Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 17, 1:39�am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message ... At least when FM came on the scene there were plenty of FM radios to choose from - so that old and tired comparison from ibquity is meaningless. FM began prior to W.W. II, and then changed from 47 MHz to the current band after the War. There were no radios available. By 1950, there were over 1000 FM stations licensed (source, Broadcasting Yearbook 1950) yet by 1960 there were only around 650 (idem, '60 edition).. There were hardly any radios available, and the ones that were out there cost many times that of a common AM radio. That was 20 years after FM stations began to broadcast. In 1977, FM surpassed AM in audience. Today, in many markets, AM has less than 10% of all listening. Whether HD will work during a recession is anybody's guess. And whether AM is even worth trying is on many owner's minds. But expecting a change in a couple of years is absurd. Satellite is in Year 9 now, and still loses nearly $1 billion a year and may not survive. You know damn well that conversions to HD have stalled, and that broadcasters will not put anymore resources in HD, especially during the recession. Forget the 10db FM-HD power increase. FM-HD and AM-HD is being turned off in D.C., and probably elsewhere. Stations will get tired of the excessive HVAC bills and fees to iBiquity, with no possible ROI, except for iBiquity. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
IBiquity Started the Spin on How Successful 2008 was for hd radio | Shortwave | |||
An email from Robert Struble, CEO iBiquity | Shortwave | |||
An open letter to iBiquity - Bob Struble | Shortwave | |||
Did a "Robert J. Struble Ibiquity" word search on Yahoo | Shortwave | |||
Spin, LARDASS, Spin | General |