|
Starve the Beast
dave wrote: On 02/22/2011 05:32 AM, dxAce wrote: dave wrote: On 02/22/2011 01:23 AM, dxAce wrote: These people crashed the economy on purpose so they could destroy the New Deal. Take your meds, Dave, and revel in the knowledge that you are a Golden Come-Along Winner! I've been spot on so far, and you continue to be wrong and against the people. You continue to be full of ****, Rickmers. Why are you always so pleasant? Old lady cut you off? ED? Too fat to find to find your penis? 'to find to find' ? Slow down, take a breath, and grab those meds, Rickmers! |
I got mine, screw the rest of ya!
On 2/21/11 15:11 , Joe from Kokomo wrote: On 2/22/2011 2:41 AM, D Peter Maus wrote: {stipulated}... Just out of idle curiosity, what kind of antenna system do you use? Just an idle answer... I have a 130 foot long, 25-30 foot high, bent dipole between two trees, fed with ladder line, used on 80-10 (including WARC bands) with a Johnson KW Matchbox balanced tuner. On 160 meters, I reconfigure the antenna to what is essentially a top loaded vertical, using a T-match tuner. Obviously not as good as a tower and beam, but I work lots o' DX with it, for example the VK0IR (Heard Island) dx'pedition and North Korea. (If you are not a ham, trust me, these are nice catches). Needless to say, it also works nicely for SWL'ing with my vintage receivers. A tower would be nice, but not worth the hassle of dealing with the (overly) strict city and subdivision restrictions. |
I got mine, screw the rest of ya!
On 2/22/11 07:55 , Joe from Kokomo wrote:
On 2/21/11 15:11 , Joe from Kokomo wrote: On 2/22/2011 2:41 AM, D Peter Maus wrote: {stipulated}... Just out of idle curiosity, what kind of antenna system do you use? Just an idle answer... I have a 130 foot long, 25-30 foot high, bent dipole between two trees, fed with ladder line, used on 80-10 (including WARC bands) with a Johnson KW Matchbox balanced tuner. On 160 meters, I reconfigure the antenna to what is essentially a top loaded vertical, using a T-match tuner. Obviously not as good as a tower and beam, but I work lots o' DX with it, for example the VK0IR (Heard Island) dx'pedition and North Korea. (If you are not a ham, trust me, these are nice catches). Needless to say, it also works nicely for SWL'ing with my vintage receivers. A tower would be nice, but not worth the hassle of dealing with the (overly) strict city and subdivision restrictions. I was speaking with a ham buddy of mine, over the weekend, and he recommended such an antenna for low noise and great digging in crowded bands. And particularly for MW Dx. I'm tempted to do it here. Which vintage receivers are you using? |
I got mine, screw the rest of ya!
On 2/22/11 07:43 , Joe from Kokomo wrote: On 2/21/11 18:42 , Joe from Kokomo wrote: On 2/21/11 15:11 , Joe from Kokomo wrote: I hope you [Lare] have and/or can afford medical insurance with YOUR pre-existing medical condition(s). The Big Business insurance companies can, have and will again deny coverage to people with pre-existing conditions. On 2/21/2011 6:25 PM, D. Peter Maus wrote: Just as the Big Government insurance plan is doing today. Seeing as the new plan has not yet been implemented, this would presume that you are referring to what we have 'today' -- Medicare -- which does NOT deny coverage because of pre-existing conditions. On 2/22/2011 2:27 AM, D. Peter Maus wrote: Government medical plans, of any stripe turn down more pre-existing conditions than all the insurance carriers combined. Can you give any examples of this On 2/22/2011 8:45 AM, D. Peter Maus wrote: You don't spend any time talking to veterans, do you. No, I've had neither the occasion nor the opportunity. Furthermore, I have no idea what "medical plan" the vets are under. Possibly you are referring to the Agent Orange issue or the spent uranium bullets? If so, the root problem may be that the science just hasn't caught up yet -- although I seem to recall that they are finally realizing some of the Agent Orange issues. My son did his Residency at a VA hospital, so I will have to ask him about this. Again however, I believe this thread was essentially focused on Medicare -- which is MUCH larger than the vet issue -- and with Medicare, pre-existing conditions do NOT appear to be a problem. On 2/22/2011 2:27 AM, D. Peter Maus wrote: Government medical plans, of any stripe turn down more pre-existing conditions than all the insurance carriers combined. Turn down more than ALL insurance carriers combined??? Can you justify this claim? Any actual numbers? |
I got mine, screw the rest of ya!
On 2/22/11 08:18 , Joe from Kokomo wrote:
On 2/22/2011 8:45 AM, D. Peter Maus wrote: You don't spend any time talking to veterans, do you. No, I've had neither the occasion nor the opportunity. You may wish to take the time. |
I got mine, screw the rest of ya!
