RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Shortwave (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/)
-   -   Look who wants to quintuple funding for government media (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/157438-look-who-wants-quintuple-funding-government-media.html)

D. Peter Maus[_2_] January 5th 11 09:46 PM

The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
 
On 1/5/11 14:27 , wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 12:38:44 -0600, "D. Peter Maus"
wrote:

I'm not the one claiming any interpretaton of law other than what you
agree with is correct

You are.



I see. So, a tendency to assign falsity to anything disagreed
with is only a flaw when YOU aren't doing it.


No, that would be exemplified by your claim that Marbury was bad.


Nice Dodge, Mrs Iaccoca.



dave January 5th 11 09:46 PM

George W. Bush is an aristocrat dunce
 
On 01/06/2011 06:52 AM, MNMikew wrote:
wrote in message



"unlikely" hardly screams that it's false. I say it's 50/50. Neither
bunked nor debunked.


But 50/50 is all you need to trumpet it all over Usenet. But then again,
liberals seldom think before putting their mouths in gear.

What the **** are you? Some kind of wind up doll that accuses anyone
with a grown-up view of things a "liberal"? I am a "left libertarian"
aka "anarchist socialist" vs "state socialist" (which is what you
probably really are-every aspect of your life is subsidized by the
government; you lap it up). That oughta keep you Googling for a while.

Mr. Bush behaved in a manner that lends credence to the story.



dave January 5th 11 09:47 PM

Never get caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy
 
On 01/06/2011 06:53 AM, MNMikew wrote:
wrote in message
. ..
On 01/06/2011 12:03 AM, wrote:
Looks like Fatty Arbuckle in some of the Our Gang/Little Rascals old
movies on TCM.

I bet y'all never heard of him before.I remember back in the 1940's when
I lived in Carthage,Missy Sippi, some people were talking about Fatty
Arbuckle.

One time about eleven years ago, I asked that married Irish woman
wayyyyyyy over yonder across the big pond if she has ever heard of Fatty
Arbuckle.She said, Of course I have!
cuhulin

You must speak from experience.

As opposed to "speaking anyway with no experience"?

D. Peter Maus[_2_] January 5th 11 09:50 PM

The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
 
On 1/5/11 14:28 , wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 12:39:27 -0600, "D. Peter Maus"
wrote:

On 1/5/11 12:18 ,
wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 09:46:31 -0600, D Peter
wrote:

On 1/5/11 09:11 ,
wrote:

What you're really describing---is a tendency to assign falsity to
anything you don't agree with---.


As are you. What's your point.

I'm not the one claiming any interpretaton of law other than what you
agree with is correct

You are.


I'm not the one claiming any interpretation of law other than
what you agree with is incorrect.


You just claimed that from the late 18th century/early 19th---that
rulings related to judicial review were malappropriate.


And you're not addressing what's being said to you.

THIS is the exchange currently on the table:


I'm not the one claiming any interpretaton of law other than what you
agree with is correct

You are.


I'm not the one claiming any interpretation of law other than
what you agree with is incorrect.



You dismiss my points on technique. The very technique you,
yourself employ.

So, it's only wrong when you're not doing it.




LOL!






[email protected] January 5th 11 10:09 PM

The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
 
Watchin WLBT 3 4:00 PM tee vee news,,,
John Boehmer's emotion was showing.
cuhulin


MnMikew January 5th 11 10:52 PM

George W. Bush is an aristocrat dunce
 

"dave" wrote in message
. ..
On 01/05/2011 11:28 PM, MNMikew wrote:
wrote in message



Actually, that story was debunked years ago.

When? Where?


http://www.factcheck.org/askfactchec...itution_a.html



"unlikely" hardly screams that it's false. I say it's 50/50. Neither
bunked nor debunked.


But 50/50 is all you need to trumpet it all over Usenet. But then again,
liberals seldom think before putting their mouths in gear.



