|
The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
"Beam Me Up Scotty" wrote in message ... Their listeners have dials and knobs to do that. You can't get more responsive than the listener tuning you out or turning you off. Liberals want speech shut down they don't like. Period. |
The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
We got a whole lot of Our Gang movies crankin up this evening at 7:00
PM, TCM channel.All the way to around 6:30 PM tomorrow evening. Spanky and the Gang. HOG Heaven! Alfalfa had somehow swallowed some soap, he was singing, Believe me if all these enduring young charms, and a Frog in his pocket was going crazy. Believe Me If All Thease Enduring Young Charms. http://www.contemplator.com/ireland/believe.html http://www.contemplator.com/midimusic/charms.mid It is Piano too. cuhulin |
Republicans To Being Investigating Obama Regime Corruption : Insider
On Jan 3, 1:34*pm, dave wrote:
On 01/04/2011 11:34 AM, John Smith wrote: On 1/2/2011 5:00 PM, dave wrote: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...6/25/ISSA.TMP&.... He also has a history of steroid use and crying in public. Him and the Boner should get along real well. What a total Bull **** post ... he was charged and never prosecuted, charges dropped ... what crap ... So, you don't like Issa and are desperate for chit to throw at him, huh? ROFLOL Just goes to show you, some morons don't read the links before posting chit ... or responding to BS posts ... Regards, JS - I can tell a crook by looking at a man's face. - Issa is a turd. 'Special-Dave' : Hey that's sort of like... Looking in a Mirror for 'You' ;;-}} ~ RHF |
The US Constitution a Blueprint of US Rights and Building Code for US Laws
On Jan 3, 1:44*pm, dave wrote:
On 01/04/2011 12:48 PM, John Smith wrote: On 1/3/2011 8:33 PM, wrote: ... There is NO "absolute right" to anything "As Hamilton stated, under the American philosophy and system of constitutionally limited government, "the people surrender nothing;" instead, they merely delegate to government--to public servants as public trustees--limited powers and therefore, he added, "they have no need of particular reservations" (in a Bill of Rights). This is the basic reason why the Framing Convention omitted from the Constitution anything in the nature of a separate Bill of Rights, as being unnecessary." FROM HE http://www.lexrex.com/enlightened/Am...stick/pr3.html The above goes into a lot more detail, the whole page(s) should be read.. Preamble to the Declaration of Independence: "When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. 2.1 We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.." FROM HE http://www.wfu.edu/~zulick/340/Declaration.html Indeed we DO possess inalienable rights ... and you are a fool ... what rock to do such moronic idiots and imbeciles, such as yourself, crawl out from under? - Hamilton was the first republican asshole - (or was it Adams?). 'Special-Dave' ! "asshole" ! -remember- Every 'Body' Needs One ! -and- The 'Body-Politics' Is No Exception ! Democrats & Republicans; etc etc etc Liberals & Conservatives; etc etc etc Deep-Thinkers & Know-Nothings; etc etc etc |
The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
|
Bring Down The National Public Radio [NPR] Liberal-Progressive'Elitist' Oligarchy
On Jan 3, 1:54*pm, dave wrote:
On 01/04/2011 02:48 PM, RHF wrote: * - There is no shortage of right wing reactionary opinion on the radio. * * 'Special-Dave' -the-other-half-of-the-story- * There is no shortage of Left Wing Radical Opinion * on NPR 'Public' Radio. * * - There are entire states without progressive radio. * * 'Special-Dave' -the-other-half-of-the-story- * There are entire States without Conservative Radio. * - A couple of problems here. - Roy assumes we accept that NPR - is some kind of liberal advocate, - yet cannot, in over 3 years of asserting so, - produce any example of this. 'Special-Dave', All The Proof There Is : Is In The Listening : To Those With An Open Mind* * Un-Tinted By Liberal Propaganda -aka- Un-Biased By Liberalism & Progressivism {Elitism} -wrt- Un-Altered By National Public Radio [NPR] Indoctrination http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...e920a863b7cab3 |
The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
MNMikew wrote: "Beam Me Up Scotty" wrote in message ... Their listeners have dials and knobs to do that. You can't get more responsive than the listener tuning you out or turning you off. Liberals want speech shut down they don't like. Period. And if the Liberal/Democrat/Marxist/Socialists don't like it here, they can go to CanaDuh, and suck off that teat till it runs dry. |
The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
A brand new Disney Cruise Ship arrived at Port Canaveral,Florida
today/last night.Good old Capitalism. It is, or used to be, the only Ships built in Russia were Military Ships. Stephanie Bell Flynt and Barbie Bassett were just now talking about Pismo Beach erosion, WLBT 3 tee vee 4:30 PM news. cuhulin |
The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
http://www.devilfinder.com
Pismo Beach erosion Where in California is Pismo Beach? I am too Lazy to dig out my Rand McNally. cuhulin |
The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
Watching 5:00 PM WLBT 3 tee vee news.
