Compared to what a dollar was worth in the year 1900, nowadays the
dollar is worth less than four and a half cents.Hardly worth the rag it
is printed on.Folding money isn't paper, it is a rag.
cuhulin

On May 15, 11:12*pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article ,



*"Clave" wrote:
"Gary Forbis" wrote in message
...
On May 15, 5:47 pm, "Clave"
wrote:
wrote in message

.. .

...

These new emerging findings are blowing common economic thought out of
the water. People are not rational and do not pursue their best
interests. They can be and are manipulated against their own economic
interests.

Case in point, poor people who vote Republican.

I don't consider that a free lunch. *The poor pay
heavily for their acts in voting Republican.
================================================== ================

His point was that it's the people paying attention to and manipulating the
predictably irrational who are in line for the free lunch.

That's the Democrap's you clowns with the promise of the free lunch
through the redistribution of wealth. The Obominator is your man on the
job.



we already have had a massive redistribution of wealth, its called
trickle down, or supply side economics. the largest swindle in the
history of america, and its left us broke, unable to service our debt,
we can no longer consume, you are a idiot.


--
Telamon
Ventura, California

On May 16, 6:29*am, wrote:
On May 16, 7:30*am, dave wrote:

Then why do the red states get more tax money per capita than the blue
states? *Defense spending is redistribution too.

Because employees in Blue States pay more State and local taxes thus
paying less Federal taxes. *Therefor, Blue States receive less Fedaral
Tax money.


You're just wrong about federal taxes.
Data from http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/22685.html
who got it from the Federal Government.

Here's the 2005 sugar dadies:
State, Recieved per dollar spent, 2004 vote, 2008 vote.
New Jersey, 0.61, Blue, Blue
Nevada, 0.65, Red, Blue
Connecticut, 0.69, Blue, Blue
New Hampshire, 0.71, Blue, Blue
Minnesota, 0.72, Blue, Blue
Illinois, 0.75, Blue, Blue
Deleware, 0.77, Blue, Blue
California, 0.78, Blue, Blue
New York, 0.79, Blue, Blue
Colorado, 0.81, Red, Blue
Massachusetts, 0.82, Blue, Blue
Wisconsin, 0.86, Blue, Blue
Washington, 0.88, Blue, Blue
Michigan, 0.92, Blue, Blue
Oregon, 0.93, Blue, Blue
Texas, 0.94, Red, Red
Florida, 0.97, Red, Blue

Rhode Island broke even, blue in both elections.

The welfare queens:
District of Columbia, 5.55, Blue, Blue
New Mexico, 2.03, Red, Blue
Mississippi, 2.02, Red, Red
Alaska, 1.84, Red, Red
Louisiana, 1.78, Red, Red
West Verginia, 1.76, Red, Red
North Dakota, 1.68, Red, Red
Alabama, 1.66, Red, Red
South Dakota, 1.53, Red, Red
Kentucky, 1.51, Red, Red
Virginia, 1.51, Red, Blue
Montana, 1.47, Red, Red
Hawaii, 1.44, Blue, Blue
Arkansas, 1.41, Red, Red
Maine, 1.41, Blue, Blue
Oklahoma, 1.36, Red, Red
South Carolina, 1.35, Red, Red
Missouri, 1.32, Red, Red
Maryland, 1.30, Blue, Blue
Tennessee, 1.27, Red, Red
Idaho, 1.21, Red, Red
Arizona, 1.19, Red, Red
Kansas, 1.12, Red, Red
Wyoming, 1.11, Red, Red
Iowa, 1.10, Red, Blue
Nebraska, 1.10, Red, Red
North Carolina, 1.08, Red, Blue
Vermont, 1.08, Blue, Blue
Pennsylvania, 1.07, Blue, Blue
Utah, 1.07, Red, Red
Indiana, 1.05, Red, Blue
Ohio, 1.05, Red, Blue
Georgia, 1.01, Red, Red

On May 16, 12:06*pm, Gary Forbis wrote:
On May 16, 6:29*am, wrote:

On May 16, 7:30*am, dave wrote:
Then why do the red states get more tax money per capita than the blue
states? *Defense spending is redistribution too.

Because employees in Blue States pay more State and local taxes thus
paying less Federal taxes. *Therefor, Blue States receive less Fedaral
Tax money.

You're just wrong about federal taxes.
Data fromhttp://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/22685.html
who got it from the Federal Government.

Here's the 2005 sugar dadies:
State, Recieved per dollar spent, 2004 vote, 2008 vote.
New Jersey, 0.61, Blue, Blue
Nevada, 0.65, Red, Blue
Connecticut, 0.69, Blue, Blue
New Hampshire, 0.71, Blue, Blue
Minnesota, 0.72, Blue, Blue
Illinois, 0.75, Blue, Blue
Deleware, 0.77, Blue, Blue
California, 0.78, Blue, Blue
New York, 0.79, Blue, Blue
Colorado, 0.81, Red, Blue
Massachusetts, 0.82, Blue, Blue
Wisconsin, 0.86, Blue, Blue
Washington, 0.88, Blue, Blue
Michigan, 0.92, Blue, Blue
Oregon, 0.93, Blue, Blue
Texas, 0.94, Red, Red
Florida, 0.97, Red, Blue

Rhode Island broke even, blue in both elections.

