On 11/8/2011 9:24 AM, SaPeIsMa wrote:


True, you ask a slave owner what a fair wage is and the response is a
lot different than a guy attempting to support a home, car,
insurances, clothing, food, medical, retirement fund, etc.


Well, to do that, asking a slave-owner, you'll have to go to an Arab
country where they still have slaves.
But thank you, for demonstrating such abyssal stupidity as to imagine
that such a strawman would apply in the western world.


That statement is simply your declaration that you consider Americans to
be too stupid to recognize that they are slaves. Since, a slave
generally has his basic needs met adequately. A slave is well fed,
starving slaves don't produce well to make their masters a profit.
Slaves are generally provided adequate housing, medical and clothes -- a
sick, tired, ill, worn out, deprived slave is, again, generally a poor
producer and cannot make his masters the profit they desire ... to make
a long story short, if you are working at minimum wage, or even double,
you are already a slave ... giving that a little thought will make it
quite obvious, to those possessing sufficient gray matter.



Still, most would not have much difficulty telling which is the more
correct opinion ... if push ever came to shove, they could always get
a job and it would become immediately apparent, as to what a "fair
wage" is!!!


You still are too stupid to get it.
A "fair wage" is a wage that both the employer and employee agree upon
as being fair", OF THEIR OWN FREE WILL..
Anything else is BULL**** for useful idiots..


When starving people from mexico and other countries are allowed to
stream across our borders as hostile invaders, it skews any sense of
fairness ... when Americans are forced to compete with starving slaves
from other countries, or even those living in china, they are simply
reduce to the same ... slaves.


I remember being shocked to find out some are in their 40s, 50s, even
60s and have never held a steady job ... well, unless unlicensed
pharmacist, gangster, crook, politician, fraud artist, con man, etc.
qualifies them ...



I'd say your text is a very good example of your intelligence ...
indeed, little anyone could add which you have not already demonstrated
in that direction! ROFLOL

Regards,
JS