On Mar 26, 4:20*pm, wrote:
On Mar 26, 6:02*pm, Anlatt the Builder wrote:



Let me see if I've got this right:

YOU DON'T!

Because he supports bailouts for companies whose failure might make
our economic crisis worth, he ALSO is required to support giving the
executives in those failing companies huger bonuses? And if he
doesn't, THAT makeshim "Porker of the Month"?

I can see being against the bailouts in general. Some people are. But
to attack him for being against bonuses to executives who got us in
this mess in the first place?

Why, that doesn't make any sense AT ALL.

By the way, Frank is a liberal (although fairly moderate by most
standards - being gay doesn't automatically make you a leftist
extremist). But he's not a fascist in any actual sense of the word.
That also doesn't make any sense AT ALL.

STOP THE LIBERAL FASCIST PROPAGANA LIES!

You might actually take the time out to explain the original,
nonsensical claim, rather than just YELL at the top of your lungs. But
that would have meant using your brains.