You are inadvertently shooting yourself in the foot.

Dave as long it is your foot. ;-} ~ RHF

On Feb 8, 9:32*pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article
,





*traveler wrote:
On Feb 8, 3:42*pm, wrote:
Democratic plans to revive government censorship of the radio and TV
airways will strike hardest at religious broadcasters who stand in the
way of a liberal social revolution.

Such nonsense! *I live in an area where we get nothing BUT rightwing
talk radio every day, ALL DAY LONG. *I've complained to the single
talk radio station's owner several times and he always hands me a load
of bull about how these shows are the only ones he can get. *We hear
G. Gordon Liddy, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, and Lars Larson. *Each
of these guys are always on about the slightest progressive notion
being tantamount to high treason. *As a result, the people in my area
are almost exclusively highschool educated retired machinists and ex-
military without a clue. *They think it's perfectly alright to poison
the hell out of their homes and yards because they don't understand
the slightest thing about the environment and don't want to know.
They think only stupid people go to college or would want to go to
college. *This is what these morons have done to this country,
propagandizing an already mentally challenged populace into believing
that being dumb and ignorant is a quality rather than a major drawback
to proper citizenship. * And you actually think making a first attempt
at correcting this appalling situation is a problem? *Nobody cares
about the religious stations. *What we care about is social and
political discussion where only the far rightwing perspective is
presented as absolute truth. *Enough! *These stations are supposed to
be run in the public interest, not in the Republican interest. *They
must obtain licenses to broadcast. *It is NOT strictly free enterprise
at stake here but the public's right to know what is going on in the
world both inside and outside the local community.

Excellent propaganda. I think there is a future position on the FCC
commission for you.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Thanks, but I'm not holding my breath. And it's not propaganda. It's
the truth. Living in liberal Southern California, you don't
understand what goes down in isolated parts of Arizona.

Telamon
Ventura, California

Thanks, but I'm not holding my breath. *And it's not propaganda. *It's
the truth. *Living in liberal Southern California, you don't
understand what goes down in isolated parts of Arizona.

Ventura County voted for Bush in 2000 and 2004. Elton Gallegly is the
local Congressman. When descriptive terms such as "liberal" cease to
be used to accurately describe a situation, maybe it's time to seek
more accurate terms that reflect a more complex reality.

Comrade traveler wrote:

On Feb 8, 3:42*pm, wrote:
Democratic plans to revive government censorship of the radio and TV
airways will strike hardest at religious broadcasters who stand in the
way of a liberal social revolution.


Such nonsense! I live in an area where we get nothing BUT rightwing
talk radio every day, ALL DAY LONG. I've complained to the single
talk radio station's owner several times and he always hands me a load
of bull about how these shows are the only ones he can get. We hear
G. Gordon Liddy, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, and Lars Larson. Each
of these guys are always on about the slightest progressive notion
being tantamount to high treason. As a result, the people in my area
are almost exclusively highschool educated retired machinists and ex-
military without a clue. They think it's perfectly alright to poison
the hell out of their homes and yards because they don't understand
the slightest thing about the environment and don't want to know.
They think only stupid people go to college or would want to go to
college. This is what these morons have done to this country,
propagandizing an already mentally challenged populace into believing
that being dumb and ignorant is a quality rather than a major drawback
to proper citizenship. And you actually think making a first attempt
at correcting this appalling situation is a problem? Nobody cares
about the religious stations. What we care about is social and
political discussion where only the far rightwing perspective is
presented as absolute truth. Enough! These stations are supposed to
be run in the public interest, not in the Republican interest. They
must obtain licenses to broadcast. It is NOT strictly free enterprise
at stake here but the public's right to know what is going on in the
world both inside and outside the local community.

Want to know what is going on in the world both inside and outside the
local community? Don't be a cheapskate and buy a newspaper. The radio
hosts you mentioned aren't news reporters, they're commentators. So
you won't get the latest breaking news from them. Want unbiased news?
Try (tic) NPR or PBS. If have this need for radio, get satellite
radio. Your choices are endless. You're online, discover all the web
sites available. You are only limited by yourself.

You have so many choices where to get your news, your bitching and
moaning is rather comical.

Berkeley Bolshevik wrote:


Want to know what is going on in the world both inside and outside the
local community? Don't be a cheapskate and buy a newspaper. The radio
hosts you mentioned aren't news reporters, they're commentators. So
you won't get the latest breaking news from them. Want unbiased news?
Try (tic) NPR or PBS. If have this need for radio, get satellite
radio. Your choices are endless. You're online, discover all the web
sites available. You are only limited by yourself.