On 02/22/2011 05:45 AM, D. Peter Maus wrote:
On 2/22/11 07:43 , Joe from Kokomo wrote: Can you give any examples of this You don't spend any time talking to veterans, do you. Oh do go on... |
Starve the Beast
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 On 11-02-22 06:42 AM, dave wrote: Why are you always so pleasant? Old lady cut you off? ED? Too fat to find to find your penis? It was surgically altered and then tucked in, all the better to participate in his weekly homosexual 'respect' sessions. His name 'Raoul' sound like him gagging on a whole throat full of 'respect'. mike -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNY9rtAAoJEJXfKw5kUPt7OmsIAKi2nGmoSa iNq3vutJV1GVfG TNWOJ0yqRGiRrHnwZo4Ks5CRxnAZ+Hs9RYOMInsmg+twyk6lyA 15vJv1e7nu1NCe rs1xajsGg+4Eyy2gjux1hfgaKnt/FLrsGUlYN2TIJtYwDHGOkbIGMfW3plPQW47N Jxgi2FL9WfC6blcCj3lHk+NNanoOSeEwzg6N7cuVzVi9suJ0jn PxlffTUc/NbKGh lAR8D1EjHE/icQIq5juESdGZLzhVtFWJ4snb2AWdsPbdEoBxX0ApttMAAtfQ0 6kH QK/LtQfLp1sAF37Rl6B2H/IOXEIz1YxBcFwuQJ9dYLS2gESlru4ztCO8F9eo4LY= =0uik -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Wisconsin End Game (Control of State's Utility Infrastructure)
Contested bill contains provisions to privatize utilities.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/0...e-in-Wisconsin |
I got mine, screw the rest of ya!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 On 11-02-22 06:31 AM, dave wrote: On 02/22/2011 01:35 AM, dxAce wrote: We're so thrilled that you got yours, Dave. After all you are a Golden Come-Along Winner, and certainly deserve the best! The header is me quoting you. Is the welfare leech giving you a rough time, dave? Funny how HIS 'free' medical is different from anything proposed for others. mike -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNY+c5AAoJEJXfKw5kUPt7988H/iUlBCwh5KyTFELcZMevqPWp RANv/4LtnWz01nlwOcNTmX5TqsW3A4dSEL2dv4V3wq0LhqMnbEr9Nm/4klst8QCB umSAk/nIaDMMOIQQlZvix08e8V5wYxHFsLPCqoafLThItimhIdmH0u8y aZGzeOnT EIY+VTaqLNHL3KvRvcpS+htfI37FQFMXRgfAD2Vhp1n2VUq0uA YQ33I/RHFSFECJ /vgqOh6QZ2ZLPXLLmUeFcjBe+TmGAiu+8Z/xb/6j9zs+rLmNDOUu9g4YtrfTjKuh cUiq6o9Sx+ttIjkR5skX7f2kfgFqZxnpZx/so2HnFhGX3+T6mISf03MI4oueTmw= =2URh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
I got mine, screw the rest of ya!
You gots What???
http://www.lug-all.com We will paint it Gold color for you for a few extra dollars. cuhulin, Come A Longs R US |
I got mine, screw the rest of ya!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 On 11-02-21 09:19 AM, dxAce wrote: Poppycock! Reminiscing about your first sexual experience? mike -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNY+vlAAoJEJXfKw5kUPt7OlkIAJxo8C84/P52U4mBW4aPK6t9 6BLfR5HFMF1JlNsCh7Q+yyZkcaJi2p+ruvg8ZihFT5MKQE5Il1 gcyjGngWdKZwqI FzCBJT4epTTCsNwdzGKqnS1DsyIJwBp9FXNwg5Hgdlbn24/PZQ7d8LzGzdfivdTl nktHRF/NxWjo2Y2jGONf6YYf6+CVdFCGYQeAEfQLlK8c36VE291q6mrV1 rdFHIv7 mJ1deE1v4KQoA6aK301GetO+C3CKvWdvn1x8nMHCatCF9JshOh V3OsV9OLIXdW/0 z7YeCIP25GFsQOCWNJi+10qGUOCgr4ozJZpSkF7ZMOH6BcwggS w+8lv1k0HTYZ4= =F4W8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
The Free Obama-Care© 'Death Panel' Counseling -wrt- Coerced "Ending-Your-Life" Mandate
On Feb 22, 12:34*am, Gary Forbis wrote:
On Feb 21, 10:42*pm, RHF wrote: More Liberal Lies ! More Democrat Deceptions ! More Liberal Lies ! More Democrat Deceptions ! More Liberal Lies ! More Democrat Deceptions ! More Liberal Lies ! More Democrat Deceptions ! - I can't tell if you are an idiot or are just playing one. - You know that there is enough noise around here - without someone playing mind games, stupid mind games. Gary Forbis : ? "idiot" ? Gary Forbis : ? "stupid" ? Gary Forbis : ? "mind games" ? |
Starve the Beast
I'm a dumbass Canuck II wrote: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11-02-22 06:42 AM, dave wrote: Why are you always so pleasant? Old lady cut you off? ED? Too fat to find to find your penis? It was surgically altered and then tucked in, all the better to participate in his weekly homosexual 'respect' sessions. His name 'Raoul' sound like him gagging on a whole throat full of 'respect'. That sound echo's throughout the logging camp when you are there giving out 'favours', right, boy? |
I got mine, screw the rest of ya!
