Help put a Republican in Murtha's Seat
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 19:39:53 -0500, Ignoramus22435
wrote: On 2010-04-29, zzzzzzzzzz wrote: On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:05:30 -0500, Ignoramus22435 wrote: The Republican candidate is Tim Burns. Really?! Yep. http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2010/0...t/tab/article/ He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is NOT a politician". Wow! You sure do have a grasp on the obvious! Just trying my best. Obviously. Are you still breathing? This means two things: 1) That he is a liar. You should know all about it, being a liar. I do not say something like "I am NOT a usenet poster", unlike that Tim Burns politician who says he is NOT a politician. shrug *You* are still a liar. 2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician". I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar. Your nym certainly *is* accurate (though perhaps 22434 too high). Possibly, but that does not make Tim Burns any more trustworthy. I made no statement otherwise. That doesn't change the fact that you're a liar, and an admitted ignoramus. |
Help put a Republican in Murtha's Seat
Tim Williams wrote: "vaughn" wrote in message ... Please take your cross-posted, off-topic political spam and stick it "where the sun don't shine". Unfortunately, no sun shines on these newsgroups, sooo... Actually it does, but 'dorkmatter' sucks out all the photons. -- Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to have a DD214, and a honorable discharge. |
Help put a Republican in Murtha's Seat
Ignoramus22435 wrote: The Republican candidate is Tim Burns. He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is NOT a politician". This means two things: 1) That he is a liar. 2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician". I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar. We are supposed to listen to anyone from Chicago? -- Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to have a DD214, and a honorable discharge. |
Help put a Republican in Murtha's Seat
On 2010-04-29, Michael A. Terrell wrote:
Ignoramus22435 wrote: The Republican candidate is Tim Burns. He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is NOT a politician". This means two things: 1) That he is a liar. 2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician". I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar. We are supposed to listen to anyone from Chicago? I am now sure why you are asking, but I do not live in Chicago. i |
Help put a Republican in Murtha's Seat
Does God hate Chicago?
The Answer to that is, No. cuhulin |
Help put a Republican in Murtha's Seat
wrote in message ... On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:05:30 -0500, Ignoramus22435 wrote: The Republican candidate is Tim Burns. Really?! He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is NOT a politician". Wow! You sure do have a grasp on the obvious! This means two things: 1) That he is a liar. You should know all about it, being a liar. 2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician". I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar. Your nym certainly *is* accurate (though perhaps 22434 too high). Ah, don't pick on iggy he's ok. The point is we need to get conservatives elected or we will still have a speaker Pelosi. Mike |
Help put a Republican in Murtha's Seat
On Apr 28, 8:05*pm, Robert Baer wrote:
amdx wrote: *I just contributed $100.00 to help Tim Burns. It would great to elect Tim Burns, who is the Republican candidate for the May 18 PA-12 special election to fill the seat vacated by the passing of Jack Murtha. http://www.timburnsforcongress.com/ "We have a chance to win an upset election that will reverberate through the country much like the election of Scott Brown did in January." * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mike * *VOTE FOR POGO! Hee Hee, "We have seen the enemy and he is...us." |
Help put a Republican in Murtha's Seat
On 2010-04-29, amdx wrote:
wrote in message ... On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:05:30 -0500, Ignoramus22435 wrote: The Republican candidate is Tim Burns. Really?! He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is NOT a politician". Wow! You sure do have a grasp on the obvious! This means two things: 1) That he is a liar. You should know all about it, being a liar. 2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician". I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar. Your nym certainly *is* accurate (though perhaps 22434 too high). Ah, don't pick on iggy he's ok. The point is we need to get conservatives elected or we will still have a speaker Pelosi. I used to vote Republican, but, unfortunately, the Republican party has greatly decayed morally. This "I am NOT a politician" politician is a good example. I would like to see the Republican party reborn as an honest, intellectual, and enlightened organization. i i |
Help put a Republican in Murtha's Seat
On Apr 28, 8:13*pm, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote: Ignoramus22435 wrote: The Republican candidate is Tim Burns. He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is NOT a politician". This means two things: 1) That he is a liar. 2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician". I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar. * *We are supposed to listen to anyone from Chicago? -- Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to have a DD214, and a honorable discharge.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Styx? Mel Torme'? Chaka Khan? Ramsey Lewis? :) |
Help put a Republican in Murtha's Seat
amdx" wrote in : I just contributed $100.00 to help Tim Burns. It would great to elect Tim Burns, who is the Republican candidate for the May 18 PA-12 special election to fill the seat vacated by the passing of Jack Murtha. woop te doo .. I make my own home power. **** off |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com