MnMikew January 5th 11 10:53 PM

Never get caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy
 

"dave" wrote in message
. ..
On 01/06/2011 12:03 AM, wrote:
Looks like Fatty Arbuckle in some of the Our Gang/Little Rascals old
movies on TCM.

I bet y'all never heard of him before.I remember back in the 1940's when
I lived in Carthage,Missy Sippi, some people were talking about Fatty
Arbuckle.

One time about eleven years ago, I asked that married Irish woman
wayyyyyyy over yonder across the big pond if she has ever heard of Fatty
Arbuckle.She said, Of course I have!
cuhulin

You must speak from experience.



RHF January 5th 11 11:07 PM

Prez-A-Duntz Obama is a Liberal Elitist and Head of the DemocratParty Corporatist Oligarchy !
 
On Jan 4, 9:32*pm, dave wrote:
On 01/05/2011 11:28 PM, MNMikew wrote:

*wrote in message


Actually, that story was debunked years ago.


When? Where?


- - http://www.factcheck.org/askfactchec...h_call_the_con....

- "unlikely" hardly screams that it's false.
- I say it's 50/50. Neither bunked nor debunked.

'Special-Dave' when you say something . . .
it makes it 's-p-e-c-i-a-l' ;;-}} ~ RHF

-wrt- 'Special-Dave' -says- "I say it's 50/50."

Special-Dave' : Your many & frequent posts here
simply prove that you are 51/50. ;;-}}

This coming from someone {Special-Dave}
who believes : "Facts Have A Liberal Bias"

Just Holding Prez Obama To The Same Standards
of Personal Attack and Destruction of Presidency
as The Liberals Held Prez Bush Too . . .
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...cd69f01b26c1ed

RHF January 6th 11 02:18 AM

Never get caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy
 
On Jan 4, 9:34*pm, dave wrote:
On 01/06/2011 12:03 AM, wrote:

Looks like Fatty Arbuckle in some of the Our Gang/Little Rascals old
movies on TCM.


I bet y'all never heard of him before.I remember back in the 1940's when
I lived in Carthage,Missy Sippi, some people were talking about Fatty
Arbuckle.


One time about eleven years ago, I asked that married Irish woman
wayyyyyyy over yonder across the big pond if she has ever heard of Fatty
Arbuckle.She said, Of course I *have!
cuhulin


.


'Special-Dave' -you-changed-the-subject-line-to-read-
"Never get caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy"

-and- Clearly 'Special-Dave' you have you very own
Rules-To-Live-by :
"Never get caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy"

Special-Dave : How is your Medical-Marijuana
Treatment* doing today . . .

* Well Toasted and Roasted . . .

-but- Not Too Blasted -hopefully- To Remember :
"Never get caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy"
-cause- Adults-on-Drugs & beds-with-under-age-children
don't mix.

stay "mellow" 'special-dave' and stay along ~ RHF

dave January 6th 11 03:37 AM

The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
 
On 01/06/2011 11:17 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 23:49:29 -0600, "D. Peter Maus"
wrote:

And your insistence that decisions that agree with your beliefs are
'good' is different somehow?


The foundation of why the USSC can review law is opposed by you

SCOTUS

dave January 6th 11 03:40 AM

Framers, er, Farmers Don't Need No Stinking King
 
On 01/06/2011 11:50 PM, RHF wrote:

.
The US Constitution a Blueprint of US Rights
and a Building Code for US Laws
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...e8b363d10e2a35
.
.


Are they inherent unalienable rights endowed by an abstract "creator" or
are they "US Rights". The Bill of Rights was added for the paranoids who
didn't believe in self-evident rights. We have hundreds more.

dave January 6th 11 03:41 AM

Roy finally learns the name of the real enemy
 
On 01/06/2011 11:52 PM, RHF wrote:
On Jan 5, 2:17 pm, wrote:
- - On 01/06/2011 09:52 PM, RHF wrote:
- - Corporatist Oligarchy !