On 2/22/11 07:55 , Joe from Kokomo wrote: On 2/21/11 15:11 , Joe from Kokomo wrote: On 2/22/2011 2:41 AM, D Peter Maus wrote: {stipulated}... Just out of idle curiosity, what kind of antenna system do you use? Just an idle answer... I have a 130 foot long, 25-30 foot high, bent dipole between two trees, fed with ladder line, used on 80-10 (including WARC bands) with a Johnson KW Matchbox balanced tuner. On 160 meters, I reconfigure the antenna to what is essentially a top loaded vertical, using a T-match tuner. Obviously not as good as a tower and beam, but I work lots o' DX with it, for example the VK0IR (Heard Island) dx'pedition and North Korea. (If you are not a ham, trust me, these are nice catches). Needless to say, it also works nicely for SWL'ing with my vintage receivers. A tower would be nice, but not worth the hassle of dealing with the (overly) strict city and subdivision restrictions. On 2/22/2011 9:06 AM, D. Peter Maus wrote: I was speaking with a ham buddy of mine, over the weekend, and he recommended such an antenna for low noise and great digging in crowded bands. And particularly for MW Dx. I'm tempted to do it here. Well, it won't hurt to try it... Your buddy says it is a quiet antenna. Compared to what? It is commonly acknowledged that noise is more vertically polarized and thus a vertical antenna is a bit noisier than a horizontal antenna like a dipole. I really don't think the dipole I described is any quieter than any other dipole AFAIK. The reason I used the antenna was mostly because of its benefits when transmitting. With the tuner and the ladder line feed, it will operate on many bands with relatively low line loss. For SWL'ing, I'm not sure if it would have any particular benefit. Which vintage receivers are you using? I've had many over the years, from an R-390 on down, but now that I am at the Gateway to Geezerdom, I've been trying to thin out the herd. The current fleet: 1912 Loose Coupler crystal set circa 1921 Westinghouse Aeriola Jr. (crystal set, first mass produced radio?) circa early 30s National SW-3 Thrill Box (regen) two Hallicrafters SX-28s--just in case owning one doesn't stretch your arms enough-- 80 pounds each. Drake T-4XB and R-4B |
I got mine, screw the rest of ya!
On Feb 22, 1:23*am, dxAce wrote:
dave wrote: On 02/21/2011 02:12 PM, dxAce wrote: The GREED of Wall Street (Big Business) brought you the Great Recession that we are in. Nah, it was the likes of Barney (give it to me in the ass) Frank. Not true. It was actually a handful of people at a handful of institutions making greedy (and stupid) decisions. 2 acts of Congress, criminal behavior by Moody's and S&P and some below the radar "waivers" created a derivatives bubble. Barney Frank just provided the bubble material. Phil Gramm, Alan Greenspan, Clinton, Geightner, etc. all went crazy reversing the laws Roosevelt put in place. This is what happens when business is deregulated. These people crashed the economy on purpose so they could destroy the New Deal. Take your meds, Dave, and revel in the knowledge that you are a Golden Come-Along Winner!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sorry, chum - Dave's right both in general and in detail, and demonstrably so. You need to get your information somewhere other than Fox Screws. |
Starve the Beast
On Feb 22, 5:30*am, dave wrote:
On 02/22/2011 01:23 AM, dxAce wrote: These people crashed the economy on purpose so they could destroy the New Deal. Take your meds, Dave, and revel in the knowledge that you are a Golden Come-Along Winner! I've been spot on so far, and you continue to be wrong and against the people. http://www.wordspy.com/words/starvethebeast.asp It's a Conservative thing - people don't count, only $$$$$$$$$$$. |
Starve the Beast
On Feb 22, 5:32*am, dxAce wrote:
dave wrote: On 02/22/2011 01:23 AM, dxAce wrote: These people crashed the economy on purpose so they could destroy the New Deal. Take your meds, Dave, and revel in the knowledge that you are a Golden Come-Along Winner! I've been spot on so far, and you continue to be wrong and against the people. You continue to be full of ****, Rickmers. Nope, he's correct. You need to read a real newspaper once in awhile. |
I got mine, screw the rest of ya!
On Feb 22, 5:32*am, dxAce wrote:
dave wrote: On 02/21/2011 11:27 PM, D. Peter Maus wrote: Government medical plans, of any stripe turn down more pre-existing conditions than all the insurance carriers combined. What do you mean "turn down more pre-existing conditions"? Are you saying people with chronic conditions are denied coverage? That is not my understanding. Your problem is that you simply lack understanding and comprehension. You are a mentally ill clown 'tard and it is you who need the voluntary counselling. Now go take your meds, Rickmers, and shut the hell up! When are you going to offer something of substance instead of insults? |
I got mine, screw the rest of ya!
