9-11 Revisited
 

The History Channel is the place to be
on this somber day. All day is going to
be great shows.

The commercial for the one at 8pm EST
is called "102 Minutes That Changed America", it gave me goosebumps,
unbelievable.

I remember that morning like it was yesterday and how this group came
alive, there was no bickering in here
that day....that's for sure.

Every 9-11 I google the threads from that
day and the following week to keep it fresh in my mind.

Be prepared for the next one is my motto.

9-11 Revisited
 

Gregg wrote:
The History Channel is the place to be
on this somber day. All day is going to
be great shows.


A couple dozen crazies bring empire to its knees with boxcutters and
maxxed-out credit cards. ****ing embarrassment. Bush should be
punished for getting caught napping.

9-11 Revisited
 

On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:20:23 -0700, dave wrote:

Gregg wrote:
The History Channel is the place to be
on this somber day. All day is going to
be great shows.


A couple dozen crazies bring empire to its knees with boxcutters and
maxxed-out credit cards. ****ing embarrassment. Bush should be
punished for getting caught napping.

Damn straight, not since Pearl Harbor, you ain't worth a damn G.Bush.

9-11 Revisited
 

dave wrote:

Gregg wrote:
The History Channel is the place to be
on this somber day. All day is going to
be great shows.


A couple dozen crazies bring empire to its knees with boxcutters and
maxxed-out credit cards. ****ing embarrassment. Bush should be
punished for getting caught napping.

Funny, as it would seem most of their work and practice took place during your
'tard boy Clinton's watch. Was he napping or fooling around with interns?

dxAce
Michigan
USA

9-11 Revisited
 

On Sep 11, 2:20*pm, dave wrote:
Gregg wrote:
The History Channel is the place to be
on this somber day. All day is going to
be great shows.

A couple dozen crazies bring empire to its knees with boxcutters and
maxxed-out credit cards. *****ing embarrassment. *Bush should be
punished for getting caught napping.

Well Dave, lets not go that far, though I understand
what you're saying.

I feel it goes/went much deeper than freeking Bush.
I wonder if something happens during Obama's
admin. if the reactions will still be to blame Bush.

Sooner or later the blame game on Bush has to stop.

It will be interesting because make no mistake
about it, the next disaster is going to make 9-11
look like a 4th of July Fireworks Show.

The question is will those people be prepared and
not loose their heads so too speak and get out safely.

Many deaths on 9-11 could have been avoided after
the first crash, people were coming down the elevators and were told
by freeking security that "this
building is secure, go back to your work stations"....
lol...I would have told him "lets don't and say we did."

I'd have been out there.shaking my head

9-11 Revisited
 

On 9/11/09 14:49 , dxAce wrote:


dave wrote:

Gregg wrote:
The History Channel is the place to be
on this somber day. All day is going to
be great shows.


A couple dozen crazies bring empire to its knees with boxcutters and
maxxed-out credit cards. ****ing embarrassment. Bush should be
punished for getting caught napping.

Funny, as it would seem most of their work and practice took place during your
'tard boy Clinton's watch. Was he napping or fooling around with interns?

He was too busy telling the Arabs he wasn't interested in taking
Bin Laden when they offered to serve him up.


He had lies to tell, taxes to raise, military budgets to cut,
guidance systems to sell to the Chinese, Israeli concessions to
orchestrate, Palestinian extremists to empower, bombings to ignore,
and women to rape.

You know, the man had important **** to do.

9-11 Revisited
 

On Sep 11, 3:49*pm, dxAce wrote:
dave wrote:
Gregg wrote:
The History Channel is the place to be
on this somber day. All day is going to
be great shows.

A couple dozen crazies bring empire to its knees with boxcutters and
maxxed-out credit cards. *****ing embarrassment. *Bush should be
punished for getting caught napping.

Funny, as it would seem most of their work and practice took place during your
'tard boy Clinton's watch. Was he napping or fooling around with interns?


***EXACTLY*** Steve. This all started way before
Bush Jr. ever sniffed the White House, but you will
never get people to understand that because it isn't
human nature...it's easier just to blame Bush and I'm
definitely not saying I am pimping Jr. either because
he had his faults but 9-11 IMO wasn't his fault.

