Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Bankrupt, pot smoking Californians will not lecture America on whatto buy.
The Persuasion of Power
Revised 11/18/2009 You know what? It is none of the bankrupt business of the State of California to tell people how many watts their tv's use. They already want to dig in our trash, bug our house, bug our phones, and watch our bank accounts? What's next, hair dryers, air conditioners, lights on at night time (safety)? Just how many people in California can afford to buy these things? A plasma tv only uses 330 watts per hour? Do you have any idea what web site servers use, or people that have to do any kind of video editing of their family cameras, or simply play a video game, or a pc flight simulator? So you bust your tail end all year, so you can save up money to use electricity the way you want to, and these stoned out liberals think they are saving the planet? OMG! Just who do you think you are fooling? The Glenn Beck show mentioned that Andy Stern said "if the power of persuasion does not work, we will use the persuasion of power"? Is that what greedy communists do? So does a prayer vigil, like the one in 2007 validate the accusation that unions and their political action groups act like thugs? Or does the persuasion of power, represented by false numbers on the US Government 18 million dollar web site, which apparently is not paying for fact checking, for stimulus tax money spent the persuasion of power? So who is comparing how the money was allocated (was that money allocated to imaginary people and congressional districts?) and how it is spent? Using a fine tooth comb, or simply being negligent in your job? And here is the problem with this public relation web site, www.recovery.gov. 25 different agencies are inputting data into the system, apparently with no auditing? So why the rush for the public relation web site without verifying the numbers unless you really don't have faith in the program in the first place? Why wasn't this created and tested before the money was spent? So a lot of this are ad hoc efforts to further political actions, and perhaps further political spending in the future? Does that alarm you, if they are reporting imaginary congressional districts, are they issuing checks to imaginary projects? Given the past record of government credit card records, that is not a partisan question, but one of common sense? (info taken from http://money.cnn.com/2009/03/19/news...ry_website.htm) And should accounting and auditing debacles distract us from the more important questions, who designed the stimulus spending bills and packages without good auditing trails in the first place? Getting back to Joe Lieberman, do you know what you do when people are making noise outside your house all night? Other than burning bales of hay (might not work in a metro area)? Put a copy of Joel Osteen's sermon(s) in the DVD player, with the stereo jacks hooked up to your home stereo, and put a speaker outside. Turn up the volume so they can enjoy the sermon (with out violating noise regulations). Either that or simply put on the local radio gospel station? You would be surprised how many delinquent teen agers disappear because they loose their interest in watching others drink beer? One day, I met a truck driver at lunch time. He was recognized in the company as having driven over not just one million safe miles without an accident, but was one of the top ten industry safest drivers. He was a humble, hulk of a black man, a Negro. And he was obviously conservative? This is what he said, he said, "retirement is a man made invention, God did not invent retirement". That is the persuasion of power. Being that this is the most exciting, most entertaining, fact finding, idea busting, fun loving, egg shell mind crunching, invincible smacketh downeth erectus among us, you can't see the truth coming, but you know it is anyway, sonic boom of Conservatism, and, most powerful keyboard in the world, You've got to ask yourself one question.... Do you feel lucky? ------------ Universal Legal Disclaimer for the Public Domain, Version 1.6, dated Nov 10th, 2009 (which supersedes all previous versions, to which this new version applies, which takes approximately 8 minutes to read) The writings, views, expressions expressed by this author to include all written and electronic forms of communication are subject to the following disclaimer and conditions: a) The views expressed by this website and the author to include all electronic forms of communication are not representative of advertisers, or other third parties that may store and or transmit the messages from this private computer, which you may observe at your own risk, with no liability to the authors, or any party related to transmitting, storing, or any other aspect of the material involved, including email correspondence, which is not necessary to the function of the website, and may or may not be archived due to other limitations incorporated into the licensed email software in use at the time such as automated spam or virus filters. No personal information exchanged will be shared without your consent, or provided to third parties with out the express permission of the parties and, or, individuals concerned. b) The author(s) of this content and those who may interact with it in various known or unknown electronic methods do not give permission to any third parties to share or provide private personal information who may operate as part of any type of electronic or written communications system, including all parties, who may technically intercept communications due to the nature of network conditions beyond both the author's legal and physical control, unless those communications represent violations of the law, upon which the author, and or web site will cooperate to pursue any legal remedies. c) The views expressed by the author or website may or may not contain factual