On 2/22/11 13:28 , Joe from Kokomo wrote:
On 2/22/11 07:55 , Joe from Kokomo wrote: On 2/21/11 15:11 , Joe from Kokomo wrote: On 2/22/2011 2:41 AM, D Peter Maus wrote: {stipulated}... Just out of idle curiosity, what kind of antenna system do you use? Just an idle answer... I have a 130 foot long, 25-30 foot high, bent dipole between two trees, fed with ladder line, used on 80-10 (including WARC bands) with a Johnson KW Matchbox balanced tuner. On 160 meters, I reconfigure the antenna to what is essentially a top loaded vertical, using a T-match tuner. Obviously not as good as a tower and beam, but I work lots o' DX with it, for example the VK0IR (Heard Island) dx'pedition and North Korea. (If you are not a ham, trust me, these are nice catches). Needless to say, it also works nicely for SWL'ing with my vintage receivers. A tower would be nice, but not worth the hassle of dealing with the (overly) strict city and subdivision restrictions. On 2/22/2011 9:06 AM, D. Peter Maus wrote: I was speaking with a ham buddy of mine, over the weekend, and he recommended such an antenna for low noise and great digging in crowded bands. And particularly for MW Dx. I'm tempted to do it here. Well, it won't hurt to try it... Your buddy says it is a quiet antenna. Compared to what? It is commonly acknowledged that noise is more vertically polarized and thus a vertical antenna is a bit noisier than a horizontal antenna like a dipole. I really don't think the dipole I described is any quieter than any other dipole AFAIK. It may be more a matter of it being a good antenna than what he was previously using. A lot of random cuts, a Windom, and some twinlead dipoles have been on his property in the past. The reason I used the antenna was mostly because of its benefits when transmitting. With the tuner and the ladder line feed, it will operate on many bands with relatively low line loss. For SWL'ing, I'm not sure if it would have any particular benefit. Which vintage receivers are you using? I've had many over the years, from an R-390 on down, but now that I am at the Gateway to Geezerdom, I've been trying to thin out the herd. The current fleet: 1912 Loose Coupler crystal set circa 1921 Westinghouse Aeriola Jr. (crystal set, first mass produced radio?) circa early 30s National SW-3 Thrill Box (regen) two Hallicrafters SX-28s--just in case owning one doesn't stretch your arms enough-- 80 pounds each. Drake T-4XB and R-4B I still have and use my grandfather's Hammarlund BC-794 Super Pro. Got your SX-28 beat by a 39 lb power supply. :) I've always wanted an SX-28. Never found one that hadn't been cut to shards by a previous owner. Nice stable. |
I got mine, screw the rest of ya!
On Feb 21, 3:25*pm, "D. Peter Maus" wrote:
On 2/21/11 15:11 , Joe from Kokomo wrote: I hope you have and/or can afford medical insurance with YOUR pre-existing medical condition(s). The Big Business insurance companies can, have and will again deny coverage to people with pre-existing conditions. * *Just as the Big Government insurance plan is doing today. From Wikipedia: The Commonwealth Fund, in its annual survey, "Mirror, Mirror on the Wall", compares the performance of the health care systems in Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, Germany, Canada and the U.S. Its 2007 study found that, although the U.S. system is the most expensive, it consistently under-performs compared to the other countries.[15] One difference between the U.S. and the other countries in the study is that the U.S. is the only country without universal health insurance coverage. The Commonwealth Fund completed its thirteenth annual health policy survey in 2010.[16] A study of the survey "found significant differences in access, cost burdens, and problems with health insurance that are associated with insurance design".[16] Of the countries surveyed, the results indicated that people in the United States had more out-of-pocket expenses, more disputes with insurance companies than other countries, and more insurance payments denied; paperwork was also higher although Germany had similarly high levels of paperwork.[16] |
I got mine, screw the rest of ya!
On Feb 22, 5:26*am, dave wrote:
On 02/21/2011 11:27 PM, D. Peter Maus wrote: Government medical plans, of any stripe turn down more pre-existing conditions than all the insurance carriers combined. What do you mean "turn down more pre-existing conditions"? Are you saying people with chronic conditions are denied coverage? That is not my understanding. Medicare is like group health insurance; they have to cover you. Again, from Wkipedia: "The Commonwealth Fund, in its annual survey, "Mirror, Mirror on the Wall", compares the performance of the health care systems in Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, Germany, Canada and the U.S. Its 2007 study found that, although the U.S. system is the most expensive, it consistently under-performs compared to the other countries.[15] One difference between the U.S. and the other countries in the study is that the U.S. is the only country without universal health insurance coverage. The Commonwealth Fund completed its thirteenth annual health policy survey in 2010.[16] A study of the survey "found significant differences in access, cost burdens, and problems with health insurance that are associated with insurance design".[16] Of the countries surveyed, the results indicated that people in the United States had more out-of-pocket expenses, more disputes with insurance companies than other countries, and more insurance payments denied; paperwork was also higher although Germany had similarly high levels of paperwork.[16]" I presume that this information is available in more detail, and I'll keep looking. |
I got mine, screw the rest of ya!
On 02/22/2011 11:44 AM, bpnjensen wrote:
When are you going to offer something of substance instead of insults? The thing that annoys me about most religious people and Republicans is their complete refusal to consider that maybe, just maybe, they might not have everything quite correctly sussed. That unflinching absolute certitude is scary to a scientific mind. |
I got mine, screw the rest of ya!