9-11 Revisited
 

dxAce wrote:

dave wrote:

Gregg wrote:
The History Channel is the place to be
on this somber day. All day is going to
be great shows.

A couple dozen crazies bring empire to its knees with boxcutters and
maxxed-out credit cards. ****ing embarrassment. Bush should be
punished for getting caught napping.

Funny, as it would seem most of their work and practice took place during your
'tard boy Clinton's watch. Was he napping or fooling around with interns?

dxAce
Michigan
USA


As I recall Clinton was being distracted by an insane witch hunt.
Regardless, Bush had dozens of very specific warnings and did nothing.

Did nothing.

9-11 Revisited
 

On Sep 11, 5:01*pm, "D. Peter Maus"
wrote:
On 9/11/09 14:49 , dxAce wrote:





dave wrote:

Gregg wrote:
The History Channel is the place to be
on this somber day. All day is going to
be great shows.

A couple dozen crazies bring empire to its knees with boxcutters and
maxxed-out credit cards. *****ing embarrassment. *Bush should be
punished for getting caught napping.

Funny, as it would seem most of their work and practice took place during your
'tard boy Clinton's watch. Was he napping or fooling around with interns?

* *He was too busy telling the Arabs he wasn't interested in taking
Bin Laden when they offered to serve him up.

* *He had lies to tell, taxes to raise, military budgets to cut,
guidance systems to sell to the Chinese, Israeli concessions to
orchestrate, Palestinian extremists to empower, bombings to ignore,
and women to rape.

* *You know, the man had important **** to do.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Peter....that about cracked me up. This thread wasn't
intended though to rile up RRS. Did you google that day in here yet?

I know that day and the week after I stayed with my
shortwave and scanners, all freqs. were definitely hopping. Unless I
am literally at the next ground zero,
which I pray never happens, I have went over and over in mind what to
do. I won't be caught off guard
again.

9-11 Revisited
 

Bushcraftgregg wrote:
On Sep 11, 2:20 pm, dave wrote:
Gregg wrote:
The History Channel is the place to be
on this somber day. All day is going to
be great shows.
A couple dozen crazies bring empire to its knees with boxcutters and
maxxed-out credit cards. ****ing embarrassment. Bush should be
punished for getting caught napping.

Well Dave, lets not go that far, though I understand
what you're saying.

I feel it goes/went much deeper than freeking Bush.
I wonder if something happens during Obama's
admin. if the reactions will still be to blame Bush.

Sooner or later the blame game on Bush has to stop.

Why were these guys allowed to fly?

"Mohamed Atta and Abdulaziz Alomari check in at the US Airways counter
at Portland International Jetport Airport. [Portland Press Herald,
10/5/2001; Federal Bureau of Investigation, 10/14/2001] They are wearing
ties and jackets. Atta checks in two bags, Alomari none. Atta is
randomly selected for additional security scrutiny by the FAA’s Computer
Assisted Passenger Prescreening System (CAPPS) (see (6:20 a.m.-7:48
a.m.) September 11, 2001). However, the only consequence is that his
checked bags will be held off the plane until it is confirmed that he
has boarded. [9/11 Commission, 7/24/2004, pp. 1; 9/11 Commission,
8/26/2004, pp. 2 pdf file; CNN, 3/3/2006] Noting that their flight is
soon due to leave, the ticket agent who checks them in, Michael Tuohey,
says, “You’re cutting it close.” [Portland Press Herald, 3/6/2005]
Tuohey thinks the pair seems unusual. He notices they both have $2,500
first-class, one-way tickets. He later comments, “You don’t see many of
those.” Atta looks “like a walking corpse. He looked so angry.” In
contrast, Tuohey says, Alomari can barely speak English and has “a goofy
smile, I can’t believe he knew he was going to die that day.” Tuohey
will later recount,

“I thought they looked like two Arab terrorists but then I berated
myself for the stereotype and did nothing.”