- Now maybe he'll join our fight
- against the real effete snobs

Prez-A-Duntz Obama is a Liberal Elitist and Head
of the Democrat Party Corporatist Oligarchy !
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...ccb254180a4f1a
.
.


You'll get no argument from me there. Are you prepared to say the same
about John Boehner vis a vis the GOP?

D. Peter Maus[_2_] January 6th 11 05:35 AM

The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
 
On 1/5/11 23:28 , wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:46:15 -0600, "D. Peter Maus"
wrote:

On 1/5/11 14:27 ,
wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 12:38:44 -0600, "D. Peter Maus"
wrote:

I'm not the one claiming any interpretaton of law other than what you
agree with is correct

You are.


I see. So, a tendency to assign falsity to anything disagreed
with is only a flaw when YOU aren't doing it.

No, that would be exemplified by your claim that Marbury was bad.


Nice Dodge, Mrs Iaccoca.


I'm not the one claiming that opinions and decisions not to your
liking are unconstitutional, you are.



Also a nice dodge.





D. Peter Maus[_2_] January 6th 11 05:35 AM

The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
 
On 1/5/11 23:28 , wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:46:15 -0600, "D. Peter Maus"
wrote:

On 1/5/11 14:27 ,
wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 12:38:44 -0600, "D. Peter Maus"
wrote:

I'm not the one claiming any interpretaton of law other than what you
agree with is correct

You are.


I see. So, a tendency to assign falsity to anything disagreed
with is only a flaw when YOU aren't doing it.

No, that would be exemplified by your claim that Marbury was bad.


Nice Dodge, Mrs Iaccoca.


I'm not the one claiming that opinions and decisions not to your
liking are unconstitutional, you are.


Again, so are you. So what.




D. Peter Maus[_2_] January 6th 11 05:42 AM

The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
 
On 1/5/11 23:30 , wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:50:55 -0600, "D. Peter Maus"
wrote:

I'm not the one claiming any interpretation of law other than
what you agree with is incorrect.



You dismiss my points on technique.


I'm repeating what you claim----that decisions that you disagree with
are labeled "unconstitutional" and a "power grab"



And when they are, I'm right to do so.


You don't get to dismiss my points based solely on the fact that
I disagree with said decisions.

That's also quite telling.

The truth is, that you've yet to make a point based in anything
other than your disagreement with my points. Your claim that you have
support of law is, in fact, the point dissent. You've offered nothing
more than that you agree with your position.





D. Peter Maus[_2_] January 6th 11 05:49 AM

The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
 
On 1/5/11 23:31 , wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:44:13 -0600, "D. Peter Maus"
wrote:

But once again, you're countering with a rebuttal based on dislike of
the ruling---


Nothing different than anything you're doing. Interesting that
you don't like it.


What ruling am I disagreeing with?

Other than YOUR belief that decisions that are adverse to your beliefs
are "bad"



And your insistence that decisions that agree with your beliefs are
'good' is different somehow?








Beam Me Up Scotty[_3_] January 6th 11 05:27 PM

The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
 
On 1/5/2011 4:35 PM, dave wrote:
On 01/06/2011 01:49 AM, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:
On 1/4/2011 9:42 PM, wrote:


Interpretation allows its intent to be ignored.


The belief of an interpretation like that is to deny the foundation of
the constitution and 300 Yrs of established law.


Judges interpreting laws and case law has been a new development of the
last 100 years.

Coincidentally the Progressives have been active in colleges and
politics in America the last 100 years.


And how about those Progressives that gave us the progressive income tax
and the IRS and the Federal Reserve. Then they gave us Prohibition.


Wrong!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marbury_v._Madison

Don't confuse the Progressive Movement with today's liberals; two
different animals sharing the same root word.

What happened in 1710 of such legal import that you keep referring to it?

When discussing "original intent" please remember the Founders were
middle class farmers who tended toward liberal democracy. The
Federalists were the liberals. The antifederalists were the
conservatives. None of the founders was rich by today's standards.