On Feb 22, 11:58*am, dave wrote:
On 02/22/2011 11:44 AM, bpnjensen wrote: When are you going to offer something of substance instead of insults? The thing that annoys me about most religious people and Republicans is their complete refusal to consider that maybe, just maybe, they might not have everything quite correctly sussed. That unflinching absolute certitude is scary to a scientific mind. ....or any logical mind, for that matter. |
I got mine, screw the rest of ya!
bpnjensen wrote: On Feb 22, 1:23 am, dxAce wrote: dave wrote: On 02/21/2011 02:12 PM, dxAce wrote: The GREED of Wall Street (Big Business) brought you the Great Recession that we are in. Nah, it was the likes of Barney (give it to me in the ass) Frank. Not true. It was actually a handful of people at a handful of institutions making greedy (and stupid) decisions. 2 acts of Congress, criminal behavior by Moody's and S&P and some below the radar "waivers" created a derivatives bubble. Barney Frank just provided the bubble material. Phil Gramm, Alan Greenspan, Clinton, Geightner, etc. all went crazy reversing the laws Roosevelt put in place. This is what happens when business is deregulated. These people crashed the economy on purpose so they could destroy the New Deal. Take your meds, Dave, and revel in the knowledge that you are a Golden Come-Along Winner!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sorry, chum - Dave's right both in general and in detail, and demonstrably so. You need to get your information somewhere other than Fox Screws. Sorry, Dave is incorrect. You need to get your information somewhere other than your DNC handlers. |
I got mine, screw the rest of ya!
bpnjensen wrote: On Feb 22, 5:32 am, dxAce wrote: dave wrote: On 02/21/2011 11:27 PM, D. Peter Maus wrote: Government medical plans, of any stripe turn down more pre-existing conditions than all the insurance carriers combined. What do you mean "turn down more pre-existing conditions"? Are you saying people with chronic conditions are denied coverage? That is not my understanding. Your problem is that you simply lack understanding and comprehension. You are a mentally ill clown 'tard and it is you who need the voluntary counselling. Now go take your meds, Rickmers, and shut the hell up! When are you going to offer something of substance instead of insults? As soon as you and Rickmers offer something of substance rather than your obviously Liberal/Democrat/Marxist/Socialist twaddle. |
I got mine, screw the rest of ya!
bpnjensen wrote: On Feb 22, 5:26 am, dave wrote: On 02/21/2011 11:27 PM, D. Peter Maus wrote: Government medical plans, of any stripe turn down more pre-existing conditions than all the insurance carriers combined. What do you mean "turn down more pre-existing conditions"? Are you saying people with chronic conditions are denied coverage? That is not my understanding. Medicare is like group health insurance; they have to cover you. Again, from Wkipedia: "The Commonwealth Fund, in its annual survey, "Mirror, Mirror on the Wall", compares the performance of the health care systems in Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, Germany, Canada and the U.S. Its 2007 study found that, although the U.S. system is the most expensive, it consistently under-performs compared to the other countries.[15] One difference between the U.S. and the other countries in the study is that the U.S. is the only country without universal health insurance coverage. The Commonwealth Fund completed its thirteenth annual health policy survey in 2010.[16] A study of the survey "found significant differences in access, cost burdens, and problems with health insurance that are associated with insurance design".[16] Of the countries surveyed, the results indicated that people in the United States had more out-of-pocket expenses, more disputes with insurance companies than other countries, and more insurance payments denied; paperwork was also higher although Germany had similarly high levels of paperwork.[16]" I presume that this information is available in more detail, and I'll keep looking. The Fund is currently led by president Karen Davis, a nationally recognized progressive economist.... "Progressive", the new code word for Liberal/Democrat/Marxist/Socialist. Your survey is poppycock. |
Starve the Beast
bpnjensen wrote: On Feb 22, 5:30 am, dave wrote: On 02/22/2011 01:23 AM, dxAce wrote: These people crashed the economy on purpose so they could destroy the New Deal. Take your meds, Dave, and revel in the knowledge that you are a Golden Come-Along Winner! I've been spot on so far, and you continue to be wrong and against the people. http://www.wordspy.com/words/starvethebeast.asp It's a Conservative thing - people don't count, only $$$$$$$$$$$. Actually the people do count, and the people have spoken at the polling place. The people want change in Wisconsin, and they'll get it. The people want change in Indiana, and they'll get it. The people want change in Ohio, and they'll get it. The people want change in Michigan, and they'll get it. The list goes on. Twenty six states have sued the Federal Government over health care, and they'll get change. A Federal Judge has ruled 'Obamacare' to be unconstitutional, yet the Obama Regime continues to implement it. Boy, there's gonna be some change coming. A prominent talk show host this afternoon intimated that before this is all over there'll be some bloodshed. As I stated a while ago, the revolution has begun, the people have woken up, and are not going to be bullied by union thugs, not going to be bullied by Liberal/Democrat/Marxist/Socialist politicians, and are not going to be bullied by Big Government. |
Starve the Beast
On 2/22/11 16:38 , dxAce wrote:
bpnjensen wrote: On Feb 22, 5:30 am, wrote: On 02/22/2011 01:23 AM, dxAce wrote: These people crashed the economy on purpose so they could destroy the New Deal. Take your meds, Dave, and revel in the knowledge that you are a Golden Come-Along Winner! I've been spot on so far, and you continue to be wrong and against the people. http://www.wordspy.com/words/starvethebeast.asp It's a Conservative thing - people don't count, only $$$$$$$$$$$. Actually the people do count, and the people have spoken at the polling place. The people want change in Wisconsin, and they'll get it. The people want change in Indiana, and they'll get it. The people want change in Ohio, and they'll get it. The people want change in Michigan, and they'll get it. The list goes on. Twenty six states have sued the Federal Government over health care, and they'll get change. A Federal Judge has ruled 'Obamacare' to be unconstitutional, yet the Obama Regime continues to implement it. Boy, there's gonna be some change coming. A prominent talk show host this afternoon intimated that before this is all over there'll be some bloodshed. This is not the first time I've heard this mentioned. In casual conversations, I've heard talk of revolution, if there isn't an accounting after the election. At his victory gathering in Grant Park the first words out of Obiteme's mouth were, "Change has come to America." Prophetic. Profound. And very likely far more reaching than he ever could have envisioned. |
I got mine, screw the rest of ya!
