Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 21, 12:44*pm, "MNMikew" wrote:
"dave" wrote in message ... MNMikew wrote: *wrote in message om... robertva wrote: On 12/21/2010 9:12 AM, dave wrote: (a long rant) Did someone force their way into your home, steal all your cable boxes and replace them with boxes that wouldn't tune other news outlets? While the cable/satellite news outlet receive per subscriber fees through the cable and satellite providers, there are still plenty of commercials. Apparently the advertisers have some way of guessimating how many pairs of eyes are watching each channel. If you disagree with a channel's politics or think their reports are unreliable DON'T WATCH IT. If enough of the viewers who are monitored by the rating's agencies agree with you the channel you despise so much will be forced to change their policies or shut down. Also note that FCC authority over cable/satellite channel content is significantly narrower than the agency's authority over direct broadcaster to home antenna content. I have no problem with their content. I have a big problem with them being able to characterize it as "news". They lie, which is completely legal with a few exceptions. I'd like a rule prohibiting them from labeling their "lies" as "news". That's all. This is a matter of urgent importance as the country is rapidly slipping into complete domination. There's that famous "freedom and liberty" crap hard at work. You have no problems with MSNBC of course. Fox lies, lol! *I love how dopey liberals like you think freedom of speech is a one way street. I have problems with MSNBC, but they do not lie and they do not call themselves "news". BWHAHAHAHH!! *Don't try telling that to Chris Mattews! They fastidiously maintain journalistic credibility and proved it recently by suspending Olberman and Scarborough for financial support of candidates. They broke a MSNBC rule. It only proves that Olberman and Scarborought are stupid. *How many Fox "News" people have been punished for supporting one side over the other. They don't have that rule, so none. To compare the 2 is ludicrous. MSNBC are "truth to power" muckrakers in the great tradition of American journalism; Fox News is first and foremost the mouthpiece of corporate America (the power that needs to hear the truth) and defenders of old money. You are a clueless. Truth to power, LOL! Fair and Balanced -is- FAIR and BALANCED ! Requires Fainess -not-from- MSNBC -but-by- FOX News -and- Requires Balance -not-from- MSNBC -but-by- FOX News Why MSNBC Can Not Be Fair and Balanced . . . To Them Facts Have A Liberal BIAS {Bigotry} |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ANS-223 AMSAT News Service Weekly News Bulletins | Info | |||
GB2RS NEWS Sunday 18 May The news headlines 2008 | Info | |||
Today's News HeadLine via the Voice-of-America-News . . . | Shortwave | |||
Morning News hour and News/Sports features | Broadcasting | |||
First attempt at an all-news or an "all-news-and-talk" station in Canada? | Broadcasting |