So it was your Liberals who made institutional slavery a constitutional
right?

I wondered when Liberals would fess up and admit that they like slavery.
It's already obvious to me that Liberals are all for slavery because
they want the the entire unwashed masses to be slaves to the elite and
superior intellect of the ruling elite Liberals.

Welfare/Redistribution is all about forcing reliance on the government
just as black slaves had to rely on their Masters good will and legal
standing in the community.


Beam Me Up Scotty[_3_] January 6th 11 05:48 PM

The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
 
On 1/6/2011 12:39 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 06 Jan 2011 12:27:57 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty
wrote:

Don't confuse the Progressive Movement with today's liberals; two
different animals sharing the same root word.

What happened in 1710 of such legal import that you keep referring to it?

When discussing "original intent" please remember the Founders were
middle class farmers who tended toward liberal democracy. The
Federalists were the liberals. The antifederalists were the
conservatives. None of the founders was rich by today's standards.


But were by their standards

So it was your Liberals who made institutional slavery a constitutional
right?

I wondered when Liberals would fess up and admit that they like slavery.


It's probably a wet-dream of every southern bigot and racist. But not
likely

It's already obvious to me that Liberals are all for slavery because
they want the the entire unwashed masses to be slaves to the elite and
superior intellect of the ruling elite Liberals.


I think we've discovered your problem---it's your "thinking"

Slavery was required to maintain the Southern aristocracy--both in
industry and social status.

With the collapse of the Southern rebellion---those conservatives
maintained their society by enacting Jim Crow laws which stood until
1954, beginning the demise of conservative stranglehold on the
Democratiic party

I'll remind you that it was progressive/liberals in congress who
stipped the southern conservative stranglehold and introduced the
"Civil RIghts Act"---aided by Northern liberals an progressives.

I'll also remind you that EVERY "progressive" policy or program in
America was opposed by conservative/Loonytarian idiots--(to name a
few): Child labor laws, collective bargaining, Womens rights, Civil
rights, Equal opportunity, desegregation/integration, childrens
rights, Old age poverty, general poverty/hunger/homelessness, clean
air, water, safe food and recently health care.


Welfare/Redistribution is all about forcing reliance on the government
just as black slaves had to rely on their Masters good will and legal
standing in the community.


You ignorant red-neck


As you revert to your Liberal racist name calling....


Liberalism is based on race and is inherently racist because in
Liberalism, race is the one thing from which all else is derived.
- Beam Me Up Scotty - 2009


John Smith January 6th 11 05:59 PM

Hairy clams and pretty girls go together!
 
On 1/5/2011 6:54 PM, RHF wrote:

...


Hairy clams are good. They have soft shells too! grin

Chuckle,
JS

D. Peter Maus[_2_] January 6th 11 06:06 PM

The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
 
On 1/6/11 11:32 , wrote:
On Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:43:37 -0600, "D. Peter Maus"
wrote:

So, no one may disagree with you without dismissal as uninformed,
unitelligent, or unenlightene


Only when they are.


Well, aren't you the snob.



[email protected] January 6th 11 06:12 PM

The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
 
And, if the B HO Butt Kissers don't get what they want for Free,
handed to them (''them')' on a Silver Platter, they (''they'') go around
Stealing!

http://www.devilfinder.com
Vehicles burglarized Raymond,Mississippi

The City of Raymond is eight miles West/Southwest (Highway 18) of
doggy's couch.
cuhulin


[email protected] January 6th 11 06:27 PM

The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
 
Hairy clams are Uglier than a bucketload of armpits.
cuhulin


John Smith January 6th 11 06:41 PM

Worship at the altar of the HAIRY CLAM!
 
On 1/6/2011 10:27 AM, wrote:
Hairy clams are Uglier than a bucketload of armpits.
cuhulin


Beauty is in the eye of the beholder!

Anyway, if the appearance offends you, shave it grin

Regards,
JS


D Peter Maus[_2_] January 6th 11 06:52 PM

Worship at the altar of the HAIRY CLAM!
 