On 2/22/2011 5:10 PM, dxAce wrote:
Sorry, Dave is incorrect. You need to get your information somewhere other than your DNC handlers. And YOU need to get your information from somewhere other than Rush 'Oxycontin' Limpballs, the Nazi gas bag that gets paid $50 million dollars to shill for Big Business. ;-) C'mon Steve, you're just a little working class guy like the rest of us. Why are you getting in bed with the greedy rich *******s? P.S. I truly don't remember the country being *this* divided during the reign of Bush Senior OR Clinton. It seemed to start with Bush Jr, possibly because of his two wars. And make no mistake, this country is truly, seriously divided, probably more so than any time since the Civil War. Heck of a job, George W. P.P.S. It does indeed look like actual class warfare -- and Wisconsin is the opening battle. Speaking of Wisconsin, why doesn't Governor Walker man up and have the balls to admit his main goal is to bust the unions. 1) Walker said it is (and continues to be) economic. 2) The unions said they would give him the economic concessions he wanted. 3) Walker turned them down cold. Ergo, it -wasn't- economic after all and Walker is not being honest with us (as in lying). Per back issues of the Milwaukee Journal, when Walker was the county exec for Milwaukee County, he fired all the union security guards and replaced them with guards from Wackenhut, a BRITISH company (thanks for getting rid of those Wisconsin jobs). Then an independent auditor ruled that he illegally fired the original guards and that they had to be re-hired, with back pay, costing the county $500,000. I'm seeing a pattern he Walker seems to have a major league grudge against unions. Walker also said to the 14 Dems in the Wisconsin legislature "Come back and we will debate it". Then he said the whole issue is totally non-negotiable. So, Guv, if it's *non-negotiable*, what's to debate, hmmm? And while we are on the subject of Wisconsin politicians putting their foot in their mouths, Rep. Paul Ryan went on national TV and said the people in Madison were RIOTING. Either he is incompetent (does not understand the meaning of the word "rioting") or is just flat out lying. If he watched even 5 minutes of the Madison TV coverage, he would have seen it was about as peaceful as it could be. |
Starve the Beast
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 On 11-02-22 03:49 PM, D. Peter Maus wrote: A Federal Judge has ruled 'Obamacare' to be unconstitutional, yet the Obama Regime continues to implement it. Boy, there's gonna be some change coming. A prominent talk show host this afternoon intimated that before this is all over there'll be some bloodshed. This is not the first time I've heard this mentioned. In casual conversations, I've heard talk of revolution, if there isn't an accounting after the election. At his victory gathering in Grant Park the first words out of Obiteme's mouth were, "Change has come to America." Prophetic. Profound. And very likely far more reaching than he ever could have envisioned. Shooting more Democrats? I thought you said the last time was done by a crazy person, not a radio talk show instigator. Palin and her cross hairs must have been more than you were letting on. Once the fruitcakes on the fringes start shooting at each other, democracy in the US will cease to be...at least what little there is left of it after the Patriot Act was brought in. Rumour has it that the Act was composed and complete, ready to go, some months before the Twin Towers. mike -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNZE9tAAoJEJXfKw5kUPt7YpEIAJBOXHIpuU lDXmO4S5GCIi9q jma/r6kmfBG9UK1WeLJG6CkAHW8Bp0oi8tgifQpNEGfZxSYefN1MI3 EDrLVhJDDb 6KBbzJdCl0sDspqZdF+1cPu6TuJ7+KudclQUGPhkhUTZJaV3yw cxvoC9hcrurjMg N8NWDvjqTSqeybqvX4LQid74Dw8ENCwDjT33T9sFTb2N73i9Kk JWXWfPDEucg+GX SNh81GRckt1aHl03dQPlnmEbQtuRkqsB90MnzrK7Dnr+X1vzql aJhCW3/kqB4aTI gacM6kbaMrMhZ+UQOch80CURpj87WXLeboqdMp3t0QUr5+DggK +nQYjQtfImF3g= =YplB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Starve the Beast
