Typical idiot Muslim, they think they can tell us what to do at the
point of a gun? Anyone can get a sucker punch in, and after that, the
tactic does not work any more, that is why they are still fighting for
decades in the Middle East, they are retarded and evil? So all you
Muslim terrorist potential recruits posting messages in dfw.politics,
seattle.politics, or or.politics should understand, you can not fight
God, who opens the ears of the oppressed?

Universal Disclaimer for the Public Domain, Version 1.4, dated Oct
10th, 2009

a) The views expressed by this website and the author to include all
electronic forms of communication are not representative of
advertisers, or other third parties that may store and or transmit the
messages from this private computer, which you may observe at your own
risk, with no liability to the authors, or any party related to
transmitting, storing, or any other aspect of the material involved,
including email correspondence, which is not necessary to the function
of the website, and may or may not be archived. No personal
information exchanged will be shared without your consent, or provided
to third parties with out the express permission of the parties and,
or, individuals concerned.

b) The author(s) of this content and those who may interact with it in
various known or unknown electronic methods do not give permission to
any third parties to share or provide private personal information who
may operate as part of the internet communications system, including
all parties, who may technically intercept communications due to the
nature of network conditions beyond both the author's legal and
physical control, unless those communications represent violations of
the law, upon which the author, and or web site will cooperate to
pursue any legal remedies.

c) The views expressed by the author or website may or may not contain
factual information, due to the use of sarcasm or parody. The views
may or may not be complete, either by design, to pre-empt being called
a liar even if telling the truth, or by error due to typographical,
grammer, or other technical communication problems not realized or
imagined, or the possibility of views based on false or missing
information, or with the intention of being used for entertainment
purposes only, and not as a definitive judgement on the actions,
character, or reputation of an organization, individual, or groups of
individuals, with the intent of communicating with a limited group of
people, and not the general public, however no distribution
restrictions apply for fair use purposes described by the US Copyright
Office, if no other restrictions are present or communicated, with all
commercial proceeds associated with the distribution of the content to
remain the sole possesion of the original author.

d) Any humor if used, is not intended to offend people, and may be
designed to apply the principals of peer pressure through reverse
examination to accomplish the communication of principals or ideas
that consist of traditional or proposed social values that are proven
to advance the common good, and are not meant to discredit, disparage
or demean any person or entities in any professional or personal
manner, by attempting to share through the eyes or opinion of the
author, for which it is expected that you read at your own risk, with
no liability held to the author or any third parties who may store,
transfer, or forward this message to others, in the traditions of free
speech, fair use, and to play a positive role in a society that
believes that graphically depicting male homosexuals having sex, and
other unusual sex acts is considered free speech or that the use of
abortion to limit Negros, Latinos, and other races from "spreading the
wealth around" as a "matter of privacy" (which the author does not
condone).

e)The use of humor is a known ingredient in providing teachable
moments, and to validate and even demonstrate artistic expressions
that are not shared by others, as demonstrated by many valuable
scientific observations that were scoffed at in the past, yet proven
to be quite valid decades later, upon which the humor used in all
electronic communications by the author are based, in the principals
and traditions of free speech and pursuit of happiness, and may not be
a representation of others, including God.

f) Additional use of automated anonymous page use tracking computer
scripts (web page programs) may be licensed by www.google.com, for
bandwidth verification or potential advertisement opportunities or
incorporation of web master tools in the future.

g) Advertisements that may appear are not necessarily endorsed by the
author, either by admission, or by silence, nor are related links,
that may be provided for all or any of the following known or unknown
purposes, but not limited to, informational, educational, and for the
purpose of giving copy right credit referal information under the
terms outlined in the conditions applied to the term "fair use"
regarding conversations and print under US Copy Right Law.

h) It is the opinion of the author that effective 1 December, 2009,
the proposed regulations from the FTC violate the first and fifth
amendments of the United States Constitution, by infringing through
economic affliction the burden without compensation all financial
details concerning the communications of both free enterprise and
opinion, and other civil rights such as "punishment must be fair" and
not at the "discretion" of public officials, or that advertisers are
assumed to be guilty of deception when United States law provides that
you are innocent before being proven guilty, and are in fact
demonstrations that there are current members of Congress that neither
understand the spirit of the law our founding fathers made for the
United States of America, or understand how they work in the opinion
of the author, as of October 10th, 2009, especially in light of
anticipated, and hopefully defeated, legislative taxes relating to
energy use and the burden of publishers and advertisers to comply with
the law and manage the environment, and in light that there are
various consumer protection agencies, including the Better Business
Bureau, which have free consumer information.

i)Although the content provided meets or exceeds those new
requirements to the knowledge of the author, and modifications to
version 1.3 of this disclaimer is a result of the opinion of the
author that blogging is another definition for a potentially infinite
number or forms of electronic communication, as such the author will
retroactively apply this version, 1.4 to all forms of previous
communications, when and wherever possible, as time allows, in order
to properly convey the intention of the author and to demonstrate an
enthusiasm to comply with the law, and not enthusiastically pursue
getting high on cocaine as often as possible as Barack Hussein Obama
has admitted in his book (paraphrase, synopsis), according to (mmm,
mmm, mmm (sonic emphasis)) Rush Hudson Limbaugh, (mmm mmm mmm (sonic
emphasis)).

j) Use of this disclaimer for either personal or professional use is
permitted with no restrictions. These restrictions or disclaimers do
not prohibit the author from pursuing or communicating in a truthful
manner, or guarantee that the audience will understand all things as
intended, and, or result in being called incoherent, or even a Chicken
Chaser!