The welfare queens:
District of Columbia, 5.55, Blue, Blue
New Mexico, 2.03, Red, Blue
Mississippi, 2.02, Red, Red
Alaska, 1.84, Red, Red
Louisiana, 1.78, Red, Red
West Verginia, 1.76, Red, Red
North Dakota, 1.68, Red, Red
Alabama, 1.66, Red, Red
South Dakota, 1.53, Red, Red
Kentucky, 1.51, Red, Red
Virginia, 1.51, Red, Blue
Montana, 1.47, Red, Red
Hawaii, 1.44, Blue, Blue
Arkansas, 1.41, Red, Red
Maine, 1.41, Blue, Blue
Oklahoma, 1.36, Red, Red
South Carolina, 1.35, Red, Red
Missouri, 1.32, Red, Red
Maryland, 1.30, Blue, Blue
Tennessee, 1.27, Red, Red
Idaho, 1.21, Red, Red
Arizona, 1.19, Red, Red
Kansas, 1.12, Red, Red
Wyoming, 1.11, Red, Red
Iowa, 1.10, Red, Blue
Nebraska, 1.10, Red, Red
North Carolina, 1.08, Red, Blue
Vermont, 1.08, Blue, Blue
Pennsylvania, 1.07, Blue, Blue
Utah, 1.07, Red, Red
Indiana, 1.05, Red, Blue
Ohio, 1.05, Red, Blue
Georgia, 1.01, Red, Red

You're just regurgitating what infant Dr.DaviD just burped.
I guess we'll have to wait until you learn how to read.

On May 16, 11:04*am, dave wrote:
wrote:
On May 15, 8:06 am, dave wrote:
wrote:
The late, great Milton Friedmanhttp://www.ideachannel.tv/
in his classic book prophetically revealed how 0baMa0's reckless
monetary policies will cause hyperinflation and destroy our nation
https://www.newsmaxstore.com/nm_mag/...MO_CODE=7FD4-1
Milton Friedman? *Give me a break. *The man should be in Hell with
Chairman Mao.

Hell will seem like paradise where you are headed..

I'm already in paradise, thank-you very much.

Yeah, now find a job and get off that sleep disorder disability
paycheck you teet sucker!

On May 16, 8:48*am, wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 00:40:18 -0700 (PDT), Gary Forbis

wrote:

There's no such thing as a free lunch. *Just because you
didn't pay for it doesn't mean it was free. *Milton's use of
the adage was different than mine. *Milton's use was more
along the lines that if one is offered something for free one
should check the fine print. *Mine is to observe shifted
costs.

Read the books. They both take this issue and expression head on.
I know you don't mind challenging your dogma a bit.

If the price is Free you can be sure a Slave paid for it.

On May 16, 1:33*pm, wrote:
On May 16, 8:48*am, wrote:

On Sat, 16 May 2009 00:40:18 -0700 (PDT), Gary Forbis

wrote:

There's no such thing as a free lunch. *Just because you
didn't pay for it doesn't mean it was free. *Milton's use of
the adage was different than mine. *Milton's use was more
along the lines that if one is offered something for free one
should check the fine print. *Mine is to observe shifted
costs.

Read the books. They both take this issue and expression head on.
I know you don't mind challenging your dogma a bit.

If the price is Free you can be sure a Slave paid for it.

you just defined free market economics.

On May 16, 1:38*pm, wrote:

If the price is Free you can be sure a Slave paid for it.

*you just defined free market economics.


You just showcased your ignoramus Public School education.

The poster defined Socialist/Communist economics - Serf of the State.

~ RHF wrote:
On May 16, 11:33 am, wrote:
On May 16, 8:48 am, wrote:

On Sat, 16 May 2009 00:40:18 -0700 (PDT), Gary Forbis
wrote:
There's no such thing as a free lunch. Just because you
didn't pay for it doesn't mean it was free. Milton's use of
the adage was different than mine. Milton's use was more
along the lines that if one is offered something for free one
should check the fine print. Mine is to observe shifted
costs.
Read the books. They both take this issue and expression head on.
I know you don't mind challenging your dogma a bit.

- If the price is Free you can be sure a Slave paid for it.

What You Think You Receive Free Today :
Often Costs You Dearly In The Future.
.
if it's free, they want something, you are selling something and just
don't know it....

On May 16, 3:30*pm, wrote:
On May 16, 1:38*pm, wrote:



If the price is Free you can be sure a Slave paid for it.

*you just defined free market economics.

You just showcased your ignoramus Public School education.

The poster defined Socialist/Communist economics - Serf of the State.

you mean when western capitalists sign free trade agreements with
communist china, and allow the communists to own 51% of the factory.
and where the western capitalists turn over all of their manufacturing
secrets, and proprietary property to take advantage of slave/sweatshop
labor, and then import those communists/socialists products into the
u.s.a., that then undercuts american production, and drives america
deep into debt for their own short term gain.
is that the serf state you are speaking of, because they are free to
do so