[Philadelphia Daily News, 2/24/2005; Mirror, 9/11/2005; CNN, 3/3/2006]
Atta becomes angry when Tuohey informs him he will have to check in
again in Boston. He complains that he was assured he would have a
“one-step check-in.” [9/11 Commission, 8/26/2004, pp. 2 pdf file;
Associated Press, 3/7/2005] Tuohey will be recalled to work later in the
day to speak to an FBI agent about his encounter with Atta and Alomari.
He is shown video footage of them passing through the airport’s security
checkpoint upstairs (see (Between 5:45 a.m. and 5:53 a.m.) September 11,
2001). Although recognizing the two men, he notices that in the video
they are no longer wearing the jackets and ties they’d had on when
checking in just minutes before. He assumes they must have taken these
off and tucked them into their carry-on baggage. He is also informed
that the security camera behind his own desk, which should have captured
the two hijackers, has in fact been out of order for some time.
[Portland Press Herald, 3/6/2005; CNN, 3/3/2006]

Entity Tags: Michael Tuohey, Federal Aviation Administration, Computer
Assisted Passenger Prescreening System, Portland International Jetport
Airport, Abdulaziz Alomari, Mohamed Atta

Timeline Tags: Complete 911 Timeline, 9/11 Timeline

http://www.historycommons.org/contex...tlandc heckin

9-11 Revisited
 

On Sep 11, 5:05*pm, dave wrote:
dxAce wrote:

dave wrote:

Gregg wrote:
The History Channel is the place to be
on this somber day. All day is going to
be great shows.

A couple dozen crazies bring empire to its knees with boxcutters and
maxxed-out credit cards. *****ing embarrassment. *Bush should be
punished for getting caught napping.

Funny, as it would seem most of their work and practice took place during your
'tard boy Clinton's watch. Was he napping or fooling around with interns?

dxAce
Michigan
USA

As I recall Clinton was being distracted by an insane witch hunt.
Regardless, Bush had dozens of very specific warnings and did nothing.

Did nothing.- Hide quoted text -

****MANY**** people did nothing Dave, there is
plenty of blame to go around. The part that just leaves me shaking my
head is that IMO, this country
is no more better prepared than it was on 9-11.

9-11 Revisited
 

On Sep 11, 5:14*pm, dave wrote:
Bushcraftgregg wrote:
On Sep 11, 2:20 pm, dave wrote:
Gregg wrote:
The History Channel is the place to be
on this somber day. All day is going to
be great shows.
A couple dozen crazies bring empire to its knees with boxcutters and
maxxed-out credit cards. *****ing embarrassment. *Bush should be
punished for getting caught napping.

Well Dave, lets not go that far, though I understand
what you're saying.

I feel it goes/went much deeper than freeking Bush.
I wonder if something happens during Obama's
admin. if the reactions will still be to blame Bush.

Sooner or later the blame game on Bush has to stop.

Why were these guys allowed to fly?

"Mohamed Atta and Abdulaziz Alomari check in at the US Airways counter
at Portland International Jetport Airport. [Portland Press Herald,
10/5/2001; Federal Bureau of Investigation, 10/14/2001] They are wearing
ties and jackets. Atta checks in two bags, Alomari

*******rest snipped********

Dave, I have to be somewhat careful what I say and how I say it in
here. Much of what happened, at its
very origin started here in Cincinnati and I will leave
it at that.

People, for fear of being labeled a racist or trying to
start trouble are ignored when ones in the know tell
their superiors "that something isn't right here."

It is much easier to say " don't worry about it".... or "you're
getting a little carried away."

Some of those pilots actually got their first taste
of simply flying a plane, not worrying about landing
a plane mind you, but flying a plane here in the Nati' and IMO it was
either ignored or no one cared.

9-11 Revisited
 

Bushcraftgregg wrote:

****MANY**** people did nothing Dave, there is
plenty of blame to go around. The part that just leaves me shaking my
head is that IMO, this country
is no more better prepared than it was on 9-11.

It was not Mr. Bush's prerogative to do nothing. Read the time line.

