dave wrote:
~ RHF wrote:
On Mar 15, 9:34 am, dxAce wrote:

- Monitoring opportunities?
-
- http://news.mobile.msn.com/en-us/art...1&aid=29691183
- (via SmokeyKat, MilCom list)
-
- That photo sure brings back memories.
- I remember those boys buzzing us from time
- to time just above the deck and a few hundred feet away.
- We'd wave at each other!
-
- Later, I remember monitoring them as they
- transited along the east coast USA, sending
- position reports in Russian Morse. At the time
- there was an article in either PopCom or
- Monitoring Times giving details on how to
- decode those posit reports.
-
- dxAce
- Michigan
- USA

Meanwhile the Obama-Regime© does nothing
to protect America's Sovereignty from this
encroachment by Russia into Cuba putting
Bombers and ?Missiles? within a few Miles
of the US Mainland.


We are putting missiles on Russia's doorstep. This is their response.

"If the members of the Obama administration would bother to take a
stroll down memory lane, they might recall that once upon a time there
was a document called the anti-ballistic missile treaty, signed in 1972
between the United States and the former Soviet Union, which recognized
that anti-missile defense shields were inherently destabilizing, and as
such should not be deployed. The ABM treaty represented the foundational
agreement for a series of strategic arms limitation and arms reduction
agreements that followed. President Obama was 10 years old when that
treaty was signed. He was 40 years old when President George W. Bush
withdrew from it, in December 2001, and set in motion a series of events
that saw arms control between the U.S. and Russia completely unravel.
The proposed U.S. missile defense shield, to be deployed in Poland and
the Czech Republic, had the Russians talking about scrapping the INF
treaty (which eliminated two classes of nuclear-armed ballistic missiles
that threatened Europe) and deploying highly accurate SS-21 “Iskander”
missiles within striking range of the proposed Polish interceptor site.

Russia did not create the missile defense system crisis. The United
States did, and, as such, cannot expect to suddenly receive diplomatic
credit when it puts this controversial program on the foreign policy
gaming table as if it were a legitimate chip to be bargained away.

Missile defense systems are defensive. The idea that a defensive system
is destabilizing is completely ludicrous.

Bombers are by their very nature offensive. An Russian offensive weapon
deployed to the western hemisphere is by its very nature destabilizing.

See the difference?