1. The Killer was probably Educated at US Taxpayer Expense

2. The killer was probably promoted around more qualified native Americans.

3.Sanders will find a way to blame it on Bush, or Republicans, or
Christians.

4. The obese Morjuan will post lame Non- Sense.

5. Obama will apologize to Jordan and all Muslims for Killing a brother.

Note: they would have been in Pakistan were it not for the Idiot you useful
idiots elected!

Pa wrote:

2. The killer was probably promoted around more qualified native Americans.

Well, he was BORN IN AMERICA. Does that make him a 'native American'?
(Hint: the answer is 'yes')

You, sir, appear to be a fool and a bigot.

Nick Danger wrote:
Pa wrote:

2. The killer was probably promoted around more qualified native
Americans.

Well, he was BORN IN AMERICA. Does that make him a 'native American'?
(Hint: the answer is 'yes')

You, sir, appear to be a fool and a bigot.

You, otoh, are a lair and a ****head.

http://origin.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,572405,00.html

Hasan, who was born and raised in Virginia and graduated from Virginia
Tech University, turned against the wars after hearing the stories of
those who came back from Afghanistan and Iraq, Nader Hasan said. Maj.
Hasan, raised a Muslim, had wanted to go into the military against his
parent's wishes, but he was taunted by others after the terror attacks
of Sept. 11, his cousin said.

A former Fort Hood colleague of the shooter said Hasan would frequently
make "outlandish" comments.

"He said maybe Muslims should stand up and fight against the aggressor,"
retired Col. Terry Lee told Fox News. "At first we thought he meant help
the armed forces, but apparently that wasn't the case. Other times he
would make comments we shouldn't be in the war in the first place."

Hasan had been optimistic that President Obama would start pulling
troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan, Lee said, but when that didn't
happen as quickly as he hoped, Hasan became angry.

Nick Danger wrote:
Pa wrote:

2. The killer was probably promoted around more qualified native
Americans.

Well, he was BORN IN AMERICA. Does that make him a 'native American'?
(Hint: the answer is 'yes')

You, sir, appear to be a fool and a bigot.


You, otoh, are a lair and a ****head.

http://origin.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,572405,00.html

Hasan, who was born and raised in Virginia and graduated from Virginia
Tech University, turned against the wars after hearing the stories of
those who came back from Afghanistan and Iraq, Nader Hasan said. Maj.
Hasan, raised a Muslim, had wanted to go into the military against his
parent's wishes, but he was taunted by others after the terror attacks
of Sept. 11, his cousin said.

A former Fort Hood colleague of the shooter said Hasan would frequently
make "outlandish" comments.

"He said maybe Muslims should stand up and fight against the aggressor,"
retired Col. Terry Lee told Fox News. "At first we thought he meant help
the armed forces, but apparently that wasn't the case. Other times he
would make comments we shouldn't be in the war in the first place."

Hasan had been optimistic that President Obama would start pulling
troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan, Lee said, but when that didn't
happen as quickly as he hoped, Hasan became angry.

"Nick Danger" wrote in message
...
Pa wrote:

2. The killer was probably promoted around more qualified native
Americans.

Well, he was BORN IN AMERICA. Does that make him a 'native American'?
(Hint: the answer is 'yes')

You, sir, appear to be a fool and a bigot.

Read it Again you stupid Liberal!

On Nov 5, 7:21*pm, "Pa" wrote:
nothing of interest

You're too predictable, hambrain. That's why you're boring.

Nick Danger wrote:
Pa wrote:

2. The killer was probably promoted around more qualified native
Americans.

Well, he was BORN IN AMERICA. Does that make him a 'native American'?
(Hint: the answer is 'yes')

You, sir, appear to be a fool and a bigot.

Alex DeLarge wrote:

You, otoh, are a lair and a ****head.

Hasan, who was born and raised in Virginia...

I'm a "lair"? (I think you mean 'liar').

*I* said only that "he was born in America" (which by definition, makes
him a 'native American', which the OP didn't quite seem to grasp).

*YOU* said he "was born and raised in Virginia".

That makes me a "lair"? Last time I looked, Virginia was in America.

The only ****head in this discussion appears to be you.

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:00:58 -0500, Carter wrote:

Nick Danger wrote:
Pa wrote:

2. The killer was probably promoted around more qualified native
Americans.

Well, he was BORN IN AMERICA. Does that make him a 'native American'?
(Hint: the answer is 'yes')

You, sir, appear to be a fool and a bigot.

Alex DeLarge wrote:

You, otoh, are a lair and a ****head.

Hasan, who was born and raised in Virginia...

I'm a "lair"? (I think you mean 'liar').

*I* said only that "he was born in America" (which by definition, makes
him a 'native American', which the OP didn't quite seem to grasp).

*YOU* said he "was born and raised in Virginia".

That makes me a "lair"? Last time I looked, Virginia was in America.

If Hawaii is not american as the birth-ers believe, perhaps Virginia has
suffered the same fate? I guess it fits the GOP and lemming limpballs
followers agenda....

Juan wrote:
On Nov 5, 7:21 pm, "Pa" wrote:
nothing of interest

You're too predictable, hambrain. That's why you're boring.


You said ham, that make you hungry gordito?