On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:38:49 -0700, bpnjensen wrote:

the term is "climate change" or "climate
forcing," "global warming" is a misnomer that is perpetuated by people
for whom it pays to cause misinformation to persist.


Total doublespeak. As evidenced by the newsgroup I CC'ed the reply to.

--

AzzMazta's Political Institute
Verbal Diarrhea & More
Washington, DC
(http://www.xcopfly.com/)

Day time temps here are in the 80s.Heap Big Spring time.
http://www.wxusa.com/wx1/Jackson-MS.htm

Won't be Heap Big much longer and the day time temps here will be in the
Heap Big 90s.Sometimes in the Heap Big 100.Heap Big Summer time.Heap Big
Hot Weather.

Currently, 62 degrees in Jackson.Currently, 71 degrees inside of my
flower box on doggy's front porch.
Heap Big,,,, Heap Big,,,, Heap Big,,,,,,,,

NO Such Thing as global warming!
cuhulin

On Apr 3, 6:31*pm, AzzMazta wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:38:49 -0700, bpnjensen wrote:
the term is "climate change" or "climate
forcing," "global warming" is a misnomer that is perpetuated by people
for whom it pays to cause misinformation to persist.

Total doublespeak. As evidenced by the newsgroup I CC'ed the reply to.

--

AzzMazta's Political Institute
Verbal Diarrhea & More
Washington, DC
(http://www.xcopfly.com/)

That's not the point, cement-head. You have no clue what you're
talking about, as proven by your totally outdated jargon that even the
knowledgeable naysayers left behind years ago.

On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 21:50:43 -0700, bpnjensen wrote:

On Apr 3, 6:31Â*pm, AzzMazta wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:38:49 -0700, bpnjensen wrote:
the term is "climate change" or "climate
forcing," "global warming" is a misnomer that is perpetuated by
people for whom it pays to cause misinformation to persist.


As evidenced by the newsgroup I CC'ed the reply to.


That's not the point, cement-head. You have no clue what you're talking
about, as proven by your totally outdated jargon that even the
knowledgeable naysayers left behind years ago.

So the name of the newsgroup is a dated term? From what I understand the
word "global warming" is still used by the media, even by believers. Most
people are finally admitting it's not-warming-everywhere "climate change"
now?

Also, you in the group keep referring to the effect of CFCs on the ozone
as "dated", I know they are banned now, but I was referring to how only
using the word "warm" could link the climate change issue to holes
created by greenhouse gases in the minds of non-intellectuals (such as
politicians). Thus "Global Warming" becomes a platform plank where we
need to (de)regulate business activity based on more than just short-term
health problems. "Climate Change" is harder to prove.

--

AzzMazta's Political Institute
Verbal Diarrhea & More
Washington, DC
(http://www.xcopfly.com/)

On Apr 6, 1:46*pm, AzzMazta wrote:
On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 21:50:43 -0700, bpnjensen wrote:
On Apr 3, 6:31*pm, AzzMazta wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:38:49 -0700, bpnjensen wrote:
the term is "climate change" or "climate
forcing," "global warming" is a misnomer that is perpetuated by
people for whom it pays to cause misinformation to persist.

As evidenced by the newsgroup I CC'ed the reply to.

That's not the point, cement-head. *You have no clue what you're talking
about, as proven by your totally outdated jargon that even the
knowledgeable naysayers left behind years ago.

So the name of the newsgroup is a dated term? From what I understand the
word "global warming" is still used by the media, even by believers. Most
people are finally admitting it's not-warming-everywhere "climate change"
now?

Also, you in the group keep referring to the effect of CFCs on the ozone
as "dated", I know they are banned now, but I was referring to how only
using the word "warm" could link the climate change issue to holes
created by greenhouse gases in the minds of non-intellectuals (such as
politicians). Thus "Global Warming" becomes a platform plank where we
need to (de)regulate business activity based on more than just short-term
health problems. "Climate Change" is harder to prove.

--

AzzMazta's Political Institute
Verbal Diarrhea & More
Washington, DC
(http://www.xcopfly.com/)

Now I know why your signature has "verbal diarrhea" in it.

Prayers for the West Virginia coal Miners.
cuhulin

On 4/6/2010 6:02 PM, wrote:
Prayers for the West Virginia coal Miners.
cuhulin



And prayers will do what exactly?

O Store Gud
http://rosemck1.tripod.com/how-great...-and-choir.wav

Have a little Homily.
cuhulin

On Apr 6, 5:11*pm, BobS wrote:
On 4/6/2010 6:02 PM, wrote:

Prayers for the West Virginia coal Miners.
cuhulin

And prayers will do what exactly?

I do think it's pretty terrible that in the USA, in the year 2010, it
is possible for this kind of preventable accident to happen again.
That company ought to pay a lifetime of restitution to the families
whose breadwinners they recklessly employed.

Here is what doofus-in-charge Blankenship said:

"I think every accident should be prevented, that's what the
definition of an accident is," said Blankenship. "Once we know what
happened, we'll know whether it was preventable by someone or not."

This guy is a walking oxymoron. EVERY accident is preventable unless
it is deliberate sabotage. Period. No explosions occur where the
ventilation reduces the volatile gas level to low enough amounts, and
this company did not make the appropriate effort to ensure adequate
ventilation.

Bruce Jensen