On 02/22/2011 02:49 PM, D. Peter Maus wrote:
Prophetic. Profound. And very likely far more reaching than he ever could have envisioned. Dream on. [An army of 3 dozen 400 pound ditto-heads crests the hill, wheezing] |
Starve the Beast
On 02/22/2011 04:06 PM, m II wrote:
Shooting more Democrats? I thought you said the last time was done by a crazy person, not a radio talk show instigator. Palin and her cross hairs must have been more than you were letting on. Once the fruitcakes on the fringes start shooting at each other, democracy in the US will cease to be...at least what little there is left of it after the Patriot Act was brought in. Rumour has it that the Act was composed and complete, ready to go, some months before the Twin Towers. mike Some parts of the Patriot Act were written by John Mitchell. They passed a wish list, not a plan. |
Starve the Beast
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 On 11-02-22 05:22 PM, dave wrote: On 02/22/2011 02:49 PM, D. Peter Maus wrote: Prophetic. Profound. And very likely far more reaching than he ever could have envisioned. Dream on. [An army of 3 dozen 400 pound ditto-heads crests the hill, wheezing] Careful, their Supreme Commander frequents this very newsgroup and will get revenge by mentioning his alleged dad's appendage yet again. It's been on his mind a lot these last few days. He's probably lonely. mike -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNZFlCAAoJEJXfKw5kUPt7xVYH/2PE4VLaOZYeMo68IehW1KRt wuG0J0e9xJHpyVceUGA7c58FJr0aglqS4szLRqFXjew6R7ZHxL 0gSv9d2E39K68e SLAITiJU/cP4lNicgx4Wgxk0KaUX5F2i5pOr4qPQ2ZQe3beia7nUmiqF5cu UxrOE MvZ61iiZgsR/LBcFSkaLnT5h4bAIQ1LamqY2au7nCHjLGBNNNJJNpgvH+5Qgae aq bk71qowIQUIU7Doid8qVl2iEIXTCY61cGWfkgTC6dA9938pLr3 7V8i8/Tbvozxke SZ2y5OiiduXc7AFDaHHODGYxrndUSLXh1TMUQbGN3YLx+Dddum YNQiwREqejWgU= =AXjq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
I got mine, screw the rest of ya!
Joe from Kokomo wrote: On 2/22/2011 5:10 PM, dxAce wrote: Sorry, Dave is incorrect. You need to get your information somewhere other than your DNC handlers. And YOU need to get your information from somewhere other than Rush 'Oxycontin' Limpballs, the Nazi gas bag that gets paid $50 million dollars to shill for Big Business. ;-) C'mon Steve, you're just a little working class guy like the rest of us. Why are you getting in bed with the greedy rich *******s? Why are you getting in bed with the Liberal/Democrat/Marxist/Socialsts? And who are the greedy rich *******s? Those who make and sell products and/or services that you can decline to purchase by personal choice, or, those who will steal your money via taxation, and, if you refuse to pay can come and confiscate your worldly possessions by way of force/law? |
Whoops! Monsanto Develops Pesticide Resistant Super Weeds
On 02/22/2011 05:01 PM, dxAce wrote:
Joe from Kokomo wrote: On 2/22/2011 5:10 PM, dxAce wrote: Sorry, Dave is incorrect. You need to get your information somewhere other than your DNC handlers. And YOU need to get your information from somewhere other than Rush 'Oxycontin' Limpballs, the Nazi gas bag that gets paid $50 million dollars to shill for Big Business. ;-) C'mon Steve, you're just a little working class guy like the rest of us. Why are you getting in bed with the greedy rich *******s? Why are you getting in bed with the Liberal/Democrat/Marxist/Socialsts? And who are the greedy rich *******s? Those who make and sell products and/or services that you can decline to purchase by personal choice, or, those who will steal your money via taxation, and, if you refuse to pay can come and confiscate your worldly possessions by way of force/law? How do you decline to purchase this: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/WO110...lways-wins.htm ?? |
I got mine, screw the rest of ya!
