On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 19:39:53 -0500, Ignoramus22435
wrote:

On 2010-04-29, zzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:05:30 -0500, Ignoramus22435
wrote:

The Republican candidate is Tim Burns.

Really?!

Yep.

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2010/0...t/tab/article/

He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of
influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is
NOT a politician".

Wow! You sure do have a grasp on the obvious!

Just trying my best.

Obviously. Are you still breathing?

This means two things:

1) That he is a liar.

You should know all about it, being a liar.

I do not say something like "I am NOT a usenet poster", unlike that
Tim Burns politician who says he is NOT a politician.

shrug *You* are still a liar.

2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who
would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for
their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician".

I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar.

Your nym certainly *is* accurate (though perhaps 22434 too high).

Possibly, but that does not make Tim Burns any more trustworthy.

I made no statement otherwise. That doesn't change the fact that you're a
liar, and an admitted ignoramus.

Tim Williams wrote:

"vaughn" wrote in message
...
Please take your cross-posted, off-topic political spam and stick it
"where the sun don't shine".

Unfortunately, no sun shines on these newsgroups, sooo...


Actually it does, but 'dorkmatter' sucks out all the photons.


--
Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to
have a DD214, and a honorable discharge.

Ignoramus22435 wrote:

The Republican candidate is Tim Burns.

He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of
influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is
NOT a politician".

This means two things:

1) That he is a liar.

2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who
would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for
their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician".

I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar.


We are supposed to listen to anyone from Chicago?


--
Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to
have a DD214, and a honorable discharge.

On 2010-04-29, Michael A. Terrell wrote:

Ignoramus22435 wrote:

The Republican candidate is Tim Burns.

He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of
influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is
NOT a politician".

This means two things:

1) That he is a liar.

2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who
would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for
their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician".

I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar.


We are supposed to listen to anyone from Chicago?

I am now sure why you are asking, but I do not live in Chicago.

i

Does God hate Chicago?
The Answer to that is, No.
cuhulin

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:05:30 -0500, Ignoramus22435
wrote:

The Republican candidate is Tim Burns.

Really?!

He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of
influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is
NOT a politician".

Wow! You sure do have a grasp on the obvious!

This means two things:

1) That he is a liar.

You should know all about it, being a liar.

2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who
would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for
their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician".

I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar.

Your nym certainly *is* accurate (though perhaps 22434 too high).

Ah, don't pick on iggy he's ok.
The point is we need to get conservatives elected or we will still have a
speaker Pelosi.
Mike

On Apr 28, 8:05*pm, Robert Baer wrote:
amdx wrote:
*I just contributed $100.00 to help Tim Burns.
It would great to elect Tim Burns, who is the Republican candidate
for the May 18 PA-12 special election to fill the seat vacated by
the passing of Jack Murtha.

http://www.timburnsforcongress.com/

"We have a chance to win an upset election that will reverberate
through the country much like the election of Scott Brown did in January."

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mike

* *VOTE FOR POGO!

Hee Hee, "We have seen the enemy and he is...us."

On 2010-04-29, amdx wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:05:30 -0500, Ignoramus22435
wrote:

The Republican candidate is Tim Burns.

Really?!

He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of
influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is
NOT a politician".

Wow! You sure do have a grasp on the obvious!

This means two things:

1) That he is a liar.

You should know all about it, being a liar.

2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who
would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for
their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician".

I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar.

Your nym certainly *is* accurate (though perhaps 22434 too high).

Ah, don't pick on iggy he's ok.
The point is we need to get conservatives elected or we will still have a
speaker Pelosi.

I used to vote Republican, but, unfortunately, the Republican party
has greatly decayed morally. This "I am NOT a politician" politician
is a good example. I would like to see the Republican party reborn as
an honest, intellectual, and enlightened organization.

i

i

On Apr 28, 8:13*pm, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:
Ignoramus22435 wrote:

The Republican candidate is Tim Burns.

He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of
influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is
NOT a politician".

This means two things:

1) That he is a liar.

2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who
would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for
their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician".

I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar.

* *We are supposed to listen to anyone from Chicago?

--
Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to
have a DD214, and a honorable discharge.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Styx?
Mel Torme'?
Chaka Khan?
Ramsey Lewis?

amdx" wrote in
:

I just contributed $100.00 to help Tim Burns.
It would great to elect Tim Burns, who is the Republican candidate
for the May 18 PA-12 special election to fill the seat vacated by
the passing of Jack Murtha.

woop te doo .. I make my own home power. **** off