Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#61
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 11, 10:33*pm, (J R) wrote:
NUTS! cuhulin It is amazing , to say the least ! And he was so quiet and robot-like while being as a Vice President ... What a liar he turned out to be... |
#62
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/11/2011 06:34 PM, Joe from Kokomo wrote:
On 8/11/2011 4:38 PM, D. Peter Maus wrote: Could someone out there in Net Land please explain why all this extra carbon dioxide (remember, a greenhouse gas) won't have an effect on the climate? Soot. We need to make sure they use sooty coal so that we can block the sunbeams with particulates. Clean air is the enemy. |
#63
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#64
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 11, 2:38*pm, bpnjensen wrote:
On Aug 11, 1:38*pm, "D. Peter Maus" wrote: On 8/11/11 13:04 , bpnjensen wrote: On Aug 11, 10:28 am, "D. Peter *wrote: On 8/11/11 10:43 , bpnjensen wrote: On Aug 10, 2:07 pm, * *wrote: On Aug 10, 8:46 am, * *wrote: - On Aug 10, 3:13 am, * *wrote: * *. Scientific Smackdown: Skeptics Voted The Clear Winners Against Global Warming Believers in Heated NYC Debatehttp://groups..google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/2acee8277e91b376 -posted-by- ka6uup -and-reply-by- Bruce Jensenhttp://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/bedf496a5fb56e41? * *. - - One Must Begin To Ask... - - - - How Many Shares BpnJ Owns in Al Gores - - Carbon Credits Corps ? ? ? - - - - Al Gore The Great Profit of Global Warming ! - - - - payola big or small is still payola ~ RHF - - *. - - Another Absurd Climate Gate Moment ! - -http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/95fe5b213fcf20c4 - - *. - - Climate-Gate : The 21st Century's Biggest Scientific SCAM ! - -http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/03f8f34788943898 - - *. - - *. - You're an uneducated idiot. BpnJ, You are getting good at the Al Gore 'Rage-&-Rant' Thingee ![]() You have elevated yourself from simple rank-and-file of 'Global Warming' to the rank of 'Full of Hot Air' ! ::-}} Oops ! Climate-Gate Did Happen Yet Another Inconvenient Truth !http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...f3800097470e85 * *. LET'S ALL CHANT THE CLIMATE-GATE MANTRA : IT'S SETTLED SCIENCE : THERE CAN BE NO DEBATE [.] -wrt- Another Absurd Climate Gate Moment !http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...4493147109bb61 * *. * *. Your Al Gore reference is smoke and mirrors, and completely irrelevant. *The settled science part are your words, not mine, and completely innaccurate. * * Actually, 'The science is settled' is a quote of Algore. *He said it at the Oscars, he's said it on Charlie Rose. * * He's said it numerous places. Please educate yourself wity something other than Faux News.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - As I said before, *Al Gore is irrelevant to the actual issue*. *He is only a messenger. *To blithely discredit 150 years of long and thoughtful research by physicists, meterologists, climatologists, oceanographers, mathematicians and astronomers, peer review after peer review of every single hypothesis vetted to the nth degree, and a science which freely admits that it still must answer some of the more intractable questions to provide a complete picture - as every true science does, every time - because you don't like the messenger - is just ugly, unscientific politics. *To do it because of greedy, narcissistic motives is reprehensible and immoral. * *::::remaining content stipulated:::: * *Algore IS irrelevant. My point being that the words were not Roy's. They were, in fact, Algore's. We may take solace in the fact, that one blind squirrel has found his nuts, today. * *More to the point...The science is not settled. As evidenced by the number of qualified physicists, meteorologists and climatologists that have taken opposition. And while the science to which you refer is, in fact, peer reviewed, in the scientific community dissent against a concensus is an essential part of the scientific process. Where there is no debate, there can be, ultimately, no truth. Only politics. What's interesting, and what many on The Other Side are so enraged about, is that the most vocal about this matter refuse to debate it at all. * *Gore, for instance, will not be on any program with any other guest who may speak. He will have the questions put to him vetted before he agrees to appear. He will not answer questions that do not presuppose his position is correct and absolute. (I speak with some first hand experience with this, as a producer of radio interview programs while I was at CBS.) In fact, recently, in Chicago, he was scheduled for a media tour, all the TV chat shows, all the radio stations. The day he was in town, the scandal broke about the e-mails from the University of East Anglia. All his appearances were summarily cancelled, and he left town under cover, so as not to have to face questions. * *Gore is only, as you say, a politician. And not a very good one at that. But he is hardly alone in this. Else, why have there been no open debates on this issue. There is only assertion and denial of opposition. But there are no questions answered, no evidence challenged. * *That's not science, Bruce. That's politics. * *History has presented other examples, look at Lister, reviled for his position that contagion may be spread doctor to patient through contaminated hands. Virtually, the entire medical community, scientists...chemists, physicians, surgeons, researchers...all condemned Lister for his single