Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 17, 2:49*pm, Frank wrote:
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:39:36 -0800, David Eduardo wrote: FM began prior to W.W. II, and then changed from 47 MHz to the current band after the War. There were no radios available. What do you mean "There were no radios available"? *As I understand, there were almost a million radios made for the old 47 Mc FM band. *Every major manufacturer made radios for the postwar 100 Mc band. FM did stumble after it's introduction, but it's NOT because the radios were unavailable. By 1950, there were over 1000 FM stations licensed (source, Broadcasting Yearbook 1950) yet by 1960 there were only around 650 (idem, '60 edition). There were hardly any radios available, and the ones that were out there cost many times that of a common AM radio. That was 20 years after FM stations began to broadcast. I have the impression that 50s AM-FM tabletop radios cost about double what AM tabletops did. *As an example, here's a page scanned from the 1955 Spiegel catalog: http://www.flickr.com/photos/wishboo...72157594263507... That doesn't cost many times more than the cheapest radio on the page, but it was an expensive way to listen to simulcasts and second tier programming. In 1977, FM surpassed AM in audience. Today, in many markets, AM has less than 10% of all listening. Whether HD will work during a recession is anybody's guess. And whether AM is even worth trying is on many owner's minds. But expecting a change in a couple of years is absurd. Is the recession the problem? *Or is the problem that HD radio really doesn't add much value to radio regardless of the state of the economy? Satellite is in Year 9 now, and still loses nearly $1 billion a year and may not survive. Yeah, it's tough to get the cheap radio consumers to pay enough for radio, even when it's digital. Frank Dresser In 1960 we didn't have computers, the Internet, cell phones ipods CD's or MP3's. cable tv or satradio And consumers had a few media choices. Today we suffer from media glut, over choice and time scarcity. Broadcasters were at a loss with FM, I'm told they use to call it free music. FM was DOA until rock listeners discovered FM as an alternative source for music. Owners and programmers stopped following the playlist, started taking chances and thinking out of the box. One could draw some similarities between FM in 1960 & HD today were HD broadcasters lack programming direction. As mentioned above today we suffer from media glut & over choice. I'm afraid cloned jukeboxes or syndicated repeaters won't be enough to launch HD above start up status and if broadcasters aren't careful following this same strategy may very well kill AM & FM radio. Plus more media/entertainment choices are on the horizon. Radio competes for Time spent listening with computers, the Internet, cell phones ipods CD's or MP3's. cable tv, satradio & webradio. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
IBiquity Started the Spin on How Successful 2008 was for hd radio | Shortwave | |||
An email from Robert Struble, CEO iBiquity | Shortwave | |||
An open letter to iBiquity - Bob Struble | Shortwave | |||
Did a "Robert J. Struble Ibiquity" word search on Yahoo | Shortwave | |||
Spin, LARDASS, Spin | General |