You have so many choices where to get your news, your bitching and
moaning is rather comical.

The issue is the commons and whether one point of view dominates the
public airwaves to the detriment of others. Many people listen to
Limpballs by default, as he is on the only station they can pick up at
work, etc. How much right-wing talk is available in Dallas? How much
progressive?

On Feb 9, 3:50*pm, dave wrote:
Berkeley Bolshevik wrote:

Want to know what is going on in the world both inside and outside the
local community? Don't be a cheapskate and buy a newspaper. The radio
hosts you mentioned aren't news reporters, they're commentators. So
you won't get the latest breaking news from them. Want unbiased news?
Try (tic) *NPR or PBS. If have this need for radio, get satellite
radio. Your choices are endless. You're online, discover all the web
sites available. You are only limited by yourself.

You have so many choices where to get your news, your bitching and
moaning is rather comical.

The issue is the commons and whether one point of view dominates the
public airwaves to the detriment of others. *Many people listen to
Limpballs by default, as he is on the only station they can pick up at
work, etc. *How much right-wing talk is available in Dallas? *How much
progressive?

What 'market' for Left-Wing-a-Ding-a-Ling
Talk Radio is their in Dallas, TX to begin
with ? ? ? : That NPR {PBS} do not satisfy
and fill the need of Liberal Radio Listeners ?

* "Air-America" Failed because they were trying
to compete with for Left-Wing {Liberal} Radio
Listeners who were already NPR {PBS} Radio
Listeners and very Loyal to the NPR {PBS}
Brand.

* Nation-Wide the NPR {PBS} Brand has over
2400 Radio Stations; while Limbaugh and Hannity
can only manage to get on about 500 Radio
Stations : That Better Than 4-to-1 in the the
NPR {PBS} Brand's favor.

* 23 Texas NPR Member Radio Stations
http://www.infoplease.com/ipea/A0758937.html
http://www.tpr.org/
That a pretty good 'network' to counter-balance
Limbaugh, Hannity, O'Reilly, Beck, etc and paid
for by my Tax Dollars.

* For that matter why aren't my Tax Dollars
helping to support true fairness on the Radio
and requiring NPR [PBS] to carry 33% of it's
Programming to reflect the Conservative Voice
since they are 100% Left-Wing {Liberal} with
some Moderates to do the "Me Too" act with
them in the name of so-called 'liberal' truth.

yes i said that ~ RHF

On Feb 9, 3:07*pm, Berkeley Bolshevik
wrote:
Comrade *traveler * wrote:



On Feb 8, 3:42*pm, wrote:
Democratic plans to revive government censorship of the radio and TV
airways will strike hardest at religious broadcasters who stand in the
way of a liberal social revolution.

Such nonsense! *I live in an area where we get nothing BUT rightwing
talk radio every day, ALL DAY LONG. *I've complained to the single
talk radio station's owner several times and he always hands me a load
of bull about how these shows are the only ones he can get. *We hear
G. Gordon Liddy, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, and Lars Larson. *Each
of these guys are always on about the slightest progressive notion
being tantamount to high treason. *As a result, the people in my area
are almost exclusively highschool educated retired machinists and ex-
military without a clue. *They think it's perfectly alright to poison
the hell out of their homes and yards because they don't understand
the slightest thing about the environment and don't want to know.
They think only stupid people go to college or would want to go to
college. *This is what these morons have done to this country,
propagandizing an already mentally challenged populace into believing
that being dumb and ignorant is a quality rather than a major drawback
to proper citizenship. * And you actually think making a first attempt
at correcting this appalling situation is a problem? *Nobody cares
about the religious stations. *What we care about is social and
political discussion where only the far rightwing perspective is
presented as absolute truth. *Enough! *These stations are supposed to
be run in the public interest, not in the Republican interest. *They
must obtain licenses to broadcast. *It is NOT strictly free enterprise
at stake here but the public's right to know what is going on in the
world both inside and outside the local community.

Want to know what is going on in the world both inside and outside the
local community? Don't be a cheapskate and buy a newspaper. The radio
hosts you mentioned aren't news reporters, they're commentators. So
you won't get the latest breaking news from them. Want unbiased news?
Try (tic) *NPR or PBS. If have this need for radio, get satellite
radio. Your choices are endless. You're online, discover all the web
sites available.

- You are only limited by yourself.

Dave's 'self' is a great limiting factor.

- You have so many choices where to get
- your news, your bitching and moaning is
- rather comical.

Dave is after all Comic Disbelief ! ~ RHF

MSM = Ministry of Propaganda

Mama, why do I keep going around in circles? [[hush up, or I will nail
your other foot down]]
cuhulin