voice against the concensus. And yet, he was right. Proven so in the fullness of time. * *After the First World War and through the Second, science advocated eugenics as a true and viable scientific solution to man's ills. Dissent was fiercely suppressed in some circles. Often with execution a result. Now widely discredited on scientific grounds, only a few holdouts still assert eugenics as a means to a societal end. William Shockley was among them. In the fullness of time, and debate, did the truth emerge through the politics. * *And, as you correctly point out, that a true science must admit it's incomplete understanding, as is the case in the Climate Change debate, and answer the more intractable questions in order to complete its understanding. In which case, dissent is also part of the scientific process. * *Taken in these lights, shooting the messenger, either messenger, is reprehensible and immoral. Which puts the abject dismissal of dissent in the same category as those who deny the concensus themselves. * *Put that another way, there must be debate for the truth to ultimately emerge. To dismiss, condemn, or silence either side is to deny the emergence of the truth through scientific processes. * *The Man Made Climate Change advocates, including Gore (yes, a politician,) have joined many sitting politicians in state and federal legislative bodies in calling for the silencing through revocation of grant, through revocation of certification, through termination of employment of anyone not supporting the Man Made Climate Change agenda. Read Barbara Boxer's statements on the subject. These individuals, as many of this body of advocacy, have been guilty of the kind of ugly, unscientific politics you yourself have here decried. * *The truth will be known in the fullness of time. Silencing either side, shooting either messenger will only support the emergent politics. It will not support the emergent truth. * *p- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I don't care about Al Gore. *Al Gore is STILL irrelevant. Nobody proposes to silence either messenger. *Let he who has the evidence present it. *I have not see any new evidence to the contrary in awhile - just the same old hackneyed arguments that keep getting dredged up, plus flash-in-the-pan exclamation points like that one about satellite data from a couple weeks ago. *They are either already accounted for or are being worked on. *If the basic theory needs adjustment, however big that may be, it gets done - no real scientist wants to see it done wrong - that makes no sense. *Meanwhile, the real scientific community has been near consensus on this matter since before Al Gore Jr. was even a known name. *The fullness of time, as I have explained before, is already largely passed and the big questions have been essentially answered. *I knew this already 35 years ago, when only scietists were still questioning the details, rather than every screwball who had a political opinion. Stop making excuses for the bozos and the coropration for whom this is an inconvenience. *More important things than money are at stake. Bruce Jensen BpnJ - NO VALID EVIDENCE HAS BEEN PRESENTED BY THE GLOBAL WARMING CULTISTS* -except- DOCTORED [FRAUDULENT] "CLIMATE-GATE"© DATA * The Cult of Global Warming who's Mantra is : It's Settle Science : The Can Be No Debate ! * * Praise Be Al Gore Lord of Carbon Credits ! -thou-shalt-not-have-any-other-data-before-you- |
#65
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 12, 8:16*am, dave wrote:
On 08/11/2011 09:47 PM, wrote: On Aug 11, 10:33 pm, (J R) wrote: NUTS! cuhulin It is amazing , to say the least ! And he was so quiet and robot-like while being as a Vice President ... What a liar he turned out to be... Another moron from inside the Bubble. Al Gore is a fine, articulate gentleman. For this reason the mainstream press is relentless in their attempts to besmirch him. The Fascistas at Koch Industries and ExxonMobil just can't stand to see a fellow oil man who isn't a massive pig like they are. Al Go is not fine,not articulate and certainly NOT a gentleman . Oh, may I ask since when is Exxon-Mobil is in the pig farming industry?? |
#66
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#67
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
bpnjensen wrote:
You are an idiot. Again. Your blathering that "science is religion" does not make it so, and only undescores your complete misunderstanding of what science and the scientific process is. Religion is the belief in something without the tiniest shred of evidence. It often equals poltiics, especially these days. Science is quite the opposite - science is skepticism until overwhelming evidence is in. Learn the difference. Or not - continue to be an ignorant idiot, I don't care. Someone once said that an atheist is someone without invisible means of support. Then there was: Christianity = The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree.. mike -- And, as always, don't leave your children unattended anywhere in Holland, Michigan. Many, many undesirable backwater types live there. They have at least one dufus who once claimed to have been the Supreme Commander of a gay paramilitary sauna club and fantasized about 'blowing away' Canada, and who knows, there may be many more dufi there. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Al Gore turns down Global Warming debate | Shortwave | |||
Directly heated tube, cathode bias | Homebrew | |||
( OT) Global Warming, no global scientific conspiracy | Shortwave | |||
Climate Change Skeptics Censored! | Shortwave | |||
Overwhelming Scientific Consensus on Warming | Shortwave |