Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why did they choose NYC to try Gitmo Prisoners of War?
To rub your nose in your new found affection for those that kill
Americans? So that jurists could be stalked by arab cab drivers in their spare time? A jury of officers in the US military is not educated, not objective enough, in a tribunal? Military officers spend hundreds of hours in training, and have college educations? A civilian jury member only has to have a basic qualification of what, a voter registration card? Does the phrase "rub your nose in it" ring a bell? Does the phrase "coward" mean anything, to anyone? Universal Disclaimer for the Public Domain, Version 1.5, dated Nov 7th, 2009 (which supersedes all previous versions, to which this new version applies) The writings, views, expressions expressed by this author to include all written and electronic forms of communication are subject to the following disclaimer and conditions: a) The views expressed by this website and the author to include all electronic forms of communication are not representative of advertisers, or other third parties that may store and or transmit the messages from this private computer, which you may observe at your own risk, with no liability to the authors, or any party related to transmitting, storing, or any other aspect of the material involved, including email correspondence, which is not necessary to the function of the website, and may or may not be archived due to other limitations incorporated into the licensed email software in use at the time such as automated spam or virus filters. No personal information exchanged will be shared without your consent, or provided to third parties with out the express permission of the parties and, or, individuals concerned. b) The author(s) of this content and those who may interact with it in various known or unknown electronic methods do not give permission to any third parties to share or provide private personal information who may operate as part of any type of electronic or written communications system, including all parties, who may technically intercept communications due to the nature of network conditions beyond both the author's legal and physical control, unless those communications represent violations of the law, upon which the author, and or web site will cooperate to pursue any legal remedies. c) The views expressed by the author or website may or may not contain factual information, due to the use of sarcasm or parody. The views may or may not be complete, either by design, to pre-empt being called a liar even if telling the truth, or by error due to typographical, grammer, or other technical communication problems not realized or imagined, or the possibility of views based on false or missing information, or with the intention of being used for entertainment purposes only, and not as a definitive judgment on the actions, character, or reputation of an organization, individual, or groups of individuals, with the intent of communicating with a limited group of people, and not the general public, however no distribution restrictions apply for fair use purposes described by the US Copyright Office, if no other restrictions are present or communicated, with all commercial proceeds associated with the distribution of the content to remain the sole possession of the original author. d) Any reference to copyrighted material is done in the spirit of fair use, to illustrate the context of a discussion regarding public events for reference purposes that adds to the conversation, for which that discussion constitutes a new and separate piece of intellectual property, for which the referenced copyrighted material can not convey by itself, and that the author reserves the right to retain any profits from the newly created intellectual property. This term also serves to promote the referenced copyrighted material, without necessarily endorsing the material for any particular fitness, use, or purpose, for which the purpose of fair use referral law was created for, through inclusion of a partial, but not whole, body of works that the copyright fair use reference applies, for which the intent of all terms of this disclaimer apply to that reference of a copyrighted work. e) Any humor if used, is not intended to offend people, and may be designed to apply the principals of peer pressure through reverse examination to accomplish the communication of principals or ideas that consist of traditional or proposed social values that are proven to advance the common good, and are not meant to discredit, disparage or demean any person or entities in any professional or personal manner, by attempting to share through the eyes or opinion of the author, for which it is expected that you read at your own risk, with no liability held to the author or any third parties who may store, transfer, or forward this message to others, in the traditions of free speech, fair use, and to play a positive role in a society that believes that graphically depicting male homosexuals having sex, and other unusual sex acts is considered free speech or that the use of abortion to limit Negros, Latinos, and other races from "spreading the wealth around" as a "matter of privacy" (which the author does not condone). f) The use of humor is a known ingredient in providing teachable moments, and to validate and even demonstrate artistic expressions that are not shared by others, as demonstrated by many valuable scientific observations that were scoffed at in the past, yet proven to be quite valid decades later, upon which the humor used in all electronic communications by the author are based, in the principals and traditions of free speech and pursuit of happiness, and may not be a representation of others, including God. g) It is the opinion of the author that you respect people when you consider their views, by reflecting their thoughts or actions against your own, which may include use of language that conveys an emotional depth that is to be imagined, but not enacted through use of language that accurately, or inaccurately describes the situation, circumstance, or idea, which does not imply that any action occur other than the consideration of the thought, for which beyond the author has no control, or liability for the action of the reader as presented in all terms of this diclaimer, and may simply be the venting of emotions with the intent of no consequence by the author to an audience the author assumes will understand the message and intent, and wishes to hear those views. h) Since all intellectual property, discussions and other communications this disclaimer applies to, either in written, or electronic form, subscribe to the terms described in paragraph (e) and (g) of this disclaimer, under no circumstances are any communications meant to violate the terms of any electronic harassment laws which include the word “harm”, for which the author understands to be limited to the definition of physical harm (not self inflicted mental harm) that requires immediate medical attention based solely or in part by the communications of the author, regardless of whether the author chooses to remain anonymous or not. i) It is the intention and opinion of the author that History is full of individuals that are not harmed by criticism, and in fact such criticism can motivate and inspire them to prove their critics wrong. Based on this historical evidence, any alleged mental harm amounts to self inflicted injury not treatable by either medical or other professionals (despite the fact that many people live from the profits of lies through gradual illusion, without judicial interference), for which the author has no control over the mental development of any potential reader prior to the discovery or reading of the material for which this disclaimer applies, as evident by the necessity that speech is to be protected by law as determined by the founders of the United States of America, who, in the opinion of the author, wrote the legal framework, which was created by God, not slaves. j) Additional use of automated anonymous page use tracking computer scripts (web page programs) or advertisements may be licensed by www.google.com, for bandwidth verification, or determination of potential advertisement opportunities subject to all other terms described in this disclaimer. k) Advertisements that may appear are not necessarily endorsed by the author, either by admission, or by silence, nor are any electronic links that may transport the reader to other web pages, sites, or computers, and such links that may be provided for all or any of the following known or unknown purposes, but not limited to, informational, educational, and for the purpose of giving copy right credit referral information under the terms outlined in the conditions applied to the term "fair use" regarding conversations and print under US Copy Right Law, and for which the author assumes no liability for any particular use, fitness, or legality there of, any link, current, past, or future, which the reader should use at their sole risk, with no liability to the author, or any other party that may store, transmit, or otherwise facilitate use of the material for which this disclaimer applies. l) It is the opinion of the author that effective 1 December, 2009, the proposed regulations from the FTC violate the first and fifth amendments of the United States Constitution, by infringing through economic affliction the burden without compensation all financial details concerning the communications of both free enterprise and opinion, and other civil rights such as "punishment must be fair" and not at the "discretion" of public officials, or that advertisers are assumed to be guilty of deception when United States law provides that you are innocent before being proven guilty, and are in fact demonstrations that there are current members of Congress that neither understand the spirit of the law our founding fathers made for the United States of America, or understand how they work in the opinion of the author, as of October 10th, 2009, especially in light of anticipated, and hopefully defeated, legislative taxes relating to energy use and the burden of publishers and advertisers to comply with the law and manage the environment, and in light that there are various consumer protection agencies, including the Better Business Bureau, which has free consumer information which preclude the use and need for excessive government regulation that burdens business with obstacles it may sense that it can not overcome without inflicting harm on the business plan or survival ability of the business to provide advertised, goods and or services. m) Although the content provided meets or exceeds those new requirements to the knowledge of the author, and modifications to version 1.3 or 1.4 of this disclaimer is a result of the opinion of the author that “blogging” is another definition for a potentially infinite number or forms of electronic communication, as such the author will retroactively apply this version, 1.5 to all forms of previous communications, when and wherever possible, as time allows, in order to properly convey the intention of the author and to demonstrate an enthusiasm to comply with the law, and not enthusiastically pursue getting high on cocaine as often as possible as Barack Hussein Obama has admitted in his book (paraphrase, synopsis), according to (mmm, mmm, mmm (sonic emphasis)) Rush Hudson Limbaugh, (mmm mmm mmm (sonic emphasis)). n) Use of this disclaimer for either personal or professional use is permitted with no restrictions. These restrictions or disclaimers do not prohibit the author from pursuing or communicating in a truthful manner, or guarantee that the audience will understand all things as intended, and, or result in being called incoherent, or even a Chicken Chaser! o) This disclaimer is meant to establish the intent of the author who may participate in message forums, or create other written or electronic forms of communication to comply with current law, and may be revoked without prior notice, due to circumstances beyond the author's control, changes in the law, or for any of the purposes, terms, or conditions that may be in effect or described by this disclaimer, or to changes in this disclaimer that the author may clarify in a revised version of this disclaimer. p) This disclaimer is attached to this message, and retroactively applies to all previous forms of communication by the author, and is done so because there is no recognized central suppository of a public disclaimer recognized by the Government of the United States to the author, and as such, the legal imperative of the author is to apply this disclaimer to all manner of correspondence as the author seems fit or prudent, so that no misunderstandings occur, or to comply with past, current or future revisions of the law, due to any of, but not limited to, any or all of the terms, partial terms, or combination of terms, of this disclaimer, which is derived from the freedom of speech, for it appears to the author that the zeal of lawmakers to take away free speech outweigh the providence of attaching this disclaimer to all correspondence for which this applies, and any inconvenience for which this presents, is the result of simply complying with the law, and not to inconvenience the reader. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Why did they choose NYC to try Gitmo Prisoners of War?