http://www.devilfinder.com Smith County,Mississippi has the highest risk of tornados than any other Counties in the United States That is what Bert Case said, he didn't say devilfinder.com though. The three deadliest tornados in recorded history happened in Mississippi. Dixie Alley? First time I have heard of that before.I reckon they had to tack some kind of a name on that.Smith County isn't far South of doggy's couch. cuhulin |
The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
On 01/04/2011 01:26 PM, D Peter Maus wrote:
On 1/4/11 14:57 , Joe from Kokomo wrote: On 1/4/11 10:19 , wrote: Sorry, but it's a philosophical statement. Federalist papers are not law On 1/4/2011 11:22 AM, D Peter Maus wrote: The Constitution, however, is. And as George W. Bush so famously put it, the Constitution is...nothing more than a piece of paper. Heck of a statement, Georgie! Actually, that story was debunked years ago. When? Where? |
The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
G.W.Bush said something to the affect/effect, Stop waving that piece of
paper in front of me! cuhulin |
The US Constitution a Blueprint of US Rights and Building Codefor US Laws
On 01/04/2011 01:41 PM, RHF wrote:
-aka- The Grand Exalted AssHole [@] of the Posteri Maximus ! It's a total 180 from the DOC to the Constitution. From self-evident and unalienable to "here's a list of some apparently not so self-evident rights which aren't all of them." |
The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin271.htm
http://www.devilfinder.com What did G.W.Bush say about the United States Constitution? G.W.Bush is NOT a Republican, Certainly NOT a Real Republican.He is a Damn liberal. I can tape a Republican card to my dog's dog collar.Would that mean she is a card carrying Republican? I don't think dogs think about that. cuhulin |
The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
Fatty, proposing to Miss Crabtree ~ Our Gang on TCM.Fatty is a
smooooooth operator. cuhulin |
The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
On 1/4/2011 9:37 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 04 Jan 2011 16:53:19 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: On 1/4/2011 3:05 PM, wrote: On Tue, 04 Jan 2011 12:03:31 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: You don't have the right to broadcast things that could cause panic (yell "fire" in a theater), that's a regulated activity But pulling the fire alarm is OK...... No--not when there isn't a fire Limpballs peddles fear, greed, corrupted history, and stupidity to a segment of society least capable of using their intellect. Hitler appealed to those kind---and innovated the means of selling it to them Just like Limpballs. Hitler had power, Limbaugh has no power. He's got the same mush-brained army of dolts that Hitler had in the late 20's Every day you call them stupid Limbaugh misfits, but today they are an army that equals the one that almost took the world..... |
The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
On 1/4/11 20:38 , wrote:
On Tue, 04 Jan 2011 15:26:02 -0600, D Peter wrote: On 1/4/11 14:57 , Joe from Kokomo wrote: On 1/4/11 10:19 , wrote: Sorry, but it's a philosophical statement. Federalist papers are not law On 1/4/2011 11:22 AM, D Peter Maus wrote: The Constitution, however, is. And as George W. Bush so famously put it, the Constitution is...nothing more than a piece of paper. Heck of a statement, Georgie! Actually, that story was debunked years ago. No---I don't think so Yes, it was. Often. Even Mathews reported that it wasn't true. And he was one of Bush's most outspoken opponents. |
The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
|
The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
|
The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
http://www.devilfinder.com
MFJ Wi Fi Antenna rec.radio.shortwave (March 19, 2009) I did say I don't know why I ordered that antenna.Something to spend my money on, I reckon. cuhulin |
George W. Bush is an aristocrat dunce
On 01/05/2011 11:28 PM, MNMikew wrote:
wrote in message Actually, that story was debunked years ago. When? Where? http://www.factcheck.org/askfactchec...itution_a.html "unlikely" hardly screams that it's false. I say it's 50/50. Neither bunked nor debunked. |
Never get caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy
|
The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
On Jan 4, 4:53*pm, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy-
