On 10/12/09 07:04 , dxAce wrote:


Ima wrote:

On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 13:36:55 -0700, ~ RHF wrote:

On Oct 10, 6:31Â pm, "D. Peter wrote:
On 9/24/09 21:36 , Ima wrote:

Kind-a funny. Â republican'ts started the Iraq war when we could not
afford it. no child left behind was started but they never allotted
any money. The GOP raided SS and medicare/aid since the 70s to
balance the budget! very fiscally unresponsible.

- Â Â How's that Hope and Change working for you?

I have 'hope' for a 'change' in 2012 )

Prez Obama One Term and O U T ! ~ RHF
.

What's nice about the forthcoming Democratic win in 2010 and 2012 is that
the only thing the GOP and it's followers can stand behind is their
ability to do nothing, except destroy and kill more people. And, the
incompetence of the followers to THINK nothing but recite and cut-n-paste
racist obama jokes.

I just have to laugh at you Liberal/Democrat/Marxist/Socialists and your feeble
attempt to stop opposition to Obungle's idiotic public policy ideas by claiming
'racism'.

dxAce
Michigan
USA



Anyone who lived through the McCarthy years knows the value of an
inflammatory label. It's easy, destructive, and simply presumed to
be true on its face. Meaning there's no need to present evidence,
nor to defend the accusation. Similarly, it's difficult, if not
impossible to defend against. And therein lies its destructive power.

Calling someone a 'racist', today, is no different that calling
someone a 'communist' in 1952.

There are analogs in the business community. If an employer wants
to do someone damage for having left the company, and can't come up
with anything else, they call the employee "thief." Or "troublemaker."

Democrats laid the foundation for this before Obiteme landed the
nomination. Anyone who resisted his nomination, opposed his
policies, were 'racists' by definition.

Jesse 'Thug' Jackson even went so far as to suggest a white
person not voting for Obiteme was a racist.

Jimmy Carter recently asserted that there can't be opposition to
this pompous jackass without racism.

No discussion of policy. No debate in the arena of ideas. Just a
destructive label.

Sadly, without racisim, these lazy and small minds can't present
any valid arguments as to why this idiot's policies are so actively
angrily resisted. And therein lies the depth of understanding of who
they really are. If 'racism' is the first place someone goes when
meeting resistance, then the racism lies first and foremost with the
accuser.

Hammer/Nail.



p