http://www.historycommons.org/timeli..._9/11=warnings

9-11 Revisited
 

Bob Dobbs wrote:
Bushcraftgregg wrote:

~~~

Sooner or later the blame game on Bush has to stop.

Maybe will when his multitude of egregious blunders is surpassed by
those of someone else, until then he gets blamed for all the **** he
either caused or allowed to happen.

It will be interesting because make no mistake
about it, the next disaster is going to make 9-11
look like a 4th of July Fireworks Show.

The Manhattan Air Show will be a tough act to follow,
what you guys got in mind?


Our health system kills as many people each year as six "9-11"s. On the
first night of Shock and Awe we killed 2,700 innocent Iraqis easy.

9-11 Revisited
 

On Sep 11, 6:22*pm, dave wrote:
Bushcraftgregg wrote:
****MANY**** people did nothing Dave, there is
plenty of blame to go around. The part that just leaves me shaking my
head is that IMO, this country
is no more better prepared than it was on 9-11.

It was not Mr. Bush's prerogative to do nothing. Read the time line.

http://www.historycommons.org/timeli...plete_911_time....

Dave, I have read everything that can/could possibly
be read about the subject, not to be a prick or anything but I can
promise you I have read more
about that day than you. Just saying.

9-11 Revisited
 

Bushcraftgregg wrote:
On Sep 11, 6:22 pm, dave wrote:
Bushcraftgregg wrote:
****MANY**** people did nothing Dave, there is
plenty of blame to go around. The part that just leaves me shaking my
head is that IMO, this country
is no more better prepared than it was on 9-11.
It was not Mr. Bush's prerogative to do nothing. Read the time line.

http://www.historycommons.org/timeli...plete_911_time...

Dave, I have read everything that can/could possibly
be read about the subject, not to be a prick or anything but I can
promise you I have read more
about that day than you. Just saying.


I acknowledge that I am no scholar nor expert on the matter, but these
people ignored the experts and did nothing.

"Between August 6 and September 11, 2001: No High-Level Meetings to
Discuss ‘Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US’ Memo
Edit event

The Bush administration holds no high-level meetings prior to 9/11 to
discuss the ‘Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US’ Presidential Daily
Briefing (PDB) given to President Bush on August 6, 2001 (see August 6,
2001). Counterterrorism “tsar” Richard Clarke will later suggest that
9/11 might have been stopped “if [National Security Adviser] Rice and
the president had acted personally, gotten involved, shaken the trees,
gotten the Cabinet members involved when they had ample warning in June
and July and August that something was about to happen.… [Rice] said
that the president received 40 warnings face to face from the director
of central intelligence that a major al-Qaeda attack was going to take
place and she admitted that the president did not have a meeting on the
subject, did not convene the Cabinet. She admitted that she didn’t
convene the Cabinet. And as some of the [9/11 Commissioners] pointed
out, this was in marked contrast to the way the government operated in
December of 1999, when it had similar information and it successfully
thwarted attacks.” [ABC News, 4/8/2004] Former CIA official Larry
Johnson will similarly comment, “At a minimum, the details in the 6
August PDB should have motivated Rice to convene a principals’ meeting.
Such a meeting would have ensured that all members of the president’s
national security team were aware of the information that had been
shared with the president. George Bush should have directed the
different department heads to report back within one week on any
information relevant to the al-Qaeda threat. Had he done this there is a
high probability that the FBI field agents concerns about Arabs taking
flight training would have rung some bells. There is also a high
probability that the operations folks at CIA would have shared the
information they had in hand about the presence of al-Qaeda operators in
the United States.” [Tom Paine (.com), 4/12/2004] There will be one
cabinet-level principals meeting to discuss terrorism on September 4,
2001, but no evidence has been released suggesting the PDB or the
possibility of al-Qaeda attacking the US was discussed (see September 4,
2001).

Entity Tags: Condoleezza Rice, Richard A. Clarke, George W. Bush, Larry
C. Johnson

Timeline Tags: 9/11 Timeline

Category Tags: Counterterrorism Policy/Politics, Bush's Aug. 6, 2001
PDB, Presidential Level Warnings, Warning Signs
Bookmark and Share "

http://www.historycommons.org/timeli...level_warnings