On 1/6/11 12:41 , John Smith wrote:
On 1/6/2011 10:27 AM, wrote:
Hairy clams are Uglier than a bucketload of armpits.
cuhulin


Beauty is in the eye of the beholder!

Anyway, if the appearance offends you, shave it grin

Regards,
JS


The worst part has always been the view.


John Smith January 6th 11 07:42 PM

Framers, er, Farmers Don't Need No Stinking King
 
On 1/5/2011 7:40 PM, dave wrote:

...
Are they inherent unalienable rights endowed by an abstract "creator" or
are they "US Rights". The Bill of Rights was added for the paranoids who
didn't believe in self-evident rights. We have hundreds more.


Actually, the Bill of Rights was added for the morons who needed
additional instructions. Some people are rather dense and you have to
literally POUND it into their heads ... other people, get it the first
time around ...

Regards,
JS

John Smith January 6th 11 07:44 PM

Roy finally learns the name of the real enemy
 
On 1/5/2011 7:41 PM, dave wrote:

...
You'll get no argument from me there. Are you prepared to say the same
about John Boehner vis a vis the GOP?


republicrats = democans = criminally-treasonous-public-servants ...

Most have already caught on ... the same puppet masters pull the strings
of them all.

Regards,
JS

m II January 7th 11 06:53 AM

Pismo Beach is the "Clam Capital" of California
 
On 11-01-05 02:55 PM, dave wrote:

About 20 miles S. of San Luis Obispo. It's full of rich homosexuals like
Roy.



First that thing about McLare's Navy and now this...





mike

RHF January 7th 11 09:42 AM

Proving There Is Nothing 'Speical' -aboot- Being A Canadian ;;-}}
 
On Jan 6, 10:53*pm, m II wrote:
- - On 11-01-05 02:55 PM, dave wrote:

- - About 20 miles S. of San Luis Obispo.
- - It's full of rich homosexuals like
- - "Mike [M II]" -edit*-was- 'Roy'

* I Am Not -and- I Believe That You Are Not.
Ask Your-Self ?Q? Which One Is More Believable ?

Being -or- Not Being a Homosexual# Is really
not the Issue. -for- the Liberal {Democrat} 'Dave'
BRANDING {RED HOT FLAMES} Someone A
"Homosexual" Is Good Enough -when- the labels
Conservative and Republican don't work.
-just-shows- the True Colors of Liberals {Democrats}
like 'Special-Dave' : Who Claim Tolerance and
Understanding -while- Inwardly Boiling in Their Own
Bigotry and Hate For All Those Who They Believe
To Be Less Than {Perfect} Them.

# -or- For that Matter a Hetrosexual; Lesbian; "Bi";
Transgender; LGBT, or even Celibate etc...

* I Am Not -and- I Believe That You Are Not.
Ask Your-Self ?Q? Which One Is More Believable ?
-while- neither is {or maybe} true . . .

- First that thing about McLare's Navy
- and now this...
-
- mike

Mike [M II} : Propaganda is about turning the 'truth'
INTO THE "BELIEVABLE TRUTH" !

The Beauty of Propaganda is . . .
An Ounce of Biased Half-Truth
Can Turn Into A Pound of Bigoted Belief in One
And A Ton Of Hatred In The Masses ! ! ! ~ RHF©

-of- People and Places :

Mike [M II] -if- You had been Born in the USA
you would be 'Special-Mike' . . .
-but-alas- your are simply a Canadian
{someone Born in Canada}

-that-goes-to-say- 'Special-Dave' is only 'special'
because he was Born in the USA . . .
-but-alas- had he been born in Canada
{he would simply a Canadian}

Proving There Is Nothing 'Special'
-aboot- Being A Canadian ;;-}} ~ RHF

m II January 8th 11 06:17 AM

The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
 
On 11-01-04 10:24 AM, John Smith wrote:
On 1/3/2011 4:42 PM, dave wrote:

...
LMAO!!!