Why did they choose NYC to try Gitmo Prisoners of War? Options
Maybe becusae they killed 3,000 on 9/11/01, many of them in New York? BTW,. aren't you glad Bush captured Bin Laden and put him on trial? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Why did they choose NYC to try Gitmo Prisoners of War?
DW wrote:
Why did they choose NYC to try Gitmo Prisoners of War? Options Maybe becusae they killed 3,000 on 9/11/01, many of them in New York? By the time the towers fell, most of the country was tuned in. We were all New Yorkers that day. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Why did they choose NYC to try Gitmo Prisoners of War?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Why did they choose NYC to try Gitmo Prisoners of War?
"dave" wrote in message ... DW wrote: Why did they choose NYC to try Gitmo Prisoners of War? Options Maybe becusae they killed 3,000 on 9/11/01, many of them in New York? By the time the towers fell, most of the country was tuned in. We were all New Yorkers that day. Except Bush - He was drunk, chasing Mayerr JulieAnnie in the WH bedroom. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Why did they choose NYC to try Gitmo Prisoners of War?
On Nov 14, 12:52*am, DW wrote:
*Why did they choose NYC to try Gitmo Prisoners of War? Options Maybe becusae they killed 3,000 on 9/11/01, many of them in New York? BTW,. aren't you glad Bush captured Bin Laden and put him on trial? Nice of the Oblama white House to put NYC back in the cross hairs in an even bigger way than it always is anyway. Should be quite the worldwide spectacle and the militant muslim loons will be wanting to make another splash during it. Might as well put NY on highest terror alert for the multi-month trial. A full defense will include all the crackpot conspiracy theories being trotted out. They just gave the extremists the largest publicity forum on earth. Nice move, O. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Why did they choose NYC to try Gitmo Prisoners of War?
How LOWWWWWWW Can Five Names Born in Kenya!
DUMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMB ASSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSS Go? http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=278215 cuhulin |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Why did they choose NYC to try Gitmo Prisoners of War?
On Nov 14, 4:03*pm, CliffB wrote:
Nice of the Oblama white House to put NYC back in the cross hairs in an even bigger way than it always is anyway. As if it were possible to increase the danger. (Hint: nutjob religious fanatics don't get nuttier any more than you can fill a water glass past the top: full is full.) For a typical example, refer to any handy mirror. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
(OT) : Has US AG Eric Holder Give The Republicans the 2010 and 2012Elections ?