(OT) : This 9/11 Pray for the Safety of the USA and All Americans
 

On Sep 11, 1:59*pm, Bushcraftgregg wrote:
On Sep 11, 2:20*pm, dave wrote:

Gregg wrote:
The History Channel is the place to be
on this somber day. All day is going to
be great shows.

A couple dozen crazies bring empire to its knees with boxcutters and
maxxed-out credit cards. *****ing embarrassment. *Bush should be
punished for getting caught napping.

Well Dave, lets not go that far, though I understand
what you're saying.

- I feel it goes/went much deeper than freeking Bush.
- I wonder if something happens during Obama's
- admin. if the reactions will still be to blame Bush.

What ever 'happens' during Obama's Presidency will
be BLAMED ON BUSH by the Obama-Regime©
and the Obama-Media-Shills©.

praise be the obama,
Praise Be The Obama.
PRAISE BE THE OBAMA !

(OT) : This 9/11 Pray for the Safety of the USA and AllAmericans
 

Check out what I wrote and their responses in the alt.horology
newsgroper.
cuhulin

(OT) : This 9/11 Pray for the Safety of the USA and All Americans
 

Better you should listen to
"20-Minutes with the President"
http://www.prisonplanet.com/twenty-m...president.html
-by- Charlie Sheen
.
Prez Obama you pledged Transparent Government Operations :
So that the US Citizens would know the Truth
-so- Prez Obama Answer Charlie Sheen's Questions
and Give the American People "The Truth" about 9/11.

Over the edge completely goes Mr. Roy Fisk, of Twain (one of America's
greatest atheists) Harte, California USA.

9-11 Revisited
 

In article ,
dxAce wrote:


dave wrote:

Gregg wrote:
The History Channel is the place to be
on this somber day. All day is going to
be great shows.


A couple dozen crazies bring empire to its knees with boxcutters and
maxxed-out credit cards. ****ing embarrassment. Bush should be
punished for getting caught napping.

Funny, as it would seem most of their work and practice took place during your
'tard boy Clinton's watch. Was he napping or fooling around with interns?

dxAce
Michigan
USA


Anyone interested in a factual telling of what was done to keep us
safe in the 90s to 9/11 can read Chapter 6 of the 9/11 Comission
Report. (About 50 pages)

http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report.pdf


Clinton tried lots of things. For many reasons, most out of his
control, they didn't work. he *did* keep us safe dueing the attacks of
the millinium new year but we don't hear about them becuase they were
foiled. Was he perfect? Far from it.

The Bush Administration just pushed reorganization memos until the
first scheduled terrorism meeting; Sept 4, 2001 Literally. They
ignored the 50+ threat warnings that the FBI knew of in their branch
offices as of the Summer of 2001 but the FBI had no national analysis
capability and the Bush Administration ever asked them to do it.

See The Comission report (2004) and updated by Amy Zegert in
Spying Blind: The CIA, the FBI, and the Origins of 9/11 (2007)





--
Al Dykes
News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising.
- Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail

9-11 Revisited
 

In article ,
Bushcraftgregg wrote:
On Sep 11, 3:49=A0pm, dxAce wrote:
dave wrote:
Gregg wrote:
The History Channel is the place to be
on this somber day. All day is going to
be great shows.

A couple dozen crazies bring empire to its knees with boxcutters and
maxxed-out credit cards. =A0****ing embarrassment. =A0Bush should be
punished for getting caught napping.

Funny, as it would seem most of their work and practice took place during=
your
'tard boy Clinton's watch. Was he napping or fooling around with interns?


***EXACTLY*** Steve. This all started way before
Bush Jr. ever sniffed the White House, but you will
never get people to understand that because it isn't
human nature...it's easier just to blame Bush and I'm
definitely not saying I am pimping Jr. either because
he had his faults but 9-11 IMO wasn't his fault.



Anyone interested in a factual telling of what was done to keep us
safe in the 90s to 9/11 can read Chapter 6 of the 9/11 Comission
Report. (About 50 pages)

http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report.pdf

Clinton tried lots of things. For many reasons, many out of his
control, they didn't work. He *did* keep us safe during the attacks of
the millennium new year but we don't hear about them because they were
foiled. Was he perfect? Far from it.

The Bush Administration just pushed reorganization memos until the
first scheduled terrorism meeting; Sept 4, 2001 Literally. They
ignored the nearly 50 threat warnings that the FBI knew of in their
branch offices as of the Summer of 2001 but the FBI had no national
analysis capability.

