In article ,
says...
If I can't read the beginning of your posts without scrolling down I
don't read them. Why you insist on reposting entire threads every time
you add your 2 cents worth is beyond me.


Well, if you followed them, you would notice some posts go for days,
close to a week without a response, so it only makes sense to post the
whole thing, just so people know what you're replying to.

It ****es me off when people cut so much out of a post to the point of
making the post totally nonsensical unless you just happen to remember
it, or the thread has it in another post.

--

BDK..
Leader of the nonexistent paid shills.
Non Jew Jew Club founding member.
Former number one Kook Magnet, title passed to Iarnrod.

If that is all you have to worry about, you have got it made in the
shade drinking orange Koolaid.
cuhulin

In article ,
wrote:

If that is all you have to worry about, you have got it made in the
shade drinking orange Koolaid.
cuhulin

That's kookaburra-aid.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article ,
BDK wrote:

SNIP

It ****es me off when people cut so much out of a post to the point of
making the post totally nonsensical unless you just happen to remember
it, or the thread has it in another post.

SNIP

Being nonsensical you must **** yourself off all the time.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article telamon_spamshield-4EBBB8.17523518062009
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
lid says...
In article ,
BDK wrote:

SNIP

It ****es me off when people cut so much out of a post to the point of
making the post totally nonsensical unless you just happen to remember
it, or the thread has it in another post.

SNIP

Being nonsensical you must **** yourself off all the time.




How lame can you get, Telemundoh?
--

BDK..
Leader of the nonexistent paid shills.
Non Jew Jew Club founding member.
Former number one Kook Magnet, title passed to Iarnrod.

BDK wrote:
In article ,
says...
If I can't read the beginning of your posts without scrolling down I
don't read them. Why you insist on reposting entire threads every time
you add your 2 cents worth is beyond me.


Well, if you followed them, you would notice some posts go for days,
close to a week without a response, so it only makes sense to post the
whole thing, just so people know what you're replying to.

It ****es me off when people cut so much out of a post to the point of
making the post totally nonsensical unless you just happen to remember
it, or the thread has it in another post.


If you use a real newsreader it will find old posts in the thread.

In article ,
says...
BDK wrote:
In article ,
says...
If I can't read the beginning of your posts without scrolling down I
don't read them. Why you insist on reposting entire threads every time
you add your 2 cents worth is beyond me.


Well, if you followed them, you would notice some posts go for days,
close to a week without a response, so it only makes sense to post the
whole thing, just so people know what you're replying to.

It ****es me off when people cut so much out of a post to the point of
making the post totally nonsensical unless you just happen to remember
it, or the thread has it in another post.


If you use a real newsreader it will find old posts in the thread.


I do use a real newsreader, but I don't keep the threads going back far
enough for what the poster is talking about after a certain point. If I
want to see them, I can, but I don't really want the hassle. Posting the
whole deal is easier. And unless someone is on dialup, what's the point
of cutting a hundred lines or so of post?

--

BDK..
Leader of the nonexistent paid shills.
Non Jew Jew Club founding member.
Former number one Kook Magnet, title passed to Iarnrod.

BDK wrote:

snip
I do use a real newsreader, but I don't keep the threads going back far
enough for what the poster is talking about after a certain point. If I
want to see them, I can, but I don't really want the hassle. Posting the
whole deal is easier. And unless someone is on dialup, what's the point
of cutting a hundred lines or so of post?


What's the use? Good netiquette, and less recursion, less waste of screen
real estate, and less repetitive motion (kbd, mouse). Proper snipping
and inclusion of quotations with interleaved new text makes for better
comprehension. I'm with the O.P. on this; sometimes I will skip a message
if it includes all of the previous messages in the thread as a quotation.
A general rule of thumb is that a message should include all of the
necessary references by quotation to be intelligible and no more.

Michael

In article ,
BDK wrote:

In article telamon_spamshield-4EBBB8.17523518062009
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
lid says...
In article ,
BDK wrote:

SNIP

It ****es me off when people cut so much out of a post to the point of
making the post totally nonsensical unless you just happen to remember
it, or the thread has it in another post.

SNIP

Being nonsensical you must **** yourself off all the time.




How lame can you get, Telemundoh?

Not nearly as lame as you Kookaburra.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article t,
_ says...
BDK wrote:

snip
I do use a real newsreader, but I don't keep the threads going back far
enough for what the poster is talking about after a certain point. If I
want to see them, I can, but I don't really want the hassle. Posting the
whole deal is easier. And unless someone is on dialup, what's the point
of cutting a hundred lines or so of post?


What's the use? Good netiquette, and less recursion, less waste of screen
real estate, and less repetitive motion (kbd, mouse). Proper snipping
and inclusion of quotations with interleaved new text makes for better
comprehension. I'm with the O.P. on this; sometimes I will skip a message
if it includes all of the previous messages in the thread as a quotation.
A general rule of thumb is that a message should include all of the
necessary references by quotation to be intelligible and no more.

Michael




If you say so.
--

BDK..
Leader of the nonexistent paid shills.
Non Jew Jew Club founding member.
Former number one Kook Magnet, title passed to Iarnrod.