information, due to the use of sarcasm or parody. The views may or may not be complete, either by design, to pre-empt being called a liar even if telling the truth, or by error due to typographical, grammar, or other technical communication problems not realized or imagined, or the possibility of views based on false or missing information, or with the intention of being used for entertainment purposes only, and not as a definitive judgment on the actions, character, or reputation of an organization, individual, or groups of individuals, with the intent of communicating with a limited group of people, and not the general public, however no distribution restrictions apply for fair use purposes described by the US Copyright Office, if no other restrictions are present or communicated, with all commercial proceeds associated with the distribution of the content to remain the sole possession of the original author. d) Any reference to copyrighted material is done in the spirit of fair use, to illustrate the context of a discussion regarding public events for reference purposes that adds to the conversation, for which that discussion constitutes a new and separate piece of intellectual property, for which the referenced copyrighted material can not convey by itself, and that the author reserves the right to retain any profits from the newly created intellectual property. This term also serves to promote the referenced copyrighted material, without necessarily endorsing the material for any particular fitness, use, or purpose, for which the purpose of fair use referral law was created for, through inclusion of a partial, but not whole, body of works that the copyright fair use reference applies, for which the intent of all terms of this disclaimer apply to that reference of a copyrighted work. e) Any humor if used, is not intended to offend people, and may be designed to apply the principals of peer pressure through reverse examination to accomplish the communication of principals or ideas that consist of traditional or proposed social values that are proven to advance the common good, and are not meant to discredit, disparage or demean any person or entities in any professional or personal manner, by attempting to share through the eyes or opinion of the author, for which it is expected that you read at your own risk, with no liability held to the author or any third parties who may store, transfer, or forward this message to others, in the traditions of free speech, fair use, and to play a positive role in a society that believes that graphically depicting male homosexuals having sex, and other unusual sex acts is considered free speech or that the use of abortion to limit Negroes, Latinos, and other races from "spreading the wealth around" as a "matter of privacy" (which the author does not condone). f) The use of humor is a known ingredient in providing teachable moments, and to validate and even demonstrate artistic expressions that are not shared by others, as demonstrated by many valuable scientific observations that were scoffed at in the past, yet proven to be quite valid decades later, upon which the humor used in all electronic communications by the author are based, in the principals and traditions of free speech and pursuit of happiness, and may not be a representation of others, including God. g) It is the opinion of the author that you respect people when you consider their views, by reflecting their thoughts or actions against your own, which may include use of language that conveys an emotional depth that is to be imagined, but not enacted through use of language that accurately, or inaccurately describes the situation, circumstance, or idea, which does not imply that any action occur other than the consideration of the thought, for which beyond the author has no control, or liability for the action of the reader as presented in all terms of this disclaimer, and may simply be the venting of emotions with the intent of no consequence by the author to an audience the author assumes will understand the message and intent, and wishes to hear those views. h) Since all intellectual property, discussions and other communications this disclaimer applies to, either in written, or electronic form, subscribe to the terms described in paragraph (e) and (g) of this disclaimer, under no circumstances are any communications meant to violate the terms of any electronic harassment laws which include the word “harm”, for which the author understands to be limited to the definition of physical harm (not self inflicted mental harm) that requires immediate medical attention based solely or in part by the communications of the author, regardless of whether the author chooses to remain anonymous or not. i) It is the intention and opinion of the author that History is full of individuals that are not harmed by criticism, and in fact such criticism can motivate and inspire them to prove their critics wrong. Based on this historical evidence, any alleged mental harm amounts to self inflicted injury not treatable by either medical or other professionals (despite the fact that many people live from the profits of lies through gradual illusion, without judicial interference), for which the author has no control over the mental development of any potential reader prior to the discovery or reading of the material for which this disclaimer applies, as evident by the necessity that speech is to be protected by law as determined by the founders of the United States of America, who, in the opinion of the author, wrote the legal framework, which was created by God, not slaves. j) Additional use of automated anonymous page use tracking computer scripts (web page programs) or advertisements may be licensed by www.google.com, for bandwidth verification, or determination of potential advertisement opportunities subject to all other terms described in this disclaimer. The author is not responsible