The Bush Administration never asked the various intelligence agencies
to combine efforts against a very real threat. Clinton had "all
hands" meetings all through the fall of 1999 that effectively foiled
some Y2K attacks. The country was on high alert on New Years Eve. Bush
never putt the nation on high alert in the late summer of 2001 despite
the abundance of information about an immanent attack.

See The Commission report (2004) and updated by Amy Zegert in
Spying Blind: The CIA, the FBI, and the Origins of 9/11 (2007)





--
Al Dykes
News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising.
- Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail

9-11 Revisited
 

Soldiers, Vets, Police say, 'We Will NOT Obey': The solution for peace
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=273157

Right Onnnnnn!
cuhulin

9-11 Revisited
 

In article ,
Gregg wrote:
The History Channel is the place to be
on this somber day. All day is going to
be great shows.

The commercial for the one at 8pm EST
is called "102 Minutes That Changed America", it gave me goosebumps,
unbelievable.

I remember that morning like it was yesterday and how this group came
alive, there was no bickering in here
that day....that's for sure.

Every 9-11 I google the threads from that
day and the following week to keep it fresh in my mind.

Be prepared for the next one is my motto.

The way to be prepared is to know the enemy and not live some delusional
myth that the US Media has created. What does Al Quaida want? We'll not
be told, because it would be inconvenient.


A personal question to all the group.

1. Did the TV coverage you watched show the people jumping from the
top of the towers?

Disney News (ABC) didn't show that, I gather that Fox did. (I first saw
pictures in a copy of the New York Times that the neighbors had bought
the following morning). My hypothesis is that seeing that in real-time
had great effect on people's attitudes. The emotional power of video...


Mark Zenier
Googleproofaddress(account:mzenier provider:eskimo domain:com)

9-11 Revisited
 

wrote:
Soldiers, Vets, Police say, 'We Will NOT Obey': The solution for peace
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=273157

Right Onnnnnn!
cuhulin


You crackers want another war over race?!?

(OT) : This 9/11 Pray for the Safety of the USA and All Americans
 

dave wrote:

Better you should listen to
"20-Minutes with the President"
http://www.prisonplanet.com/twenty-m...president.html
-by- Charlie Sheen
.
Prez Obama you pledged Transparent Government Operations :
So that the US Citizens would know the Truth
-so- Prez Obama Answer Charlie Sheen's Questions
and Give the American People "The Truth" about 9/11.

Over the edge completely goes Mr. Roy Fisk, of Twain (one of America's
greatest atheists) Harte, California USA.

Yo Dave. maybe you should be the one to tell Really-High-Frequently,
that the interview was a phony? or, let me. sorry Ray-gun, it never
happened. just another made up interview by the fear and hate people.
the Neo-Cons Live!

Now, can we get back to radio?

Drifter...

(OT) : This 9/11 Pray for the Safety of the USA and All Americans
 

In article ,
~ RHF wrote:
On Sep 11, 1:59=A0pm, Bushcraftgregg wrote:
On Sep 11, 2:20=A0pm, dave wrote:

Gregg wrote:
The History Channel is the place to be
on this somber day. All day is going to
be great shows.

A couple dozen crazies bring empire to its knees with boxcutters and
maxxed-out credit cards. =A0****ing embarrassment. =A0Bush should be
punished for getting caught napping.

Well Dave, lets not go that far, though I understand
what you're saying.

- I feel it goes/went much deeper than freeking Bush.
- I wonder if something happens during Obama's
- admin. if the reactions will still be to blame Bush.

What ever 'happens' during Obama's Presidency will
be BLAMED ON BUSH by the Obama-Regime=A9
and the Obama-Media-Shills=A9.

praise be the obama,
Praise Be The Obama.
PRAISE BE THE OBAMA !
.
Better you should listen to
"20-Minutes with the President"
http://www.prisonplanet.com/twenty-m...president.html
-by- Charlie Sheen



That's 100% fiction written by Alex Jones, probably to promote his
next DVD.


--
Al Dykes
News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising.
- Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail

(OT) : This 9/11 Pray for the Safety of the USA and AllAmericans
 

Did/do y'all cats really, really, really sit in front of your boob tubes
and watch hour after hour of the ''Inside Job'' replays/reruns?
Does y'all Really?

I am fixin to watch Kelly's Heroes on the TCM channel right now.
cuhulin

9-11 Revisited
 

On Sep 12, 12:25*pm, Toxic wrote:
