"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Iarnrod wrote:

On Jul 31, 7:40 pm, "Brenda Ann" wrote:

You idiot, a military base on foreign soil is NOT considered US
territory IN ANY WAY. You're simply wrong.

Believe it is, just as a Navy ship is considered to be US territory.



Bases are leased. Just because the lease is part of a diplomatic treaty does
not mean the property is soverign. Ships ARE soverign from old rules.
Embassy perimeter is like a ship, US territory.

Bases have different contracts, rules, procedures, security, etc. depending
on how old. Gitmo is different from most for obvious reasons, but is not
soverign. Diego Garcia is leased. Japan and Germany are different from
Panama. Philippine bases were vacated instantly. Some countries like to have
the bases near, some don't.

www.devilfinder.com
U.S.Military Bases and Embassies in Foreign Countries

U.S.A.is all over the World.On Land, on the Water, in the Water,
(Submarines) and in the Air, 24/7.
cuhulin

On Jul 31, 8:07*pm, "bw" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message

...



Iarnrod wrote:

On Jul 31, 7:40 pm, "Brenda Ann" wrote:

You idiot, a military base on foreign soil is NOT considered US
territory IN ANY WAY. You're simply wrong.

Believe it is, just as a Navy ship is considered to be US territory.

Bases are leased. Just because the lease is part of a diplomatic treaty does
not mean the property is soverign. Ships ARE soverign from old rules.
Embassy perimeter is like a ship, US territory.

Bases have different contracts, rules, procedures, security, etc. depending
on how old. Gitmo is different from most for obvious reasons, but is not
soverign. Diego Garcia is leased. Japan and Germany are different from
Panama. Philippine bases were vacated instantly. Some countries like to have
the bases near, some don't.

=WRT= To any Foreign US Military Base :
What Does the Treaty Say . . .