"no brainer" whimpered:

Baron_Mind was having a laugh, at the expense of:

"night light, underpants" regurgitated the usual right-wing ignorance:

Everyone knows that liberals are crypto-fascists.

That would be a logical fallacy..

--Fascism has always been a right-wing ideology, per history..

LOL!!! Ah yes, another brainwash

So, you cited a web-log to support your foolishness?

How quaint.. Now, for the historic facts..

http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_...3/Fascism.html

Compared to Other Radical Right-Wing Ideologies

"Although fascism comes in many forms, not all radical
right-wing movements are fascist. In France in the 1890s,
for example, the Action Française movement started a
campaign to overthrow the democratic government of France
and restore the king to power. Although this movement
embraced the violence and the antidemocratic tendencies
of fascism, it did not develop the fascist myth of
revolutionary rebirth through popular power. There
have also been many movements that were simply nationalist
but with a right-wing political slant. In China, for example,
the Kuomintang (The Chinese National People’s Party), led
by Chiang Kai-shek, fought leftist revolutionaries until
Communists won control of China in 1949. Throughout the
20th century this type of right-wing nationalism was
common in many military dictatorships in Latin America,
Africa, and Asia. Fascism should also be distinguished
from right-wing separatist movements that set out to
create a new nation-state rather than to regenerate an
existing one. This would exclude cases such as the Nazi puppet
regime in Croatia during World War II. This regime, known as
the Ustaše government, relied on paramilitary groups to govern,
and hoped that their support for Nazism would enable Croatia
to break away from Yugoslavia. This separatist goal
distinguishes the Ustaše from genuine fascist movements."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism

Position in the political spectrum

"Fascism is normally described as "extreme right",
but writers on the subject have often found placing
fascism on a conventional left-right political spectrum
difficult. There is a scholarly consensus that fascism
was influenced by both the left and the right. A number
of historians have regarded fascism either as a revolutionary
centrist doctrine, as a doctrine which mixes philosophies
of the left and the right, or as both of those things.

The historians Eugen Weber, David Renton, and Robert Soucy
view fascism as on the ideological right. Rod Stackelberg
argues that fascism opposes egalitarianism (particularly racial)
and democracy, which according to him are characteristics that
make it an extreme right-wing movement. Stanley Payne states
that pre-war fascism found a coherent identity through
alliances with right-wing movements. Roger Griffin argues
that since the end of World War II, fascist movements have
become intertwined with the radical right, describing certain
groups as part of a "fascist radical right".

Walter Laqueur says that historical fascism "did not belong
to the extreme Left, yet defining it as part of the extreme
Right is not very illuminating either", but that it "was
always a coalition between radical, populist ('fascist')
elements and others gravitating toward the extreme Right".
Payne says "fascists were unique in their hostility to all
the main established currents, left right and center",
noting that they allied with both left and right, but more
often the right. However, he contends that German Nazism
was closer to Russian communism than to any other non-communist
system."

On Oct 14, 9:25*pm, Baron_Mind wrote:
"no brainer" whimpered:



Baron_Mind was having a laugh, at the expense of:

"night light, underpants" regurgitated the usual right-wing ignorance:

Everyone knows that liberals are crypto-fascists.

That would be a logical fallacy..

--Fascism has always been a right-wing ideology, per history..

LOL!!! Ah yes, another brainwash

So, you cited a web-log to support your foolishness?

How quaint.. *Now, for the historic facts..

http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_...3/Fascism.html

Compared to Other Radical Right-Wing Ideologies

"Although fascism comes in many forms, not all radical
* right-wing movements are fascist. In France in the 1890s,
* for example, the Action Française movement started a
* campaign to overthrow the democratic government of France
* and restore the king to power. Although this movement
* embraced the violence and the antidemocratic tendencies
* of fascism, it did not develop the fascist myth of
* revolutionary rebirth through popular power. There
* have also been many movements that were simply nationalist
* but with a right-wing political slant. In China, for example,
* the Kuomintang (The Chinese National People’s Party), led
* by Chiang Kai-shek, fought leftist revolutionaries until
* Communists won control of China in 1949. Throughout the
* 20th century this type of right-wing nationalism was
* common in many military dictatorships in Latin America,
* Africa, and Asia. Fascism should also be distinguished
* from right-wing separatist movements that set out to
* create a new nation-state rather than to regenerate an
* existing one. This would exclude cases such as the Nazi puppet
* regime in Croatia during World War II. This regime, known as
* the Ustaše government, relied on paramilitary groups to govern,
* and hoped that their support for Nazism would enable Croatia
* to break away from Yugoslavia. This separatist goal
* distinguishes the Ustaše from genuine fascist movements."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism

Position in the political spectrum

"Fascism is normally described as "extreme right",
* but writers on the subject have often found placing
* fascism on a conventional left-right political spectrum
* difficult. There is a scholarly consensus that fascism
* was influenced by both the left and the right. A number
* of historians have regarded fascism either as a revolutionary
* centrist doctrine, as a doctrine which mixes philosophies
* of the left and the right, or as both of those things.

* The historians Eugen Weber, David Renton, and Robert Soucy
* view fascism as on the ideological right. Rod Stackelberg
* argues that fascism opposes egalitarianism (particularly racial)
* and democracy, which according to him are characteristics that
* make it an extreme right-wing movement. Stanley Payne states
* that pre-war fascism found a coherent identity through
* alliances with right-wing movements. Roger Griffin argues
* that since the end of World War II, fascist movements have
* become intertwined with the radical right, describing certain
* groups as part of a "fascist radical right".

* Walter Laqueur says that historical fascism "did not belong
* to the extreme Left, yet defining it as part of the extreme
* Right is not very illuminating either", but that it "was
* always a coalition between radical, populist ('fascist')
* elements and others gravitating toward the extreme Right".
* Payne says "fascists were unique in their hostility to all
* the main established currents, left right and center",
* noting that they allied with both left and right, but more
* often the right.

- However, he contends that German Nazism
- was closer to Russian communism than to
- any other non-communist system."

Chinese 'Communism' {One Party Rule} Today
in the 21st Century is Uniquely Fascist :
The Great Leader {or One Party Leadership}
The Party United Behind The Great Leader
The People United Behind The Party

Recovering Liberals Casting-Off Their
me, Me. ME ! Elitism and should go to
Liberal's Anonymous [LA] Meetings and
repeat the Liberal's {Serenity} Prayer
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...198eaab596d11c

RHF wrote:


Recovering Liberals Casting-Off Their
me, Me. ME ! Elitism and should go to
Liberal's Anonymous [LA] Meetings and
repeat the Liberal's {Serenity} Prayer
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...198eaab596d11c
.

I thought "elite" meant exceptional. What's wrong with that?

The Cash for Clunkers End Game (Clunker Pics)
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=275768

What a Waste!!!
cuhulin

"rf_not" writhed in sociopathic denials because:

Baron_Mind was pointing out the obvious, as it escaped laughing at:

"no brainer" whimpered:

Baron_Mind was having a laugh, at the expense of:

"night light, underpants" regurgitated the usual right-wing ignorance:

Everyone knows that liberals are crypto-fascists.

That would be a logical fallacy..

--Fascism has always been a right-wing ideology, per history..

LOL!!! Ah yes, another brainwash

So, you cited a web-log to support your foolishness?

How quaint.. Now, for the historic facts..

http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_...3/Fascism.html

Compared to Other Radical Right-Wing Ideologies

"Although fascism comes in many forms, not all radical
right-wing movements are fascist. In France in the 1890s,
for example, the Action Française movement started a
campaign to overthrow the democratic government of France
and restore the king to power. Although this movement
embraced the violence and the antidemocratic tendencies
of fascism, it did not develop the fascist myth of
revolutionary rebirth through popular power. There
have also been many movements that were simply nationalist
but with a right-wing political slant. In China, for example,
the Kuomintang (The Chinese National People’s Party), led
by Chiang Kai-shek, fought leftist revolutionaries until
Communists won control of China in 1949. Throughout the
20th century this type of right-wing nationalism was
common in many military dictatorships in Latin America,
Africa, and Asia. Fascism should also be distinguished
from right-wing separatist movements that set out to
create a new nation-state rather than to regenerate an
existing one. This would exclude cases such as the Nazi puppet
regime in Croatia during World War II. This regime, known as
the Ustaše government, relied on paramilitary groups to govern,
and hoped that their support for Nazism would enable Croatia
to break away from Yugoslavia. This separatist goal
distinguishes the Ustaše from genuine fascist movements."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism

Position in the political spectrum

"Fascism is normally described as "extreme right",
but writers on the subject have often found placing
fascism on a conventional left-right political spectrum
difficult. There is a scholarly consensus that fascism
was influenced by both the left and the right. A number
of historians have regarded fascism either as a revolutionary
centrist doctrine, as a doctrine which mixes philosophies
of the left and the right, or as both of those things.

The historians Eugen Weber, David Renton, and Robert Soucy
view fascism as on the ideological right. Rod Stackelberg
argues that fascism opposes egalitarianism (particularly racial)
and democracy, which according to him are characteristics that
make it an extreme right-wing movement. Stanley Payne states
that pre-war fascism found a coherent identity through
alliances with right-wing movements. Roger Griffin argues
that since the end of World War II, fascist movements have
become intertwined with the radical right, describing certain
groups as part of a "fascist radical right".

Walter Laqueur says that historical fascism "did not belong
to the extreme Left, yet defining it as part of the extreme
Right is not very illuminating either", but that it "was
always a coalition between radical, populist ('fascist')
elements and others gravitating toward the extreme Right".
Payne says "fascists were unique in their hostility to all
the main established currents, left right and center",
noting that they allied with both left and right, but more
often the right. However, he contends that German Nazism
was closer to Russian communism than to any other non-communist
system."

Recovering Liberals

Speaking of elitism, when are you going to quit pretending
that your failed political ideology is above questioning?

--Do you see the contradiction that's inherent with that?

On Oct 15, 11:23*pm, Baron_Mind wrote:

Speaking of elitism, when are you going to quit pretending
that your failed political ideology is above questioning?