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:47:43 -0700, Bushcraftgregg wrote:
* * * * * * * * * * ********rest snipped********

Dave, I have to be somewhat careful what I say and how I say it in here..
Much of what happened, at its
very origin started here in Cincinnati and I will leave it at that.

Are you implying that you either were complicit in that event, or at the
least, have knowledge that you are unwilling to share, even if it could
be beneficial to the ongoing security of this country?

Umm.....yea. That's right. Call the FBI.rolling my
eyes Do your own homework pal.


...Or perhaps merely trying to conflate the circumstance of your
residence to the proximity of an activity with which you were totally
unconnected yet serves conveniently to impute self importance?

LMAO - what a retard...lol.

9-11 Revisited
 

DUMMMMMMMMB ASS and the 9/11 murderers.
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=273177

NO COUNT MULE DUMMMMMMMMB ASS B HO!
cuhulin

9-11 Revisited
 

DeMint calls out DUMMMMMB ASS and Congress: 'Americans Are Awake, They
Are Informed, And They Are Outraged'
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=273188

OUTRAGED!!!
cuhulin

(OT) : The 9-12 Project "We The People" News -was- 9-11 Revisited
 

On Sep 12, 9:00*am, dave wrote:
wrote:
Soldiers, Vets, Police say, 'We Will NOT Obey': The solution for peace
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=273157

Right Onnnnnn!
cuhulin

- You crackers want another war over race?!?

Dave calling people 'crackers' is one way of
instigating and promoting an attitude between
people creating the Hate leading up-to a Race
War : Making 'you' as the Agent Provocateur.
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=315ju42&s=3

Dave Keep Preaching That Class Warfare Mantra
along with the good old Race War Fear Mongering.
http://firstfriday.files.wordpress.c...lasswar781.jpg

Dave - After all as a self-prclaimed Libertarian-Anarchist
'you' are committed to "The-Cau$e".
http://neatorama.cachefly.net/images...ich-people.GIF

(OT) : The 9-12 Project "We The People" News -was- 9-11 Revisited
 

~ RHF wrote:

.
The 9-12 Project "We The People" News
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cghAiWH_AUM
Thousands of Downtown D.C. Protesters Blast Obama

Your rallies are virtually all white people. That's not a populist
uprising.

(OT) : The 9-12 Project "We The People" News -was- 9-11 Revisited
 

On Sep 13, 2:31*am, "~ RHF" wrote:
On Sep 12, 9:00*am, dave wrote:

wrote:
Soldiers, Vets, Police say, 'We Will NOT Obey': The solution for peace
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=273157

Right Onnnnnn!
cuhulin

- You crackers want another war over race?!?

Dave calling people 'crackers' is one way of
instigating and promoting an attitude between
people creating the Hate leading up-to a Race
War : Making 'you' as the Agent Provocateur.http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=315ju42&s=3



Sorry racist, but only white people showed up and only white people
were expected to show up. Kinda like a repug convention, once you get
by the one black face, no more African-Americans.

Face it, you had a Klan rally with out the robes.

(OT) : This 9/11 Pray for the Safety of the USA and AllAmericans
 

Bob Vila (on tv) once explained Crackers.Georgians moving to Florida,
Cracking their Whips in the air to keep their Livestock moving along.
Bob Vila is Right.

You want to know how the redneck(s) word/term came about, as regards
some people? The old Southern democrap party, they wore red hankerchiefs
around their necks.
cuhulin

(OT) : The 9-12 Project "We The People" News -was- 9-11 Revisited
 

"Kevin Cunningham" wrote in message
...
On Sep 13, 2:31 am, "~ RHF" wrote:
On Sep 12, 9:00 am, dave wrote:

wrote:
Soldiers, Vets, Police say, 'We Will NOT Obey': The solution for peace
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=273157

Right Onnnnnn!
cuhulin

- You crackers want another war over race?!?

Dave calling people 'crackers' is one way of
instigating and promoting an attitude between
people creating the Hate leading up-to a Race
War : Making 'you' as the Agent
Provocateur.http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=315ju42&s=3



Sorry racist, but only white people showed up and only white people
were expected to show up. Kinda like a repug convention, once you get
by the one black face, no more African-Americans.

Face it, you had a Klan rally with out the robes.




We knew what Obama gatherings would be like when we saw new black panther
guards at polling places in Pennsylvania. And our thoughts are confirmed
