wrote in message
...
On Mar 13, 11:58 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:

Eduardo - You really don't know what your talking about. WBZ is a
times as strong or stronger than KDKA's groundwave in their local
area. This is not debatable. WBZ hash can be heard under KDKA most
nights.

You are saying that WBZ is stronger (I assume you mean "at night") in
Allegheny, Beaver, Butler, Fayette, Washington and Westmoreland counties of
Pennsylvania than KDKA?

Those 6 counties are the only market area that KDKA is interested in.

Similarly, I doubt that KDKA interferes with WBZ in Essex, Middlesex,
Norfolk, Plymouth, Suffolk, Worcester and Hillsborough counties, the Boston
MSA or, as you say, "market area." Since WBZ is directional westward, it's
not likely they will have any interference of significance.

Heck, every AM gets occasional interference; I recall numerous times hearing
Venezuela on 1-A Clear Channel 1100 in early evenings over WKYC (now WTAM)
even though I was about 12 miles from the WTAM transmitter. That's one of
the reasons AM has so little appeal to the generations that grew up on FM...
interference, noise, static, lousy audio quality.

On Mar 13, 2:24�pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message

...

On Mar 13, 11:58 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:

Eduardo - You really don't know what your talking about. �WBZ is a
times as strong or stronger than KDKA's groundwave in their local
area. �This is not debatable. �WBZ hash can be heard under KDKA most
nights.

You are saying that WBZ is stronger (I assume you mean "at night") in
Allegheny, Beaver, Butler, Fayette, Washington and Westmoreland counties of
Pennsylvania than KDKA?

Those 6 counties are the only market area that KDKA is interested in.

Similarly, I doubt that KDKA interferes with WBZ in Essex, Middlesex,
Norfolk, Plymouth, Suffolk, Worcester and Hillsborough counties, the Boston
MSA or, as you say, "market area." Since WBZ is directional westward, it's
not likely they will have any interference of significance.

Heck, every AM gets occasional interference; I recall numerous times hearing
Venezuela on 1-A Clear Channel 1100 in early evenings over WKYC (now WTAM)
even though I was about 12 miles from the WTAM transmitter. That's one of
the reasons AM has so little appeal to the generations that grew up on FM....
interference, noise, static, lousy audio quality.

" Rochester Station Says IBOC Interferes" Bob Savage, CEO, WYSL

"WYSL has filed FIVE separate pleadings including two detailed
interference studies, over a period of 19 weeks encompassing a variety
of local weather conditions, in all three antenna modes and powers,
reply pleadings to two CBS responses (notably thin on data and highly
implausible) including scores of field readings and audio recordings
on CD. All of WYSL's data is supported by engineering statements from
TWO unimpeachable professional radio engineering firms representing
many decades of experience, all submitted UNDER OATH. One of these
engineers is renowned as an experienced researcher in the development
of terrestrial digital radio. All in all, including exhibits, over 100
pages of text and measurement data were filed with the Enforcement
Bureau with copies to the Mass Media Bureau. The FCC's response to
this mountain of persuasive data? They simply ignored it."

http://tinyurl.com/cdybql

"PocketRadio" wrote in message
...
On Mar 13, 2:24�pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

Heck, every AM gets occasional interference; I recall numerous times
hearing
Venezuela on 1-A Clear Channel 1100 in early evenings over WKYC (now WTAM)
even though I was about 12 miles from the WTAM transmitter. That's one of
the reasons AM has so little appeal to the generations that grew up on
FM...
interference, noise, static, lousy audio quality.

" Rochester Station Says IBOC Interferes" Bob Savage, CEO, WYSL

WYSL is not a Rochester station. It is a far suburban station trying, with
horribly low power at night, to cover a market beyond it's ability to cover,
with or without HD on a distant station.

David Eduardo wrote:

Heck, every AM gets occasional interference; I recall numerous times
hearing Venezuela on 1-A Clear Channel 1100 in early evenings over WKYC
(now WTAM) even though I was about 12 miles from the WTAM transmitter.
That's one of the reasons AM has so little appeal to the generations
that grew up on FM... interference, noise, static, lousy audio quality.

Most people have no idea what "audio quality" means.

"dave" wrote in message
m...
David Eduardo wrote:

Heck, every AM gets occasional interference; I recall numerous times
hearing Venezuela on 1-A Clear Channel 1100 in early evenings over WKYC
(now WTAM) even though I was about 12 miles from the WTAM transmitter.
That's one of the reasons AM has so little appeal to the generations that
grew up on FM... interference, noise, static, lousy audio quality.

Most people have no idea what "audio quality" means.

They can certainly tell the difference between AM and FM. That is why nearly
nobody under 50 or 55 listens to AM.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dave" wrote in message
m...
David Eduardo wrote:

Heck, every AM gets occasional interference; I recall numerous times
hearing Venezuela on 1-A Clear Channel 1100 in early evenings over
WKYC (now WTAM) even though I was about 12 miles from the WTAM
transmitter. That's one of the reasons AM has so little appeal to the
generations that grew up on FM... interference, noise, static, lousy
audio quality.

Most people have no idea what "audio quality" means.

They can certainly tell the difference between AM and FM. That is why
nearly nobody under 50 or 55 listens to AM.

Doubtful. How do you know the 30-somethings aren't merely avoiding your
surveyors at the mall or on street corners. Maybe people who listen to
AM radio don't go to the mall.

"dave" wrote in message
m...
David Eduardo wrote:

"dave" wrote in message
m...
David Eduardo wrote:

Heck, every AM gets occasional interference; I recall numerous times
hearing Venezuela on 1-A Clear Channel 1100 in early evenings over WKYC
(now WTAM) even though I was about 12 miles from the WTAM transmitter.
That's one of the reasons AM has so little appeal to the generations
that grew up on FM... interference, noise, static, lousy audio quality.

Most people have no idea what "audio quality" means.

They can certainly tell the difference between AM and FM. That is why
nearly nobody under 50 or 55 listens to AM.

Doubtful. How do you know the 30-somethings aren't merely avoiding your
surveyors at the mall or on street corners. Maybe people who listen to AM
radio don't go to the mall.

Nobody surveys radio audience at the mall or on the street corner.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dave" wrote in message
m...
David Eduardo wrote:

"dave" wrote in message
m...
David Eduardo wrote:

Heck, every AM gets occasional interference; I recall numerous times
hearing Venezuela on 1-A Clear Channel 1100 in early evenings over WKYC
(now WTAM) even though I was about 12 miles from the WTAM transmitter.
That's one of the reasons AM has so little appeal to the generations
that grew up on FM... interference, noise, static, lousy audio quality.

Most people have no idea what "audio quality" means.

They can certainly tell the difference between AM and FM. That is why
nearly nobody under 50 or 55 listens to AM.

Doubtful. How do you know the 30-somethings aren't merely avoiding your
surveyors at the mall or on street corners. Maybe people who listen to AM
radio don't go to the mall.

Nobody surveys radio audience at the mall or on the street corner.

Seems like you'd mentioned doing that before, oh faux one?