Wrong on every account ... only fools make such a mockery of themselves
and work to completely destroy their credibility ... good job moron.

Regards,
JS



Your personality is showing again, Alwayswrong...




mike

m II January 8th 11 06:24 AM

Proving There Is Nothing 'Speical' -aboot- Being A Canadian ;;-}}
 
On 11-01-07 02:42 AM, RHF wrote:

Being -or- Not Being a Homosexual# Is really
not the Issue.



Listen, what you do with your penis is none of my business. However, if
you are getting feelings of underutilization, may I recommend the
closest US Navy recruiting station?





mike

[email protected] January 8th 11 06:35 AM

Proving There Is Nothing 'Speical' -aboot- Being A Canadian ;;-}}
 
On Jan 8, 1:24*am, m II wrote:
On 11-01-07 02:42 AM, RHF wrote:

Being -or- Not Being a Homosexual# Is really
not the Issue.


Listen, what you do with your penis is none of my business. However, if
you are getting feelings of underutilization, may I recommend the
closest US Navy recruiting station?

mike


'In the Navy',by village people,1978.

dxAce January 8th 11 11:26 AM

Proving There Is Nothing 'Speical' -aboot- Being A Canadian ;;-}}
 


m II wrote:

On 11-01-07 02:42 AM, RHF wrote:

Being -or- Not Being a Homosexual# Is really
not the Issue.


Listen, what you do with your penis is none of my business. However, if
you are getting feelings of underutilization, may I recommend the
closest US Navy recruiting station?


You're in no position to recommend anything. After all, YOUR navy is
permanently welded to the pier.



RHF January 8th 11 12:45 PM

Proving Once Again... There Is Nothing 'Speical' -aboot- Being ACanadian ;;-}}
 
On Jan 6, 10:53 pm, m II wrote:
- - On 11-01-05 02:55 PM, dave wrote:
- - About 20 miles S. of San Luis Obispo.
- - It's full of rich homosexuals like Roy.

RHF's -reply-to- Gay Bashing by the "Liberal"
'Special-Dave' : Habitual Medical-Marijuana Smoker
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...f57f547b44da76
-noting-to- 'Special-Dave' that there are
NO 'Gay' Claims at Pismo Beach -cause-
The Clams are in-fact "Hermaphroditic"
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_do_clams_reproduce
-was- Pismo Beach is the "Clam Capital" of California

RHF's -reply-to- Gay Bashing by the "Liberal"
Canadian Mike [M II] -aka- 'The Voice of Canada'
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...b52c88b7db98be
-was- Proving There Is Nothing 'Speical'
-aboot- Being A Canadian ;;-}}
-ps- Mike [M II] now it looks like I will have to add
"Gay Bashing" to you long list of Hate Speech here.
{Verbal/Written Hate Crimes}
-wrt- Canada The Land of Enlightenment and Tolerance
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...defcadafd8900c
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...03ceb350ccfa79
Except for Mike [M II] : The Hater/Basher of Haters/Bashers !
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...025ecad07c49b9
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...dff201f383f1b6
* Preaching Hate for the USA and Americans
* Preaching Hate for Jews, Zionist and Israelis
* Preaching Hate for Person-of-Faith and Religion
* Preaching Hate for Catholics and Religion
* Preaching Hate for Mormons and Religion
* Frequent Use of 'The-N-Word'
+ Now Add 'Gay Bashing' to the growing list...