On Nov 14, 4:03*pm, CliffB wrote:
On Nov 14, 12:52*am, DW wrote: *Why did they choose NYC to try Gitmo Prisoners of War? Options Maybe becusae they killed 3,000 on 9/11/01, many of them in New York? BTW,. aren't you glad Bush captured Bin Laden and put him on trial? Nice of the Oblama white House to put NYC back in the cross hairs in an even bigger way than it always is anyway. Should be quite the worldwide spectacle and the militant muslim loons will be wanting to make another splash during it. Might as well put NY on highest terror alert for the multi-month trial. A full defense will include all the crackpot conspiracy theories being trotted out. They just gave the extremists the largest publicity forum on earth. Nice move, O. Looks like Prez Obama's US AG Eric Holder is trying hard to make Obama a one term president and cost the Democrats control of both the US House and US Senate in the next Elections. ? Has US AG Eric Holder Give The Republicans the 2010 and 2012 Elections ? Trying Islam-O-Fascist Terrorist WAR CRIMINALS {Foreign Mass Murderers} as everyday Civilian Criminals : Begs Disaster {Attacks} to Happen Again in New York City. The US Congress passed Laws to Try all these Non-Combatant Islam-O-Fascist Terrorist WAR CRIMINALS -via- a Military Tribunal System : But the Obama-Regime© seams to Ignore this Law and the Public Safety of the Citizens of New York City. Another Islam-O-Fascist Terrorist Attack on New York City might have happen some day -but- Now an Attack on NYC is certain to Happen one day in the next Year or two or three because of this Trial of the Islam-O-Fascist Terrorist in New York City. {Holder Is Inviting Disaster To Happen} Some Attack {Any Attack} on/in New York City during the Trial will be BLAMED on the Trial and Holder and on Prez Obama -then- Prez Obama and the Democrats will Pay for this Mistake and Inviting another Attack in Elections of 2010, 2011 and 2012. {BHO's Re-Election} The Any Attack Scenario : The Attack by the Islam-O-Fascist Terrorists could be on many 'soft-targets' within NYC that will produce High Body Counts and Video Images of Destruction for the Islam-O-Fascist Terrorist and the World Media will gladly run the Videos around the World 24/7 showing the Death and Destruction. This will be Great Propaganda for the Islam-O-Fascist Terrorists -but- Make Prez Obama and the Obama-Regime© to appear to be Foolish and Stupid for Inviting the Attacks once again on NYC. -wrt- 2005 London UK Subway and Bus Attacks by the Islam-O-Fascist Terrorists. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_July_...ondon_bombings The Courts Attack Scenario : Worse for Prez Obama and the Obama-Regime© would be a Direct Attack on the NYC Federal Court House. The Attack could be a stand-off-attack on the US Federal Court building from four-or-more nearby adjacent buildings that the Islam-O-Fascist Terrorists can easily see the Court Room Floor that the Trial is being held on with any variant of RPGs. The US Federal Government has to Defend the Whole Building and it's perimeter -while- all the Islam-O-Fascist Terrorists have to do to make the 24/7 News Headlines around the World is Hit the Court Building on all four sides to have a Terror Propaganda Victory and Bad News for the USA and NYC. IMHO - US AG Eric Holder has make the US Federal Courts Building in NYC the new PRIME TARGET {Ground-Zero} for every Islam-O-Fascist Terrorist on this Planet Earth to Attack. -note- Remember to the Islam-O-Fascist Terrorists those on Trial will Die as Martyrs for Islam. -obtw- These same Islam-O-Fascist Terrorists will 'see' the failure of Prez Obama to get re-elected in 2012 as a Result of these Attacks as another Propaganda Victory for their Jihad cause any Attack on NYC during the Trial will Impact the US Elections in 2010 and 2012. -omg- Holder may just have given the Republicans control of the US House and the US Senate in 2010 and put a Republican in the White House in 2012. HEY US AG ERIC HOLDER JUST MAY BE YOU SHOULD RETHINK THIS ONE ~ RHF -hint- You Prosecute Criminals to Protect the Citizens of the USA -not- To Put The Citizens of NYC & the USA at Risk of Terrorist Attacks by Islamic Jihadists. -tip- A US Military Tribunal for these Terrorist at GITMO would have been Legal and Served Justice; plus Protected the Citizens of the USA too. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
(OT) : Has US AG Eric Holder Give The Republicans the 2010 and2012 Elections ?
Once in a China Blue Moon wrote:
How does it feel to be such a coward? Do you even live in New York? I guess it's okay for you to kill Americans halfway across the world, but when your own butt is at risk, it's time to be the big scaredy cat. He's afraid Bin Ladin's gonna dump a colostomy bag on him. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Rattle Snake of Gitmo has bitten? | Shortwave | |||
(OT) : McCain's "My Fellow Prisoners" -and- Obama's "in 57Stat... | Shortwave | |||
Geriatric Prisoners You Pick Up the Tab | Shortwave | |||
Communist Chinese sell organs from executed prisoners to British | Shortwave | |||
(OT) Yeah, we really 'torture' prisoners... | Shortwave |