On May 27, 9:48*am, Kevin Cunningham wrote:
On May 27, 1:36*am, "~ RHF" wrote:





On May 26, 7:13*am, Kevin Cunningham wrote:

On May 26, 8:48*am, Gary Forbis wrote:

On May 26, 5:35*am, wrote:

It is indisputable that since at least the beginning of the Twentieth
Century the American Left has been engaged in a guerilla war against
its own country, while having a love fest with their totalitarian
idols who seek our destruction.

What a load of carp. *Something smells
fishy. *I feel under attack all the time by
right wing totalitarians. *By accusing the
left of what the right is doing the unthinking
may be swayed, as has the masses for
far too long, but people are waking up to
the truth of who is and who is not attacking
this nation and its values of freedom and
justice for all.

Good post!

- What the right can't push completely under the table are things like
- segregation, Father Conklin, the KKK and the Citizens council. *When
a
- writer can explain away these niggling facts they might get some
were.

Dang It Flash-Back Time 'segregation' -pre- 1960s
* an Obama-Speak© Code Word for the Evil
that White People Do.
Preaching Hate Against White People
and/or Class/Racial/Ethnic Warfare
*.
Dang It Flash-Back Time 'Father Coughlin' -circa- 1930s
* an Obama-Speak© Code Word for a Religious
{Evil} White Conservative.
Preaching Hate Against Religious People
and/or Class/Racial/Ethnic Warfare
*.
Dang It Flash-Back Time 'KKK' -circa- 1950s
* an Obama-Speak© Code Word for the Evil
that White People Do.
Preaching Hate Against White People
and/or Class/Racial/Ethnic Warfare
*.
Dang It Flash-Back Time {White} 'Citizens council' *-circa- 1960s
* an Obama-Speak© Code Word
for the Evil that White People Do.
Preaching Hate Against White People
and/or Class/Racial/Ethnic Warfare
*.
Liberal-Fascists are almost always stuck with
their heads-up-their-pasts ~ RHF
*.
*.

Hmmm, a right wing attempt to slough off their history. *You know,
their continuing support of segregation. *Until the repugs can get rid
of the taint of segregation they will have to relegate them selves to
being a regional party.

Publik School Neo-Commie brainwashing is a terrible thing to waste on
a useful idiot.
Yet another Liberal Fascist propaganda lie by yet another ignorant
Liberal Fascist.
This is getting to be fun entertainment. Like watching Kernal Klink
and Sargent Shultz - ROTFLMAO!
HEIL LIBERAL FASCIST HITLER!!!

On May 27, 12:06*pm, Michael Coburn wrote:
On Wed, 27 May 2009 14:18:59 +0900, Brenda Ann wrote:
"Gary Forbis" wrote in message
news:2ffa9ccc-

...

So, Is the conservative or liberal point of view to impose their will
upon the woman?

Consider this. *Suppose a quadraplegic takes up residence in your home
without your permission. *Do you then become responsible for the care of
this human being? *If you say no then why does a woman become
responsbile for some human who takes up residency in her womb without
her permission?

Has she not, by virtue of having had the requisite coitus, given defacto
permission (rape notwithstanding)?

No. *She has not given permission for it. *She accented to sex. *Not to
motherhood. Perhaps the male lied and told her he had been "fixed" or
that he would use a condom, or, or, or. *The "intent" of the act was not
necessarily motherhood. *She could also have been mistaken about her own
ovulation periods. *There is not (regardless of your particular opinions)
a prohibition on sex except that it be a necessary "evil" for procreation..

How else did you expect a PubliK Liberal Fascist Neo-Commie School
drop-out to increase her welfare income?

On May 27, 4:39*pm, Kevin Cunningham wrote:
On May 27,

(gone)
- - Liberal-Fascists are almost always stuck with
- - their heads-up-their-old-wealth-pasts ~ RHF

- Repetition doesn't make Liberals "Fascists".
- Fascism is a right wing concept and goal.
- Liberals favor democratic rule over dictatorships.

Repeating Liberal Lies and Democrat Party
of the USA Distortions does not change the
Fact that Liberal-Fascism Exists [.] *~ RHF
*.

(Tons and tons of crap deleted)

And you can't define it, place the concept with it's founder, say who
else uses it but it's still real. *Sort of like "Alice in Wonderland".

Yes, the Wonderland of right wing dementia.

ROTFLMAO!!!

This is fun Fun FUN ! Kernal Klink and Sargent Shultz hilarious -
ROTFLMAO!
HEIL LIBERAL FASCIST HITLER!!!

On May 27, 4:42*pm, Kevin Cunningham wrote:

Interesting, mostly when I read an anti-abortion screed, it's written
by some guy. *Now why is that? *Is it because banning abortion won't
influence them at all? *Sorta like Briston Palin's boy friend.

And this "guy" is the same way. *He's not going to have a baby, he's
not going to deliver but he's still against every thing that doesn't
affect him.

"Interesting"? pffft ROTFLMAO!!!!

On May 27, 5:40*pm, Meldon wrote:
On May 27, 3:23*am, Gary Forbis wrote:





On May 26, 10:18*pm, "Brenda Ann" wrote:

"Gary Forbis" wrote in message

....
So, Is the conservative or liberal point of view to impose their will
upon the woman?

Consider this. *Suppose a quadraplegic takes up residence in your
home without your permission. *Do you then become responsible
for the care of this human being? *If you say no then why does
a woman become responsbile for some human who takes up
residency in her womb without her permission?

Has she not, by virtue of having had the requisite coitus, given defacto
permission (rape notwithstanding)?