--Do you see the contradiction that's inherent with that?- Hide quoted text -


Oh - enlighten us Dear Leader with more of your Neo-Commie 0baMa0
Propaganda LIES!
rotfl

"abdominally dumb" whimpered:

Baron_Mind was laughing at the intentional ignorance of:

"rf_not" writhed in sociopathic denials because:

Baron_Mind was pointing out the obvious, as it escaped laughing at:

"no brainer" whimpered:

Baron_Mind was having a laugh, at the expense of:

"night light, underpants" regurgitated the usual right-wing ignorance:

Everyone knows that liberals are crypto-fascists.

That would be a logical fallacy..

--Fascism has always been a right-wing ideology, per history..

LOL!!! Ah yes, another brainwash

So, you cited a web-log to support your foolishness?

How quaint.. Now, for the historic facts..

http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_...3/Fascism.html

Compared to Other Radical Right-Wing Ideologies

"Although fascism comes in many forms, not all radical
right-wing movements are fascist. In France in the 1890s,
for example, the Action Française movement started a
campaign to overthrow the democratic government of France
and restore the king to power. Although this movement
embraced the violence and the antidemocratic tendencies
of fascism, it did not develop the fascist myth of
revolutionary rebirth through popular power. There
have also been many movements that were simply nationalist
but with a right-wing political slant. In China, for example,
the Kuomintang (The Chinese National People’s Party), led
by Chiang Kai-shek, fought leftist revolutionaries until
Communists won control of China in 1949. Throughout the
20th century this type of right-wing nationalism was
common in many military dictatorships in Latin America,
Africa, and Asia. Fascism should also be distinguished
from right-wing separatist movements that set out to
create a new nation-state rather than to regenerate an
existing one. This would exclude cases such as the Nazi puppet
regime in Croatia during World War II. This regime, known as
the Ustaše government, relied on paramilitary groups to govern,
and hoped that their support for Nazism would enable Croatia
to break away from Yugoslavia. This separatist goal
distinguishes the Ustaše from genuine fascist movements."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism

Position in the political spectrum

"Fascism is normally described as "extreme right",
but writers on the subject have often found placing
fascism on a conventional left-right political spectrum
difficult. There is a scholarly consensus that fascism
was influenced by both the left and the right. A number
of historians have regarded fascism either as a revolutionary
centrist doctrine, as a doctrine which mixes philosophies
of the left and the right, or as both of those things.

The historians Eugen Weber, David Renton, and Robert Soucy
view fascism as on the ideological right. Rod Stackelberg
argues that fascism opposes egalitarianism (particularly racial)
and democracy, which according to him are characteristics that
make it an extreme right-wing movement. Stanley Payne states
that pre-war fascism found a coherent identity through
alliances with right-wing movements. Roger Griffin argues
that since the end of World War II, fascist movements have
become intertwined with the radical right, describing certain
groups as part of a "fascist radical right".

Walter Laqueur says that historical fascism "did not belong
to the extreme Left, yet defining it as part of the extreme
Right is not very illuminating either", but that it "was
always a coalition between radical, populist ('fascist')
elements and others gravitating toward the extreme Right".
Payne says "fascists were unique in their hostility to all
the main established currents, left right and center",
noting that they allied with both left and right, but more
often the right. However, he contends that German Nazism
was closer to Russian communism than to any other non-communist
system."

Recovering Liberals

Speaking of elitism, when are you going to quit pretending
that your failed political ideology is above questioning?

Oh - enlighten us

Enlighten yourself, if that's your path, neophyte..

--Yours is no disgrace..

On Oct 14, 11:25*pm, Baron_Mind wrote:
"no brainer" whimpered:



Baron_Mind was having a laugh, at the expense of:

"night light, underpants" regurgitated the usual right-wing ignorance:

Everyone knows that liberals are crypto-fascists.

That would be a logical fallacy..

--Fascism has always been a right-wing ideology, per history..

LOL!!! Ah yes, another brainwash

So, you cited a web-log to support your foolishness?

How quaint.. *Now, for the historic facts..


I strongly suggest you visit a library and a book store and start
reading "the facts" about the roots of Fascism and its mother -
Progressivism and Neo-Liberalism.
Your naked ignorance reveals nothing more then your Communist rooted
propaganda lies.
Your ignorance is naked.

N? ?baMa? wrote:


I strongly suggest you visit a library and a book store and start
reading "the facts" about the roots of Fascism and its mother -
Progressivism and Neo-Liberalism.

Neo-liberalism? Isn't that the same thing as contemporary conservatism?

You make feel extra special to be a anarchist-socialist.

On Oct 15, 9:14*am, dave wrote:
N? ?baMa? wrote:

I strongly suggest you visit a library and a book store and start
reading "the facts" about the roots of Fascism and its mother -
Progressivism and Neo-Liberalism.

Neo-liberalism? *Isn't that the same thing as contemporary conservatism?

You make feel extra special to be a anarchist-socialist.

Would you kindly mind your own business and stop ruining the Commie
Clap Traps.