On 1/5/11 14:27 , wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 12:38:44 -0600, "D. Peter Maus"
wrote:

I'm not the one claiming any interpretaton of law other than what you
agree with is correct

You are.


I see. So, a tendency to assign falsity to anything disagreed
with is only a flaw when YOU aren't doing it.

No, that would be exemplified by your claim that Marbury was bad.

Nice Dodge, Mrs Iaccoca.

On 01/06/2011 06:52 AM, MNMikew wrote:
wrote in message


"unlikely" hardly screams that it's false. I say it's 50/50. Neither
bunked nor debunked.

But 50/50 is all you need to trumpet it all over Usenet. But then again,
liberals seldom think before putting their mouths in gear.

What the **** are you? Some kind of wind up doll that accuses anyone
with a grown-up view of things a "liberal"? I am a "left libertarian"
aka "anarchist socialist" vs "state socialist" (which is what you
probably really are-every aspect of your life is subsidized by the
government; you lap it up). That oughta keep you Googling for a while.

Mr. Bush behaved in a manner that lends credence to the story.

On 01/06/2011 06:53 AM, MNMikew wrote:
wrote in message
. ..
On 01/06/2011 12:03 AM, wrote:
Looks like Fatty Arbuckle in some of the Our Gang/Little Rascals old
movies on TCM.

I bet y'all never heard of him before.I remember back in the 1940's when
I lived in Carthage,Missy Sippi, some people were talking about Fatty
Arbuckle.

One time about eleven years ago, I asked that married Irish woman
wayyyyyyy over yonder across the big pond if she has ever heard of Fatty
Arbuckle.She said, Of course I have!
cuhulin

You must speak from experience.

As opposed to "speaking anyway with no experience"?

On 1/5/11 14:28 , wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 12:39:27 -0600, "D. Peter Maus"
wrote:

On 1/5/11 12:18 , wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 09:46:31 -0600, D Peter
wrote:

On 1/5/11 09:11 , wrote:

What you're really describing---is a tendency to assign falsity to
anything you don't agree with---.


As are you. What's your point.

I'm not the one claiming any interpretaton of law other than what you
agree with is correct

You are.

I'm not the one claiming any interpretation of law other than
what you agree with is incorrect.


You just claimed that from the late 18th century/early 19th---that
rulings related to judicial review were malappropriate.


And you're not addressing what's being said to you.

THIS is the exchange currently on the table:


I'm not the one claiming any interpretaton of law other than what you
agree with is correct

You are.

I'm not the one claiming any interpretation of law other than
what you agree with is incorrect.


You dismiss my points on technique. The very technique you,
yourself employ.

So, it's only wrong when you're not doing it.




LOL!

Watchin WLBT 3 4:00 PM tee vee news,,,
John Boehmer's emotion was showing.
cuhulin

"dave" wrote in message
. ..
On 01/05/2011 11:28 PM, MNMikew wrote:
wrote in message


Actually, that story was debunked years ago.

When? Where?

http://www.factcheck.org/askfactchec...itution_a.html



"unlikely" hardly screams that it's false. I say it's 50/50. Neither
bunked nor debunked.

But 50/50 is all you need to trumpet it all over Usenet. But then again,
liberals seldom think before putting their mouths in gear.

"dave" wrote in message
. ..
On 01/06/2011 12:03 AM, wrote:
Looks like Fatty Arbuckle in some of the Our Gang/Little Rascals old
movies on TCM.

I bet y'all never heard of him before.I remember back in the 1940's when
I lived in Carthage,Missy Sippi, some people were talking about Fatty
Arbuckle.

One time about eleven years ago, I asked that married Irish woman
wayyyyyyy over yonder across the big pond if she has ever heard of Fatty
Arbuckle.She said, Of course I have!
cuhulin

You must speak from experience.

On Jan 4, 9:32*pm, dave wrote:
On 01/05/2011 11:28 PM, MNMikew wrote:

*wrote in message

Actually, that story was debunked years ago.

When? Where?

- - http://www.factcheck.org/askfactchec...h_call_the_con....

- "unlikely" hardly screams that it's false.
- I say it's 50/50. Neither bunked nor debunked.

'Special-Dave' when you say something . . .
it makes it 's-p-e-c-i-a-l' ;;-}} ~ RHF

-wrt- 'Special-Dave' -says- "I say it's 50/50."

Special-Dave' : Your many & frequent posts here
simply prove that you are 51/50. ;;-}}

This coming from someone {Special-Dave}
who believes : "Facts Have A Liberal Bias"

Just Holding Prez Obama To The Same Standards
of Personal Attack and Destruction of Presidency
as The Liberals Held Prez Bush Too . . .
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...cd69f01b26c1ed

On Jan 4, 9:34*pm, dave wrote:
On 01/06/2011 12:03 AM, wrote:

Looks like Fatty Arbuckle in some of the Our Gang/Little Rascals old
movies on TCM.

I bet y'all never heard of him before.I remember back in the 1940's when
I lived in Carthage,Missy Sippi, some people were talking about Fatty
Arbuckle.

One time about eleven years ago, I asked that married Irish woman
wayyyyyyy over yonder across the big pond if she has ever heard of Fatty
Arbuckle.She said, Of course I *have!
cuhulin

.

'Special-Dave' -you-changed-the-subject-line-to-read-
"Never get caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy"

-and- Clearly 'Special-Dave' you have you very own
Rules-To-Live-by :
"Never get caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy"

Special-Dave : How is your Medical-Marijuana
Treatment* doing today . . .

* Well Toasted and Roasted . . .

-but- Not Too Blasted -hopefully- To Remember :
"Never get caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy"
-cause- Adults-on-Drugs & beds-with-under-age-children
don't mix.

stay "mellow" 'special-dave' and stay along ~ RHF

On 01/06/2011 11:17 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 23:49:29 -0600, "D. Peter Maus"
wrote:

And your insistence that decisions that agree with your beliefs are
'good' is different somehow?

The foundation of why the USSC can review law is opposed by you

SCOTUS