wrote: On 1/4/2011 3:05 PM, wrote: On Tue, 04 Jan 2011 12:03:31 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: You don't have the right to broadcast things that could cause panic (yell "fire" in a theater), that's a regulated activity But pulling the fire alarm is OK...... No--not when there isn't a fire Limpballs peddles fear, greed, corrupted history, and stupidity to a segment of society least capable of using their intellect. Hitler appealed to those kind---and innovated the means of selling it to them Just like Limpballs. Hitler had power, Limbaugh has no power. Apples and Oranges. If you want to look at two in the same seat look at Hitler and Obama. Obama loves and believes in Redistribution, Hitler loved and believed in redistribution. Obama takes from Capitalists and gives to his Socialist pals, Hitler would take from the Jews and give to the Aryans who were his pals. Obama wants to say who gets health care and who dies and Hitler liked saying who got health care and who he herded into gas chambers. Obama and his ilk believe power comes from the barrel of a gun and Hitler believed that power came from the barrel of his guns.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - How did we forget Bismark? If it wasn't for him, Germany couldn't become the first country with universal health system. And Schicklegruber just came at the right place and at the right time. BTW, very few of his 'pals' were officially determined to qualify as 'Aryans'...How about Erhard Mich ? Even Manstein's original name was von Lewinski ... |
The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
On Jan 4, 5:54*pm, wrote:
A brand new Disney Cruise Ship arrived at Port Canaveral,Florida today/last night.Good old Capitalism. It is, or used to be, the only Ships built in Russia were Military Ships. Stephanie Bell Flynt and Barbie Bassett were just now talking about Pismo Beach erosion, WLBT 3 tee vee 4:30 PM news. cuhulin During the Cuban missile crisis they used regular merchant marine cargo and even passenger ships to 'deliver' their 'goods'. I think that's what I heard. |
Just Holding Prez Obama To The Same Standards of Personal Attack andDestruction of Presidency as The Liberals Held Prez Bush Too
On Jan 4, 7:22*pm, D Peter Maus wrote:
On 1/4/11 20:38 , wrote: On Tue, 04 Jan 2011 15:26:02 -0600, D Peter wrote: On 1/4/11 14:57 , Joe from Kokomo wrote: On 1/4/11 10:19 , wrote: Sorry, but it's a philosophical statement. Federalist papers are not law On 1/4/2011 11:22 AM, D Peter Maus wrote: The Constitution, however, is. And as George W. Bush so famously put it, the Constitution is...nothing more than a piece of paper. Heck of a statement, Georgie! * *Actually, that story was debunked years ago. No---I don't think so - Yes, it was. -Often. - Even Mathews reported that it wasn't true. - And he was one of Bush's most outspoken opponents. DPM, Actually I never took it as something GWB said. The import {meaning} that got from the 'claimed' statement by GWB : "George W. Bush so famously put it, the Constitution is...nothing more than a piece of paper." =WAS= # 1 - GWB Was To 'Dumb' To Read It. # 2 - GWB Was To 'Stupid' To Understand It. # 3 - To GWB Any 'Paper' With Writing On It -was- "nothing more than a piece of paper" based on # 1 & # 2. The 'Claim' Was To Add Insult To GWB [The Man] and To Injury GWB [The President] : In An Effort To Diminish GWB 'The Man' and Destroy GWB 'The President'. Now Apply The Same To Prez Obama : To Add Insult To BHO [The Man] and To Injury BHO [The President] : In An Effort To Diminish BHO 'The Man' and Destroy BHO 'The President'. |
The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
"dave" wrote in message . .. On 01/04/2011 01:26 PM, D Peter Maus wrote: On 1/4/11 14:57 , Joe from Kokomo wrote: On 1/4/11 10:19 , wrote: Sorry, but it's a philosophical statement. Federalist papers are not law On 1/4/2011 11:22 AM, D Peter Maus wrote: The Constitution, however, is. And as George W. Bush so famously put it, the Constitution is...nothing more than a piece of paper. Heck of a statement, Georgie! Actually, that story was debunked years ago. When? Where? http://www.factcheck.org/askfactchec...itution_a.html |
The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... On 1/4/11 20:38 , wrote: On Tue, 04 Jan 2011 15:26:02 -0600, D Peter wrote: On 1/4/11 14:57 , Joe from Kokomo wrote: On 1/4/11 10:19 , wrote: Sorry, but it's a philosophical statement. Federalist papers are not law On 1/4/2011 11:22 AM, D Peter Maus wrote: The Constitution, however, is. And as George W. Bush so famously put it, the Constitution is...nothing more than a piece of paper. Heck of a statement, Georgie! Actually, that story was debunked years ago. No---I don't think so Yes, it was. Often. Even Mathews reported that it wasn't true. And he was one of Bush's most outspoken opponents. http://www.factcheck.org/askfactchec...itution_a.html |
The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
|
The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
Looks like Fatty Arbuckle in some of the Our Gang/Little Rascals old
movies on TCM. I bet y'all never heard of him before.I remember back in the 1940's when I lived in Carthage,Missy Sippi, some people were talking about Fatty Arbuckle. One time about eleven years ago, I asked that married Irish woman wayyyyyyy over yonder across the big pond if she has ever heard of Fatty Arbuckle.She said, Of course I have! cuhulin |
The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
|
The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
On 1/5/11 12:18 , wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 09:46:31 -0600, D Peter wrote: On 1/5/11 09:11 , wrote: What you're really describing---is a tendency to assign falsity to anything you don't agree with---. As are you. What's your point. I'm not the one claiming any interpretaton of law other than what you agree with is correct You are. I see. So, a tendency to assign falsity to anything disagreed with is only a flaw when YOU aren't doing it. Interesting. |