- First that thing about McLare's Navy and now this...
-
- mike

Mike [M II] : That's what makes 'Special-Dave' "special"
-while- You Mike [M II] simply remain a Canadian ;;-}}

Speaking of People and Places :
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...b52c88b7db98be
-was- Proving There Is Nothing 'Speical'
-aboot- Being A Canadian ;;-}}

Mike [M II] -if- You had been Born in the USA
you would be 'Special-Mike' . . .
-but-alas- your are simply a Canadian
{someone Born in Canada}

-that-goes-to-say- 'Special-Dave' is only 'special'
because he was Born in the USA . . .
-but-alas- had he been born in Canada
{he would simply a Canadian}

Proving There Is Nothing 'Special'
-aboot- Being A Canadian ;;-}} ~ RHF©
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...b52c88b7db98be

RHF January 8th 11 01:22 PM

Mike [M II] : Recommendations From Someone Who Him-Self Has Chosen"The Path" Less Traveled
 
On Jan 7, 10:24 pm, m II wrote:

- - On 11-01-07 02:42 AM, RHF wrote:
- - Being -or- Not Being a Homosexual#
- - Is really not the Issue.

The fact-is that many/most of the 'Clams'
at Pismo Beach are not Homosexual :
They Are "Hermaphroditic" [.]
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_do_clams_reproduce
-noting-to- 'Special-Dave' that there are
NO 'Gay' Claims at Pismo Beach -cause-
The Clams are in-fact "Hermaphroditic" [.]

[email protected] January 8th 11 05:07 PM

Mike [M II] : Recommendations From Someone Who Him-Self HasCh...
 
Down Periscope, and Up Periscope,,, if they had wimmins like that in the
Navy when I was in the Army, I would have joined the Navy.
GO ARMY! GO NAVY! GO AIR FORCE! GO MARINES! GO COAST GUARD!
cuhulin


dave January 8th 11 06:00 PM

Mike [M II] : Recommendations From Someone Who Him-Self HasCh...
 
On 01/08/2011 09:07 AM, wrote:
Down Periscope, and Up Periscope,,, if they had wimmins like that in the
Navy when I was in the Army, I would have joined the Navy.
GO ARMY! GO NAVY! GO AIR FORCE! GO MARINES! GO COAST GUARD!
cuhulin

You should start a cult that finds hidden meaning in Kelsey Grammar's
consistently mediocre output.

Beam Me Up Scotty[_3_] January 9th 11 05:20 AM

The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
 

"The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint"


Actually it's more like a footing and cornerstone.... you have the base
to build the rest but you can't go adding on beyond your footer and
cornerstones lest the new additions will crumble from a lack of support
and strength.

Which is what we see happening these days.





RHF January 9th 11 12:27 PM

Mike [M II] : Recommendations From Someone Who Him-Self Has Ch...
 
On Jan 8, 10:00*am, dave wrote:
On 01/08/2011 09:07 AM, wrote: Down Periscope, and Up Periscope,,, if they had wimmins like that in the
Navy when I was in the Army, I would have joined the Navy.
GO ARMY! GO NAVY! GO AIR FORCE! GO MARINES! GO COAST GUARD!
cuhulin


- You should start a cult that finds hidden meaning
- in Kelsey Grammar's consistently mediocre output.

Yeah You Could Call Your-Many-Selves
The 'Special-Dave's !

Hey that's better than the 'Mediocre Kelsey's

pardon my grammar... ~ RHF

[email protected] January 9th 11 02:56 PM

Mike [M II] : Recommendations From Someone Who Him-Self HasCh...
 
Down Periscope, Up Periscope,,, they are only movies, not for real.
The Real Navy isn't like that.At least one of those new fangled
Submarines doesn't have an Up and Down Periscope.It has Cameras.
cuhulin


RHF January 9th 11 08:43 PM

Mike [M II] : Recommendations From Someone Who Him-Self Has Ch...
 
On Jan 8, 4:06*pm, dave wrote:
On 01/09/2011 10:56 PM, wrote:

Down Periscope, Up Periscope,,, they are only movies, not for real.
The Real Navy isn't like that.At least one of those new fangled
Submarines doesn't have an Up and Down Periscope.It has Cameras.
cuhulin


They can launch drones that look like birds and nuclear tipped cruise
missiles;


- the idea of a dual prism periscope is positively quaint.

-but- when all else fails 'no-batteries-required'


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com