Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21   Report Post  
Old October 8th 09, 06:38 PM posted to alt.radio.broadcasting,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 15
Default HD Radio - Trend to watch: Team-branded HD2s !!


"John Higdon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Watchin & Waitin'" wrote:

HD is just another option/choice.

Choices are a good thing.


Not when they cause interference on the band and harm reception on other
stations.

I suggest you get up to speed on some of the tests that have been done
and are currently in progress.


I am more up-to date than you could imagine.

There has been no widespread interference complaints from the public...and
virtually all stations are protected within their contours.

Reminds me of the engineers who didn't want to turn on the stereo
pilot...because they were afraid to give up any coverage area.



  #22   Report Post  
Old October 8th 09, 06:39 PM posted to alt.radio.broadcasting,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 15
Default HD Radio - Trend to watch: Team-branded HD2s !!


"dave" wrote in message
...
~ RHF wrote:
On Oct 7, 10:23 pm, John Higdon wrote:
In article
,
"~ RHF" wrote:

NFL Team Branded HD-2 is a 24/7 InfoMercial
for every NFL Team in it's 'Local' Market Media
Area - b r i l l i a n t ! ~ RHF


- Yawn.
-
- --
- John Higdon
- +1 408 ANdrews 6-4400
- AT&T-Free At Last

D'Oh a Rabid NFL Fan {Fanatic} would say HOORAY !
while listening to the 24/7 "Team Spirit" HD-2 Radio
Station.
.


Have you ever tried to listen to HD-2 in a moving car?


Yes, every day. I enjoy it!



  #23   Report Post  
Old October 9th 09, 12:23 AM posted to alt.radio.broadcasting,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 968
Default HD Radio - Trend to watch: Team-branded HD2s !!

On Oct 8, 10:33*am, John Higdon wrote:
In article ,
*"Watchin & Waitin'" wrote:

HD is just another option/choice.


Choices are a good thing.


Not when they cause interference on the band and harm reception on other
stations.

I suggest you get up to speed on some of the tests that have been done
and are currently in progress.

--
John Higdon
+1 408 ANdrews 6-4400
AT&T-Free At Last


FM HD-Radio and the HD-2 Channels are
about Expanding the FM Radio Business
and the minor technical issues are simply
the cost of doing more business. ~ RHF
  #24   Report Post  
Old October 9th 09, 06:41 AM posted to alt.radio.broadcasting,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 15
Default HD Radio - Trend to watch: Team-branded HD2s !!


"John Higdon" wrote in message
...
In article
,
"~ RHF" wrote:

FM HD-Radio and the HD-2 Channels are
about Expanding the FM Radio Business
and the minor technical issues are simply
the cost of doing more business.


The broadcasters being interfered with don't consider such interference
a "minor technical issue".


Can you state a broadcaster that is being interfered with in their protected
contours?

Again, if this is so prevailent, why isn't there a pile of listeners
complaints at the FCC?



  #25   Report Post  
Old October 9th 09, 01:53 PM posted to alt.radio.broadcasting,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,185
Default HD Radio - Trend to watch: Team-branded HD2s !!

Jo Jo Gunn wrote:
"John Higdon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Watchin & Waitin'" wrote:

HD is just another option/choice.

Choices are a good thing.

Not when they cause interference on the band and harm reception on other
stations.

I suggest you get up to speed on some of the tests that have been done
and are currently in progress.


I am more up-to date than you could imagine.

There has been no widespread interference complaints from the public...and
virtually all stations are protected within their contours.

Reminds me of the engineers who didn't want to turn on the stereo
pilot...because they were afraid to give up any coverage area.



Stereo destroys FM coverage. Those engineers were right.

People don't complain as much as they just find other things to listen
to. Digital sidebands increase analog channel noise. That is a fact.
Now if they were to quit trying to do stereo in the analog channel, that
might work.


  #26   Report Post  
Old October 9th 09, 01:53 PM posted to alt.radio.broadcasting,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,185
Default HD Radio - Trend to watch: Team-branded HD2s !!

Jo Jo Gunn wrote:

Station.
.

Have you ever tried to listen to HD-2 in a moving car?


Yes, every day. I enjoy it!



You must enjoy silence.
  #27   Report Post  
Old October 9th 09, 01:55 PM posted to alt.radio.broadcasting,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,185
Default HD Radio - Trend to watch: Team-branded HD2s !!

~ RHF wrote:


FM HD-Radio and the HD-2 Channels are
about Expanding the FM Radio Business
and the minor technical issues are simply
the cost of doing more business. ~ RHF
.

**** the Radio Business. Bring back radio service.

Unlike you, Roy, we're not all a bunch of whores.
  #28   Report Post  
Old October 9th 09, 02:04 PM posted to alt.radio.broadcasting,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,185
Default HD Radio - Trend to watch: Team-branded HD2s !!

Jo Jo Gunn wrote:


Can you state a broadcaster that is being interfered with in their protected
contours?

Again, if this is so prevailent, why isn't there a pile of listeners
complaints at the FCC?


Protected Contours need to be rethought. Lots of people live in
suburbs, out of any protected contours. Are you saying they have no
right to listen to NPR, which they help finance?
  #29   Report Post  
Old October 9th 09, 02:15 PM posted to alt.radio.broadcasting,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 344
Default HD Radio - Trend to watch: Team-branded HD2s !!


"dave" wrote in message
...
Jo Jo Gunn wrote:
"John Higdon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Watchin & Waitin'" wrote:

HD is just another option/choice.

Choices are a good thing.
Not when they cause interference on the band and harm reception on other
stations.

I suggest you get up to speed on some of the tests that have been done
and are currently in progress.


I am more up-to date than you could imagine.

There has been no widespread interference complaints from the
public...and virtually all stations are protected within their contours.

Reminds me of the engineers who didn't want to turn on the stereo
pilot...because they were afraid to give up any coverage area.



Stereo destroys FM coverage. Those engineers were right.


Stereo multiplexing in and of itself does no damage to the coverage area.
Listening on a monaural receiver or in mono mode with a stereo receiver
gives the same coverage as a monaural transmitter would.



  #30   Report Post  
Old October 9th 09, 06:23 PM posted to alt.radio.broadcasting,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 15
Default HD Radio - Trend to watch: Team-branded HD2s !!


"dave" wrote in message
...
Jo Jo Gunn wrote:
"John Higdon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Watchin & Waitin'" wrote:

HD is just another option/choice.

Choices are a good thing.
Not when they cause interference on the band and harm reception on other
stations.

I suggest you get up to speed on some of the tests that have been done
and are currently in progress.


I am more up-to date than you could imagine.

There has been no widespread interference complaints from the
public...and virtually all stations are protected within their contours.

Reminds me of the engineers who didn't want to turn on the stereo
pilot...because they were afraid to give up any coverage area.



Stereo destroys FM coverage. Those engineers were right.


And those that were purists and held to that belief....are all out of
business.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
JUMP TEAM RADIO OPERATORS NEEDED Mr Ham Radio Policy 3 October 11th 04 08:02 PM
Texas Balloon Launch Team (BLT) to fly ham radio and GPS this saturday 10a Steve Digital 1 August 28th 04 10:05 AM
Texas Balloon Launch Team (BLT) to fly ham radio and GPS thiss... [email protected] Scanner 2 August 22nd 04 07:49 PM
Amateur Radio BPL Team to Stress Credibility Mike Terry Shortwave 0 August 13th 04 10:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017