for distributions of this work, which may be posted in public forums, and archived by www.google.com which may then create comments from people who hide their true identities by using false email credentials, who will then be violating terms of service regarding accessing computer systems by directly or indirectly accessing computer systems through hacking (hiding their requested email address or other forms of requested identification) which should not be archived for public display by www.google.com in order to fight acts of criminal behavior ranging from acts of nuisance, to lethal forms of terrorism, for which the author does not intend to encourage, and to remind it is a civic duty to all web masters to remove from public view such illegal postings by hackers, and ban their use. k) Advertisements that may appear are not necessarily endorsed by the author, either by admission, or by silence, nor are any electronic links that may transport the reader to other web pages, sites, or computers, and such links that may be provided for all or any of the following known or unknown purposes, but not limited to, informational, educational, and for the purpose of giving copy right credit referral information under the terms outlined in the conditions applied to the term "fair use" regarding conversations and print under US Copy Right Law, and for which the author assumes no liability for any particular use, fitness, or legality there of, any link, current, past, or future, which the reader should use at their sole risk, with no liability to the author, or any other party that may store, transmit, or otherwise facilitate use of the material for which this disclaimer applies. l) It is the opinion of the author that effective 1 December, 2009, the proposed regulations from the FTC violate the first and fifth amendments of the United States Constitution, by infringing through economic affliction the burden without compensation all financial details concerning the communications of both free enterprise and opinion, and other civil rights such as "punishment must be fair" and not at the "discretion" of public officials, or that advertisers are assumed to be guilty of deception when United States law provides that you are innocent before being proven guilty, and are in fact demonstrations that there are current members of Congress that neither understand the spirit of the law our founding fathers made for the United States of America, or understand how they work in the opinion of the author, as of October 10th, 2009, especially in light of anticipated, and hopefully defeated, legislative taxes relating to energy use and the burden of publishers and advertisers to comply with the law and manage the environment, and in light that there are various consumer protection agencies, including the Better Business Bureau, which has free consumer information which preclude the use and need for excessive government regulation that burdens business with obstacles it may sense that it can not overcome without inflicting harm on the business plan or survival ability of the business to provide advertised, goods and or services. m) Although the content provided meets or exceeds those new requirements to the knowledge of the author, and modifications to version 1.3 or 1.4 of this disclaimer is a result of the opinion of the author that “blogging” is another definition for a potentially infinite number or forms of electronic communication, as such the author will retroactively apply this version, 1.6 to all forms of previous communications, when and wherever possible, as time allows, in order to properly convey the intention of the author and to demonstrate an enthusiasm to comply with the law, and not enthusiastically pursue getting high on cocaine as often as possible as Barrack Hussein Obama has admitted in his book (paraphrase, synopsis), according to (mmm, mmm, mmm (sonic emphasis)) Rush Hudson Limbaugh, (mmm mmm mmm (sonic emphasis)). n) Use of this disclaimer for either personal or professional use is permitted with no restrictions. These restrictions or disclaimers do not prohibit the author from pursuing or communicating in a truthful manner, or guarantee that the audience will understand all things as intended, and, or result in being called incoherent, or even a Chicken Chaser! o) This disclaimer is meant to establish the intent of the author who may participate in message forums, or create other written or electronic forms of communication to comply with current law, and may be revoked without prior notice, due to circumstances beyond the author's control, changes in the law, or for any of the purposes, terms, or conditions that may be in effect or described by this disclaimer, or to changes in this disclaimer that the author may clarify in a revised version of this disclaimer. p) This disclaimer is attached to this message, and retroactively applies to all previous forms of communication by the author, and is done so because there is no recognized central suppository of a public disclaimer recognized by the Government of the United States to the author, and as such, the legal imperative of the author is to apply this disclaimer to all manner of correspondence as the author seems fit or prudent, so that no misunderstandings occur, or to comply with past, current or future revisions of the law, due to any of, but not limited to, any or all of the terms, partial terms, or combination of terms, of this disclaimer, which is derived from the freedom of speech, for it appears to the author that the zeal of lawmakers to take away free speech outweigh the providence of attaching this disclaimer to all correspondence for which this applies, and any inconvenience for which this presents, is the result of simply complying with the law, and not to inconvenience the reader. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Bankrupt, pot smoking Californians will not lecture America onwhat to buy.
Should a FAILED STATE like Kalifornia be allowed a congressional
delegation until it gets its own affairs in order? Should a state - which federal estimates say has half of all illegal aliens in America - be allowed a congresssional delegation when apportionment methods let those wetbacks each count as much as a native-born American when deciding how many congresscritters that state gets? http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/0...your-townhall/ is the all-states, continually-updated calendar of "town halls." http://www.Internet-Gun-Show.com - your source for hard-to-find stuff! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Bankrupt, pot smoking Californians will not lecture America on...
GENERAL STRIKE ANNOUNCED!!!!!
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=278687 Hell Yes! Damn Right!,,, STRIKE!!!!! cuhulin |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Bankrupt, pot smoking Californians will not lecture America on...
On Nov 20, 7:00*pm, wrote:
GENERAL STRIKE ANNOUNCED!!!!!http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=278687 Hell Yes! Damn Right!,,, STRIKE!!!!! cuhulin ***Hey Baka, give this NG fifty guesses as to what cesspool you call home....Dopers paradise, California!!!!!!!!!! Three cheers for the idiot engineer (and part time chemist) that "juices up" a Class 1 narcotic for personal use...priceless! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Bankrupt, pot smoking Californians will not lecture America on...
nurk_fred2000 wrote:
On Nov 20, 7:00 pm, wrote: GENERAL STRIKE ANNOUNCED!!!!!http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=278687 Hell Yes! Damn Right!,,, STRIKE!!!!! cuhulin ***Hey Baka, give this NG fifty guesses as to what cesspool you call home....Dopers paradise, California!!!!!!!!!! Three cheers for the idiot engineer (and part time chemist) that "juices up" a Class 1 narcotic for personal use...priceless! Hey, Dumb ass, what is priceless is that even stoned I am way smarter than you. I don't 'juice up' anything, just remove the cellulose (wood fiber to you) so I don't have to inhale all that CO. BTW, Do you or have you ever; 1. Smoked? 2. Drank? 3. Flunked an IQ test? 4. All of the above. The whole country is bankrupt and it is boy George's fault. Bill Baka |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
(OT) : How Does One "Flunk" an IQ Test ? -was- California Bankrupt
On Nov 20, 10:19*pm, Bill Baka wrote:
nurk_fred2000 wrote: On Nov 20, 7:00 pm, wrote: GENERAL STRIKE ANNOUNCED!!!!!http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=278687 Hell Yes! Damn Right!,,, STRIKE!!!!! cuhulin ***Hey Baka, give this NG fifty guesses as to what cesspool you call home....Dopers paradise, California!!!!!!!!!! Three cheers for the idiot engineer (and part time chemist) that "juices up" a Class 1 narcotic for personal use...priceless! Hey, Dumb ass, what is priceless is that even stoned I am way smarter than you. I don't 'juice up' anything, just remove the cellulose (wood fiber to you) so I don't have to inhale all that CO. BTW, Do you or have you ever; 1. Smoked? 2. Drank? - 3. Flunked an IQ test? http://www.funeducation.com/Tests/IQTest/TakeTest.aspx How Does One "Flunk" an IQ Test ? http://www.iqtest.com/ Even an Idiot can sort of 'Pass' an IQ Test by Scoring at an Idiot Level. http://www.free-iqtest.net/ idtars ~ RHF http://www.addictinggames.com/theidiottest.html |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
(OT) : How Does One"Flunk" an IQ Test ? -was- California Bankrupt
All of the above.
It's all on me and I aint tellin. cuhulin |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
(OT) : How Does One "Flunk" an IQ Test ? -was- California Bankrupt
RHF wrote:
On Nov 20, 10:19 pm, Bill Baka wrote: nurk_fred2000 wrote: On Nov 20, 7:00 pm, wrote: GENERAL STRIKE ANNOUNCED!!!!!http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=278687 Hell Yes! Damn Right!,,, STRIKE!!!!! cuhulin ***Hey Baka, give this NG fifty guesses as to what cesspool you call home....Dopers paradise, California!!!!!!!!!! Three cheers for the idiot engineer (and part time chemist) that "juices up" a Class 1 narcotic for personal use...priceless! Hey, Dumb ass, what is priceless is that even stoned I am way smarter than you. I don't 'juice up' anything, just remove the cellulose (wood fiber to you) so I don't have to inhale all that CO. BTW, Do you or have you ever; 1. Smoked? 2. Drank? - 3. Flunked an IQ test? http://www.funeducation.com/Tests/IQTest/TakeTest.aspx How Does One "Flunk" an IQ Test ? http://www.iqtest.com/ Even an Idiot can sort of 'Pass' an IQ Test by Scoring at an Idiot Level. http://www.free-iqtest.net/ idtars ~ RHF http://www.addictinggames.com/theidiottest.html . 4. All of the above. The whole country is bankrupt and it is boy George's fault. Bill Baka I tried free-iqtest.net and pretty well aced it but could not get a number since I was hit with a barrage of junk to sign up for. That is what I call a phishing site. Every screen would ask for just one more detail of your life and try to get you sucked in. The IQ test was way too easy and the real test was to see if you could be sucked in. I passed by clicking out and now need to clean my cookies. Bill Baka |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
(OT) : How Does One "Flunk" an IQ Test ? -was- CaliforniaBankrupt
On Nov 21, 12:44*pm, Bill Baka wrote:
RHF wrote: On Nov 20, 10:19 pm, Bill Baka wrote: nurk_fred2000 wrote: On Nov 20, 7:00 pm, wrote: GENERAL STRIKE ANNOUNCED!!!!!http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=278687 Hell Yes! Damn Right!,,, STRIKE!!!!! cuhulin ***Hey Baka, give this NG fifty guesses as to what cesspool you call home....Dopers paradise, California!!!!!!!!!! Three cheers for the idiot engineer (and part time chemist) that "juices up" a Class 1 narcotic for personal use...priceless! Hey, Dumb ass, what is priceless is that even stoned I am way smarter than you. I don't 'juice up' anything, just remove the cellulose (wood fiber to you) so I don't have to inhale all that CO. BTW, Do you or have you ever; 1. Smoked? 2. Drank? - 3. Flunked an IQ test? http://www.funeducation.com/Tests/IQTest/TakeTest.aspx How Does One "Flunk" an IQ Test ? http://www.iqtest.com/ Even an Idiot can sort of 'Pass' an IQ Test by Scoring at an Idiot Level. http://www.free-iqtest.net/ idtars ~ RHF http://www.addictinggames.com/theidiottest.html *. 4. All of the above. The whole country is bankrupt and it is boy George's fault. Bill Baka I tried free-iqtest.net and pretty well aced it but could not get a number since I was hit with a barrage of junk to sign up for. That is what I call a phishing site. Every screen would ask for just one more detail of your life and try to get you sucked in. The IQ test was way too easy and the real test was to see if you could be sucked in. I passed by clicking out and now need to clean my cookies. Bill Baka Either Way . . . whether your IQ and Score was 55 or 145 : You Could Not Flunk It ! http://iq-test.learninginfo.org/iq04.htm As a Matter-of-Fact an IQ Score of 55 or 145 shows that you are truly 'The Exception'; and Not-the-Rule; where-as an IQ Score of around 100 just simply means that you are 'average'. http://wilderdom.com/intelligence/IQWhatScoresMean.html yeah as dumb as it sounds . . . that is something to think about ~ RHF |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Here is the smoking gun | Digital | |||
What's This Guy Smoking? | Homebrew | |||
Air America Goes Bankrupt | Policy | |||
Here is the smoking gun | Antenna | |||
Here is the smoking gun | Equipment |