Joe from Kokomo wrote: On 2/22/2011 5:10 PM, dxAce wrote: Sorry, Dave is incorrect. You need to get your information somewhere other than your DNC handlers. And YOU need to get your information from somewhere other than Rush 'Oxycontin' Limpballs, the Nazi gas bag that gets paid $50 million dollars to shill for Big Business. ;-) C'mon Steve, you're just a little working class guy like the rest of us. Why are you getting in bed with the greedy rich *******s? On 2/22/2011 8:01 PM, dxAce wrote: Why are you getting in bed with the Liberal/Democrat/Marxist/Socialsts? And who are the greedy rich *******s? Those who make and sell products and/or services that you can decline to purchase by personal choice, or, those who will steal your money via taxation, and, if you refuse to pay can come and confiscate your worldly possessions by way of force/law? Have you ever heard of the phrase "checks and balances"? Do your homework, review the auto companies of the 1930s, before the unions came into being. There was a very good reason why the unions were needed, namely Capital's rampant abuse of Labor. Unions have had their share of excesses, as has Big Business (witness the current Great Recession, courtesy of Big Business greed). You NEED checks and balances. If the Repubs get their way and make the unions disappear, there will be no protection for labor, nothing, NOTHING to balance runaway greed. It's that simple -- unions, even with their imperfections, are needed to balance the greed of Capital. Again, do your homework and find out about all the abuses that took place before unions. Finally, you complain about "those who will steal your money via taxation". What are you saying? That you don't want taxes at all? That you only want some taxes? How much is too much? I don't know about you, but I -like- our libraries, paved roads, traffic lights, police and fire departments, all paid for by taxes. I presume your disability benefits are helpful to you. You can be against taxes, but make sure you don't shoot yourself in the foot. |
The Free Obama-Care© 'Death Panel' Counseling -wrt- Coerced "Ending-Your-Life" Mandate
On Feb 22, 9:36*am, RHF wrote:
On Feb 22, 12:34*am, Gary Forbis wrote: On Feb 21, 10:42*pm, RHF wrote: More Liberal Lies ! More Democrat Deceptions ! More Liberal Lies ! More Democrat Deceptions ! More Liberal Lies ! More Democrat Deceptions ! More Liberal Lies ! More Democrat Deceptions ! - I can't tell if you are an idiot or are just playing one. - You know that there is enough noise around here - without someone playing mind games, stupid mind games. Gary Forbis : ? "idiot" ? Gary Forbis : ? "stupid" ? Gary Forbis : ? "mind games" ? *. - - - = = = RHF's Canned Reply 'Rant' = = = - - - [: To Liberal-Fascist {Democrat} Name Calling :] ROTFL - You Know When You Are Winning An Argument : When An Ever So Super-Smart "Enlightened" Liberal Democrat Socialist Starts Fascist Name Calling*.http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...8979fbe8546cfa * They Lose Their Ability To Think And Get Emotional + Plus They Often Snip/Delete What You Wrote : To Disguise Their Complete Inability To Carry The Argument Forward. -that-is-how-i-see-it- ~ RHF© And yet I didn't snip what you wrote, I snipped what I wrote. How does that play? I will reply in kind. If that's an indication of "Winning An Argument" then I have won. But winning a silly argument isn't my goal. I come here to inform and be informed. The only arguments I care about are logical argument, that is from premis to conclusion. See it any way you wish. You have my permission. |
I got mine, screw the rest of ya!
On Feb 22, 2:41*pm, bpnjensen wrote:
On Feb 22, 1:23*am, dxAce wrote: dave wrote: On 02/21/2011 02:12 PM, dxAce wrote: The GREED of Wall Street (Big Business) brought you the Great Recession that we are in. Nah, it was the likes of Barney (give it to me in the ass) Frank. Not true. It was actually a handful of people at a handful of institutions making greedy (and stupid) decisions. 2 acts of Congress, criminal behavior by Moody's and S&P and some below the radar "waivers" created a derivatives bubble. Barney Frank just provided the bubble material. Phil Gramm, Alan Greenspan, Clinton, Geightner, etc. all went crazy reversing the laws Roosevelt put in place. This is what happens when business is deregulated. These people crashed the economy on purpose so they could destroy the New Deal. Take your meds, Dave, and revel in the knowledge that you are a Golden Come-Along Winner!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sorry, chum - Dave's right both in general and in detail, and demonstrably so. *You need to get your information somewhere other than Fox Screws.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - It is called Foxy News . They are missing a lot of Screws . And Nuts . And Washers . |
I got mine, screw the rest of ya!
On Feb 22, 2:54*pm, bpnjensen wrote:
On Feb 22, 5:26*am, dave wrote: On 02/21/2011 11:27 PM, D. Peter Maus wrote: Government medical plans, of any stripe turn down more pre-existing conditions than all the insurance carriers combined. What do you mean "turn down more pre-existing conditions"? Are you saying people with chronic conditions are denied coverage? That is not my understanding. Medicare is like group health insurance; they have to cover you. Again, from Wkipedia: "The Commonwealth Fund, in its annual survey, "Mirror, Mirror on the Wall", compares the performance of the health care systems in Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, Germany, Canada and the U.S. Its 2007 study found that, although the U.S. system is the most expensive, it consistently under-performs compared to the other countries.[15] One difference between the U.S. and the other countries in the study is that the U.S. is the only country without universal health insurance coverage. The Commonwealth Fund completed its thirteenth annual health policy survey in 2010.[16] A study of the survey "found significant differences in access, cost burdens, and problems with health insurance that are associated with insurance design".[16] Of the countries surveyed, the results indicated that people in the United States had more out-of-pocket expenses, more disputes with insurance companies than other countries, and more insurance payments denied; paperwork was also higher although Germany had similarly high levels of paperwork.[16]" I presume that this information is available in more detail, and I'll keep looking. This was very well known for many years . It is exactly what the bio- medical and insurance mafia has fought against for a very long time . |
I got mine, screw the rest of ya!
I am watchin that Magic Jack infomercial on channel 225, the EDEN
channel.I saw those Magic Jacks for sale yesterday in that Dangerous Walmart store.I don't want, nor do I need a stupid Magic Jack. cuhulin |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:51 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com