The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
On 1/5/11 12:18 , wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 09:46:31 -0600, D Peter wrote: On 1/5/11 09:11 , wrote: What you're really describing---is a tendency to assign falsity to anything you don't agree with---. As are you. What's your point. I'm not the one claiming any interpretaton of law other than what you agree with is correct You are. I'm not the one claiming any interpretation of law other than what you agree with is incorrect. You are. What's your point? |
The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
On 1/5/11 12:20 , wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 12:49:50 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: On 1/4/2011 9:42 PM, wrote: Interpretation allows its intent to be ignored. The belief of an interpretation like that is to deny the foundation of the constitution and 300 Yrs of established law. Judges interpreting laws and case law has been a new development of the last 100 years. Then you haven't read Marbury v Madison One of the singular most insidious power grabs in the history of the Union. Acting on a significantly broad gloss on the terms of the Constitution, it is the first example of the Justices legislating from the bench. Marbury v Madison created what Jefferson, himself, called 'the despotism of an oligarchy.' Marbury v Madison was an example of interpretation diverting from both the text and the spirit of law to empower the court to act beyond jurisdiction. Thank you for the example. |
The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
Locations That Have Dead Birds And Fish
http://www.standeyo.com There still are Birds flying around here.I put some more Bird food in my Bird feeder. cuhulin |
The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
On 01/06/2011 01:49 AM, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:
On 1/4/2011 9:42 PM, wrote: Interpretation allows its intent to be ignored. The belief of an interpretation like that is to deny the foundation of the constitution and 300 Yrs of established law. Judges interpreting laws and case law has been a new development of the last 100 years. Coincidentally the Progressives have been active in colleges and politics in America the last 100 years. And how about those Progressives that gave us the progressive income tax and the IRS and the Federal Reserve. Then they gave us Prohibition. Wrong! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marbury_v._Madison Don't confuse the Progressive Movement with today's liberals; two different animals sharing the same root word. What happened in 1710 of such legal import that you keep referring to it? When discussing "original intent" please remember the Founders were middle class farmers who tended toward liberal democracy. The Federalists were the liberals. The antifederalists were the conservatives. None of the founders was rich by today's standards. Therefore when an elite Supreme Court justice like Nino Scalia, who routinely hangs out with powerful captains of industry, attempts to divine "original intent" I want to puke. |
The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
On 01/06/2011 02:47 AM, D. Peter Maus wrote:
On 1/5/11 12:20 , wrote: On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 12:49:50 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: On 1/4/2011 9:42 PM, wrote: Interpretation allows its intent to be ignored. The belief of an interpretation like that is to deny the foundation of the constitution and 300 Yrs of established law. Judges interpreting laws and case law has been a new development of the last 100 years. Then you haven't read Marbury v Madison One of the singular most insidious power grabs in the history of the Union. Acting on a significantly broad gloss on the terms of the Constitution, it is the first example of the Justices legislating from the bench. Marbury v Madison created what Jefferson, himself, called 'the despotism of an oligarchy.' He was talking about the Roberts court, the most corrupt and damaging in history. |
The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
|
The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
On 1/5/11 14:27 , wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 12:47:20 -0600, "D. Peter Maus" wrote: On 1/5/11 12:20 , wrote: On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 12:49:50 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: On 1/4/2011 9:42 PM, wrote: Interpretation allows its intent to be ignored. The belief of an interpretation like that is to deny the foundation of the constitution and 300 Yrs of established law. Judges interpreting laws and case law has been a new development of the last 100 years. Then you haven't read Marbury v Madison One of the singular most insidious power grabs in the history of the Union. That's what Judge Roy Moore believes(d) How'd that work out for him? But once again, you're countering with a rebuttal based on dislike of the ruling--- Nothing different than anything you're doing. Interesting that you don't like it. |
The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:38 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com