when all charges are dropped against the perpetrators.

50% of whites voted for Obama. 95% of blacks voted for Obama. Who are
voting their race?

9-11 Revisited
 

On Sep 13, 8:36*am, Toxic wrote:
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:50:05 -0700, Bushcraftgregg wrote:
On Sep 12, 12:25*pm, Toxic wrote:
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:47:43 -0700, Bushcraftgregg wrote:
* * * * * * * * * * ********rest snipped********

Dave, I have to be somewhat careful what I say and how I say it in
here. Much of what happened, at its
very origin started here in Cincinnati and I will leave it at that.

Are you implying that you either were complicit in that event, or at
the least, have knowledge that you are unwilling to share, even if it
could be beneficial to the ongoing security of this country?

Umm.....yea. That's right. Call the FBI.rolling my eyes Do your own
homework pal.

You were the one alluding to some arcane connection you
(would like to have) had to those events.

" Arcane Connection"? Just about anyone that lives in Cincinnati knows
exactly what I mean, like I said, do your own homework.



...Or perhaps merely trying to conflate the circumstance of your
residence to the proximity of an activity with which you were totally
unconnected yet serves conveniently to impute self importance?

LMAO - what a retard...lol.

Yer so kewl... and important too. It's the vacuous egos like yours that
suck so much off topic crap into these fora.

It's dickheads...lol...like you that post with "out of the ordinary"
words on usenet - such as yourself snickerto try an "somewhat" give
the appearance of intelligience.


The last time I heard the freeking term "vacuous"
was from my homosexual ( too each their own)
eighth grade art teacher....lol...put away your
Webster there pal and try again.snicker Color
me not impressed.

"Fora"?....lol...Oh quit it and be real.rolling my eyes

9-11 Revisited
 

On Sep 12, 11:55*am, (Mark Zenier) wrote:
In article ,





Gregg wrote:
The History Channel is the place to be
on this somber day. All day is going to
be great shows.

The commercial for the one at 8pm EST
is called "102 Minutes That Changed America", it gave me goosebumps,
unbelievable.

I remember that morning like it was yesterday and how this group came
alive, there was no bickering in here
that day....that's for sure.

Every 9-11 I google the threads from that
day and the following week to keep it fresh in my mind.

Be prepared for the next one is my motto.

The way to be prepared is to know the enemy and not live some delusional
myth that the US Media has created. *What does Al Quaida want? *We'll not
be told, because it would be inconvenient.

A personal question to all the group.

1. Did the TV coverage you watched show the people jumping from the
top of the towers? *

Disney News (ABC) didn't show that, I gather that Fox did. *(I first saw
pictures in a copy of the New York Times that the neighbors had bought
the following morning). *My hypothesis is that seeing that in real-time
had great effect on people's attitudes. *The emotional power of video....


Mark, you're speaking to the choir here when you're
talking to me. I was just mentioning the show because it included
footage from angles never
shown before.

Make no mistake about it, if Alex Jones can be screaming on his show
two months before the "attacks" that he had intel that the WTC were
going to be hit....and still it happened. You don't
have to be too bright to figure the rest out IMO.

9-11 Revisited
 

On Sep 13, 4:21*pm, Bob Dobbs wrote:
Mark Zenier wrote:

1. Did the TV coverage you watched show the people jumping from the
top of the towers? *

I only saw them going out open windows some stories below the top,
but none of the splattering landings were televised here.

--

Indeed. I can't believe no footage ever leaked out
showing some splattered bodies, maybe because
there weren't any? Just saying.

9-11 Revisited
 

www.devilfinder.com
Black Day 9/11

(NavExpress)
cuhulin

9-11 Revisited
 

In article ,
Bushcraftgregg wrote:
On Sep 13, 4:21=A0pm, Bob Dobbs wrote:
Mark Zenier wrote:

1. Did the TV coverage you watched show the people jumping from the
top of the towers? =A0

I only saw them going out open windows some stories below the top,
but none of the splattering landings were televised here.




Thousands of firemen and EMS workers know that bodies went splat. If
they didn't witness it, they scraped them off the concrete afterowrds.

Hundreds of thousands of eyewitnesses saw and heard them hit the
gounnd.


--
Al Dykes
News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising.
- Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail