Paul Hyett wrote:
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 at 05:17:27, Kevin Alfred Strom
wrote in uk.politics.misc :

Far better technique than converting our societies into
ever-tightening "national security" states:

1) Stop invading and occupying other people's countries or fomenting
revolution in them, and 2) stop supporting those who do; if we did so,
90 per cent. of the hatred of the West would disappear in time. At the
same time we need to 3) take steps to prevent the invasion and
occupation of our own lands.

If they stopped carrying out terrorist attacks on the West, *we'd* stop
hassling *them*...

You go first.

aracari wrote:

That assumes terrorists are responding to something the West has
done to them. This may be the excuse used by a tiny minority of
nutcases, but overwhelmingly the reason is hatred and jealousy,
ie they're varieties of socialists who want to destroy the current
global social order by imposing their ideology onto the rest of us
through intimidation and fear.

Well the old Islamic caliphate they wish to restore was a lot of things,
but never Socialist...

--
William Black

"Any number under six"

The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of
Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat
single handed with a quarterstaff.

aracari wrote:
'William Black' wrote thus:

aracari wrote:

That assumes terrorists are responding to something the West has
done to them. This may be the excuse used by a tiny minority of
nutcases, but overwhelmingly the reason is hatred and jealousy,
ie they're varieties of socialists who want to destroy the current
global social order by imposing their ideology onto the rest of us
through intimidation and fear.
Well the old Islamic caliphate they wish to restore was a lot of things,
but never Socialist...

Why not?


Because they never ever wanted the people to have control of the means
of production, distribution and exchange.

All were in the hands of the Caliph.

Despotism and tyranny are not Socialist.

Although some Socialists are despots and run tyrannies...



--
William Black

"Any number under six"

The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of
Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat
single handed with a quarterstaff.

Brenda Ann wrote:
Someone needs to do their friggin'
job and stop these yahoos BEFORE they get on the plane. This one could have
been stopped any of SEVERAL times before ever embarking! If I ever come
home, I'll take a friggin' BOAT, it's not so much more expensive anymore,
and you get your own room and don't have to eat nasty airline food (or deal
with a lack of it).

I suggest we get the **** out of their territory, let the Israelis level
the place, and be done with it.

On 31 Dec, 13:19, dave wrote:
..

I suggest we get the **** out of their territory, let the Israelis level
the place, and be done with it.

I fear that Israel is the problem , not the solution.
There were no Arab terrorist attacks on western interests until 1970.
Make of that what you will

"Editor RadioTalkingPoints" wrote
in message
...
The following is the personal opinion of the author,

Good, you are legally responsible for the message.

who reserves the
right to republish this piece for profit,

I doubt anyone would pay you, but I do not give permission
for you to republish anythinh I type for profit or gain.

which you may read at your
own risk,

Why, will my cat explode?

without any legal liabilities to the author

You said above you were responsible for the post, so that
includes legally.

or anyone who
may publish or share this article

At that point they would be jointly liable for the message.

(which must include this disclaimer)

Which disclaimer?

for which you here by waive the ability to sue for any reason in whole
or in part in or outside of a court of law,

You are legally responsible for what you post, if you do not agree
or recognise this point, do not post.

if you do not agree, the
entire article is to be considered a work of fiction,

It can't be as you are legally responsible for your message.

since you
apparently want to live in an imaginary world.


Are you talking about yourself? What you are displaying is
a classic symptom of mental illness.



Why waste the money? Just show up in a bathrobe? Hey, if we are
going to spend that kind of money, why not skip the machine, we get
inspected totally naked, by a TSA employee who is also totally naked
and must have at least two years experience as a stripper? I mean,
why not have fun with it? If you are going to have to wait four hours
to check in, what on Earth are you going to do?

Why all the talk of gloom and doom? You should make me the CEO of
American Airlines, I'll make billions!

I think Mark Stein has rubbed his ideological sense of humor on my
way of thinking now? You see what you've done Rush, now I'm having
fun again? Thanks Mark!

Happy New Year!


What a boring pointless message you posted. Why spam newsgroups?

On Dec 30, 7:02*pm, Editor RadioTalkingPoints
wrote:
The following is the personal opinion of the author, who reserves the
right to republish this piece for profit, which you may read at your
own risk, without any legal liabilities to the author or anyone who
may publish or share this article (which must include this disclaimer)
for which you here by waive the ability to sue for any reason in whole
or in part in or outside of a court of law, if you do not agree, the
entire article is to be considered a work of fiction, since you
apparently want to live in an imaginary world.

Why waste the money? *Just show up in a bathrobe? *Hey, if we are
going to spend that kind of money, why not skip the machine, we get
inspected totally naked, by a TSA employee who is also totally naked
and must have at least two years experience as a stripper? *I mean,
why not have fun with it? *If you are going to have to wait four hours
to check in, what on Earth are you going to do?

Why all the talk of gloom and doom? *You should make me the CEO of
American Airlines, I'll make billions!

I think Mark Stein has rubbed his ideological sense of humor *on my
way of thinking now? *You see what you've done Rush, now I'm having
fun again? *Thanks Mark!

Happy New Year!


Say No all you want. You have already been overruled. This will be
implemented because even though it wouldn't have stopped the
underpants bomber, it's a cool new way for government employees to
seize more control over private citizens, and isn't that what freedom
is all about? The leering and jeering parts are just neat little
bonuses for them, on top of the very generous package of bonuses and
goodies they already enjoy.