On Apr 28, 10:12*pm, Ignoramus22435 ignoramus22...@NOSPAM.
22435.invalid wrote:
On 2010-04-29, amdx wrote:





wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:05:30 -0500, Ignoramus22435
wrote:

The Republican candidate is Tim Burns.

Really?!

He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of
influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is
NOT a politician".

Wow! *You sure do have a grasp on the obvious!

This means two things:

1) That he is a liar.

You should know all about it, being a liar.

2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who
would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for
their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician".

I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar.

Your nym certainly *is* accurate (though perhaps 22434 too high).

* Ah, don't pick on iggy he's ok.
The point is we need to get conservatives elected or we will still have a
speaker Pelosi.

I used to vote Republican, but, unfortunately, the Republican party
has greatly decayed morally. This "I am NOT a politician" politician
is a good example. I would like to see the Republican party reborn as
an honest, intellectual, and enlightened organization.

There's a move afoot to do exactly that, by people who call themselves
"conservatives." "Conservative" here though, is really what was
classically called "liberal"--one who is prudent (not prudish) and
thoughtful; avoiding excessive risk; conserving, as in responsibly
husbanding resources, not wasting or wasteful; fiscally responsible;
motivated to improve the human condition for all, and so forth. You
know, like a conservative design--something built solid, with margins
of safety.

The Tea Party seeks to encourage statesmen who vow to be faithful to
the principles of smaller government, more liberty, and to the
Constitution.

It's a beautiful thing.

--
Cheers,
James Arthur