No. *pregnancy is no more a result of coitus than becoming a
millionare is a result of playing lotto. *

You heard it here first! Men by simply having sex, are not responsible
for unwanted pregnancies because there’s no guarantee of pregnancy.

LOL - tell that to the Puerto Rican Liberal Fascist Judge - ROTFLMAO!

On May 26, 8:00*pm, Gary Forbis wrote:

And the left can't hide any number of their own hypocrisies such as
women’s choice to kill.

So, Is the conservative or liberal point of view to impose their will
upon the woman?

Consider this. *Suppose a quadraplegic takes up residence in your
home without your permission. *Do you then become responsible
for the care of this human being? *If you say no then why does
a woman become responsbile for some human who takes up
residency in her womb without her permission?- Hide quoted text -


ROTFLMAO!!!!

On May 26, 8:39*pm, "marika" wrote:
"Gary Forbis" wrote in message
The "old wealth" is a matter of entitlement and enfranchisement.

NO one shared any of this wealth with me, old or new, *so why do I have to
support those who came before me

Because the Liberal FASCISTS say so - HEIL LIBERAL HITLER!

Liberal Kernal Klink and Fascist Sargent Shultz - ROTFLMAO!

On May 26, 8:58*pm, Joe from Kokomo wrote:
On May 26, 2:20 pm, Kevin Cunningham wrote:
I think we owe the world a few basic apologies. *The first one should
be for the stupid, corrupt invasion of Iraq for no known reason.

And you support the Iraq invasion when it suits you. *Now, why did we
do it? *There is no reason I can see, no reason that Bush gave that
panned out. *But your repugs, lying is what you do well.
wrote:
ROTFLMAO!

How about a REAL answer instead of your bull$hit (non) response?

Hide behind your laughing a$$hole if you wish, but if you have good
reasons for justifying the Iraq war, by all means, tell us.

C'mon, go ahead, really explain it. Now's your chance to dazzle us with
your brilliance instead of trying to baffle us with your bull$hit!

You can't handle a "real" answer, Kernal Klink and Sargent Shultz -
ROTFLMAO!

On May 27, 2:42*pm, Kevin Cunningham wrote:
On May 27, 1:33*pm, "~ RHF" wrote:



On May 27, 12:23*am, Gary Forbis wrote:

On May 26, 10:18*pm, "Brenda Ann" wrote:

"Gary Forbis" wrote in message

...
So, Is the conservative or liberal point of view to impose their will
upon the woman?

Consider this. *Suppose a quadraplegic takes up residence in your
home without your permission. *Do you then become responsible
for the care of this human being? *If you say no then why does
a woman become responsbile for some human who takes up
residency in her womb without her permission?

Has she not, by virtue of having had the requisite coitus, given defacto
permission (rape notwithstanding)?

- No. *pregnancy is no more a result of coitus
- than becoming a millionare is a result of
- playing lotto.

GF - Oh Ye Great Denier of Biology {Obama-Speaker©}

-*While you have to play to win few who play actually win.

-wrt- The Human Sexual Act it's about 1-in-4 Chances.
-ps- That Ain't a Million to One.

-*Most who do it do it for fun not for the chance
- of having a baby.

Then again - Some/Many 'Do It' to Create a Baby :
Which is a Natural Outcome of the Sexual Act.

-*Those who do it to have a baby will not ask
- for the human to be evicted.

Abortion is not an 'eviction'

The 'evicted' are out-on-the-street
-but- Very Much Alive
-and- Have a 'Chance' at a New Day
-and- A New Beginning for Their Life

The "Aborted" Are Dead {Murdered}
-yeah- Very Much Dead
-and- Have a 'NO Chance' at a New Day
-and- A NO Beginning of Their Life

Partial Birth Abortion -aka- ObamaCide©

-*There is no meeting of the minds between
- the parties prior to human taking up resident
- in the womb so no contract was made.

Don't Know whether there was a 'meeting-of-the-minds'
-but- There Was Sure A "Meeting-of-the-Bodies"

GF - "human taking up resident in the womb"

# 1 - Yes It Is A Living Human Being :
Not an organic tissue sample to disposed of...

# 2 - "taking up resident in the womb"
You make it sound like some space alien invasion.
*.

- Interesting, mostly when I read an anti-abortion screed, it's
written
- by some guy. *Now why is that? *Is it because banning abortion won't
- influence them at all? *Sorta like Briston Palin's boy friend.
-
- And this "guy" is the same way. *He's not going to have a baby, he's
- not going to deliver but he's still against every thing that doesn't
- affect him.

KC - Have One of Your Children Aborted {Murdered}
Without Your Knowledge : Until Then STFU ~ RHF

On May 27, 3:40*pm, Meldon wrote:
On May 27, 3:23*am, Gary Forbis wrote:



On May 26, 10:18*pm, "Brenda Ann" wrote:

"Gary Forbis" wrote in message

....
So, Is the conservative or liberal point of view to impose their will
upon the woman?

Consider this. *Suppose a quadraplegic takes up residence in your
home without your permission. *Do you then become responsible
for the care of this human being? *If you say no then why does
a woman become responsbile for some human who takes up
residency in her womb without her permission?

Has she not, by virtue of having had the requisite coitus, given defacto
permission (rape notwithstanding)?

No. *pregnancy is no more a result of coitus than becoming a
millionare is a result of playing lotto. *

- You heard it here first! Men by simply having sex, are not
responsible
- for unwanted pregnancies because there’s no guarantee of pregnancy.

Yeah That The Liberal-Fascist {Male Theology}
Abortion Escape Clause : It's All Her Fault !